Juvenile justice survives General Assembly’s crossover day, ‘fair share’ tax bill doesn’t [Baltimore Sun]
Of the 2,700 pieces of legislation under consideration in this year’s session of the
Monday marked the annual “crossover day” deadline at the State House, when bills must pass their original chamber to have a guarantee that they’ll be considered in the other during the final three weeks of the 90-day session.
Bills can still reach Democratic Gov. Wes Moore’s desk even if they’ve come up short so far — or haven’t been introduced in either chamber yet.
But the deadline often shines a spotlight on legislators’ priorities. It can also highlight their differences, where Democratic leaders in the
Here’s where some major legislation stands after this year’s crossover day — as winners on track to pass (bills that are moving forward), hang-ups with uncertain futures (one chamber advancing but another holding it up), and losers not on track to pass (ideas that are coming up short).
Winners on track to pass
Juvenile justice (Senate Bill 744 and House Bill 814): In response to constituent complaints about a spike in certain juvenile crimes,
School policy (Senate Bill 1145 and House Bill 1493): Closing a loophole in current law, this legislation would prohibit children on the juvenile sex offender registry from attending public or private schools with other students. Local school boards would be tasked with providing alternative schooling options for those children to continue their education. The bill passed unanimously in the
Immigrant health care (Senate Bill 705 and House Bill 728): In spite of it faltering in the
Pay equality (Senate Bill 525 and House Bill 649): In an attempt to level the playing field among men and women in the workplace, this legislation would require employers to publicly list benefits packages and salary minimums and maximums when posting notice for a job opening to applicants for public or internal positions. The bill passed both chambers after
School book bans (Senate Bill 738 and House Bill 785):
Facial recognition (Senate Bill 182 and House Bill 338): Police use of facial recognition technology would be limited to investigations of violent crimes and other serious offenses under a compromise bill favored by both law enforcement and public defenders. Disclosure of when the technology is used would also be necessary during trial, one of several transparency measures built into the law. The bill passed both the
Tolling expansion (Senate Bill 1093 and House Bill 1070) and electric vehicle fees (Senate Bill 1065): This pair of ideas is the most likely way
Cannabis zoning (Senate Bill 537 and House Bill 805): Spurred by efforts in
Gov. Wes Moore’s 2024 wish list — a16-part bill package — is mostly moving along with ease.
Hang-ups with an uncertain future
iGaming (House Bill 1319): Online slot machines, blackjack, poker and other casino games would be available in
Firearm public nuisance (Senate Bill 488 and House Bill 974): Continuing in step with recent gun control legislation in the state, this bill would allow Maryland’s attorney general to sue gun manufacturers and dealers for financial damages if they don’t take reasonable steps to prohibit their firearms from being sold to traffickers or people who legally are unable to possess a gun, or if the seller has reason to believe the purchaser intends to use it to harm others or to commit a crime. The
Limitations on diminution credits in honor of
Special elections (Senate Bill 29): When a member of the
A bill that passed the
Losers not on track to pass
Fair Share for
Aid-in-dying option (Senate Bill 443 and House Bill 403): Though Senate President
Ending the tipped wage (Senate Bill 160 and House Bill 465):
RENEW Act (Senate Bill 958 and House Bill 1438): A plan that started off as environmental activists’ top priority this year, it would have required companies that have been the largest polluters in recent decades to pay a fee — combining to
Prescription drug affordability (Senate Bill 388 and House Bill 340): Expanding the nascent board’s authority was a top priority for health care advocates. If passed, it would have allowed the five-member board to use upper payment limits to make high-cost medications more affordable, not just those who work for state and local governments (which is the case under current law). Advocates and legislators said they would push for the change again next year, after the board sets upper payment limits for the first time by
©2024 Baltimore Sun. Visit baltimoresun.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Allianz Life launches accumulation annuity
House panel opens hearings on Pritzker's health insurance reforms
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News