Jeremy Stine: BCBS leadership's answers on sale unsatisfactory
For months, I've been concerned about how the potential sale of
As a member of the state
Despite my time with BCBSLA's CEO, their leadership failed to provide me with satisfactory answers to two basic, fundamental questions: How does this new deal benefit policyholders of BCBSLA and how does it benefit the state of
I believe that this issue is not just a mere bureaucratic matter of policy; it is a weighty decision that could be life-changing for many of our friends and neighbors. This deal continues to look as lopsided as it truly is, favoring the few over the many.
By law, Elevance is obligated to ensure that the "plan of reorganization serves the best interests of policyholders and members" and is "fair and equitable." However, the proposed deal falls short of these standards. The fact that only 92,000 policyholders have a vote, leaving the remaining 1.9 million members voiceless, is a clear disparity. Furthermore, the financial benefits of this transaction appear to favor only policyholders, excluding the interests of other members.
The revelation that those 92,000 policyholders stand to lose their membership interests, as outlined in the proposed sale, is deeply concerning.
The proposed transition to an out-of-state, for-profit entity like Elevance may introduce a layer of bureaucracy that distances decision-makers from the immediate consequences felt by our local population.
In health care, it is not just a business; it is about accountability and ethical decision-making. I believe that decisions affecting our health should be made by those who genuinely understand
majority leader,
Please take a few minutes to think about — and help — caregivers. Here’s how. | Opinion [Lexington Herald-Leader]
Sen. Blumenthal slams UnitedHealthcare Medicare Advantage ads as 'deceptive'
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News