Illinois Medicaid program faces looming funding crisis due to federal changes
A multibillion-dollar budget crisis will hit the state’s Medicaid program in the next few years unless state lawmakers and Gov. JB Pritzker act to prevent it, budget analysts both inside and outside state government warn.
The crisis comes from changes in federal Medicaid policy that were enacted last year as part of President Donald Trump’s sweeping domestic policy agenda, known officially as H.R. 1, or the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” which, among many other things, slashes one of the main funding tools many states have used for four decades to fund their share of the cost of Medicaid.
“By the time you’re a few years in, you’re looking at a
Worthington is a coauthor of a recent IGPA report that describes the upcoming changes in Medicaid funding as one of the most serious long-term fiscal challenges facing
The funding tools at issue are known as provider taxes. Those are special taxes that states levy on hospitals, nursing homes, private insurance plans known as “managed care organizations,” or MCOs, and other kinds of health care providers.
States levy those taxes — usually on a per-patient or per-bed basis — and put the money into a fund that is used to draw down federal matching funds. The combination of state and federal funds is then used either to enhance Medicaid reimbursement rates or make direct payments to hospitals and nursing homes that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients to help sustain those facilities financially. Capping provider taxes
When Medicaid was first established in 1965, it was a relatively modest program that provided health care benefits to people who already qualified for other kinds of public assistance, with costs split between the federal government and the states.
As both the size and cost of the program grew, however, states began looking for new ways to pay for their share of the cost outside of their general revenues. Provider taxes emerged in the mid-1980s as one such mechanism.
By the mid-1990s,
The idea was that states were prohibited from holding providers harmless by assuring them they would get all their money back, and then some, once the federal matching funds were drawn down.
But the federal rules also included a “safe harbor” provision. States could avoid having to comply with the hold-harmless prohibition as long as their taxes amounted to no more than 6% of net patient revenue.
That rule has effectively served as a cap on what states can levy in the form of a provider tax. But that cap is about to be cut nearly in half.
Under a provision of H.R. 1 – a provision that only applies to states like
In FY 2025, according to the
Of that total,
IGPA reported that provider taxes in FY 2025 amounted to
A recent report by the nonpartisan health policy research organization KFF points out that
The report by IGPA estimates that when the first reduction takes effect in FY 2028, revenues from those two assessments alone will fall
“But remember, that’s just the state money,” Worthington said. “That is not taking into account the matching funds.”
Assuming the state continues to receive an average 62% federal match rate, the total impact to
That estimate aligns with a separate estimate from the Governor’s
The impending limits on Medicaid provider taxes will pose a significant challenge for lawmakers who will either have to find some other way to pay the state’s share of the cost or adjust the program to fit within the new fiscal constraints.
But because the federal changes do not take effect for another year, it is possible lawmakers will not feel pressure to take immediate action in the upcoming legislative session.
© 2026 the Belleville News-Democrat (Belleville, Ill.). Visit www.bnd.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.



Flood insurance savings ahead as Provincetown earns Class 7
Delta Sigma Zeta event empowers community with retirement, Medicare tips
Advisor News
- Why aligning wealth and protection strategies will define 2026 planning
- Finseca and IAQFP announce merger
- More than half of recent retirees regret how they saved
- Tech group seeks additional context addressing AI risks in CSF 2.0 draft profile connecting frameworks
- How to discuss higher deductibles without losing client trust
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Allianz Life Launches Fixed Index Annuity Content on Interactive Tool
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Trademark Application for “SMART WEIGHTING” Filed: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Somerset Re Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Chief Legal Officer as Firm Builds on Record-Setting Year
- Indexing the industry for IULs and annuities
- United Heritage Life Insurance Company goes live on Equisoft’s cloud-based policy administration system
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Affordability vs. cost containment: What health plans will face in 2026
- Sick of fighting insurers, hospitals offer their own Medicare Advantage plans
- After loss of tax credits, WA sees a drop in insurance coverage
- My Spin: The healthcare election
- COLUMN: Working to lower the cost of care for Kentucky families
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News