House Votes to Defend Health Care Law in Federal Appeals Court
* * *
- Patient Protections at Risk if Ruling Stands
* * *
Today the
If allowed to stand, the ruling would eliminate critical protections for people with pre-existing conditions and minimum insurance standards known as essential health benefits, which ensure comprehensive coverage.
Following is a joint statement from the
"The
"If the ruling is upheld, millions of patients with serious illnesses as well as anyone with a pre-existing condition could be charged more for health coverage or denied access to coverage altogether. Health plans would no longer be required to cover essential benefits necessary to prevent and treat a serious condition, and plans could once again put annual and lifetime limits on coverage.
"On behalf of patients with cancer, heart disease, stroke, lung disease, diabetes and multiple sclerosis, we commend Members of the


Watchdog to Legislative Leaders: Maui Utilities’ Junket While Paradise Burned Should Spark New Rules for Real-time Disclosure of Lawmaker Trips
Senators Urge HHS to Enforce Separate Abortion Fee Payment Requirement
Advisor News
- Are families ready for the costs of aging at home?
- When a client moves, their insurance plan needs to move, too
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- Financial stress leaves less room for retirement saving
- Giving while you’re living: 3 frequently asked questions about gifting
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Global Atlantic names Dan Farrelly head of IMO and IBD channels
- A rising retirement challenge: The license to spend
- What lower interest rates mean to annuity payouts
- AM Best downgrades A-Cap insurers amid financial and regulatory troubles
- Lawsuit claims Delaware Life hid billions in insurer-linked investments
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News