House Votes to Defend Health Care Law in Federal Appeals Court
* * *
- Patient Protections at Risk if Ruling Stands
* * *
Today the
If allowed to stand, the ruling would eliminate critical protections for people with pre-existing conditions and minimum insurance standards known as essential health benefits, which ensure comprehensive coverage.
Following is a joint statement from the
"The
"If the ruling is upheld, millions of patients with serious illnesses as well as anyone with a pre-existing condition could be charged more for health coverage or denied access to coverage altogether. Health plans would no longer be required to cover essential benefits necessary to prevent and treat a serious condition, and plans could once again put annual and lifetime limits on coverage.
"On behalf of patients with cancer, heart disease, stroke, lung disease, diabetes and multiple sclerosis, we commend Members of the
Watchdog to Legislative Leaders: Maui Utilities’ Junket While Paradise Burned Should Spark New Rules for Real-time Disclosure of Lawmaker Trips
Senators Urge HHS to Enforce Separate Abortion Fee Payment Requirement
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News