HHS IG Audit: 'New York Generally Identified and Corrected Duplicate Children's Health Insurance Plan Payments Made to Managed Care Organizations'
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Report in Brief
Why OIG Did This Audit
Previous OIG audits identified Federal Medicaid reimbursement for managed care payments that were not claimed in compliance with Federal requirements. Specifically, some individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care had more than one identification number. As a result, Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) received unallowable monthly Medicaid payments for these beneficiaries. An analysis of New York Children Health Insurance Program (CHIP) data indicated that
Our objective was to determine whether
How OIG Did This Audit
We limited our audit to potential CHIP payments
What OIG Found
What OIG Recommends and New York Comments
This report does not contain any recommendations because
In written comments to our draft report,
* * *
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ... 1
Why We Did This Audit ... 1
Objective ... 1
Background ... 1
State
How We Conducted This Audit ... 2
FINDING ... 3
CONCLUSION ... 4
STATE AGENCY COMMENTS ... 4
APPENDICES
A: Audit Scope and Methodology ... 5
B:
C: State Agency Comments ... 8
* * *
INTRODUCTION
WHY WE DID THIS AUDIT
Previous
Specifically, some individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care had more than one identification number. As a result, Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) received unallowable monthly Medicaid payments for these enrollees. An analysis of New York Children Health Insurance Program (CHIP) data indicated that the
* * *
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to determine whether the State agency claimed Federal reimbursement for duplicate CHIP payments made to MCOs.
* * *
BACKGROUND
State
Title XXI of the Social Security Act authorizes Federal grants to States for providing child health assistance to uninsured, low-income children. The program is jointly financed by the Federal and State Governments and administered by the States. At the Federal level, the
In
Capitation Payments
The State agency pays MCOs a monthly fee, known as a capitation payment, to ensure that each CHIP enrollee has access to a comprehensive range of medical services. A capitation payment is "a payment the State [agency] makes periodically to a contractor on behalf of each enrollee enrolled under a contract for the provision of medical services under the State plan.
The State agency makes the payment regardless of whether the particular enrollee receives services during the period covered by the payment" (42 CFR Sec. 438.2). The State agency's CMS-approved MCO contract states that the State agency may make recoveries for any improper billings for a person enrolled in the managed care program (New York Managed Care Contract Sec. 17.3). Also, the State agency must refund the Federal share of CHIP overpayments to CMS (42 CFR Sec. 457.232). Overpayments are amounts that exceed allowable amounts and include unallowable capitation payments made on behalf of the same enrollee for the same coverage of services.
Detection of Enrollees Assigned More Than One Identification Number
As part of the CHIP enrollment process, the State agency compares an applicant's information (e.g.,
* * *
FINDING
The State agency generally did not claim Federal reimbursement for duplicate CHIP payments made to MCOs. The State agency identified and corrected duplicate CHIP payments associated with 100 of the 104 enrollee-matches we reviewed. Specifically, the State agency (1) appropriately determined that CHIP payments associated with sampled enrollee-matches were for two different enrollees/3 or (2) timely identified and corrected the duplicate CHIP payments made to MCOs. However, the State agency did not identify and correct duplicate CHIP payments to MCOs for the remaining four enrollee-matches totaling
The State agency's CMS-approved MCO contract states that the State agency may make recoveries for any improper billings for a person enrolled in the managed care program (New York Managed Care Contract Sec. 17.3). Also, the State agency must refund the Federal share of CHIP overpayments to CMS (42 CFR Sec. 457.232). Overpayments are amounts that exceed allowable amounts and would include unallowable capitation payments made on behalf of the same enrollee for the same coverage of services.
The improper payments we identified occurred because the State agency did not obtain adequate information (e.g.,
* * *
The report is posted at: https://oig.hhs.gov/documents/audit/9852/A-02-23-01017.pdf
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Pomerantz Law Firm Investigates Claims On Behalf of Investors of Globe Life Inc. – GL
Funding Opportunities: Bank Enterprise Award (BEA) Program; FY 2024 Funding Round
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News