Here's a look inside Donald Trump's $355 million civil fraud verdict as an appeals fight looms
After Friday’s eye-popping penalty in his
A judge ordered the former president to fork over
“The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience,” Judge
The ruling, after a 2½-month trial in
The financial penalty — staggering even for a businessman who’s seen casinos, an airline and other ventures fail — adds to Trump's mounting legal debts and could put the Republican presidential front-runner in a serious cash crunch as he campaigns to retake the
Trump, who's also dealing with four criminal cases, decried Friday's ruling as “election inference” and has vowed to appeal.
Here’s a look at the case, the penalties and what's next for Trump.
WHAT DID THE JUDGE DECIDE?
Engoron ruled that Trump engaged in a yearslong conspiracy with top executives at his company, the
Engoron, who ruled before the trial that Trump and his co-defendants committed fraud with his financial statements, found Trump liable on five of the six remaining claims in James’ lawsuit: falsifying business records, issuing false financial statements, conspiracy to commit insurance fraud and conspiracy to falsify business records.
Two former longtime
Engoron decided the case because state law doesn’t allow for juries in this type of lawsuit, which sought what's known as “equitable relief” and has different rules than other cases with big-money penalties. Also, he noted, neither side asked for a jury.
WAIT, HOW MUCH DOES TRUMP OWE?
Trump could ultimately end up owing a half-billion dollars or more as a result of Friday’s verdict.
In addition to the
At an annual rate of 9%, as prescribed by
James’ office calculates that, to date, Trump owes an additional
In his ruling, Engoron ruled that the interest Trump owes on about half of the total penalty amount, pertaining to loan savings, can be calculated from the start of the investigation in 2019. Some interest on the remaining amount, which pertains to more recent transactions, can be calculated starting in
In all, Engoron imposed
Trump maintains that he is worth several billion dollars and testified last year that he had about
WHY DOES TRUMP OWE SO MUCH?
Engoron found that Trump's phony wealth claims were critical to his success, affording him lower loan interest rates and allowing him to build projects he wouldn't have otherwise been able to finish. The judge determined that those savings and windfall profits were “ill-gotten gains” and ordered him and his co-defendants to cough them up to the state, with interest.
Trump, both individually and as the owner of various corporate entities, must pay:
—
—
—
Trump's sons, Eric and
WHAT DO TRUMP AND HIS LAWYERS SAY?
Trump called the decision “weaponization against a political opponent” and complained that he was being penalized for “having built a perfect company, great cash, great buildings, great everything.”
“President Trump will of course appeal and remains confident the Appellate Division will ultimately correct the innumerable and catastrophic errors made by a trial court untethered to the law or to reality,” Trump lawyer
Trump and his lawyers have said that outside accountants that helped prepare his financial statements should’ve flagged any discrepancies and that the documents came with disclaimers that shielded him from liability. They say Trump never told anyone to inflate the value of assets and that, if there were discrepancies, no one was harmed.
“There were no victims because the banks made a lot of money,” Trump said Friday, echoing his trial testimony in November.
Trump testified that regardless of what his financial statements said, banks did their own due diligence and would’ve qualified him for the loans anyway. He said there’s no evidence that the terms or pricing would have been any different.
HOW WILL TRUMP'S APPEAL UNFOLD?
Trump isn't able to appeal the decision just yet because the clerk's office at Engoron’s courthouse still has to file paperwork to make it official.
Once that happens, Trump can file an appeal with New York’s Appellate Division, a mid-level appeals court just above Engoron's trial court in the state's judicial hierarchy. His lawyers are almost certain to ask for an immediate stay — a legal term for an order halting enforcement of Engoron's decision while the appeals process plays out.
Under state law, Trump will receive an automatic stay if he puts up money, assets or an appeal bond covering the amount he owes. The appeals process typically takes months, if not a year or more. If Trump is unsuccessful at the Appellate Division, he can ask the state’s highest court, the
Any appeal is likely to focus on Engoron, whom Trump's lawyers have accused of tainting the case with “tangible and overwhelming” bias, as well as objections to the legal mechanics involved in James' lawsuit. Trump contends the law she sued him under is a consumer-protection statute that's normally used to rein in businesses that rip off customers.
Trump’s lawyers have already gone to the Appellate Division at least 10 times to challenge Engoron’s prior rulings, including during the trial in an unsuccessful bid to reverse a gag order and
Trump's lawyers have long argued that some of the allegations are barred by the statute of limitations, contending that Engoron failed to comply with an Appellate Division ruling last year that he narrow the scope of the trial to weed out outdated allegations.
WHAT ELSE DID THE DECISION SAY?
Engoron set strict limitations on the Trump Organization’s ability to do business, but took the “corporate death penalty" off the table, rescinding his earlier decision to strip Trump of his companies.
The judge placed the company under an independent monitor's supervision for at least three years, ordered the hiring of an independent compliance director and forced a shakeup in its leadership. He wrote that without the restrictions, Trump and his co-defendants were “likely to continue their fraudulent ways."
The judge imposed a two-year ban on Trump's sons, Eric and
Trump, who owns the company but no longer has an official leadership position, was given a three-year ban. Engoron also banned him and his companies for three years from getting loans from banks registered in
Weisselberg and another longtime company executive, ex-controller
Engoron wrote that taking away Trump's companies was no longer necessary because it will be under a “two-tiered oversight” with the independent monitor, retired federal judge
HOW DID THIS CASE COME ABOUT?
James, a Democrat, sued Trump in 2022 under a decades-old
James started investigating Trump’s financial statements in 2019 after his former personal lawyer and fixer,
Cohen served time in federal prison for violating campaign finance laws in connection with an alleged hush-money scheme that is the subject of Trump's
James's lawsuit accused Trump and his co-defendants of routinely puffing up his financial statements — a yearly snapshot of his holdings — to create the illusion that he and his properties were far more valuable than they actually were.
Trump used the statements to banks and others he did business with, and even handed them over to financial magazines like Forbes to justify his place among the world’s billionaires.
WHAT WERE SOME THINGS TRUMP WAS ACCUSED OF?
Among other tricks, Trump and his co-defendants were accused of overvaluing his
They were also accused of valuing his Mar-a-Lago estate in
Trump “was aware of having deeded away the right to use Mar-a-Lago as anything other than a social club, and notwithstanding, continued to value it as if it could be used as a single family residence,” Engoron wrote in his decision. “He was aware that the Triplex apartment in which he, a real estate mogul and self-identified expert, resided for decades was not 30,000 square feet, but actually 10,996 square feet.”
At trial, Trump insisted that he believed Mar-a-Lago is currently worth between
HOW DID THE JUDGE ASSESS TRUMP AND OTHER KEY WITNESSES?
Trump's defiant, rambling turn on the witness stand in November led a frustrated Engoron to warn: “This is not a political rally.” How did the judge really feel, sitting mere feet away from Trump as the former president laid into him as an “extremely hostile judge.”
“Overall,
Regarding
“The
Conversely, the judge found that
Trump, who was in court for Cohen's testimony, decried his fixer-turned-foe as a “a proven liar" and claimed he was “totally discredited.”
“A less-forgiving factfinder might have concluded differently, might not have believed a single word of a convicted perjurer,” Engoron wrote. "This factfinder does not believe that pleading guilty to perjury means that you can never tell the truth.
Top Stories in America for Feb 17, 2024
More NC residents are losing home insurance as underwriters tighten guidelines [The News & Observer (Raleigh)]
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News