Gun rights group sues California city over liability law
“The law is unconstitutional,”
Dhillon said the law also infringes on the First Amendment by compelling gun owners to pay an annual fee to a not-yet-formed nonprofit that could promote a message they don't agree with.
“The Ordinance even prohibits the city from directing how the non-profit would use the funds. The one thing that is clear is that the organization will likely be dedicated to exclusively preaching the negative risks of gun ownership,” the lawsuit says.
The liability insurance would cover losses or damages resulting from any accidental use of the firearm, including death, injury or property damage, according to the ordinance. If a gun is stolen or lost, the owner of the firearm would be considered liable until the theft or loss is reported to authorities.
However, gun owners who don’t have insurance won’t lose their guns or face any criminal charges, the mayor said.
Pharmacist Sentenced For $180 Million Health Care Fraud Scheme
$14M Medicaid fraud scheme collected urine samples from Charlotte-area kids, feds say [The Charlotte Observer]
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News