GUEST COLUMN: Working is no guarantee you’ll have health insurance
I bring this up not because I begrudge lawmakers and their families health insurance. Everyone should have health insurance. Not having health insurance is irresponsible if there's any way you can swing it.
I bring this up because Republican politicians have been talking a lot lately about who deserves and who does not deserve to be insured by Medicaid, the government program that
Medicaid also covers people who have disabilities, children, moms-to-be, new moms and seniors. A third of Kentuckians get their medical care through Medicaid.
As GOP
Well, sure, we also want that free Bubble Up and rainbow stew of which the late poet
But let's be real.
You can have a job — or a few jobs — and still not have health insurance or an offer of health insurance that you can afford.
A lot of Kentuckians who have jobs can afford health care only because of the Medicaid expansion.
Nationally only about half of small employers (those employing fewer than 50 people) sponsor a health insurance plan for their workers, and in
Overall, about 1 in 4 workers are not eligible to enroll in employer-sponsored insurance. Even large employers are not required to offer health insurance to employees working fewer than 30 hours a week.
Which brings us back to the
(You might suppose Barr, a Phi Beta Kappa who's running for
I did not ask for any lawmakers' names when I filed my open records request with the Personnel Cabinet; I asked only for the number of lawmakers enrolled in the state health insurance plan.
Arithmetic tells us most of them are
Lawmakers and their families don't have to go through a full redetermination process or prove their "community engagement" every six months to keep their coverage — in contrast to the work requirements (really, paperwork requirements) that
Monthly premiums for a single enrollee in the four plans for state employees range from
Lawmakers over the years also have voted themselves nice pensions, giving them a degree of economic security unknown to many of their constituents, who, even if they have 401K plans at work, are at the mercy of investment markets for security in their later years.
I don't begrudge lawmakers their health insurance or their pensions. Legislative pay is low.
Still, you have to shake your head when lawmakers who have feathered their own nests use their power to punish people who don't even have a nest to feather.
Instead of figuring out how to kick people off health care, our elected leaders could do us all a favor by figuring out how to make the system work better for everyone.



The Week Ahead: Jobs Report and Inflation Data Drop as Micron and Nike Report Earnings
Guess which country pays the most for health care
Advisor News
- Affordability on Florida lawmakers’ minds as they return to the state Capitol
- Gen X confident in investment decisions, despite having no plan
- Most Americans optimistic about a financial ‘resolution rebound’ in 2026
- Mitigating recession-based client anxiety
- Terri Kallsen begins board chair role at CFP Board
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Reframing lifetime income as an essential part of retirement planning
- Integrity adds further scale with blockbuster acquisition of AIMCOR
- MetLife Declares First Quarter 2026 Common Stock Dividend
- Using annuities as a legacy tool: The ROP feature
- Jackson Financial Inc. and TPG Inc. Announce Long-Term Strategic Partnership
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Healey taps $250M to offset rising health insurance premiums
- Why the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s closure exposes a growing threat to democracy
- TRAHAN SUPPORTS BIPARTISAN LEGISLATION TO END THE GOP HEALTH CARE CRISIS
- CT SENATE GOP: HEALTHCARE COSTS TOO MUCH IN CT, BUT ASSOCIATION HEALTH PLANS NEVER PASS
- Thousands in CT face higher health insurance costs after federal subsidies expired at start of 2026
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News