Fairwinds Estate Winery takes insurance company to court claiming misleading policy, refusal to pay
The Calistoga winery is suing
At the time of the fire, which broke out
When the Glass Fire destroyed Fairwinds' main building and tasting room, Fairwinds expected this excess policy to kick in, since it believed that property losses were higher than the combined coverage - let alone the primary, policy from Beazley, according to the lawsuit.
But now, Kinsale refuses to pay out, saying that Beazley's coverage was more than enough.
Kinsale assessed the value of Fairwinds's main building and tasting room to
"Under Kinsale's interpretation, Fairwinds could never suffer loss sufficient to trigger coverage under the Excess Policy," Fairwinds said in its lawsuit.
According to the suit, Kinsale's total valuation of the main building, tank building, tasting room, business personal property and outside equipment amounts to
"Thus, even if Fairwinds lost every single piece of property in a wildfire, because the underlying policy's coverage limit is greater than that amount at
Attorneys for Fairwinds and Kinsale did not respond to requests for comment.
No trial date has been set for the lawsuit. A status conference is set for February.
Collin County residents among 23 charged with fraud scheme
Iowa Agriculture Dept. Cover Crop Insurance Discount Program Continues This Fall
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News