EVEREST RE GROUP LTD – 10-K –
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION The following is a discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes, under ITEM 8 of this Form 10-K. Pursuant to the FAST Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K, comparisons between 2020 and 2019 have been omitted from this Form 10-K but can be found in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the
year ended
All comparisons in this discussion are to the corresponding
prior year unless otherwise indicated.
Industry Conditions. The worldwide reinsurance and insurance businesses are highly competitive, as well as cyclical by product and market. As such, financial results tend to fluctuate with periods of constrained availability, higher rates and stronger profits followed by periods of abundant capacity, lower rates and constrained profitability. Competition in the types of reinsurance and insurance business that we underwrite is based on many factors,
including the perceived overall
financial strength of the reinsurer or insurer, ratings of the reinsurer or insurer byA.M. Best and/orStandard & Poor's , underwriting expertise, the jurisdictions where the reinsurer or insurer is licensed or otherwise authorized, capacity and coverages offered, premiums charged, other terms and conditions of the reinsurance and insurance business offered, services offered, speed of claims payment and reputation and experience in lines written. Furthermore, the market impact from these competitive factors related to reinsurance and insurance is generally not consistent across lines of business, domestic and international geographical
areas and distribution channels.
We compete in theU.S. ,Bermuda and international reinsurance and insurance markets with numerous global competitors. Our competitors include independent reinsurance and insurance companies, subsidiaries or affiliates of established worldwide insurance companies, reinsurance departments of certain insurance companies, domestic and international underwriting operations, including underwriting syndicates atLloyd's of London and certain government sponsored risk transfer vehicles. Some of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do and have established long term and continuing business relationships, which can be a significant competitive advantage. In addition, the lack of strong barriers to entry into the reinsurance business and recently, the securitization of reinsurance and insurance risks through capital markets provide
additional sources of potential reinsurance
and insurance capacity and competition.
Worldwide insurance and reinsurance market conditions historically have been competitive. Generally, there is ample insurance and reinsurance capacity relative to demand, as well as additional capital from the capital markets through insurance linked financial instruments. These financial instruments such as side cars, catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance funds, provided capital markets with access to insurance and reinsurance risk exposure. The capital markets demand for these products is primarily driven by the desire to achieve greater risk diversification and potentially higher returns on their investments. This competition
generally has a negative impact
on rates, terms and conditions;
however,
the impact varies widely by market
and coverage. Based on recent competitive behaviors in the insurance and reinsurance industry, natural catastrophe events and the macroeconomic backdrop, there has been some dislocation in the market which we expect to
have a positive impact on rates
and terms and conditions, generally,
though local market specificities can
vary. The increased frequency of catastrophe losses experienced throughout 2022 appears to be pressuring the increase of rates. As business activity continues to regain strength after the pandemic and current macroeconomic uncertainty, rates appear to be firming in
most lines of business, particularly in the casualty
lines that had seen significant losses such as excess casualty and directors' and officers' liability. Other casualty lines are experiencing modest rate increase, while some lines such as workers' compensation were experiencing softer market conditions. It is too early to tell what the impact on pricing conditions will be, but it is likely to
change depending on the line of business and geography.
42
Our capital position remains
a source of strength,
with high quality invested
assets, significant liquidity
and a low operating expense ratio. Our diversified global platform with its broad mix of products, distribution and geography is resilient. The war in theUkraine is ongoing and an evolving event. Economic and legal sanctions have been levied againstRussia , specific named individuals and entities connected to the Russian government, as well as businesses located in theRussian Federation and/or owned by Russian nationals by numerous countries, includingthe United States . The significant political and economic uncertainty surrounding the war and associated sanctions have impacted economic and investment markets both withinRussia and around the world. The Company has
recorded
to the
43 Financial Summary. We monitor and evaluate
our overall performance based upon
financial results.
The following table displays a summary of the consolidated
net income (loss), ratios and shareholders'
equity for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , Percentage Increase/(Decrease) (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 2022/2021 2021/2020 Gross written premiums$ 13,952 $ 13,050 $ 10,482 6.9% 24.5% Net written premiums 12,344 11,446 9,117 7.9% 25.5% REVENUES: Premiums earned$ 11,787 $ 10,406 $ 8,682 13.3% 19.9% Net investment income 830 1,165 643 (28.8)% 81.3% Net gains (losses) on investments (455) 258 268 (276.4)% -3.6% Other income (expense) (102) 37 7 NM NM Total revenues 12,060 11,866 9,598 1.6% 23.6% CLAIMS AND EXPENSES: Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses 8,100 7,391 6,551 9.6% 12.8% Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees 2,528 2,209 1,873 14.5% 17.9% Other underwriting expenses 682 583 511 17.0% 14.0% Corporate expenses 61 68 41 (10.1)% 65.0% Interest, fees and bond issue cost amortization expense 101 70 36 43.9% 93.1% Total claims and expenses 11,472 10,321 9,013 11.2% 14.5% INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES 588 1,546 585 (62.0)% 164.1% Income tax expense (benefit) (9) 167 71 (105.3)% 133.9% NET INCOME (LOSS)$ 597 $ 1,379 $ 514 (56.7)% 168.2% RATIOS: Point Change Loss ratio 68.7% 71.0% 75.5% (2.3) (4.5) Commission and brokerage ratio 21.4% 21.2% 21.6% 0.2 (0.4) Other underwriting expense ratio 5.8% 5.6% 5.8% 0.2 (0.2) Combined ratio 96.0% 97.8% 102.9% (1.8) (5.1) AtDecember 31 , Percentage Increase/(Decrease) (Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2022 2021 2020 2022/2021 2021/2020 Balance sheet data: Total investments and cash$ 29,872 $ 29,673 $ 25,462 0.7% 16.5% Total assets 39,966 38,185 32,712 4.7% 16.7% Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves 22,065 19,009 16,322 16.1% 16.5% Total debt 3,084 3,089 1,910 (0.2)% 61.7% Total liabilities 31,525 28,046 22,985 12.4% 22.0% Shareholders' equity 8,441 10,139 9,726 (16.8)% 4.2% Book value per share 215.54 258.21 243.25 (16.5)% 6.2% (NM, not meaningful) (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) 44 Revenues. Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by 6.9% to$14.0 billion in 2022, compared to$13.1 billion in 2021, reflecting a$653.4 million , or 16.4%, increase in our insurance business and a$248.8 million , or 2.7%, increase in our reinsurance business. The increase in insurance premiums reflects growth across most lines of business, particularly specialty casualty business and property/short tail business, driven by positive rate and exposure increases, new business and strong renewal retention. The increase in reinsurance premiums was
primarily due to increases in casualty pro
rata business and financial lines of business, partially offset
by a decline in property pro rata business. Net written premiums increased by 7.9% to$12.3 billion in 2022, compared to$11.4 billion in 2021. The higher percentage increase in net written premiums compared to gross written premiums was primarily due to a reduction in business ceded to the segregated accounts ofMt. Logan Re during 2022 compared to 2021. Premiums earned increased by 13.3% to$11.8 billion in 2022, compared to$10.4 billion in 2021. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums was primarily the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period. Accordingly, the significant increase in gross written premiums from pro rata business during the latter half of 2021 contributed to the current year-to-date percentage increases in net earned premiums. Other Income (Expense). We recorded other expense of$102 million and other income of$37 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The changes were primarily the result of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We recognized foreign currency exchange expense of$103 million in 2022 and foreign currency exchange
income of
45 Claims and Expenses. Incurred Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. The following table presents our incurred losses and loss
adjustment expenses ("LAE") for
the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , Current Ratio %/Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/ (Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change 2022 Attritional$ 7,047 59.8%$ (2) -%$ 7,045 59.8% Catastrophes 1,055 9.0% - -% 1,055 9.0% Total segment$ 8,102 68.8%$ (2) -%$ 8,100 68.7% 2021 Attritional$ 6,265 60.2%$ (9) (0.1)%$ 6,256 60.1% Catastrophes 1,135 10.9% - -% 1,135 10.9% Total segment$ 7,400 71.1%$ (9) (0.1)%$ 7,391 71.0% 2020 Attritional$ 5,724 66.0%$ 401 4.7%$ 6,126 70.7% Catastrophes 425 4.9% - -% 425 4.9% Total segment$ 6,150 70.9%$ 401 4.7%$ 6,551 75.5% Variance 2022/2021 Attritional$ 782 (0.4) pts$ 7 0.1 pts$ 789 (0.3) pts Catastrophes (80) (1.9) pts - - pts (80) (1.9) pts Total segment$ 702 (2.3) pts$ 7 0.1 pts$ 709 (2.2) pts Variance 2021/2020 Attritional$ 541 (5.8) pts$ (411) (4.8) pts$ 130 (10.6) pts Catastrophes 710 6.0 pts - - pts 710 6.0 pts Total segment$ 1,251 0.2 pts$ (411) (4.8) pts$ 840 (4.6) pts (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Incurred losses and LAE
increased by 9.6% to
to$7.4 billion in 2021, primarily due to an increase of$782 million in current year attritional losses, partially offset by a decrease of$80 million in current year catastrophe losses. The increase in current year attritional losses was mainly due to the impact of the increase in premiums earned and$45 million of attritional losses incurred due to theUkraine /Russia war. The current year catastrophe losses of$1.1 billion in 2022 related primarily to Hurricane Ian ($699 million ), the 2022Australia floods ($88 million ), the 2022Western Europe hailstorms ($69 million ), the 2022South Africa flood ($50 million ), the 2022 Western Europe Convective Storm ($35 million ), Hurricane Fiona ($27 million ), the 2022 European storms ($21 million ) and the 2022Canada derecho ($21 million ), with the remaining losses resulting from various storm events. The$1.1 billion of current year catastrophe losses in 2021 related primarily to Hurricane Ida ($460 million ), theTexas winter storms ($294 million ), the European floods ($242 million ), theCanada drought loss ($80 million ) and the Quad State tornadoes ($45 million ) with the rest of the losses
emanating from the
the 2021 Australia floods. Catastrophe losses and loss expenses typically have a material effect on our incurred losses and loss adjustment expense results and can vary significantly from period to period. Losses from natural catastrophes contributed 9.0 percentage points to the combined ratio in 2022, compared with 10.9 percentage points in 2021. The Company has up to$350.0 million of catastrophe bond protection ("CAT Bond") that attaches at a$48.1 billion PCS Industry loss threshold. This recovery would be recognized on a pro-rata basis up to a$63.8 billion PCS Industry loss level. PCS's current
industry estimate of
is below the attachment point.
The potential recovery under the CAT Bond is not included in the Company's estimate for Hurricane Ian but would provide
significant downside protection should
the industry loss estimate increase.
46 Commission, Brokerage, Taxes and Fees. Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees increased by 14.5% to$2.5 billion for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 compared to$2.2 billion for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 . The increase was primarily due to the impact of the increases in premiums earned and changes in the mix of business. Other Underwriting Expenses. Other underwriting expenses were$682 million and$583 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in other underwriting expenses was mainly due to the impact of the increase in premiums earned as well as the continued build out of our insurance operations, including an expansion of the
international insurance platform.
Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses, which are general operating expenses that are not allocated to segments, were$61 million and$68 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The
decrease from 2021 to 2022 was mainly
due to a decrease in variable incentive compensation.
Interest, Fees and Bond Issue Cost Amortization Expense. Interest, fees and other bond amortization expense was$101 million and$70 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increases were primarily due to the issuance of$1.0 billion of senior notes inOctober 2021 . Interest expense was also impacted by the movements in the floating interest rate related to the long term subordinated notes, which is reset quarterly per the note agreement. The floating rate was
6.99% as of
2021. Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We had income tax benefit of$9 million and income tax expense of$167 million in 2022 and 2021, respectively. Income tax expense is primarily a function of the geographic location of the Company's pre-tax income and the statutory tax rates in those jurisdictions. The effective tax rate ("ETR") is primarily affected by tax-exempt investment income, foreign tax credits and dividends. Variations in the ETR generally result from changes in the relative levels of pre -tax income, including the impact of catastrophe losses
and net capital gains (losses), among jurisdictions
with different tax rates. OnAugust 16, 2022 , the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 ("IRA") was enacted. We have evaluated the tax provisions of the IRA, the most significant of which are the corporate alternative minimum tax and the share repurchase excise tax
and do not expect the legislation to have
a material impact on our results of operations.
As
the
any impact to our consolidated
financial statements. Net Income (Loss). Our net income was$597 million and$1.4 billion in 2022 and 2021, respectively. The change was primarily
driven by the consolidated investment
results explained below. Ratios. Our combined ratio decreased by 1.8 points to 96.0% in 2022, compared to 97.8% in 2021. The loss ratio component decreased by 2.3 points in 2022 over the same period last year
mainly due to a decline
in catastrophe losses. The commission and brokerage ratio components increased slightly to 21.4% in 2022 compared to 21.2% in 2021. The increase was mainly due to changes in the mix of business. The other underwriting expense ratios increased slightly to 5.8% in 2022 compared to 5.6% in 2021. These increases were
mainly due to higher insurance operations
costs. Shareholders' Equity. Shareholders' equity decreased by$1.7 billion to$8.4 billion atDecember 31, 2022 from$10.1 billion atDecember 31, 2021 , principally as a result of$1.9 billion of unrealized depreciation on available for sale fixed maturity portfolio net of tax,$255 million of shareholder dividends,$77 million of net foreign currency translation adjustments, and the repurchase of 241,273 common shares for$61 million , partially offset by$597 million of net income. 47Consolidated Investment Results Net Investment Income. Net investment income decreased by 28.8% to$830 million in 2022 compared with net investment income of$1.2 billion in 2021. The decrease was primarily the result of a decline of$490 million in limited partnership income, partially offset by an additional$181 million of income from fixed maturity investments. The limited partnership income primarily reflects decreases in their reported net asset values. As such, until these asset values are monetized and the
resultant income is distributed,
they are subject to future increases
or decreases in the asset value, and the results may be volatile.
The following table shows the components
of net investment income for
the periods indicated.
Years EndedDecember 31 , (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Fixed maturities$ 742 $ 561 $ 542 Equity securities 16 17 19 Short-term investments and cash 28 1 5 Other invested assets Limited partnerships 75 565 113 Other 29 63 2 Gross investment income before adjustments 890 1,208 681 Funds held interest income (expense) 2 12 13 Future policy benefit reserve income (expense) - (1) (1) Gross investment income 892 1,219 692 Investment expenses (62) (54) (50) Net investment income$ 830 $ 1,165 $ 643 (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) The following tables show a comparison
of various investment yields for
the periods indicated. 2022 2021 2020 Annualized pre-tax yield on average cash and invested assets 2.7 % 4.4 % 2.9 % Annualized after-tax yield on average cash and invested assets 2.3 % 3.8 % 2.5 % Annualized return on invested assets 1.2 % 5.3 % 4.0 % 2022 2021 2020 Fixed income portfolio total return (5.9) % 0.5 % 6.3 % Barclay's Capital -U.S. aggregate index (13.0) % (1.5) % 7.5 % Common equity portfolio total return (18.5) % 19.0 % 26.7 % S&P 500 index (18.1) % 28.7 % 18.4 % Other invested asset portfolio total return 4.5 % 36.5 % 8.3 % The pre -tax equivalent total return for the bond portfolio was approximately (5.9)% and 0.5%, respectively, in 2022 and 2021. The pre-tax equivalent return adjusts the yield on tax-exempt bonds to the fully taxable equivalent. Our fixed income and equity portfolios have different compositions than the benchmark indexes. Our fixed income portfolios have a shorter duration
because we align our investment
portfolio with our liabilities.
We also hold foreign securities to match our foreign liabilities while the index is comprised of onlyU.S. securities. Our equity portfolios reflect an emphasis on dividend yield and growth equities, while the index is comprised of the largest 500 equities by market capitalization. 48 Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses). The following table presents the composition
of our net realized capital gains
(losses) for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , 2022/2021 2021/2020 (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Variance Variance Realized gains (losses) from dispositions:
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale:
Gains$ 40 $ 72 $ 80 $ (32) $ (8) Losses (127) (55) (85) (72) 27 Total (87) 17 (5) (104) 19 Equity securities: Gains 165 42 37 123 5 Losses (53) (15) (46) (38) 32 Total 112 28 (9) 85 37 Other Invested Assets Gains 18 10 8 8 2 Losses (5) (4) (6) (1) 2 Total 13 6 2 7 4 Short Term Investments Gains - - 1 - (1) Losses - - - - - Total - - 1 - (1)
Total net realized gains (losses) from dispositions:
Gains 223 124 126 99 (2) Losses (185) (74) (137) (111) 63 Total 38 50 (11) (12) 61 Allowance for credit losses: (33) (28) (2) (5) (26) Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments: Fixed maturities - - 2 - (2) Equity securities (460) 236 279 (696) (43) Total (460) 236 280 (696) (45) Total net gains (losses) on investments$ (455) $ 258 $ 268 $ (713) $ (10) (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Net gains (losses) on investments in 2022 primarily relate to net losses from fair value adjustments on equity securities in the amount of$460 million as a result of equity market declines in 2022. In addition, we realized$38 million of gains due to the disposition of investments and recorded an increase to the allowance for credit
losses of
holdings of Russian corporate fixed maturity securities. Segment Results. The Company manages its reinsurance and insurance operations as autonomous units and key strategic
decisions are based on the aggregate operating
results and projections for these segments of business. The Reinsurance operation writes worldwide property and casualty reinsurance and specialty lines of business, on both a treaty and facultative basis, through reinsurance brokers, as well as directly with ceding companies. Business is written in theU.S. ,Bermuda , andIreland offices, as well as, through branches inCanada ,Singapore , theUnited Kingdom andSwitzerland . The Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance directly 49 and through brokers, surplus lines brokers and general agents within theU.S. ,Bermuda ,Canada ,Europe ,Singapore andSouth America through its offices in theU.S. ,Canada ,Chile ,Singapore , theUnited Kingdom ,Ireland and branches located
in
These segments are managed independently, but conform with corporate guidelines with respect to pricing, risk management, control of aggregate catastrophe exposures, capital, investments and support operations. Management generally monitors and evaluates the financial performance of these operating segments based
upon their underwriting results.
Underwriting results include earned premium less LAE incurred, commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses. We measure our underwriting results using ratios, in particular loss, commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios, which, respectively, divide incurred losses, commissions and brokerage and other
underwriting expenses by premiums earned.
The Company does not maintain separate balance sheet data for its operating segments. Accordingly, the Company does not review and evaluate the financial results of its operating segments based upon balance sheet data. Our loss and LAE reserves are management's best estimate of our ultimate liability for unpaid claims. We re- evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including all prior period reserves, taking into consideration all available information, and in particular, recently reported loss claim experience and trends related to prior periods.
Such re-evaluations are recorded
in incurred losses in the period in which re-evaluation
is made.
The following discusses the underwriting results for
each of our segments for the periods indicated.
Reinsurance. The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , 2022/2021 2021/2020 (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Variance % Change Variance % Change Gross written premiums$ 9,316 $ 9,067 $ 7,282 $ 249 2.7%$ 1,786 24.5% Net written premiums 8,983 8,536 6,768 447 5.2% 1,768 26.1% Premiums earned$ 8,663 $ 7,758 $ 6,466 $ 905 11.7%$ 1,291 20.0% Incurred losses and LAE 5,997 5,556 4,933 441 7.9% 623 12.6% Commission and brokerage 2,134 1,855 1,552 279 15.1% 302 19.5% Other underwriting expenses 218 199 176 19 9.6% 23 13.3% Underwriting gain (loss)$ 313 $ 147 $ (195) $ 166 112.6%$ 343 175.4% Point Chg Point Chg Loss ratio 69.2% 71.6% 76.3% (2.4) (4.7) Commission and brokerage ratio 24.6% 23.9% 24.0% 0.7 (0.1) Other underwriting expense ratio 2.5% 2.6% 2.7% (0.1) (0.1) Combined ratio 96.4% 98.1% 103.0% (1.8) (4.9) (NM, not meaningful) (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by 2.7% to$9.3 billion in 2022 from$9.1 billion in 2021, primarily due to increases in casualty pro rata business and financial lines of business, partially offset by a decline in property pro rata business. Net written premiums increased by 5.2% to$9.0 billion in 2022 compared to$8.5 billion in 2021. The higher percentage increase in net written premiums compared to gross written premiums 50 mainly related to a reduction in business ceded to the segregated accounts ofMt. Logan Re in 2022 compared to 2021. Premiums earned increased by 11.7% to$8.7 billion in 2022, compared to$7.8 billion in 2021. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is primarily the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period. Accordingly, the significant increases in gross written premiums from pro rata business during the latter half of 2021 contributed
to the current year-to-date percentage
increase in net earned premiums.
Incurred Losses and LAE. The following table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , Current Ratio %/Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/ (Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change 2022 Attritional$ 5,070 58.5%$ (2) -%$ 5,067 58.5% Catastrophes 930 10.7% - -% 930 10.7% Total segment$ 6,000 69.2%$ (2) -%$ 5,997 69.2% 2021 Attritional$ 4,582 59.1%$ (8) (0.1)%$ 4,574 59.0% Catastrophes 983 12.7% - -% 983 12.7% Total segment$ 5,564 71.8%$ (8) (0.1)%$ 5,556 71.6% 2020 Attritional$ 4,180 64.6%$ 397 6.1%$ 4,576 70.7% Catastrophes 357 5.5% - -% 357 5.5% Total segment$ 4,537 70.1%$ 397 6.1%$ 4,933 76.3% Variance 2022/2021 Attritional$ 488 (0.6) pts$ 6 0.1 pts$ 494 (0.5) pts Catastrophes (53) (2.0) pts - - pts (53) (2.0) pts Total segment$ 435 (2.6) pts$ 6 0.1 pts$ 441 (2.4) pts Variance 2021/2020 Attritional$ 402 (5.5) pts$ (405) (6.2) pts$ (3) (11.7) pts Catastrophes 626 7.2 pts - - pts 626 7.2 pts Total segment$ 1,028 1.7 pts$ (405) (6.2) pts$ 623 (4.5) pts (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Incurred losses increased by 7.9% to$6.0 billion in 2022, compared to$5.6 billion in 2021. The increase was primarily due to an increase of$488 million in current year attritional losses,
partially offset by a decrease
of$53 million in current year catastrophe losses. The increase in current year attritional losses was mainly related to the impact of the increase in premiums earned and$45 million of attritional losses due to theUkraine /Russia war. The current year catastrophe losses of$930 million in 2022 related primarily to Hurricane Ian ($599 million ), the 2022Australia floods ($88 million ), theWestern Europe hailstorms ($69 million ), the 2022South Africa flood ($50 million ), the 2022Western Europe Convective storm ($29 million ), Hurricane Fiona ($22 million ), the 2022 European storms ($21 million ) and the 2022 Canada derecho ($21 million ), with the remaining losses resulting from various storm events. The$983 million of current year catastrophe losses in 2021 related primarily to Hurricane Ida ($380 million ), theTexas winter storms ($237 million ), the European floods ($242 million ), theCanada drought loss ($80 million ) and the Quad state tornadoes ($30 million ), with the rest of the losses emanating from the 2021 South Africa riots and the 2021 Australia floods. Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expense increased by 15.1% to$2.1 billion in 2022 compared to$1.9 billion in 2021. The increase was mainly due to the impact of the increase in premiums earned and changes 51 in the mix of business. Segment other underwriting expenses increased to$218 million in 2022 from$199 million in 2021. The increase was mainly due to the increase in written premium attributable to the planned expansion of the business. Insurance. The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the Insurance segment for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , 2022/2021 2021/2020 (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Variance % Change Variance % Change Gross written premiums$ 4,636 $ 3,983 $ 3,201 $ 653 16.4%$ 782 24.4% Net written premiums 3,361 2,910 2,349 451 15.5% 561 23.9% Premiums earned$ 3,124 $ 2,649 $ 2,215 $ 475 17.9%$ 434 19.6% Incurred losses and LAE 2,103 1,835 1,617 268 14.6% 217 13.4% Commission and brokerage 394 354 321 40 11.3% 33 10.4% Other underwriting expenses 463 384 336 79 20.8% 48 14.3% Underwriting gain (loss)$ 164 $ 76 $ (58) $ 88 114.4%$ 135 230.7% Point Chg Point Chg Loss ratio 67.3% 69.3% 73.0% (2.0) (3.7) Commission and brokerage ratio 12.6% 13.4% 14.5% (0.8) (1.1) Other underwriting expense ratio 14.8% 14.5% 15.1% 0.3 (0.6) Combined ratio 94.8% 97.1% 102.6% (2.5) (5.5) (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by 16.4% to$4.6 billion in 2022 compared to$4.0 billion in 2021. The increase in insurance premiums reflects growth across most lines of business, particularly specialty casualty and property/short tail business, driven by positive rate and exposure increases, new business and strong renewal retention. Net written premiums increased by 15.5% to$3.4 billion in 2022 compared to$2.9 billion in 2021, which is consistent with the percentage change in gross written premiums. Premiums earned increased 17.9% to$3.1 million in 2022 compared to$2.6 billion in 2021. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result
of timing; premiums are earned ratably
over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period. Accordingly, the significant increases in gross written premiums during the latter half of 2021 contributed to the current year -to-date percentage increase in net earned premiums. 52 Incurred Losses and LAE. The following table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the Insurance segment for the periods indicated. Years EndedDecember 31 , Current Ratio %/Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/ (Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change 2022 Attritional$ 1,977 63.3%$ 1 -%$ 1,978 63.3% Catastrophes 125 4.0% - -% 125 4.0% Total segment$ 2,102 67.3%$ 1 -%$ 2,103 67.3% 2021 Attritional$ 1,684 63.6%$ (1) -%$ 1,682 63.6% Catastrophes 153 5.8% - -% 153 5.8% Total segment$ 1,836 69.4%$ (1) -%$ 1,835 69.3% 2020 Attritional$ 1,545 69.7%$ 5 0.2%$ 1,549 69.9% Catastrophes 68 3.1% - -% 68 3.1% Total segment$ 1,613 72.8%$ 5 0.2%$ 1,617 73.0% Variance 2022/2021 Attritional$ 293 (0.3) pts$ 1 - pts$ 294 (0.3) pts Catastrophes (28) (1.8) pts - - pts (28) (1.8) pts Total segment$ 265 (2.1) pts$ 1 - pts$ 266 (2.0) pts Variance 2021/2020 Attritional$ 139 (6.1) pts$ (6) (0.2) pts$ 133 (6.3) pts Catastrophes 85 2.7 pts - - pts 85 2.7 pts Total segment$ 223 (3.4) pts$ (6) (0.2) pts$ 217 (3.7) pts (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Incurred losses and LAE increased by
14.6% to
in 2021. The increase was mainly due to an increase of$293 million in current year attritional losses, partially offset by a decrease in current year catastrophe losses of$28 million . The increase in current year attritional losses was primarily due to the impact of the increase in premiums earned. The current year catastrophe losses of$125 million primarily related to Hurricane Ian ($99 million ), with the remaining losses resulting from various storm events. The$153 million of current year catastrophe losses in 2021 related to Hurricane Ida ($80 million ), theTexas winter storms ($58 million ) and the Quad State tornadoes ($15 million ). Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage increased by 11.3% to$394 million in 2022 compared to$354 million in 2021. Segment other underwriting expenses increased to$463 million in 2022 compared to$384 million in 2021. These increases were mainly due to the impact of the increase in premiums earned and increased expenses related to the continued build out of the insurance business, including an expansion of the international insurance platform. Critical Accounting Estimates The following is a summary of the critical accounting estimates related to accounting estimates that (1) require management to make assumptions about highly uncertain matters and (2) could materially impact the
consolidated financial statements
if management made different assumptions. Loss and LAE Reserves. Our most critical accounting estimate is the determination of our loss and LAE reserves. We maintain reserves equal to our estimated ultimate liability for losses and LAE for reported and unreported 53 claims for our insurance and reinsurance
businesses.
Because reserves are based on estimates
of ultimate losses and LAE by underwriting or accident year, we use a variety of statistical and actuarial techniques to monitor reserve adequacy over time, evaluate new information as it becomes known and adjust reserves whenever an adjustment appears warranted. We consider many factors when setting reserves including: (1) our exposure base and projected ultimate premiums earned; (2) our expected loss ratios by product and class of business,
which are developed collaboratively
by underwriters and actuaries;
(3) actuarial methodologies and
assumptions which analyze our loss reporting and payment experience, reports from ceding companies and historical trends, such as reserving patterns, loss payments and product mix; (4) current legal interpretations of coverage and liability; and (5) economic conditions. Our insurance and reinsurance loss and LAE reserves represent management's best estimate of our ultimate liability. Actual losses and LAE ultimately paid may deviate, perhaps substantially, from such reserves. Our net income (loss) will be impacted in a period in which the change in estimated ultimate losses and LAE is recorded.
See also ITEM 8, "Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data" - Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. It is more difficult to accurately estimate loss reserves for reinsurance liabilities than for insurance liabilities. AtDecember 31, 2022 , we had reinsurance reserves of$16.1 billion , of which$278 million were loss reserves for A&E liabilities, and insurance loss reserves of$5.9 billion . A detailed discussion of additional considerations related to A&E exposures
follows later in this section.
The detailed data required to evaluate ultimate losses for our insurance business is accumulated from our
underwriting and claim systems.
Reserving for reinsurance requires evaluation of loss information received from ceding companies. Ceding companies report losses to us in many forms dependent on the type of contract and the agreed or contractual reporting requirements. Generally, proportional/quota share contracts require the submission of a monthly/quarterly account, which includes premium and loss activity for the period with corresponding reserves as established by the ceding company. This information is recorded into our records. For certain proportional contracts, we may require a detailed loss report for claims that exceed a certain dollar threshold or relate to a particular type of loss. Excess of loss and facultative contracts generally require individual loss reporting with precautionary notices provided when a loss reaches a significant percentage of the attachment point of the contract or when certain causes of loss or types of injury occur. Our experienced claims staff handles individual loss reports and supporting claim information. Based on our evaluation of a claim, we may establish additional case reserves (ACRs) in addition to the case reserves reported by the ceding company. To ensure ceding companies are submitting required and accurate data, the Underwriting, Claim, Reinsurance Accounting and Internal Audit departments of the Company perform various reviews of our ceding companies, particularly larger ceding companies, including
on-site audits of domestic ceding companies.
We sort both our reinsurance and insurance reserves into exposure groupings for actuarial analysis. We assign our business to exposure groupings so that the underlying exposures have reasonably homogeneous loss development characteristics and are large enough to facilitate credible estimation of ultimate losses. We periodically review our exposure groupings and we may change our groupings over time as our business changes. We currently use over 200 exposure groupings to develop our reserve estimates. One of the key selection characteristics for the exposure groupings is the historical duration of the claims settlement process. Business in which claims are reported and settled relatively quickly are commonly referred to as short tail lines, principally property lines. Casualty claims tend to take longer to be reported and settled and casualty lines are generally referred to as long tail lines. Our estimates of ultimate losses for shorter tail lines, with the exception of loss estimates for large catastrophic
events,
generally exhibit less volatility
than those for the longer tail lines.
We use similar actuarial methodologies, such as expected loss ratio, chain ladder reserving methods and Bornhuetter-Ferguson, supplemented by judgment where appropriate, to estimate our ultimate losses and LAE for each exposure group. Although we use similar actuarial methodologies for both short tail and long tail lines, the faster reporting of experience for the short tail lines allows us to have greater confidence in our estimates of ultimate losses for short tail lines at an earlier stage than for long tail lines. As a result, we utilize, as well, exposure-based methods to estimate our ultimate losses for longer tail lines, especially for immature accident years. For both short and long tail lines, we supplement these general approaches with analytically based 54 judgments. We cannot estimate losses from widespread catastrophic events, such as hurricanes and earthquakes, using traditional actuarial methods. We estimate losses for these types of events based on information derived from catastrophe models, quantitative and qualitative exposure analyses, reports and communications from ceding companies and development patterns for historically similar events. Due to the inherent uncertainty in estimating such losses, these estimates are subject to variability, which increases with
the severity and complexity of the underlying event.
Our key actuarial assumptions contain no explicit provisions for reserve uncertainty nor do we supplement the actuarially determined reserves for uncertainty. Our carried reserves at each reporting date are management's best estimate of ultimate unpaid losses and LAE at that date. We complete detailed reserve studies for each exposure group annually for our reinsurance and insurance operations. The completed annual reinsurance reserve studies are "rolled forward" for each accounting period until the subsequent reserve study is completed. Analyzing the roll-forward process involves comparing actual reported losses to expected losses based on the most recent reserve study. We analyze significant variances between actual and expected losses and also consider recent market, underwriting and management criteria to determine management's best estimate of ultimate unpaid losses and LAE. Management's best estimate is developed through collaboration with actuarial, underwriting, claims, legal and finance departments and culminates with the input of reserve committees. Each segment reserve committee
includes the participation of the relevant parties
from actuarial, finance, claims and segment senior management and has the responsibility for recommending and approving management's best estimate. Reserves are further reviewed by Everest's Chief Reserving Actuary and senior management. The objective of such process is to determine a single best estimate viewed by management to be the best estimate of its ultimate loss liability. As a result of these additional factors, in some instances the selected reserve level may be higher or lower than the
actuarial indicated estimate.
Given the inherent variability in our loss reserves, we have developed an estimated range of possible gross reserve levels. A table of ranges by segment, accompanied by commentary on potential and historical variability, is included in "Financial Condition - Loss and LAE Reserves". The ranges are statistically developed
using the exposure groups used in
the reserve estimation process
and aggregated to the segment
level. For each exposure group, our actuaries calculate a range for each accident year based principally on two variables. The first is the historical changes in losses and LAE incurred but not reported ("IBNR") for each accident year over time; the second is volatility of each accident year's held reserves related to estimated ultimate losses, also over time.
Both are measured at various
ages from the end of the accident year through
the final payout of the year's losses. Ranges are developed for the exposure groups using statistical methods to adjust for diversification; the ranges for the exposure groups are aggregated to the segment level, likewise, with an adjustment for diversification. Our estimates of our reserve variability may not be comparable to those of other companies because there are no consistently applied actuarial or accounting standards governing such presentations. Our recorded reserves reflect our best point estimate of our liabilities and our actuarial methodologies focus on developing such point estimates. We calculate the ranges subsequently, based on the historical variability of such reserves. Asbestos and Environmental Exposures. We continue to receive claims under expired insurance and reinsurance contracts asserting injuries and/or damages relating to or resulting from environmental pollution and hazardous substances, including asbestos. Environmental claims typically assert liability for (a) the mitigation or remediation of environmental contamination or (b) bodily injury or property damage caused by the release of hazardous substances into the land, air or water. Asbestos claims typically assert liability for bodily injury from exposure to asbestos or for
property damage resulting from asbestos
or products containing asbestos. Our reserves include an estimate of our ultimate liability for A&E claims. There are significant uncertainties surrounding our estimates of our potential losses from A&E claims. Among the uncertainties are: (a) potentially long waiting periods between exposure and manifestation of any bodily injury or property damage; (b) difficulty in identifying sources of asbestos or environmental contamination; (c) difficulty in properly allocating 55 responsibility and/or liability for asbestos or environmental damage; (d) changes in underlying laws and judicial interpretation of those laws; (e) the potential for an asbestos or environmental claim to involve many insurance providers over many policy periods; (f) questions concerning interpretation and application of insurance and reinsurance coverage; and (g) uncertainty regarding the number and identity of insureds with potential asbestos or environmental exposure. Due to the uncertainties discussed above, the ultimate losses attributable to
A&E, and particularly asbestos,
may
be subject to more variability
than are non-A&E reserves and such variation could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. See also ITEM 8, "Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data" - Notes 1 and 3
of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reinsurance Recoverables. We have purchased reinsurance to reduce our exposure to adverse claim experience, large claims and catastrophic loss occurrences. Our ceded reinsurance provides for recovery from reinsurers of a portion of losses and loss expenses under certain circumstances. Such reinsurance does not relieve us of our obligation to our policyholders. In the event our reinsurers are unable to meet their obligations under these agreements or are able to successfully challenge losses ceded by us under the contracts, we will not be able to realize the full value of the reinsurance recoverable balance. In some cases, we may hold full or partial collateral for the receivable, including letters of credit, trust assets and cash. Additionally, creditworthy foreign reinsurers of business written in theU.S. , as well as capital markets' reinsurance mechanisms, are generally required to secure their obligations. We have established reserves for uncollectible balances based on our assessment of the collectability of the outstanding balances. The allowance for uncollectible reinsurance reflects management's best estimate of reinsurance cessions that may be uncollectible in the future due to reinsurers' unwillingness or inability to pay. The allowance for uncollectible reinsurance comprises an allowance and an allowance for disputed balances. Based on this analysis, the Company may adjust the allowance for
uncollectible reinsurance or charge
off reinsurer balances that are
determined to be uncollectible.
Due to the inherent uncertainties as to collection and the length of time before reinsurance recoverable become due, it is possible that future adjustments to the Company's reinsurance recoverable, net of the allowance, could be required, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations or
cash flows in a particular quarter or annual period.
The allowance is estimated as the amount of reinsurance recoverable exposed to loss multiplied by estimated factors for the probability of default. The reinsurance recoverable exposed is the amount of reinsurance recoverable net of collateral and other offsets, considering the nature of the collateral, potential future changes in collateral values, and historical loss information for the type of collateral obtained. The probability of default factors are historical insurer and reinsurer defaults for liabilities with similar durations to the reinsured liabilities as estimated through multiple economic cycles. Credit ratings are forward-looking and consider a variety of economic outcomes. The Company's evaluation of the required allowance for reinsurance recoverable considers
the current economic environment
as well as macroeconomic scenarios.
The Company records credit loss expenses related to reinsurance recoverable in Incurred losses and loss
adjustment expenses in the Company's
consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive
income (loss). Write-offs of reinsurance recoverable and any related allowance are recorded in the period in which the balance is deemed uncollectible. Premiums Written and Earned. Premiums written by us are earned ratably over the coverage periods of the related insurance and reinsurance contracts. We establish unearned premium reserves to cover the unexpired portion of each contract. Such reserves, for assumed reinsurance, are computed using pro rata methods based on statistical data received from ceding companies. Premiums earned, and the related costs, which have not yet been reported to us, are estimated and accrued. Because of the inherent lag in the reporting of written and earned premiums by our ceding companies, we use standard accepted actuarial methodologies to estimate earned but not reported
premium at each financial reporting
date. These earned but not reported premiums are combined with reported earned premiums to comprise our total premiums earned for determination of our 56 incurred losses and loss and LAE reserves. Commission expense and incurred losses related to the change in earned but not reported premium are included in current period company and segment financial results. See also ITEM 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" - Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table displays
the estimated components of net earned but
not reported premiums by segment for the periods indicated. AtDecember 31 , (Dollars in millions) 2022 2021 2020 Reinsurance$ 2,255 $ 2,055 $ 1,774 Insurance - - - Total$ 2,255 $ 2,055 $ 1,774 (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Investment Valuation. Our fixed income investments are classified for accounting purposes as either available for sale or held to maturity. The available for sale fixed maturity securities are carried at fair value and the held to maturity fixed maturity portfolio is carried at amortized cost, net of current expected credit allowance on our consolidated balance sheets. Our equity securities are all carried at fair value. Most securities we own are traded on national exchanges where market values are readily available. Some of our commercial mortgage- backed securities ("CMBS") are valued using cash flow models and risk-adjusted discount rates. We hold some privately placed securities, less than 10% of the portfolio, that are either valued by investment advisors or the Company. In some instances, values provided by an investment advisor are supported with opinions from
qualified independent third parties.
The Company has procedures
in place to review the values
received from its investment advisors. AtDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, our investment portfolio included$3.8 billion and$2.6 billion , respectively, of limited partnership investments whose values are reported pursuant to the equity method of accounting. We carry these investments at values provided by the managements of the limited partnerships and due to inherent reporting lags, the carrying values are based on values with "as of" dates from one month to one quarter prior to our financial statement
date.
At
net unrealized losses on our available
for sale fixed maturity securities, net of tax, of$1.7 billion compared to net unrealized gains on our available for sale fixed maturity securities, net of tax, of$239 million atDecember 31, 2021 . Gains (losses) from market fluctuations on available for sale fixed maturity securities at fair value are reflected as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated balance sheets. Market value declines for available for sale fixed income portfolio, which are considered credit related, are reflected in our consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), as realized capital losses. We consider many factors when determining whether a market value decline is credit related, including: (1) we have no intent to sell and, more likely than not, will not be required to sell prior to recovery, (2) the length of time the market value has been below book value, (3) the credit strength of the issuer, (4) the issuer's market sector, (5) the length of time to maturity and (6) for asset-backed securities, changes in prepayments, credit enhancements and underlying default rates. If management's assessments change in the future, we may ultimately record a realized loss after management originally concluded that the decline in value was temporary. Fixed maturity securities designated as held to maturity consist of debt securities for which the Company has both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity or redemption and are reported at amortized cost, net of the current expected credit loss allowance. Interest income for fixed maturity securities held to maturity is determined in the same manner as interest income for fixed maturity securities available for sale. The Company evaluates fixed maturity securities classified as held to maturity for current expected credit losses utilizing risk characteristics of each security, including credit rating, remaining time to maturity, adjusted for prepayment considerations, and subordination level, and applying default and recovery rates, which include the 57 incorporation of historical credit loss experience and macroeconomic forecasts, to develop an estimate of current expected credit losses. See also ITEM 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" - Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. FINANCIAL CONDITION Investments. Total investments were$28.5 billion atDecember 31, 2022 , an increase of$241 million compared to$28.2 billion atDecember 31, 2021 . The rise in investments was primarily related to an increase in other invested assets, partially
offset by a decline in equity
securities.
The increase in other invested
assets was due to the inclusion of assets held for the implementation of a CompanyOwned Life Insurance ("COLI") program in the fourth quarter of 2022. A portion of the equity securities portfolio was sold in order to invest in the COLI assets
which accounted for the decline in equity
securities. The Company's limited partnership investments are comprised of limited partnerships that invest in private equity, private credit and private real estate. Generally, the limited partnerships are reported on a month or quarter lag. We receive annual audited financial statements for all of the limited partnerships which are prepared using fair value accounting in accordance with FASB guidance. For the quarterly reports, the Company reviews the financial reports for any unusual changes in carrying value. If the Company becomes aware of a significant decline in value during the lag reporting period, the loss will be recorded in the period in which the Company identifies the decline. The table below summarizes the composition and characteristics of our investment portfolio as of the dates indicated. AtDecember 31, 2022 2021 Fixed income portfolio duration (years) 3.1 3.2 Fixed income composite credit quality A+ A+ Reinsurance Recoverables . Reinsurance recoverables for both paid and unpaid losses totaled$2.2 billion atDecember 31, 2022 and$2.1 billion atDecember 31, 2021 . AtDecember 31, 2022 ,$520 million , or 23.2%, was recoverable fromMt. Logan Re collateralized segregated accounts;$283 million , or 12.6%, was recoverable from Munich Re and$148 million , or 6.6%, was recoverable from Endurance Re. No other retrocessionaire accounted for more than 5% of our recoverables. Loss and LAE Reserves. Gross loss and LAE reserves totaled$22.1 billion and
2022 and 2021, respectively. 58 The following tables summarize gross outstanding loss and LAE reserves by segment, classified by case reserves and IBNR reserves, for the periods indicated. AtDecember 31, 2022 Case IBNR Total % of (Dollars in millions) Reserves Reserves Reserves Total Reinsurance$ 6,045 $ 9,818 $ 15,862 71.9% Insurance 1,863 4,062 5,925 26.9% Total excluding A&E 7,908 13,880 21,787 98.7% A&E 138 140 278 1.3% Total including A&E$ 8,046 $ 14,019 $ 22,065 100.0% (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) AtDecember 31, 2021 Case IBNR Total % of (Dollars in millions) Reserves Reserves Reserves Total Reinsurance$ 5,415 $ 8,312 $ 13,727 72.2% Insurance 1,546 3,562 5,109 26.9% Total excluding A&E 6,961 11,875 18,836 99.1% A&E 164 10 174 0.9% Total including A&E$ 7,125 $ 11,885 $ 19,009 100.0% (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) Changes in premiums earned and business mix, reserve re-estimations, catastrophe losses and changes in catastrophe loss reserves
and claim settlement activity all impact loss and LAE
reserves by segment and in total. Our carried loss and LAE reserves represent management's best estimate of our ultimate liability for unpaid claims. We continuously re-evaluate our reserves, including re-estimates of prior period reserves, taking into consideration all available information and, in particular, newly reported loss and claim experience. Changes in reserves resulting from such re-evaluations are reflected in incurred losses in the period when the re-evaluation is made. Our analytical methods and processes operate at multiple levels including individual contracts, groupings of like contracts, classes and lines of business, internal business units, segments, accident years, legal entities, and in the aggregate. In order to set appropriate reserves, we make qualitative and quantitative analyses and judgments at these various levels. We utilize actuarial science, business expertise and management judgment in a manner intended to ensure the accuracy and consistency of our reserving practices. Management's best estimate is developed through collaboration with actuarial, underwriting, claims, legal and finance departments and culminates with the input of reserve committees. Each segment reserve committee
includes the participation of the relevant parties
from actuarial, finance, claims and segment senior management and has the responsibility for recommending and approving management's best estimate. Reserves are further reviewed by Everest's Chief Reserving Actuary and senior management. The objective of such process is to determine a single best estimate viewed by management to be the best estimate of its ultimate loss liability.
Nevertheless, our reserves are estimates,
which are subject to variation,
which may be significant. There can be no assurance that reserves for, and losses from, claim obligations will not increase in the future, possibly by a material amount. However, we believe that our existing reserves and reserving methodologies lessen the probability that any such increase would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
We have included ranges for loss reserve estimates determined by our actuaries, which have been developed through a combination of objective and subjective criteria. Our presentation of this information may not be directly comparable to similar presentations of other companies as there are no consistently applied actuarial or 59 accounting standards
governing such presentations.
Our recorded reserves are an aggregation of our best point estimates for approximately 200 reserve groups and reflect our best point estimate of our liabilities. Our
actuarial methodologies develop
point estimates rather than ranges and the ranges are developed subsequently based upon historical and prospective variability measures. The following table below represents the reserve levels and ranges for each of our business segments for the period indicated. Outstanding Reserves and Ranges By Segment (1) AtDecember 31, 2022 As Low Low High High (Dollars in millions) Reported Range % Range Range % Range Gross Reserves By Segment Reinsurance$ 15,862 -7.4%$ 14,689 7.8%$ 17,095 Insurance 5,925 -9.9% 5,340 10.8% 6,565 Total Gross Reserves (excluding A&E) 21,787 -8.1% 20,029 8.6% 23,660 A&E (All Segments) 278 -22.9% 214 22.7% 341 Total Gross Reserves$ 22,065 -8.3% 20,243 8.8% 24,001 (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) ______________________________________________________ (1) There can be no assurance that reserves
will not ultimately exceed the
indicated ranges requiring additional
income (loss) statement expense. Depending on the specific segment, the range derived for the loss reserves, excluding reserves for A&E exposures, ranges from minus 7.4% to minus 9.9% for the low range and from plus 7.8% to plus 10.8% for the high range. Both the higher and lower ranges are associated with the Insurance segment. The size of the range is dependent upon the level of confidence associated with the reserve estimates. Within each range, management's best estimate of loss reserves is based upon the point estimate derived by our actuaries in detailed reserve studies. Such ranges are necessarily subjective due to the lack of generally accepted actuarial standards with respect to their development. There can be no assurance that our claim obligations will not vary outside of these ranges. Additional losses, including those relating to latent injuries, and other exposures, which are as yet unrecognized, the type or magnitude of which cannot be foreseen by us or the reinsurance and insurance industry generally, may emerge in the future. Such future emergence, to the extent not covered by existing retrocessional contracts, could have material adverse effects on our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Asbestos and Environmental Exposures.
A&E exposures represent a separate
exposure group for monitoring and evaluating reserve adequacy. With respect to asbestos only, atDecember 31, 2022 , we had net asbestos loss reserves of$233 million , or
90.5%, of total net A&E reserves, all of which was
for assumed business. See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of Asbestos and Environmental Exposures. Ultimate loss projections for A&E liabilities cannot be accomplished using standard actuarial techniques. We believe that our A&E reserves represent management's best estimate of the ultimate liability; however, there
can be no assurance that ultimate loss
payments will not exceed such reserves,
perhaps by a significant amount.
Industry analysts use the "survival ratio" to compare the A&E reserves among companies with such liabilities.
The survival ratio is typically calculated
by dividing a company's
current net reserves by the three year
average of 60 annual paid losses. Hence, the survival ratio equals the number of years that it would take to exhaust the current reserves if future loss payments were to continue at historical levels. Using this measurement, our net three year asbestos survival ratio was 6.9 years atDecember 31, 2022 . These metrics can be skewed by individual large settlements occurring in the prior three years and therefore, may not be indicative of the timing of future payments.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital. Shareholders' equity atDecember 31, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 was$8.4 billion and$10.1 billion , respectively. Management's objective in managing capital is to ensure its overall capital level, as well as the capital levels of its operating subsidiaries, exceed the amounts required by regulators, the amount needed to support our current financial strength ratings from rating agencies and our own economic capital models. The Company's capital
has historically exceeded these benchmark
levels. Our two main operating companiesBermuda Re andEverest Re are regulated by theBermuda Monetary Authority ("BMA") and theState of Delaware , Department of Insurance, respectively. Both regulatory bodies have their own capital adequacy models based on statutory capital as opposed to GAAP basis equity. Failure to meet the required statutory capital levels could result in various regulatory restrictions, including business
activity and the payment of dividends to
their parent companies.
The regulatory targeted
capital and the actual statutory
capital for Bermuda Re and Everest
Re were as follows: Bermuda Re (1)Everest Re (2) AtDecember 31 , AtDecember 31 , (Dollars in millions) 2022 (3) 2021 2022 2021 Regulatory targeted capital $ -$ 2,169 $ 3,353 $ 2,960 Actual capital$ 2,759 $ 3,184 $ 5,553 $ 5,717 (1)
Regulatory targeted capital represents
the target capital level from
the applicable year's BSCR calculation. (2)
Regulatory targeted capital represents
200% of the RBC authorized control
level calculation for the applicable
year.
(3)
The 2022 BSCR calculation is not
yet due to be completed;
however,
the Company anticipates that
Bermuda Re's December
31, 2022 actual capital will
exceed
the targeted capital level. Our financial strength ratings as determined byA.M. Best , Moody's andStandard & Poor's are important as they provide our customers and investors with an independent assessment of our financial strength using a rating scale that provides for relative comparisons. We continue to possess significant financial flexibility and access to debt and equity markets as a result of our financial strength, as evidenced by the financial strength ratings as
assigned by independent rating agencies.
See also ITEM 1, Business - "Financial Strength Ratings".
We maintain our own economic capital models to monitor and project our overall capital, as well as, the capital at our operating subsidiaries. A key input to the economic models is projected income and this input is
continually compared to actual results,
which may require a change in the capital
strategy. In 2022, we repurchased 241,273 shares for$61 million in the open market and paid$255 million in dividends. During 2021, we repurchased 887,622 shares for$225 million in the open market and paid$247 million in dividends. We may at times enter into a Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan agreement to facilitate the repurchase of shares. OnMay 22, 2020 , our existing Board authorization to purchase up to 30 million of our shares was amended to authorize the purchase of up to 32 million shares. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had repurchased 30.8 million shares under this authorization. We repurchased$6 million of our long term subordinated notes during the third quarter of 2022 and recognized a gain of$1 million on the repurchase. We may continue, from time to time, to seek to retire portions of our outstanding debt securities through cash repurchases, in open-market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will be subject to and depend on prevailing market 61 conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved in any
such transactions, individually or in the aggregate,
may be material. OnOctober 7, 2020 , we issued an additional$1.0 billion of 30 year senior notes with an interest coupon rate of 3.5%.
These senior notes will mature on October
15, 2050 and will pay interest
semi-annually. OnOctober 4, 2021 , we issued an additional$1.0 billion of 31 year senior notes with an interest coupon rate of 3.125%.
These senior notes will mature on
will pay interest semi-annually. Liquidity. Our liquidity requirements are generally met from positive cash flow from operations. Positive cash flow results from reinsurance and insurance premiums being collected prior to disbursements for claims, which disbursements generally take place over an extended period after the collection of premiums, sometimes a period of many years. Collected premiums are generally invested, prior to their use in such disbursements, and investment income provides additional funding for loss payments. Our net cash flows from operating activities were$3.7 billion and$3.8 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Additionally, these cash flows reflected net catastrophe loss payments of$677 million and$834 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively and net tax payments of$171 million and$98 million for the years
ended
If disbursements for claims and benefits, policy acquisition costs and other operating expenses were to exceed premium inflows, cash flow from reinsurance and insurance operations would be negative. The effect on cash flow from insurance operations would be partially offset by cash flow from investment income. Additionally, cash inflows from investment maturities - both short-term investments and longer term maturities are available to supplement other operating cash flows. We do not expect to supplement negative insurance operations cash flows from investment dispositions. As the timing of payments for claims and benefits cannot be predicted with certainty, we maintain portfolios of long term invested assets with varying maturities, along with short-term investments that provide additional liquidity for payment of claims. AtDecember 31, 2022 andDecember 31, 2021 , we held cash and short -term investments of$2.4 billion and$2.6 billion , respectively. Our short-term investments are generally readily marketable and can be converted to cash. In addition to these cash and short-term investments, atDecember 31, 2022 , we had$1.3 billion of available for sale fixed maturity securities maturing within one year or less,$7.5 billion maturing within one to five years and$5.3 billion maturing after five years. Our$281 million of equity securities are comprised primarily of publicly traded securities that can be easily liquidated. We believe that these fixed
maturity and equity securities,
in conjunction with the short -term investments and positive cash flow from operations, provide ample sources of liquidity for the expected payment of losses in the near future. We do not anticipate selling a significant amount
of securities or using available
credit facilities to pay losses and LAE but have the ability to do so. Sales of securities might result in realized capital gains or losses. AtDecember 31, 2022 we had$1.9 billion of net pre-tax unrealized depreciation related to available for sale fixed maturity securities, comprised of$2.0 billion of pre-tax unrealized depreciation and$81 million of pre-tax unrealized appreciation. Management generally expects annual positive cash flow from operations, which reflects the strength of overall pricing. However, given the recent set of catastrophic events, cash flow from operations may decline and could become negative in the near term as
significant claim payments are
made related to the catastrophes.
However, as indicated above, the Company has ample liquidity to settle its catastrophe claims and/or any payments due for its catastrophe bond program.
In addition to our cash flows from operations
and liquid investments, we also have
multiple active credit facilities that provide commitments of up to$1.5 billion of collateralized standby letters of credit to support business written by ourBermuda operating subsidiaries. In addition, the Company has the ability to request access to an additional$440 million of uncommitted credit facilities, which would require approval from the applicable 62 lender. There is no guarantee the uncommitted capacity will be available to us on a future date. See Note 5 - Credit Facilities for further details. Exposure to Catastrophes. Like other insurance and reinsurance companies, we are exposed to multiple insured losses arising out of a
single occurrence, whether a
natural event, such as a hurricane or an earthquake, or other catastrophe, such as an explosion at a major factory. A large catastrophic event can be expected to generate insured losses to multiple reinsurance treaties, facultative certificates and direct insurance policies across
various lines of business.
We focus on potential losses that could result from any single event, or series of events as part of our evaluation and monitoring of our aggregate exposures to catastrophic events. Accordingly, we employ various techniques to estimate the amount of loss we could sustain from
any single catastrophic
event or series of events in various geographic areas. These techniques range from deterministic approaches, such as tracking aggregate limits exposed in catastrophe-prone zones and applying reasonable damage factors, to modeled approaches that attempt to scientifically measure catastrophe loss exposure using sophisticated Monte Carlo simulation
techniques that forecast
frequency and severity of potential losses
on a probabilistic basis. No single computer model or group of models is currently capable of projecting the amount and probability of loss in all global geographic regions in which we conduct business. In addition, the form, quality and granularity of underwriting exposure data furnished by (re)insureds is not uniformly compatible with the data requirements for our licensed models, which adds to the inherent imprecision in the potential loss projections. Further, the results from multiple models and analytical methods must be combined to estimate potential losses by and across business units. Also, while most models have been updated to incorporate claims information from recent catastrophic events, catastrophe model projections are still inherently imprecise. In addition, uncertainties with respect to future climatic patterns and cycles could add further uncertainty to loss projections from models based on historical data. Nevertheless, when combined with traditional risk management techniques and sound underwriting judgment, catastrophe models are a useful tool for underwriters to price catastrophe exposed risks and for providing management with quantitative analyses with which to monitor and manage catastrophic risk exposures by zone and across zones for individual and multiple events. Projected catastrophe losses are generally summarized in terms of the PML. We define PML as our anticipated loss, taking into account contract terms and limits, caused by a single catastrophe affecting a broad contiguous geographic area, such as that caused by a hurricane or earthquake. The PML will vary depending upon the modeled simulated losses and the make-up of the in force book of business. The projected severity levels are described in terms of "return periods", such as "100-year events" and "250-year events". For example, a 100- year PML is the estimated loss to the current in-force portfolio from a single event which has a 1% probability of being exceeded in a twelve month period. In other words, it corresponds to a 99% probability that the loss from a single event will fall below the indicated PML. It is important to note that PMLs are estimates. Modeled events are hypothetical events produced by a stochastic model. As a result, there can be no assurance that any actual event will align with the modeled event or that actual losses from events similar to the modeled events
will not vary materially from the modeled event
PML. From an enterprise risk management perspective, management sets limits on the levels of catastrophe loss exposure we may underwrite. The limits are revised periodically based on a variety of factors, including but not limited to our financial resources and expected earnings and risk/reward analyses of the business being underwritten. Management estimates that the projected net economic loss from its largest 100-year event in a given zone is to an Earthquake event affectingCalifornia which represents approximately 6.9% of itsDecember 31, 2022 shareholders' equity. Economic loss is the PML exposure, net of third party reinsurance including catastrophe industry loss warranty cover, reduced by estimated reinstatement premiums to renew coverage and estimated 63 income taxes. The impact of income taxes on the PML depends on the distribution of the losses by corporate entity, which is also affected by inter-affiliate reinsurance. Management also monitors and controls its largest PMLs at multiple points along the loss distribution curve, such as loss amounts at the 20, 50, 100, 250, and 500 year return periods. This process enables management to identify and control exposure accumulations and to integrate such exposures
into enterprise risk, underwriting and capital
management decisions. Our catastrophe loss projections, segmented by risk zones, are updated quarterly and reviewed as part of a
formal risk management review
process. We believe that our greatest worldwide 1 in 100 year exposure to a single catastrophic event is to a hurricane event affectingSoutheast U.S. , where we estimate we have a PML exposure, net of third party reinsurance including catastrophe industry loss warranty cover, of$878 million . See also table under ITEM 1, "Business - Risk
Management of Underwriting and Retrocession
Arrangements". If such a single catastrophe loss were to occur, management estimates that the net economic loss to us would be approximately$515 million . The estimate involves multiple variables, including which Everest entity would
experience the loss, and as a result there can be no
assurance that this amount would not be exceeded. We may purchase reinsurance to cover specific business written or the potential accumulation or aggregation of exposures across some or all of our operations. Reinsurance purchasing decisions consider both the potential coverage and market conditions including the pricing, terms, conditions, availability and collectability of coverage, with the aim of securing cost effective protection
from financially secure counterparts.
The amount of reinsurance purchased has varied
over
time, reflecting our view of our exposures
and the cost of reinsurance. Information Technology. Everest's information technology is a key component of its business operations. Information technology systems and services are hosted at public and private cloud service providers across multiple datacenters with processing performed at the office locations of our operating subsidiaries and branches. We have implemented security procedures, and regularly assess and enhance our security protocols, to ensure that our key business systems are protected, secured and backed up at off-site locations so that they can be restored promptly if necessary. We have business continuity plans and disaster recovery plans along with periodic testing of those plans to ensure we are capable of providing uninterrupted technology services in the event of major systems
outages with alternative secure datacenters
available in case of broader outages.
Our business operations depend on the proper functioning and availability of our information technology platform, which includes data processing and related electronic communications. We communicate electronically internally and externally with our brokers, program managers, clients, third-party vendors, regulators, and others. These communications and the data we handle may include personal, confidential or proprietary information. We ensure that all our systems, data and electronic transmissions are appropriately
protected with the latest technology
safeguards and meet regulatory
standards.
Despite these safeguards,
a significant cyber incident,
including system failure, security breach and disruption by malware or other damage could interrupt or delay our operations and possibly our results. This type of incident may result in a violation of applicable data security, privacy, or other laws, damage our reputation, cause a loss of customers or give rise to regulatory scrutiny as well as monetary fines and other penalties. Management is
not aware of a cybersecurity incident that
has had a material impact on our operations.
64 Expected Cash Outflows. The following table shows our significant expected cash outflows for the period indicated. Payments due by period Less than More than (Dollars in millions) Total 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years 5 years Senior notes$ 2,400 $ - $ - $ -$ 2,400 Long term notes 219 - - - 219 Interest expense (1) 3,018 101 202 202 2,513 Operating lease agreements 187 21 38 32 95 Gross reserve for losses and LAE (2) 22,065 2,430 7,971 5,230 6,435 Total$ 28,409 $ 3,071 $ 8,211 $ 5,464 $ 11,662 (Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.) (1) Interest expense on long term notes is calculated
at the variable floating rate of 6.99% as of
December 31, 2022 . (2) Loss and LAE reserves represent management's best estimate of losses from claim and related settlement costs. Both the amounts and timing of such payments are estimates, and the inherent variability of resolving claims as well as changes in market conditions make the timing of cash flows uncertain. Therefore, the ultimate amount and timing of loss and LAE payments could differ from our estimates. The cash outflows for senior notes and long term notes are the responsibility of Holdings. We strive to ensure that we have sufficient cash flow, liquidity, investments and access to capital markets to satisfy these obligations. Holdings generally depends upon dividends fromEverest Re , its operating insurance subsidiary for its funding, capital contributions from Group or access to the capital markets. Our various operating insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries have sufficient cash flow, liquidity and investments to settle outstanding reserves for losses and LAE. Management believes that
we, and each of our entities,
have sufficient financial resources or ready access thereto, to meet all obligations. Dividends. During 2022 and 2021, we declared and paid common shareholder dividends of$255 million and$247 million , respectively. As an insurance holding company, we are partially dependent on dividends and other permitted payments from our subsidiaries to pay cash dividends to our shareholders. The payment of dividends to Group by HoldingsIreland andEverest Dublin Holdings is subject to Irish corporate and regulatory restrictions; the payment of dividends to HoldingsIreland by Holdings and to Holdings byEverest Re is subject toDelaware regulatory restrictions; and the payment of dividends to Group byBermuda Re, Everest International, Everest Preferred International Holdings ("Preferred Holdings"), EverestRe Advisors Ltd. ("Advisors Re") orMt. Logan Re is subject toBermuda insurance regulatory restrictions. Management expects that, absent extraordinary catastrophe losses, such restrictions should not affectEverest Re's ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support Holdings' general corporate needs and that HoldingsIreland ,Everest Dublin Holdings,Bermuda Re and Everest International will have the ability to declare and pay dividends sufficient to support Group's general corporate needs. For the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021,Everest Re paid$250 million and$0 million of cash dividends to Holdings. For the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021,Bermuda Re paid cash dividends to Group of$430 million and$300 million , respectively; Everest International paid no cash dividends to Group; Preferred Holdings paid cash dividends to Group of$46 million and$10 million , respectively; Advisors Re paid cash dividends to Group of$0 million and$10 million , respectively; andMt. Logan Re paid no cash dividends to Group. See ITEM 1, "Business - Regulatory Matters - Dividends" and ITEM 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" - Note 14 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Market Sensitive Instruments. TheSEC's Financial Reporting Release #48 requires registrants to clarify and expand upon the existing financial statement disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments and
other financial instruments (collectively,
"market sensitive instruments"). We do not generally enter into market sensitive instruments for trading purposes. 65 Our current investment strategy seeks to maximize after-tax income through a high quality, diversified, fixed maturity portfolio, while maintaining an adequate level of liquidity. Our mix of investments is adjusted periodically, consistent with our current and projected operating results and market conditions. The fixed maturity securities in the investment portfolio are comprised of non-trading securities. Additionally, we have
invested in equity securities.
The overall investment strategy considers the scope of present and anticipated Company operations. In particular, estimates of the financial impact resulting from non-investment asset and liability transactions, together with our capital structure and other factors, are used to develop a net liability analysis. This analysis includes estimated payout characteristics for which our investments provide liquidity. This analysis is considered in the development of specific investment strategies for asset allocation, duration and credit quality. The change in overall market sensitive
risk exposure principally reflects
the asset changes that took place during the period.
Interest Rate Risk. Our$29.9 billion investment portfolio atDecember 31, 2022 , is principally comprised of fixed maturity securities, which are generally subject to interest rate risk and some foreign currency exchange rate
risk, and some equity securities, which are subject to price
fluctuations and some foreign exchange
rate risk. The overall economic impact of the foreign exchange risks on the investment portfolio is partially mitigated by changes in the dollar value of foreign currency denominated liabilities and their associated income statement impact. Interest rate risk is the potential change in value of the fixed maturity securities portfolio, including short-term investments, from a change in market interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, it includes prepayment risk on the$4.0 billion of mortgage -backed securities in the$23.1 billion fixed maturity portfolio. Prepayment risk results from potential accelerated principal payments that shorten the average life and thus the
expected yield of the security.
The tables below display the potential impact of market value fluctuations and after-tax unrealized appreciation on our fixed maturity portfolio (including$1.0 billion of short-term investments) for the period indicated based on upward and downward parallel and immediate 100 and 200 basis point shifts in interest rates. For legal entities with aU.S. dollar functional currency, this modeling was performed on each security individually. To generate appropriate price estimates on mortgage
-backed securities, changes in prepayment
expectations under different interest rate environments were taken into account. For legal entities with a non-U.S. dollar functional currency, the effective duration of the involved portfolio of securities was used as a proxy for the market value
change under the various interest
rate change scenarios.
Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points AtDecember 31, 2022 -200 -100 - 100 200 (Dollars in millions) Total Fair Value$ 25,618 $ 24,863 $ 24,107 $ 23,352 $ 22,596 Fair Value Change from Base (%) 6.3% 3.1% -% (3.1)% (6.3)% Change in Unrealized Appreciation After-tax from Base ($)$ 1,316 $ 658 $ -$ (658) $ (1,316) Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points AtDecember 31, 2021 -200 -100 - 100 200 (Dollars in millions) Total Fair Value$ 24,973 $ 24,230 $ 23,487 $ 22,744 $ 22,001 Fair Value Change from Base (%) 6.3% 3.2% -% (3.2)% (6.3)% Change in Unrealized Appreciation After-tax from Base ($)$ 1,294 $ 647 $ -$ (647) $ (1,294) 66 We had$22.1 billion and$19.0 billion of gross reserves for losses and LAE as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These amounts are recorded at their nominal value, as opposed to present value, which would reflect a discount adjustment to reflect the time value of money. Since losses are paid out over a period of time, the present value of the reserves is less than the nominal value. As interest rates rise, the present value of the reserves decreases and, conversely, as interest rates decline, the present value increases. These movements are the opposite of the interest rate impacts on the fair value of investments. While the difference between present value and nominal value is not reflected in our financial statements, our financial results will include investment income over time from the investment portfolio until the claims are paid. Our loss and loss reserve obligations have an expected duration of approximately 3.8 years, which is reasonably consistent with our fixed income portfolio. If we were to discount our loss and LAE reserves, net of ceded reserves, the discount would be approximately$3.6 billion resulting in a discounted reserve balance of approximately$16.4 billion , representing
approximately 67.9% of the value
of the fixed maturity investment
portfolio funds. Equity Risk. Equity risk is the potential change in fair and/or market value of the common stock, preferred stock and mutual fund portfolios
arising from changing prices.
Our equity investments consist of a diversified portfolio of individual securities and mutual funds, which invest principally in high quality common and preferred stocks that are traded on the major exchanges. The primary objective of the equity portfolio is to obtain greater total return relative to our core
bonds over time through market
appreciation and income.
The tables below display the impact on fair/market
value and after-tax change
in fair/market value
of a 10% and 20% change in equity prices up and down for the period indicated. Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values AtDecember 31, 2022 (Dollars in millions) -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Fair Value of the Equity Portfolio$ 225 $ 253 $ 281 $ 309 $ 337 After-tax Change in Fair Value$ (46) $ (23) $ -$ 23 $ 46 Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values AtDecember 31, 2021 (Dollars in millions) -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Fair Value of the Equity Portfolio$ 1,461 $ 1,643 $ 1,826 $ 2,009 $ 2,191 After-tax Change in Fair Value$ (290) $ (145) $ -$ 145 $ 290 Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency risk is the potential change in value, income and cash flow arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Each of our non-U.S. /Bermuda ("foreign") operations maintains capital in the currency of the country of its geographic location consistent with local regulatory guidelines. Each foreign operation may conduct business in its local currency, as well as the currency of other countries in which it operates. The primary foreign currency exposures for these foreign operations are the Canadian Dollar, theSingapore Dollar, the British Pound Sterling and the Euro. We mitigate foreign exchange exposure by generally matching the currency and duration of our assets to our corresponding operating liabilities. In accordance with FASB guidance, the impact on the market value of available for sale fixed maturities due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, in relation to functional currency, is reflected as part of other comprehensive income. Conversely, the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, in relation to functional currency, on other assets and liabilities is reflected through net income as a component of other income (expense). In addition, we translate the assets, liabilities and income of non-U.S. dollar functional currency legal entities to theU.S. dollar. This translation amount is reported as a component of other comprehensive income. 67 The tables below display the potential impact of a parallel and immediate 10%
and 20% increase and decrease
in foreign exchange rates on the valuation of invested assets subject to foreign currency exposure for the periods indicated. This analysis includes the after-tax impact of translation from transactional currency to functional currency as well as the after-tax impact of translation from functional currency to theU.S. dollar reporting currency. Change in Foreign Exchange Rates in Percent AtDecember 31, 2022 (Dollars in millions) -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Total After-tax Foreign Exchange Exposure$ (814) $ (407) $ -$ 407 $ 814 Change in Foreign Exchange Rates in Percent AtDecember 31, 2021 (Dollars in millions) -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% Total After-tax Foreign Exchange Exposure$ (688) $ (344) $ -$ 303 $ 606 Safe Harbor Disclosure. This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of theU.S. federal securities laws. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in the federal securities laws. In some cases, these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "may", "will", "should", "could", "anticipate", "estimate", "expect", "plan", "believe", "predict", "potential" and "intend". Forward-looking statements contained in this report include information regarding our reserves for losses and LAE, the impact of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act, the adequacy of capital in relation to regulatory required capital, the adequacy of our provision for uncollectible balances, estimates of our catastrophe exposure, the effects of catastrophic and pandemic events on our financial statements, the ability ofEverest Re, Holdings , HoldingsIreland , Dublin Holdings,Bermuda Re and Everest International to pay dividends and the settlement costs of our specialized equity index put option contracts. Forward-looking statements only reflect our expectations and are not guarantees of performance. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause our actual events or results to be materially different from our expectations include those discussed under the caption ITEM 1A, "Risk Factors". We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK See "Market Sensitive Instruments"
in ITEM 7.
New indictment accuses Greg Lindberg of misappropriating millions
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP LTD. – 10-K – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News