EDITORIAL: Roberts rules of order on Obamacare
You didn't have to read between the lines.
You didn't need to know the subtleties of the government's defense of a legal challenge to Obamacare: That Congress had flubbed in drafting the law but everyone knew what
"Words no longer have meaning if an exchange that is not established by a state is 'established by the state'," Scalia wrote in his icy dissent. "Under all the usual rules of interpretation, in short, the government should lose this case. But normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved."
Obamacare? "We should start calling this law SCOTUScare," Scalia wrote.
Zing.
And the conservative chief justice -- yes, he still tends to be a conservative -- wrote the majority opinion in the 6-3 ruling issued Thursday.
It does remind us of the long-ago comment from Mayor
At any rate, the majority accepted the argument that, despite what the law's language said,
"
Millions of people whose coverage was at risk, including more than 200,000 people in
While the legal challenges to Obamacare are winding down, big financial and structural challenges remain.
Many insurers are seeking big premium increases for the next year. Many Americans who signed up for health coverage earlier this year have fallen off the rolls because they didn't pay their premiums.
President
It's time, though, to move on some changes that would preserve the best-liked elements of Obamacare while easing some of the financial pressures, and reverse incentives it has created.
Among them:
--Ease the mandate that forces employers to cover employees who work 30 hours a week or more as full-timers. Setting that standard at 40 hours would encourage employers not to greatly curb workers' hours or cut full-time jobs.
--Exempt businesses that have fewer than 100 employees from the mandate to provide coverage that kicks in next year. Many small businesses can't afford it.
--Offer Americans more choices for coverage. A proposed "copper" option, for instance, would appeal to people who want low premiums and protection from the cost of treating a catastrophic illness or injury.
Call it Obamacare or SCOTUScare, it's the law of the land. It can be vastly improved. It should be.
___
(c)2015 the Chicago Tribune
Visit the Chicago Tribune at www.chicagotribune.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


Advisor News
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
- Poor money habits are a dealbreaker in a new relationship
- DC plan sponsors see opportunity in alternatives
- The American Dream: Redefined as financial stability
- Partial annuitization: How advisors can help clients balance income, growth
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CA judge certifies class action in teachers’ lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Managing Director Joins ‘Target Topics’ Podcast to Discuss State of Delegated Underwriting Authority Enterprises Market
- KBRA Assigns Rating to TruSpire Retirement Insurance Company
- Partial annuitization: How advisors can help clients balance income, growth
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Copay assistance is meant to defray patient drug costs. Some insurers keep it instead
- Amid claims of 'playing politics,' Auburn council amends city manager's contract
- OCWNY to hold seminar for disability beneficiaries Friday
- Atrium pushes back after State Health Plan leaves healthcare network out of Tier 1
- Douglas Veterans Claims Clinic Connects Rural Veterans With Critical Services
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Upgrades Credit Ratings of Sagicor Financial Company Ltd. and Most of Its Subsidiaries
- Trust, technology and the future of claims
- New York Life Launches an Indemnity Benefit for its Asset Flex Long-Term Care Insurance Solution
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of DB Insurance Co., Ltd.
More Life Insurance News