Don't abandon New York's children with autism: The impact of medicaid cuts on ABA therapy
To the editor:
As a developmental pediatrician and the parent of a daughter on the spectrum, I live this. I have seen first-hand how access to ABA therapy can change lives. ABA, the most proven-to-be-effective treatment for autism, helps children develop essential communication and social and daily living skills. Providing ABA early in life is crucial, with research showing that children who receive those services at a young age have significantly better long-term outcomes.
For years, Medicaid did not cover ABA therapy in
Now, just two years later, the state is poised to reverse that progress with drastic funding cuts. The proposed reductions will make it even harder for families to find behavioral providers, as low reimbursement rates already deter many ABA professionals from accepting Medicaid patients. The cuts will also reduce services during the critical Early Intervention (0-3 year) period, when ABA is most crucial.
This is not just a health issue, it is a social justice issue. Well-off families will continue to obtain ABA through private health insurance or paying out of pocket, while poor families will be left with limited or no access to the same life-changing services. These cuts will deepen existing disparities in autism care, disproportionately impacting communities that are already underserved.
Beyond the ethical implications, these cuts are fiscally irresponsible. Failing to provide ABA therapy in early childhood leads to higher special education and mental healthcare costs later in life. Many children on the autism spectrum go on to develop significant mental health challenges, requiring expensive crisis care and long-term state-funded support. The state is already spending billions on crisis intervention and mental health services for individuals with developmental disabilities – yet is it now proposing to slash funding for the very therapy that could prevent these crises from occurring.
Imagine a river where people keep falling in, struggling to stay afloat. Instead of investing in guardrails and safety measures upstream, we keep spending money on emergency rescues. Cutting ABA funding is like removing those guardrails – and more people will fall into the river rather than preventing the problems at their source.



CT bill would prohibit AI use by health insurers
FHSU's Robbins Banking Institute hosts Federal Reserve Governor Bowman
Advisor News
- House panel votes to raise certain taxes, transfer money to offset Medicaid shortfall
- Iowa House backs temporary tax hike to fill Medicaid gap
- Iowa Medicaid temporary tax plan draws sharp public opposition
- Charitable giving planning can strengthen advisor/client relationships
- New $6K deduction could provide tax planning window for retirees
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- We can help find a loved one’s life insurance policy
- 2025: A record-breaking year for annuity sales via banks and BDs
- Lincoln Financial launches two new FIAs
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company trademark request filed
- The forces shaping life and annuities in 2026
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CT leaders debate how to fix health care: Blunt federal cuts, up reimbursement or kill private health care?
- When health insurance costs $2,500 per month, families make tough choices
- In U.S. Health Insurance Market, Consolidation Of Insurers Is Increasing Premiums
- Health insurance jargon can be frustrating and confusing – here's how to navigate it
- Minnesota Blue Cross CEO steps down from Sutter Health board over conflict of interest
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Murray Giles Hulse
- New individual life premium hits record-setting $17.5B in 2025
- Maryland orders Cigna to halt underpaying doctors or give cause
- Insurers optimistic about their investments in 2026
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of PVI Insurance Corporation
More Life Insurance News