Don't abandon New York's children with autism: The impact of medicaid cuts on ABA therapy
To the editor:
As a developmental pediatrician and the parent of a daughter on the spectrum, I live this. I have seen first-hand how access to ABA therapy can change lives. ABA, the most proven-to-be-effective treatment for autism, helps children develop essential communication and social and daily living skills. Providing ABA early in life is crucial, with research showing that children who receive those services at a young age have significantly better long-term outcomes.
For years, Medicaid did not cover ABA therapy in
Now, just two years later, the state is poised to reverse that progress with drastic funding cuts. The proposed reductions will make it even harder for families to find behavioral providers, as low reimbursement rates already deter many ABA professionals from accepting Medicaid patients. The cuts will also reduce services during the critical Early Intervention (0-3 year) period, when ABA is most crucial.
This is not just a health issue, it is a social justice issue. Well-off families will continue to obtain ABA through private health insurance or paying out of pocket, while poor families will be left with limited or no access to the same life-changing services. These cuts will deepen existing disparities in autism care, disproportionately impacting communities that are already underserved.
Beyond the ethical implications, these cuts are fiscally irresponsible. Failing to provide ABA therapy in early childhood leads to higher special education and mental healthcare costs later in life. Many children on the autism spectrum go on to develop significant mental health challenges, requiring expensive crisis care and long-term state-funded support. The state is already spending billions on crisis intervention and mental health services for individuals with developmental disabilities – yet is it now proposing to slash funding for the very therapy that could prevent these crises from occurring.
Imagine a river where people keep falling in, struggling to stay afloat. Instead of investing in guardrails and safety measures upstream, we keep spending money on emergency rescues. Cutting ABA funding is like removing those guardrails – and more people will fall into the river rather than preventing the problems at their source.
CT bill would prohibit AI use by health insurers
FHSU's Robbins Banking Institute hosts Federal Reserve Governor Bowman
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News