Dems snub medical malpractice reform
Long before the legislative session started, a full-page ad accosted readers with this headline: “Medical corporations & insurance companies blame patients harmed by medical malpractice for the healthcare crisis so they can distract us from the billions of dollars in profit that go to their out-of-state corporate headquarters.”
Whoa! Nobody is blaming patients who are victims of medical malpractice. And, looking at New Mexico’s ragged hospital network, there’s more red ink than black ink.
“The high cost of malpractice insurance, and the high likelihood of being sued discourage doctors and other health care workers from practicing in New Mexico,” the report concluded.
Right after Think New Mexico announced its plan, the above advertisement appeared, claiming “real solutions to the healthcare crisis.” It was paid for by New Mexico Safety Over Profti (NMSOP), a new group. Its website lists a spokeswoman but not offci ers, board members or funding sources. It appears to be closely aligned with the
NMSOP’s big concerns are “corporate greed” and “holding corporations responsible for harm.” The group wants you to believe our ills are the result of “medical corporations and insurance companies (that) prioritize profit to take back to their out of state headquarters and shareholders.”
To be fair, ownership by private equity firms and corporate giants is a huge issue, but that’s nationally and not so much here.
With this backdrop, Sen.
SB 176 would cap fees at 25% of the money awarded if a case is settled or 33% if a case goes to trial. Currently,
What if the estimate is wrong?
And SB 176 would also use punitive damage verdicts to improve patient safety and reduce future malpractice. Currently,
This should not be a partisan issue. But a day after
Senate Majority Leader
“Undoing these important changes to the law now will only harm patients and allow insurance companies to evade responsibility for compensating hurting families,” said Wirth, a lawyer.
NMSOP couldn’t have said it better.
The governor recognizes the problem: “Insurance rates for doctors and healthcare providers shouldn’t be any higher in
Her solution is state-sponsored medical malpractice insurance, but she hasn’t offered details.
Contrary to what you might hear, reformers do want to protect injured patients, but they would ratchet down attorney payouts from stratospheric to earthly.
Contact


State Farm asks for more insurance rate increases after LA fires
Trump’s executive orders leave imprint on the Fed
Advisor News
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Minnesota seniors face tough choices for health plans
- Recent Findings from New York University (NYU) Langone Health Provide New Insights into Managed Care (State Medicaid Body Mass Index Requirements for Solid Organ Transplant Coverage: A 50-State Policy Review): Managed Care
- After booting 760K off ACA health plans, the Trump administration adds some people back
- New Findings from University of Hawaii at Manoa in the Area of Science Reported (Expanded Medi-Cal Coverage and Persisting Access Barriers for Latino Immigrants in California): Science
- What’s shaping retirement readiness in healthcare?
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News