Congressional Research Service Issues Insight White Paper on Flood Buyouts
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Flood Buyouts: Federal Funding for Property Acquisition
Flooding is the most frequent natural disaster in
A flood buyout is a property acquisition in which a government agency purchases private property, relocates or demolishes any structures on it, and preserves the land as open space in perpetuity to restore and conserve natural floodplain functions. The local government is responsible for maintaining parcels of bought-out land and buyout programs generally do not include funding for future design, maintenance, or use of bought-out land.
In the case of property acquisition and demolition, often using federal funding, a local or state government purchases flood-prone land and structures from willing sellers and demolishes the structures. Alternatively, state or local governments purchase land from willing sellers and assist the property owners with relocation to another site. If the new location is in a flood zone, the structure must meet the community's building codes (e.g., elevation above a certain height). In both cases, the bought-out land must be maintained as open space.
Federal Funding for Buyouts
Flood buyouts can be funded by several federal programs:
* Any of the
* National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage;
* FEMA Public Assistance;
*
and under some circumstances:
*
*
*
*
*
All
Considerations for
Length of Time for Buyouts
One of the biggest considerations for homeowners is the speed of the buyout. Some studies show that the average FEMA HMGP buyout project takes over five years from the start of the associated disaster to project closeout. However, property acquisition typically occurs before an acquisition program is closed out. According to
Funding may be insufficient to buy out all of the properties requested, and volunteers on waiting lists may return to their flooded homes as they wait for a buyout. If they repair their flood-damaged house for habitability while waiting, they may no longer wish to relocate. Longer buyout timelines may restrict the opportunity for lower-income households to participate.
Challenges for Local Governments
Buyout programs may be controversial, even though they may reduce long-term flood risk. Buyouts may reduce state and local income from property taxes, reduce housing stock, cause a decline in real estate values in neighborhoods with large numbers of vacant lots, create fears that low-income communities are being removed, or fragment communities through resident displacement and loss of neighborhood cohesion. In addition, the nonfederal cost-share requirement and the cost of maintaining open space may prove to be a disincentive for small or disadvantaged communities.
Without full participation in a buyout program, some properties are acquired and converted while others are left to remain, creating a "checkerboard" effect with some properties surrounded by vacant or underutilized parcels. This may create numerous problems, including blight, community fragmentation, difficulty with providing municipal services, and inability to restore full floodplain functionality.
For these reasons, buyouts are often a politically unpopular option unless there is a particularly catastrophic event that changes people's willingness to move and creates unified state and local support for relocation.
Policy Options
There are a number of policy options available to increase participation in buyout programs.
One option to speed up buyouts could be to fast-track HMGP funding to be available immediately after a disaster for buyouts. Local governments could be reimbursed up to a specified percentage of total federal funding if they undertake buyouts immediately after a disaster, or
Federal agencies usually do not track the new locations of households after a buyout, so it is typically not known whether households have moved to a less vulnerable location. Buyout programs could provide more assistance in the relocation process and greater emphasis on developing affordable housing in nonvulnerable locations.
* * *
Figure 1.
Source: Provided by
* * *
The white paper is posted at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11911


Columbia University: Millions of kids in U.S. have inadequate health coverage
THE READERS' FORUMThe Readers' Forum: Why do many evangelicals support Donald Trump? The Readers' Forum: Why do many evangelicals support Donald Trump?
Advisor News
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
- Poor money habits are a dealbreaker in a new relationship
- DC plan sponsors see opportunity in alternatives
- The American Dream: Redefined as financial stability
- Partial annuitization: How advisors can help clients balance income, growth
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CA judge certifies class action in teachers’ lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Managing Director Joins ‘Target Topics’ Podcast to Discuss State of Delegated Underwriting Authority Enterprises Market
- KBRA Assigns Rating to TruSpire Retirement Insurance Company
- Partial annuitization: How advisors can help clients balance income, growth
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Copay assistance is meant to defray patient drug costs. Some insurers keep it instead
- Amid claims of 'playing politics,' Auburn council amends city manager's contract
- OCWNY to hold seminar for disability beneficiaries Friday
- Atrium pushes back after State Health Plan leaves healthcare network out of Tier 1
- Douglas Veterans Claims Clinic Connects Rural Veterans With Critical Services
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Upgrades Credit Ratings of Sagicor Financial Company Ltd. and Most of Its Subsidiaries
- Trust, technology and the future of claims
- New York Life Launches an Indemnity Benefit for its Asset Flex Long-Term Care Insurance Solution
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of DB Insurance Co., Ltd.
More Life Insurance News