Congressional Research Service Issues Insight White Paper on Federal Funding for Property Acquisition
Here are excerpts:
* * *
Floodplain Buyouts: Federal Funding for Property Acquisition
Flooding is the most frequent natural disaster in
Federal Funding for Buyouts
Flood buyouts can be funded by several federal programs:
* Any of the
* National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage;
*
and under some circumstances:
* FEMA Public Assistance;
*
*
*
*
*
FEMA Floodplain Buyouts
Although there is no database that identifies all federal funding for floodplain buyouts, some research indicates that the majority of buyout funding has been provided by
Considerations for
Length of Time for Buyouts
One of the biggest considerations for homeowners is the speed of the buyout. Some studies show that the average FEMA HMGP buyout project takes over five years from the start of the associated disaster to project closeout, although property acquisition typically occurs before a funding program is closed out. According to
Funding may be insufficient to buy out all of the properties requested, and volunteers on waiting lists may return to their flooded homes as they wait for a buyout. If they repair their flood-damaged house for habitability while waiting, they may no longer wish to relocate. Longer buyout timelines may restrict the opportunity for lower-income households to participate.
Challenges for Local Governments
Buyout programs may be controversial, even though they may reduce long-term flood risk. Buyouts may reduce state and local income from property taxes, reduce housing stock, cause a decline in real estate values in neighborhoods with large numbers of vacant lots, create fears that low-income communities are being removed, or fragment communities through resident displacement and loss of neighborhood cohesion. The local government is responsible for maintaining parcels of bought-out land and buyout programs generally do not include funding for future design, maintenance, or use of bought-out land. Nonfederal cost-share requirements and the cost of maintaining open space and may prove to be a disincentive, particularly for small or disadvantaged communities.
With voluntary buyout programs, some properties are acquired and converted while others are left to remain, creating a "checkerboard" effect with some properties surrounded by vacant or underutilized parcels. This may create numerous problems, including blight, community fragmentation, difficulty with providing municipal services, and inability to restore full floodplain functionality.
For these reasons, buyouts are often a politically unpopular option unless there is a particularly catastrophic event that changes people's willingness to move and creates unified state and local support for relocation.
Policy Options
There are a number of policy options available to increase participation in buyout programs. Agencies could dedicate a special round of funding for buyouts, offer a higher federal cost-share for buyouts that relocate contiguous properties, or provide greater assistance to low-income communities for post-buyout maintenance. Homeowners are generally offered the pre-disaster fair market value of the property. Programs could incentivize participation by offering higher payments to low-income residents or encouraging relocation in a lower-risk area.
One option to speed up buyouts could be to fast-track funding to be available immediately after a disaster for buyouts. Local governments could be reimbursed up to a specified percentage of total federal funding if they undertake buyouts immediately after a disaster, or an agency could establish a pre-approval process. States and communities could pre-approve or guarantee buyouts to interested homeowners before a flood, or acquire homes and rent them back to owners or tenants for as long as the property remains habitable. For example, the federal government has used life estates to acquire property for its own use, such as national parks, allowing homeowners to remain for the rest of their lives or until they choose to leave. A similar approach could be used to encourage flood buyouts.
Federal agencies usually do not track the new locations of households after a buyout, so it is typically not known whether households have moved to a less vulnerable location. Buyout programs could provide more assistance in the relocation process and greater emphasis on developing affordable housing in nonvulnerable locations.
* * *
Figure 1.
Source: Provided by
* * *
The white paper is posted at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11911



Palomar Holdings, Inc. Announces Participation in the William Blair 44th Annual Growth Stock Conference
Congressional Research Service Issues Insight White Paper on National Flood Insurance Program Risk Rating 2.0
Advisor News
- NAIFA: Financial professionals are essential to the success of Trump Accounts
- Changes, personalization impacting retirement plans for 2026
- Study asks: How do different generations approach retirement?
- LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
- Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Edward Wilson Joins SEDA, Bringing Deep Expertise in Risk Management, Derivatives Trading and Institutional Prime Brokerage
- Trademark Application for “INSPIRING YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Jackson Financial ramps up reinsurance strategy to grow annuity sales
- Insurer to cut dozens of jobs after making splashy CT relocation
- AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America Following Agreement to Acquire Schroders, plc.
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Red and blue states alike want to limit AI in insurance. Trump wants to limit the states.
- CT hospital, health insurer battle over contract, with patients caught in middle. Where it stands.
- $2.67B settlement payout: Blue Cross Blue Shield customers to receive compensation
- Sen. Bernie Moreno has claimed the ACA didn’t save money. But is that true?
- State AG improves access to care for EmblemHealth members
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News