Column: Capital Gains Taxes And The Democrats – InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Washington Wire
Topics
    • Life Insurance
    • Annuity News
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Property and Casualty
    • Advisor News
    • Washington Wire
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Content
    • Webinars
    • Monthly Focus
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Free Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Free Newsletters
  • Insider
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Advisor News
Washington Wire RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
September 28, 2021 Washington Wire No comments
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Column: Capital Gains Taxes And The Democrats

Cato at Liberty: Blog
Commentary

President Biden and congressional Democrats are pushing to raise capital gains taxes. The Democratic proposals are radical and out of step with the treatment of capital gains in other high‐income nations. I argue here, here, and here that higher capital gains taxes would damage America's technology industries and entrepreneurial economy.

Let's look at capital gains tax rates in the high‐income OECD nations. In the chart below, the red bar in the middle is the current U.S. top rate of 29.2 percent, which is much higher than the OECD average of 19.1 percent. These rates, compiled by the Tax Foundation, include both federal and state taxes.

Biden has proposed doubling the top federal capital gains tax rate. With state taxes on top, that would push the U.S. rate up to the highest in the OECD at 48.4 percent. The House Democratic plan would push the U.S. rate up to 37 percent, or the third highest in the OECD.

Pundits and politicians on the left talk about equalizing the top tax rates on capital gains and ordinary income, but virtually all OECD nations have substantially lower rates on gains than on ordinary income for good reasons. By pushing to raise capital gains tax rates, the Democrats are ignoring the best practices of our trading partners, and also ignoring the bipartisan consensus over the past century to keep capital gains tax rates at a moderate level.

In recent years, there has been a movement in the United States to immediately tax asset appreciation or unrealized capital gains. But gain is not ordinary income, and it has always been treated differently in tax codes here and abroad. The definition of income used in the National Income and Product Accounts does not include capital gains. And note that nine OECD countries in the chart do not tax long‐term capital gains, while other nations only started taxing long‐term gains in recent decades, such as Canada (1972), Ireland (1975), and Australia (1985). Former Fed chair Alan Greenspan testified to Congress in 1997 that the proper tax rate on long‐term capital gains is zero.

So why are Democrats pushing to raise taxes on gains? The 16th amendment to the U.S. Constitution allowed "taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived," but it did not define what "income" was. For a century, liberal and conservative economists have debated the proper definition of income for tax purposes. Liberals have been slaves to the idea that "Haig‐Simons income" should be the starting point for taxation, and that radical approach would tax all paper gains in all assets every year. That is the direction that Senate finance chair Ron Wyden is moving, but no other OECD country taxes gains that way.

Conservative economists have long argued that taxing a Haig‐Simons base would damage savings, investment, and growth. Taxing such a base would also be horrendously complicated and unfair as it would tax people with paper gains but no cashflow. Conservatives instead favor a definition of income closer to consumption. Taxing consumption would remove the bias against savings and investment under the income tax, and thus remove an important barrier to growth.

To the extent that we need to tax, we should "tax the fruit of the tree, but not the tree itself." That is, taxing the flow of consumption produced by capital assets, not the capital itself that will provide for future consumption. A Haig‐Simons tax base would hack away at the tree with an ax and destroy fruit production. Unfortunately, economists on the left don't see it that way, and so our "income tax" system has long been a compromise between the liberal Haig‐Simons approach and the conservative consumption‐based approach.

For further reading, I discuss capital gains taxation here and the superiority of consumption‐based taxation here. And see here for a broader overview of taxing capital and capital income.

Older

PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation Announces Cigna Adds Aquablation Therapy to its Coverage Policy

Newer

Assurant Announces Leadership Appointments to Accelerate Business Strategy

Advisor News

  • Retirement Savers Remain Confident Despite Short-Term Woes
  • City of Memphis Helps Employees With Financial Wellness Programs
  • IRI CEO: ‘I Am Optimistic for Our Industry’s Future’
  • 2/3 Of Near-Retirees Failed Or Barely Passed A Basic Social Security Quiz
  • Crypto As National Currency? Maybe Not A Good Idea
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • LibertyMark Freedom Fixed Indexed Annuities Launch
  • Nationwide Adds BNP Paribas Global H-Factor Index To FIA
  • Transamerica Launches Structured Index Advantage Annuity
  • Recommending FIAs: Start With The Client’s Objective
  • NC Man Wins First $5 Million Prize In Scratch-Off Game
Sponsor
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • EBRI Studies Expanding Pre-Deductible Coverage For Chronic Conditions
  • Most Consumers Choose To Pay Higher LTCi Premiums
  • CMS Creates More User-Friendly Medicare Website
  • Integrity Marketing Group Buys Ritter Insurance Marketing
  • Maine Powerless In Big Fight Between Its Largest Insurer And Hospital
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance

  • The 5 Secrets To Retaining Financial Sales Professionals
  • Life Insurance Activity Continues Dip In April But Still Stronger Than 2021, MIB Reports
  • Transamerica Adds Execs To Annuity And Life Insurance Team
  • Northwestern Mutual Invests $5M In Black-Led Financial Institutions
  • Protective Life Closes On AUL Acquisition
More Life Insurance

- Presented By -

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

FEATURED OFFERS

Get Linked INN to your industry Connect with INN on LinkedIn to be first on all the news and insights that matter to your industry.

Press ReleasesAll press releases

  • OneAmerica Commits $1 Million Toward Financial Literacy
  • Transamerica Structured Index Advantage Annuity Offers Investors More Certainty with Upside Growth and Downside Protection
  • Senior Market Sales Creates First-of-Its-Kind Lead Acquisition Platform
  • Growing financial services firm Kuvare opens Des Moines office in East Village, continuing expansion in Iowa
  • BetterLife Selects iPipeline® to Digitally Transform Its Business & Better Serve Future Generations
Add your Press Release >

Topics

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Content
  • Webinars
  • Monthly Focus

Top Sections

  • Life Insurance
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • AdvisorNews
  • Washington Wire
  • Insurance Webinars

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Magazine
  • Write for INN
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2022 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your INNsider Account

Not registered? Become an INNsider.