Colorado's workers can't afford a privatized Pinnacol | OPINION
By
Pinnacol was created in 1915 to make sure all employers — especially those in dangerous industries — could obtain this required coverage at an affordable cost. It was designed as a "provider of last resort," meaning it would insure employers who might otherwise be unable to find coverage. Over time, Pinnacol has continued to offer affordable coverage not only to high-risk employers, but to businesses of all kinds.
In recent years, however, Pinnacol has repeatedly pushed to become a private company. Privatization would allow it to operate like a for-profit insurer, keeping financial benefits for itself while offering no guarantees to the employers who pay into the system or to the workers who rely on the coverage.
Since at least the Ritter administration, Pinnacol has found support for privatization within the governor's office. Pinnacol has made several promises to justify this change, but these claims appear focused more on increasing profits than on protecting employers or injured workers. For example, Pinnacol argues it is losing market share even though it still controls about half of the workers' compensation market. It also claims it could require PERA — the state retirement system — to accept a buyout of its employees from the system at a price set by Pinnacol itself, while also providing hundreds of millions of dollars to the state. However, under Pinnacol's governing laws, its profits belong to the ratepayers — the employers — not to the company itself.
Despite years of opposition from employers, workers and competing workers' compensation insurers, legislators and the governor continue to push this plan forward. Even more concerning, the state's ongoing budget pressures are being used as leverage to force privatization through. In past attempts, funding for critical priorities — such as the Homestead tax exemption, K-12 education, and contributions to PERA — have been put at risk to pit constituencies against one another. Last year, privatization of Pinnacol was even floated as a bargaining chip in unrelated labor legislation. This pattern makes clear the proposal is driven less by sound policy and more by short-term political and budgetary goals.
If privatization ultimately passes, the immediate result may look like a success: a one-time infusion of money, a claim of a balanced budget, and promises of future growth as Pinnacol expands into other states and lines of insurance. But those gains rest on shaky ground. Pinnacol's assets legally belong to the employers who pay into the system, privatization invites costly legal challenges that could take years to resolve. If the courts agree those funds were taken improperly, the state would be left with a massive budget shortfall of its own making potentially hundreds of millions of dollars while employers, workers and taxpayers bear the fallout. What is being presented as a fiscal solution is a high-risk gamble that threatens the stability of a system that has protected
It is always tempting to prioritize short-term convenience over long-term security, especially when there is a desire to leave office on a high note. The next governor will start their first-year hundreds of millions in debt from "a solution" that created the very problem it claimed to solve.
The post


Exasperated WSJ begs Trump to ‘take the hint’ as court blows up revenge case
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. Acquires 7,502 Shares of Union Pacific Corporation $UNP
Advisor News
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
- Majority of Americans concerned recent market highs are unsustainable
- GLP-1 users choose between medication and retirement saving
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News