Capital and Risk Management 2023
Pillar III - Capital and risk management report 2023
|
Table of Contents |
|
|
Internal Audit |
11 |
|
Business and support units |
12 |
|
2 (36) |
|
|
OWN FUNDS AND CAPITAL ADEQUACY |
13 |
|
Own funds |
13 |
|
Leverage ratio |
13 |
|
Capital adequacy |
13 |
|
Definition |
17 |
|
Credit risk profile |
17 |
|
Credit risk management principles |
17 |
|
Credit risk management organization |
18 |
|
Credit quality assessment and credit risk mitigation |
18 |
|
Definition of default and accounting principles |
19 |
|
Credit risk adjustments |
19 |
|
Counterparty credit risk |
20 |
|
LIQUIDITY RISK |
22 |
|
Definition |
22 |
|
Liquidity risk profile |
22 |
|
Liquidity risk management |
22 |
|
Liquidity risk monitoring and reporting |
23 |
|
Stress testing |
23 |
|
Market risk |
24 |
|
Interest rate risk |
24 |
|
Managing interest rate risk |
25 |
|
OPERATIONAL RISK |
26 |
3 (36)
|
Definition |
26 |
|
Managing operational risk |
26 |
|
Appendix: Summary Table of Pilar III requirements |
28 |
INTRODUCTION
Disclosure of Pilar III information
This report presents comprehensive information on the risks, risk management and capital adequacy required by applicable regulation. EU Capital Requirements Regulation 575/2013 (CRR), Part 8, sets requirements for the disclosure obligation of institutions and the disclosure of information concerning banks' risks, their management and capital adequacy. Additionally, for example, the
The company complies with its disclosure obligation by publishing comprehensive information on its capital adequacy and risk management (so-called Pillar III information) alongside its annual report. Pillar III report contains a qualitative and quantitative report. Pillar III report contains the information required from a small and non-complex institution and
4 (36)
such as Corporate Governance Statement and Remuneration report are available on
Risk appetite
Risk management in
The company's Board of Directors has the primary responsibility for risk management. The Board of Directors confirms the risk strategy, risk management principles and responsibilities, risk limits and other guidelines according to which risk management and internal control are organized.
|
5 (36) |
||||
|
The company keeps its capital adequacy at a safe level. The company's |
there are no individual significant customer risks. At the end of the |
|||
|
capital adequacy and risk-bearing capacity will be strengthened |
reporting period there was one secured exposure (corporate sales |
|||
|
through profitable business operations and, in addition, debt and |
invoice funding) that exceeded 10 % of Tier 1 own funds. The |
|||
|
equity instruments that increase own funds. The Board of Directors is |
outstanding amount of the loan portfolio before deducting provisions |
|||
|
regularly provided with information on the company's various risks and |
for credit losses was |
|||
|
their levels. The Board of Directors also approves the authority and |
The amount of non-performing loans in the credit base has increased |
|||
|
framework for risk-taking by defining risk |
due to increased bankruptcies in corporate financing |
|||
|
limits for credit and market risks. |
during the review period. At the end of the review |
|||
|
Within the limits of the mandate, the |
period, the amount of non-performing loans was 7.2 |
|||
|
million |
||||
|
responsibility for day-to-day risk monitoring |
||||
|
CET1 ratio |
non-performing receivables in relation to loans and |
|||
|
and control lies with the Heads of business |
||||
|
advances, was 4.2 (4.0) percent at the end of the |
||||
|
units. Risk reporting practices meet the |
12,0% |
|||
|
review period. |
||||
|
requirements set for risk management, |
||||
|
considering the nature and scope of the |
Total capital ratio |
Loan receivables with a payment delay of more than |
||
|
company's operations. |
30 days but less than 90 days were 3.5 (2.6) percent |
|||
|
15,2% |
||||
|
Risk position / Key ratios and |
of the entire loan portfolio. The proportion of |
|||
|
Leverage ratio |
overdue payments of more than 90 days was 3.0 (3.6) |
|||
|
figures |
percent. In the comparison period, most of the |
|||
|
5,8% |
||||
|
Credit risk |
insolvent loans consisted of foreign loans. About 22% |
|||
|
of |
||||
|
Credit risk is the company's primary risk. It is |
foreign consumer loans, 28% of business loans and |
|||
|
managed in accordance with the credit risk |
50% of domestic consumer loans. |
|||
|
policy approved by the Board of Directors by |
Own funds and Capital adequacy |
|||
|
setting targets and risk limits for the loan portfolio's quality and |
||||
|
concentrations. These limits are followed by the business units and the |
The Board of Directors confirms the risk strategies and defines the |
|||
|
risk control team. During |
target levels for capital, which covers all material risks arising from |
|||
|
growth in the loan portfolio decreased from the previous year, but the |
business operations and changes in the operating environment. The |
|||
|
relative credit risk position has remained stable. |
company's Board of Directors defines the risk limits related to the |
|||
|
include both personal and small and medium sized (SME) business |
operations. |
|||
|
customers. After the closure of peer-to-peer and crowdfunding |
|
activities, the company has systematically targeted lending towards |
|
|
equity Tier 1 ratio was 12.0 %, exceeding the banks' total capital |
|
|
customers with a lower credit risk. With a diversified customer base, |
|
requirement (10.5 %). The total capital requirement for banks consists of a minimum capital requirement of 8.0 % in accordance with Pillar I and an additional fixed capital requirement of 2.5 % in accordance with Act on the Credit Institutions.
At the end of the review period, the group's capital structure was strong and consisted of core capital (CET 1) and secondary capital (Tier 2). The group's own funds (TC) were
|
CAPITAL AND RISK POSITION, |
|
|
|
|
25 856 |
|
|
Adjustments to Common Tier 1 Capital |
-8 172 |
|
|
Common Tier 1 Capital in total (CET1) |
17 684 |
|
|
Additional Tier 1 Capital before adjustments |
0 |
|
|
Adjustments to Tier 1 Capital |
0 |
|
|
Additional Tier 1 Capital in total (AT1) |
0 |
|
|
Total Capital (T1 = CET1 + AT1) |
17 684 |
|
|
Tier 2 Capital before adjustments |
6 100 |
|
|
Adjustments to Tier 2 Capital |
-1 471 |
|
|
Tier 2 Capital in total (T2) |
4 629 |
|
6 (36) |
|
|
Total risk weighted exposure amounts |
|
|
Credit and Counterparty risk |
120 969 |
|
Market risk |
853 |
|
Operational risk |
25 139 |
|
Risk weighted exposure in total |
146 960 |
|
Common Equity Tier 1 ratio (CET 1), % |
12,0 |
|
Tier 1 ratio (T1), % |
12,0 |
|
Total Capital Ratio (TC), % |
15,2 |
|
LEVERAGE RATIO, |
|
|
Total Equity, Tier 1 capital |
17 684 |
|
Total Exposure Amount |
305 649 |
|
Leverage ratio (LR), % |
5,8 |
Liquidity risk
The company's liquidity risks arise from the maturity difference between funding and lending operations. The sufficiency of liquidity has been ensured by setting a
limit on the company's cash reserves determined by the company's Board of Directors.
The company's liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) at the end of the
review period was 689 % (whereas supervisory minimum requirement is 100%) Average LCR for the last quarter was 613%. 100% of the liquidity buffer was Level 1 assets with very high liquidity. The buffer consists of unpledged, high-quality, and very liquid funds. Net stable funding Ratio (NSFR) at the end of the period was 199.9% (the minimum requirement is 100%).
Market and interest rate risk
The market risk consists of the interest rate risk of the bank's balance sheet and the currency risk. The loan portfolio is the main source for interest rate risk as there tends to be a mismatch between the interest rate repricing dates that the company set on customer loans and on deposits. The new lending is mainly variable rate and tied to the 3-
7 (36)
month Euribor. The company currently has to a lesser extent long (over 1 y) fixed-rate loans, and the share is constantly declining.
Strong changes in market interest rates underline the importance of managing the interest rate risk. The company continuously monitors the development of interest rate risk through, among other things, a sensitivity analysis of the present value of the economic value of equity, and the change in the net interest income. If the interest rate were to increase by two percentage points, the company's economic value of equity would increase by 1.9 percent, due to positive earnings development based on the situation on
Compliance and operational risk
Compliance Risk is defined in
reputation
Operational risk refers to the risk of direct or indirect financial loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or external events. Operational risks also comprise legal, compliance, and information security risks. Operational risks are thus related to management systems, operational processes, people, and
8 (36)
various external factors or threats. Operational risks are managed by the business line. The most significant source of operational risks are development of the new products and services, risks related to IT- security, fraud risk and compliance risk. The company's board confirms the principles of operational risk management every year. In operational risk management, the company's main goal is to manage reputational risk and ensure business continuity and regulatory compliance in the short and long term.
Risk statement approved by the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of
RISK MANAGEMENT IN ALISA BANK
Objective of risk management
The Board of Directors of
The objectives of the risk management framework in
- Making the management aware of the risks having financial significance in the short or long term.
- Ensuring rationality of business and risk management processes; creating a decision-making basis, proportional to company's risk-taking ability, for risk-taking and risk mitigation.
- Ensuring full commitment of the employees to continuous risk management work.
- Making risk management a part of normal daily management.
Three lines of defense
The strategies and processes to manage risk and to organize internal control in
- Risk control function (second line of defense)
- Compliance function (second line of defense)
- Internal audit function (third line of defense)
Organization and principles of risk management Board of Directors
9 (36)
The Board approves the risk management policy including the principles concerning risk management and risk monitoring. The Board sets the risk appetite and the top-level limits. Within these limits
Credit and risk management committee
Credit and risk management committee is a supervisory and consultative body working under the mandate of the Board. Credit and risk management committee members are appointed by the Board. The committee's mandates and responsibilities are described in the working order of committee and include the following:
- Controlling the bank's credit, market, and liquidity risks.
- Controlling the banks' balance sheet usage and structure
- Preparation of decisions on risks and risk management to the Board (including risk limits)
- Expressing opinions on issues with significant impact on company's risk profile
- Deciding on matters where the Board has delegated decision making authority to Credit and risk management committee.
- Reporting to the CEO and the Board on the overall risk profile of the company
- Reporting and presenting an overview of its activities to the Board including reporting to the Board on decisions made under the authority delegated by the Board.
- Control the adequacy of operational risk management.
CEO
The CEO is responsible for organizing risk management in
Group Risk Control
Group Risk Control (GRC) is an independent unit established to monitor and control risk-taking mandates. GRC provides the business units with detailed reports on risk taking and provides the Board, Management team and Credit and risk management committee with aggregate level risk reports. GRC supports line management in the creation of its own risk management. GRC unit oversees the implementation of the financial and the non-financial risk policies. GRC unit monitors and controls the Risk Management Framework and oversees that all risks that
10 (36)
material, previously unidentified risks are included in the risk management of the company's business operations.
The GRC has several objectives:
- Analysing and reporting material risks to the management (daily) and the Board & Credit and risk management committee (monthly)
- Daily monitoring of financial risk positions both on unit and aggregate level and elevating limit breaches
- Reporting risks which are inconsistent with the risk appetite to the management.
- Suggesting and implementing changes to the risk management framework
- Act as an early warning centre
- Compliance with regulatory rules related to risk management
- Coordination of the risk assessment of new products or other material changes, such as new systems or outsourcing.
Compliance
Compliance risk is defined in
The purpose of the Compliance function is to ensure regulatory compliance within the company by supporting the executive management and business units in the application of legislation, regulations and internal guidelines. In addition, the Compliance
Attachments
Disclaimer
Alisa Pankki Oyj published this content on



Tenn. U.S. Attorney: Randa Allison Sentenced to 14 Months in Prison for COVID-19 Unemployment Insurance Fraud Scheme
Legal Notices
Advisor News
- NAIFA: Financial professionals are essential to the success of Trump Accounts
- Changes, personalization impacting retirement plans for 2026
- Study asks: How do different generations approach retirement?
- LTC: A critical component of retirement planning
- Middle-class households face worsening cost pressures
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Trademark Application for “INSPIRING YOUR FINANCIAL FUTURE” Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- Jackson Financial ramps up reinsurance strategy to grow annuity sales
- Insurer to cut dozens of jobs after making splashy CT relocation
- AM Best Comments on Credit Ratings of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America Following Agreement to Acquire Schroders, plc.
- Crypto meets annuities: what to know about bitcoin-linked FIAs
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Former NFL player convicted in nearly $200M Medicare fraud scheme
- Senior Health Insurance in Florida Adapts to 2026 Care Costs
- Officials Report Record Enrollment In CT's Health Insurance Marketplace
- 'Washington is broken': Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Roy Cooper pledges to fight for affordable health insurance, Medicaid expansion
- Kontoor updates executive severance package amid talk of more potential departures
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News