Andy Barr says he'll 'always protect people with preexisting conditions.' He hasn't.
That's a lie, counters his Democratic challenger, Lexington lawyer
Hicks says Barr repeatedly voted to repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the 2010 law that -- among other things -- guarantees equal access to health insurance at approximately the same cost for people with preexisting conditions, such as asthma, diabetes, heart disease and cancer.
Before the law was enacted, many Americans with such conditions were denied coverage or charged exorbitant premiums.
This year,
Hicks contends Barr is trying to rewrite history.
"I can't let a lie like that stand," Hicks says in his ad. "The truth is, he voted over and over to end protections for people with preexisting conditions, people like my mom and my sister."
Rolling down the screen as Hicks speaks is a list of 13 of Barr's House votes from the last seven years.
In a written response to the Herald-Leader, Barr's re-election campaign identified three votes he cast in the past two years, after
One of those votes, for example, was on an
Barr, first elected to
Sometimes, as in
Four years later, in
When Barr voted for it, he said the American Health Care Act's House passage marked "a great day for freedom in America." He lists the bill on the health care section of his campaign website, at the top of the "
That
A key amendment to the American Health Care Act would have required insurance companies to provide access to coverage for people with preexisting conditions. But it would not have prevented insurers from charging that group far higher premiums, just as they did before the Affordable Care Act.
The amendment also would have let states request waivers to avoid important preexisting condition protections in the individual insurance markets. About 16 percent of the
"Over time, less healthy individuals (including those with preexisting or newly acquired medical conditions) would be unable to purchase comprehensive coverage with premiums close to those under current law and might not be able to purchase coverage at all," the
Overall, the American Health Care Act that Barr supported would have resulted in an estimated 19 million more Americans without insurance by this year had it become law, according to the
"In short, this plan is terrible," said the National Disability Rights Network. "It permits discrimination against people with disabilities in the insurance market for their preexisting conditions."
Similar claim labeled 'mostly false'
A preexisting conditions claim nearly identical to Barr's, made by former
Like Barr, Pittenger voted to replace the Affordable Care Act with the American Health Care Act and later told voters that he never acted to weaken protections for people with preexisting conditions. But that's untrue, PolitiFact concluded after a point-by-point analysis.
"While insurers technically would still be required to offer coverage to people with preexisting conditions, the
"Insurers would be able to charge people significantly more if they had a preexisting condition like heart disease, cancer, diabetes or arthritis -- possibly requiring people to pay thousands of dollars extra every year to remain insured," PolitiFact wrote.
Over the last two election cycles, Barr has collected at least
Barr defends American Health Care Act
The Barr campaign defended the American Health Care Act in its statement to the Herald-Leader. Had the bill become law, insurance companies could not have hiked premiums on Americans with preexisting conditions unless there was, for some reason, an interruption in their insurance coverage, it said. Only a "relatively small number of people" conceivably could have been affected, it said.
For states that sought waivers to preexisting condition protections, the Barr campaign added, the bill would have set aside
"Those funds would've helped to offset the cost of insurance premiums for individuals," the Barr campaign wrote.
However, critics, including the
"The history of high-risk pools demonstrates that Americans with preexisting conditions will be stuck in second-class health care coverage -- if they are able to obtain coverage at all," the AMA said in 2017.
And others, such as health care consulting firm
"Given the amount of funding in the bill, the program can only afford a few small states to opt into medical underwriting,"
___
(c)2020 the Lexington Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.)
Visit the Lexington Herald-Leader (Lexington, Ky.) at www.kentucky.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Home Emergency Insurance and Home Services, UK Market Future Business Scope & New Investment Plans for Next 5 Y
Smart Money Investing in the Financial Services Market Is Gaining Momentum with Key Players Phoenix Group Holdings, SIX Group, APS Payments, L&T Capital, InCred Cap
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News