Minimum Training Requirements for Entry-Level Commercial Drivers’ License Applicants; Consideration of Negotiated Rulemaking Process
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
Notice of intent.
CFR Part: "49 CFR Parts 380, 383, and 384"
RIN Number: "RIN 2126-AB66"
Citation: "79 FR 49044"
Document Number: "Docket No. FMCSA-2007-27748"
Page Number: "49044"
"Proposed Rules"
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that the Agency is exploring the feasibility of conducting a negotiated rulemaking (Reg Neg) concerning entry-level training for drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). Specifically, the Agency is exploring a Reg Neg to implement the entry-level driver training (ELDT) provisions in the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). The FMCSA has hired a convener to speak with interested parties about the feasibility of conducting of an ELDT Reg Neg. FMCSA anticipates that these interested parties may include driver organizations, CMV training organizations, motor carriers (of property and passengers) and industry associations, State licensing agencies, State enforcement agencies, labor unions, safety advocacy groups, and insurance companies.
DATES: Please submit your comments no later than
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number FMCSA-2007-27748 using any one of the following methods:
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
* Fax: 202-493-2251.
* Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30),
* Hand delivery: Same as mail address above,
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this document, call or email Mr.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the early 1980s, the
In 2004, FMCSA implemented a driver training rule that focused on areas unrelated to the hands-on operation of a CMV, relying instead on the commercial driver's license (CDL) knowledge and skills tests to encourage training in the operation of CMVs. These current training regulations in 49 CFR Part 380, subpart E cover four areas: (1) Driver qualifications; (2) hours of service limitations; (3) wellness; and (4) whistleblower protection. In 2005, the
On
Following publication of the NPRM, the Agency reviewed the public responses to the proposal. Additionally, FMCSA held ELDT listening sessions on
FMCSA is now assessing the feasibility of using Reg Neg for this rulemaking. In a Reg Neg, an agency invites representatives of interested parties that are likely to be affected by a regulation to work with each other and the agency on a negotiating committee to develop a consensus draft of a proposed rule. If a consensus is reached, the Agency would then publish the proposal for public comment under customary regulatory procedures. FMCSA believes this cooperative problem-solving approach should be given serious consideration. To do so, the Agency must determine, among other statutory factors, whether an appropriate advisory committee can be assembled that would fairly represent all affected interests, will negotiate in good faith and whether consensus on the issues is likely.
FMCSA has retained a neutral convener, Mr.
The neutral convener will interview affected interests, including but not limited to, CMV driver organizations, CMV training organizations, motor carriers (of property and passengers) and industry associations, State licensing agencies, State enforcement agencies, labor unions, safety advocacy groups, and insurance companies and associations. The convener will determine whether additional categories of interested parties may be necessary. The convenor will, among other things, examine the potential for adequate and balanced representation of these varied interests on an advisory committee that would be convened to negotiate the regulation. The convener will then submit a written "convening" report of findings and recommendations to the Agency, and the final report will be available to the public. The convener's report will provide a basis for FMCSA to decide whether to proceed with a Reg Neg, and, if so, to determine the scope of the issues the committee would address. In the alternative, FMCSA may decide to forgo the Reg Neg and proceed with traditional notice-and-comment rulemaking.
All interested parties are advised that the confidentiality provisions of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, 5 U.S.C. 574, will apply to the convener's activities. The Federal Government will make no claim to the convener's notes, memoranda, or recollections or to documents provided to the convener in confidence in the course of the convening process.
The convenor will not interpret FMCSA or DOT policy on behalf of the Agency or the Department nor make decisions on items of policy, regulation, or statute. The convenor will not take a stand on the merits of substantive items under discussion.
The FMCSA will provide the convener any comments it receives in reaction to this notice and will file the comments in docket FMCSA-2007-27748. If you want to submit comments to this notice directly to the docket, use the addresses above under the heading ADDRESSES.
Should the FMCSA decide to proceed with a Reg Neg process, the Agency will follow the procedures set forth in the Negotiated Rulemaking Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 561 et seq. This would include the mandatory publication of a notice of intent to solicit comment on membership and invite interested persons to apply for nomination to the committee. It also includes the establishment of a negotiating committee under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2).
Issued under the authority of delegation in 49 CFR 1.87.
Dated:
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-19637 Filed 8-15-14;
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
| Copyright: | (c) 2014 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1323 |



Risk Management, Financial Assurance and Loss Prevention
Advisor News
- Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
- Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
- Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
- Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
- Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
- Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
- Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News