House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation, and Regulatory Affairs and Energy Policy, Health Care, and…
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation, and Regulatory Affairs and Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements Hearing
Chairman Lankford, Chairman Jordan and Members of the Committee, I am
Consumer Oriented and Operated Plans, or health insurance CO-OPs as they're commonly known, were a political compromise dreamed up in 2009 during the health care debate. n1 Congressional support for CO-OPs was primarily because they could serve a political purpose. Whether or not CO-OPs could serve an economic purpose -and are economically viable-seemed to draw less scrutiny at that time. Proponents envisioned CO-OPs as an alternative to a public plan option, which Progressives advocated as a means to boost competition with established insurance companies. n2
Health insurance CO-OPs were chosen to fill a "middle-ground" of sorts that would appeal to moderate voters, some of whom might be turned off by a government-sponsored public plan. In a nutshell, this explains the only real purpose for CO-OPs; a political alternative that served its purpose in 2009, but is no longer needed; and was never economically viable.
This is the conclusion of critics both on the Left and the Right. Nobel Laureate,
Proponents viewed CO-OPs through rose-colored glasses. CO-OPs were envisioned as a type of non-profit, enrollee-owned mutual insurance company that would do what for-profit insurers supposedly refused to do -put the needs of people over profit. n5 The member-led plans would feature all the latest patient-centered fads, despite little evidence these fads were cost-effective or would make a difference. One plan in
Proponents hoped CO-OPs would outperform established, for-profit insurers and undercut their premiums. In retrospect this idea was rather naive. CO-OP proponents' political agenda overshadowed the economic purpose -dooming what little chance of survival CO-Ops ever had. n7 For instance, advocates of public health coverage have long complained that insurance company profits and marketing waste money and drive up premiums. As a result, CO-OPs were designed as non-profit organizations and barred from using federal startup funds to advertise and market their plans. But without access to equity markets and advertising dollars, CO-OPs are doomed to failure.
The low-hanging fruit in the insurance business is large group employer plans. CO-OPs are barred from competing for large groups. Co-OPs can only compete in the individual and small group market -the most risky segment of the health insurance market, according to
According to actuarial firm, Milliman, starting a non-profit health insurer is no easy task; but establishing a non-profit CO-OP adds additional complexity. n9 According to an
Finally, with no prior claims data, and no idea who will enroll (or how many enrollees), CO-OPs will find it difficult to accurately assess risk and price premiums. n12 With the exchanges off to a rocky start, many CO-Ops found they had no way to reach potential customers. The actuarial firm Milliman believes CO-Ops have a limited window of opportunity and need to gain market share early to be financially viable. n13 Moreover, the exchange problems and the stopgap fix-allowing insurers to sign up customer directly -disadvantaged CO-OPs even more. n14
The selection process and awarding of loans appears to contain an element of political cronyism.
The
The Administration has all but admitted CO-OPs are risky. It estimated that between one-third to one-half the nearly
In conclusion, as with most ill-conceived ventures run by inexperienced or undercapitalized management teams, health insurance CO-OPs will likely muddle along until they run out of taxpayers' money.
n1
n2
n3
n4 "Rockefeller Decimates Co-ops in Letter to Baucus and Grassley,"
n5
n6
n7
n8
n9
n10
n11
n12 Ibid.
n13
n14
n15
n16
n17
n18 Ibid.
n19 Ibid.
n20
Read this original document at: http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Herrick_Testimony.pdf
| Copyright: | (c) 2010 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1800 |


Advisor News
- Help women break through their retirement roadblocks
- Advisors await SEC decision on Vanguard fair fund distribution
- What to do when adult children become the client
- Judge rules insurers not liable for Newport Group’s AME Church pension lawsuit
- Why vacation homes are becoming a major blind spot for advisors
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
- Best’s Market Segment Report: Global Life/Annuity Reinsurers Remained Poised for Steady Growth
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
- Legacy Marketing Group® and Malibu Life USA Announce Distribution Partnership for New Fixed Indexed Annuity Platform
- Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America Trademark Application for “EMPOWER WHAT’S NEXT” Filed: Empower Annuity Insurance Company of America
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News
- How advisors can get clients to act sooner on life insurance
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Crum & Forster Insurance Group’s Members and Monitor Life Insurance Company of New York
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Life Insurance Company Centras Life JSC
- AM Best Withdraws Credit Ratings of New Providence Life Insurance Company
- When technology becomes easy to rent, what still separates life and annuity carriers?
More Life Insurance News