House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation, and Regulatory Affairs and Energy Policy, Health Care, and…
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Job Creation, and Regulatory Affairs and Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements Hearing
Chairman Lankford, Chairman Jordan and Members of the Committee, I am
Consumer Oriented and Operated Plans, or health insurance CO-OPs as they're commonly known, were a political compromise dreamed up in 2009 during the health care debate. n1 Congressional support for CO-OPs was primarily because they could serve a political purpose. Whether or not CO-OPs could serve an economic purpose -and are economically viable-seemed to draw less scrutiny at that time. Proponents envisioned CO-OPs as an alternative to a public plan option, which Progressives advocated as a means to boost competition with established insurance companies. n2
Health insurance CO-OPs were chosen to fill a "middle-ground" of sorts that would appeal to moderate voters, some of whom might be turned off by a government-sponsored public plan. In a nutshell, this explains the only real purpose for CO-OPs; a political alternative that served its purpose in 2009, but is no longer needed; and was never economically viable.
This is the conclusion of critics both on the Left and the Right. Nobel Laureate,
Proponents viewed CO-OPs through rose-colored glasses. CO-OPs were envisioned as a type of non-profit, enrollee-owned mutual insurance company that would do what for-profit insurers supposedly refused to do -put the needs of people over profit. n5 The member-led plans would feature all the latest patient-centered fads, despite little evidence these fads were cost-effective or would make a difference. One plan in
Proponents hoped CO-OPs would outperform established, for-profit insurers and undercut their premiums. In retrospect this idea was rather naive. CO-OP proponents' political agenda overshadowed the economic purpose -dooming what little chance of survival CO-Ops ever had. n7 For instance, advocates of public health coverage have long complained that insurance company profits and marketing waste money and drive up premiums. As a result, CO-OPs were designed as non-profit organizations and barred from using federal startup funds to advertise and market their plans. But without access to equity markets and advertising dollars, CO-OPs are doomed to failure.
The low-hanging fruit in the insurance business is large group employer plans. CO-OPs are barred from competing for large groups. Co-OPs can only compete in the individual and small group market -the most risky segment of the health insurance market, according to
According to actuarial firm, Milliman, starting a non-profit health insurer is no easy task; but establishing a non-profit CO-OP adds additional complexity. n9 According to an
Finally, with no prior claims data, and no idea who will enroll (or how many enrollees), CO-OPs will find it difficult to accurately assess risk and price premiums. n12 With the exchanges off to a rocky start, many CO-Ops found they had no way to reach potential customers. The actuarial firm Milliman believes CO-Ops have a limited window of opportunity and need to gain market share early to be financially viable. n13 Moreover, the exchange problems and the stopgap fix-allowing insurers to sign up customer directly -disadvantaged CO-OPs even more. n14
The selection process and awarding of loans appears to contain an element of political cronyism.
The
The Administration has all but admitted CO-OPs are risky. It estimated that between one-third to one-half the nearly
In conclusion, as with most ill-conceived ventures run by inexperienced or undercapitalized management teams, health insurance CO-OPs will likely muddle along until they run out of taxpayers' money.
n1
n2
n3
n4 "Rockefeller Decimates Co-ops in Letter to Baucus and Grassley,"
n5
n6
n7
n8
n9
n10
n11
n12 Ibid.
n13
n14
n15
n16
n17
n18 Ibid.
n19 Ibid.
n20
Read this original document at: http://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Herrick_Testimony.pdf
| Copyright: | (c) 2010 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 1800 |



Advisor News
- Health-related costs are the greatest threat to retirement security
- Social Security literacy is crucial for advisors
- The $25T market opportunity in mid-market and mass-affluent households
- Advisors must lead the policy risk conversation
- Gen X more anxious than baby boomers about retirement
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- CT commissioner: 70% of policyholders covered in PHL liquidation plan
- ‘I get confused:’ Regulators ponder increasing illustration complexities
- Three ways the Corebridge/Equitable merger could shake up the annuity market
- Corebridge, Equitable merge to create potential new annuity sales king
- LIMRA: Final retail annuity sales total $464.1 billion in 2025
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Harriet Tubman quote vote; Health insurance drop; PHL checkpoints open | Morning Roundup
- Losing Health Coverage Due to Trump Cuts? Your Guide on 'Essential Plan' Changes
- Aflac overcharging Virginians, SCC finds
- Illinois pursues abortion coverage for people with little or no insurance
- AZ small businesses deserve better on health insurance costs
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Aflac overcharging Virginians, SCC finds
- Virginia orders rate cuts for Aflac policies
- QANDA WITH OBI BOARD CHAIR JUSTIN DELANEY
- Aflac to cut rates for Virginia policyholders after SCC findings
- Greg Lindberg ordered to pay $1.6 billion to insurers he defrauded
More Life Insurance News