Fitch Expects to Rate Catastrophe Bond Long Point Re III Ltd. Series 2015-1 Class A Notes ‘BB- sf’
The following is from Fitch Ratings on
Fitch Ratings expects to rate the series 2015-1 principal at- risk variable rate notes issued by
--Class A notes expected to mature May, 2018 'BB- sf'; Rating Outlook Stable.
Neither the principal amount nor the risk interest spread has been determined.
TRANSACTION SUMMARY
The series 2015-1 notes provide three years of indemnity, per occurrence coverage to various insurance subsidiaries or affiliates of
The Total Insured Limit of the Subject Business for Tropical Cyclone is about
The effective Reset dates will occur in May, 2016 and May, 2017 where AIR Worldwide, as the Reset Agent, will rerun the Escrow Model with updated data provided by Travelers. Travelers may elect to lower the Expected Loss to any level but may not increase the Expected Loss above the Maximum Expected Loss of 1.606 percent. The Risk Interest Spread will be adjusted to reflect any changes in the risk profile but subject to a Minimum Risk Interest Spread.
The 2015-1 notes are exposed to principal loss if a Covered Event exceeds
On a historical basis, Travelers have not experienced any actual natural catastrophe losses that would have triggered a loss event on this class of notes. Only as a point of reference, Travelers reported total case incurred losses of
The notes may be extended up to 12 additional quarters if certain qualifying events occur; however, they are not exposed to any further catastrophe events during this extension period. The Final Extended Redemption Date will be
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The rating is based on the evaluation of the natural catastrophe risk, the counterparty risk of Travelers, the credit risk of the permitted investments and the structural integrity of the transaction. The natural catastrophe risk represents the lowest rating amongst the three risk segments and currently drives the final rating of the notes.
The rating analysis in support of the evaluation of the natural catastrophe risk is highly model-driven. As with any model of complex physical systems, particularly those with low frequencies of occurrence and potentially high severity outcomes, the actual losses from catastrophic events may differ from the results of simulation analyses. Fitch is neutral to any of the major catastrophe modeling firms chosen by the issuer to provide the model analysis, and thus Fitch did not include any explicit margins or qualitative haircuts to the probability of loss metric provided by the modeling firm.
Based on fifty thousand simulations, the one-year attachment probability for the 2015-1 notes was 1.276 percent. This corresponds to implied ratings of 'BB-' using Fitch's ILS Calibration Matrix with a one year time to risk maturity assumption. A sensitivity test performed by AIR reflecting the impact of elevated sea surface temperatures produced a Modeled Trigger Probability of 1.35 percent which would not change the implied rating. Results from other third- party modeling firms or from Travelers were not provided that could indicate different levels of attachment probability. Note holders are exposed to this basis risk or the difference between actual losses incurred by Travelers and the AIR modeled losses.
Nearly 83 percent of the Modeled Trigger Probability is attributable to Tropical Cyclones. Severe Thunderstorms represent almost 12 percent, while Earthquake and Winter Storms represent 5 percent and 1 percent, respectively. This reflects the 'per occurrence' trigger feature of the 2015-1 notes where a significant event needs to occur versus multiple aggregate events. In addition, historical data surrounding northeast U.S. earthquake is limited. As can be expected, the
During the annual reset process, Travelers may lower the Updated Modeled Expected Loss to any level but is limited to raising it to 1.606 percent. Fitch's implied rating calibration matrix is dependent on the Trigger Probability (or first-dollar loss); consequently, we cannot estimate at this time if there would be any rating impact if the expected loss was raised to its maximum.
Long Point III Re is reliant on the counterparty credit risk of Travelers to make periodic payments for the Risk Interest Spread. In the event that any payment is not made, principal will be returned to Note holders. In addition, the notes ultimately 'follow the fortunes' of Travelers over the next three years in regards to underwriting of new business, claim loss management and reserve practices.
Proceeds from this issuance will be held in a reinsurance trust account and used to purchase high-credit-quality money market funds meeting defined eligibility criteria, otherwise funds will be held in cash. Investment yields generated from these permitted investments are passed directly to note holders as the other component of the variable rate. A downgrade of a permitted investment will not necessarily lead to a replacement of that investment. Further, note holders are exposed to possible market value risk if the net asset value of a money market fund falls below
RATING SENSITIVITIES
This rating is sensitive to the occurrence of a qualifying natural catastrophe event(s), Travelers' election to reset the note's expected loss, changes in the data quality, the counterparty rating of Travelers and the rating or performance on the assets held in the collateral account.
If a qualifying covered event occurs that results in a loss of principal, Fitch will downgrade the note to reflect an effective default and issue a Recovery Rating.
The implied rating of the natural catastrophe risk profile may change if Travelers elects to significantly reduce (or increase) the Modeled Expected Loss at the Reset Dates which may impact the rating of the series 2015-1 Class A notes.
The escrow model may not reflect future methodology enhancements by AIR which may have an adverse or beneficial effect on the implied rating of the notes were such future methodology considered.
To a lesser extent, the notes may be downgraded if the credit ratings of Travelers or the reinsurance trust account assets were significantly downgraded to a level commensurate to the implied rating of the natural catastrophe risk. Likewise, it is unlikely that the 2015-1 notes would be rated above the credit ratings of Travelers if the implied rating of the natural catastrophe risk was significantly reduced to those ratings.
Fitch's expected rating is based on a review of a Preliminary Offering Circular Supplement and the Offering Circular, the AIR Expert Risk Analysis and AIR Expert Risk Analysis Results and a Rating Agency Presentation (all supplied
Additional information is available at fitchratings.com.
--'Insurance-Linked Securities Methodology' (
--'Insurance Rating Methodology' (
--'Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria' (
--'Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance Transactions and Covered Bonds' (
Insurance-Linked Securities Methodology
http://fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/ report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=752532
Insurance Rating Methodology
http://fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/ report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=756650
Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria - Effective from
http://fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/ report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=754389
Additional Disclosure
Solicitation Status
http://fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/ solicitation?pr_id=983695
((Comments on this story may be sent to [email protected]))


Advisor News
- Nearly half of nonretirees doubt they will fully retire
- How much could failure to fund Social Security cost average Americans?
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Advisors don’t have an annuity problem; they have an integration problem.
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
- Canvas steps into the direct-to-consumer market that has yet to take off
- The next growth phase in life/annuities depends on modernization
- CA judge certifies class action in teachers’ lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Insurers hedge on Trump-backed pledge to improve denials process
- Tips for life, health insurance for military members, families
- Health insurers use a whole arsenal of tools to deny care, increase profit
- Health insurers use a whole arsenal of tools to deny care, increase profit
- Covered California rates to jump nearly 10% as thousands struggle to afford coverage
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Agentic AI is transforming insurance sales both for consumers and agents
- USAA introduces Secure Start whole life program for children
- Best’s Market Segment Report: AM Best Maintains Stable Outlook on South Korea’s Non-Life Insurance Market
- Horace Mann Strengthens Customer Relationships and Accelerates Long-Term Growth Through Transactions with Medical Mutual of Ohio
- Regulators: ‘No firm conclusions’ from first offshore reinsurance filings
More Life Insurance News