Classification of Securities: Interagency Guidance
| Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
OCC 2013-28
Classification of Securities
Date:
To: Chief Executive Officers of All National Banks and Federal Savings Associations, Department and Division Heads, All Examining Personnel, and Other Interested Parties
Description: Interagency Guidance
Summary
Highlights
- Removes reference to, or requirement of reliance on, credit ratings as the basis for the classification of securities, consistent with sections 939 and 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and applies the standards of creditworthiness defined in OCC Bulletin 2012-18, "Alternatives to the Use of External Credit Ratings in the Regulations of the OCC," as the new basis for the classification of securities.
- Provides specific examples to demonstrate the appropriate application of the new standards of creditworthiness consistent with the agencies' longstanding asset classification definitions. Each example describes specific credit risk characteristics and provides classification and upgrade guidance for securities already owned, as well as guidance on what is eligible for potential purchase.
- Removes credit ratings-based guidance for the treatment and classification of declines in the fair value of investment securities.
See original table at: http://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2013/bulletin-2013-28.html
Background
Sections 939 and 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act direct the agencies to remove any reference to, or requirement of reliance on, credit ratings in the agencies' regulations, and to replace credit ratings with appropriate standards of creditworthiness. This Agreement removes the 2004 Agreement's reliance on credit ratings as a determinant of classification and applies in its place the creditworthiness standards adopted in OCC Bulletin 2012-18, "Alternatives to the Use of External Credit Ratings in the Regulations of the OCC."
The agencies' longstanding asset classification definitions are not changed by this Agreement. As with the previous version, examiners may use discretion to assess the credit risk of, and to classify, a security when justified by available credit risk information, independent of any credit rating assigned by the institution or external credit rating entity.
Investment grade securities are no longer defined as one of the four highest credit ratings, but instead are those deemed by the purchasing institution's credit analyses as having an adequate capacity to repay the obligation. An issuer has adequate capacity to meet its financial commitments if the risk of default is low and the full and timely repayment of principal and interest is expected. Explanatory language in the Agreement offers additional clarifications to the investment grade standards conveyed in OCC Bulletin 2012-18. Specifically, the Agreement states that classification should be based on the instrument's worth as an earning asset assuming it is held to maturity. Therefore, the phrase "liquidation of the debt" in the classification definition is synonymous with the "payment of the obligation in full" wording in the investment grade definition. Accordingly, if the institution's analyses do not support the full payment of all future contractual amounts, that security is not investment grade. Similarly, securities with realized credit losses do not conform to the investment grade standard.
As this Agreement focuses on applying investment grade standards for classification, it removes the 2004 Agreement's credit ratings-based guidance for the treatment and classification of declines in the fair value of investment securities. The determination of the appropriate accounting, e.g., classification, measurement, and other-than-temporary impairment, for investment securities is not addressed in the Agreement. The accounting for investment securities is addressed under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles in ASC 320, "Investments - Debt and Equity Securities," ASC 325, "Investments - Other," and under regulatory reporting requirements in the call report instructions and glossary. For questions concerning accounting for investment securities, please contact the
With the issuance of this bulletin on the classification of securities, OCC Bulletin 2004-25, "Uniform Agreement on the Classification of Securities," is rescinded.
Further Information
Any questions regarding this securities classification agreement should be directed to
Senior Deputy Comptroller and Chief National
Related Link
- "Uniform Agreement on the Classification and Appraisal of Securities Held by Depository Institutions (http://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/bulletins/2013/bulletin-2013-28a.pdf)" (PDF)
| Copyright: | (c) 2012 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. |
| Wordcount: | 775 |


Advisor News
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
- Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
- Investors aren’t waiting out uncertainty
- Transamerica and Advo(k)ate Advisors launch pooled employer plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
- NAIC regulators begin consensus phase on annuity illustration overhaul
- AM Best Revises Outlooks to Negative for Subsidiaries of Group 1001 Insurance Holdings, LLC
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- AHF Optimistic About New Senate Bill to Protect 340B Program from Greedy PhRMA and Health Insurers
- Why Gen Z turns everything – even murder – into a joke
- California nearly achieved universal health care. Now, millions are losing coverage.
- Vote delayed on school employee health plan
NJ school employees' health care plan vote delayed amid 34% rate hike
- Financial planning could solve the looming Medicaid disaster
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- ‘Uniquely positioned’: Equitable outlines future post-Corebridge merger
- Don't keep checks with clerical errors
- The insurance distributor that builds its own software will win the next decade
- iA Financial Group Reports Second Quarter Results
- Supporting small businesses starts with smarter benefits conversations
More Life Insurance News