St. Louis County fraud findings withheld by Dooley administration
By Steve Giegerich, St. Louis Post-Dispatch | |
McClatchy-Tribune Information Services |
Mueth was supposed to meet with his bosses the next morning to answer questions raised about his ties to a county computer vendor.
As the
The embezzlement was an embarrassment for County Executive
As of today, however, neither an explanation of how the
Only a handful of Dooley's closest advisers have seen any details about the embezzlement or January's audit.
One of those is
Mueth "was extraordinarily effective at stealing from us," Earls said in an interview.
The fraud initially escaped notice, according to Earls, because Gateway Technical Solutions, the corporation established by Mueth to take advantage of his position as the official overseeing the procurement of technical goods and services for the county health department, delivered on an original
But from that point forward, Earls said, Mueth stole every cent the county paid to Gateway Technical Solutions.
Earls said the audit determined that Mueth had been able to purchase not only the 7,000-square-foot home in
Mueth was also "a big consumer of electronics," Earls said.
The financial information in the audit provided by the
Meanwhile, members of the
"They keep us out of the loop on everything," Councilman
Council member
Even County Prosecutor
"I had no idea it existed," McCulloch said.
Dooley, in a statement released through spokeswoman
"At this point our goal is to make sure that we can file the necessary claims against
Earls said the county expected to recover most of its losses through insurance and a lien on the proceeds from the sale of Mueth's property and possessions.
Completed in January, the previously undisclosed federal audit results were delivered to the county counselor's office and police, who in turn passed audit information along to Earls and other ranking county officials. The audit focused on bank records and other financial aspects of the Mueth case.
The county has cited the 5-month-old letter from the
"The documents and their contents are not to be distributed outside your agency, and the documents must be returned to the
Yet, the U.S. Attorney for the
County officials insist they still are bound by federal authorities' request from January not to disclose the findings even though the federal investigation is over.
"The letter is self-explanatory,"
However,
"The
"We're waiting on the forensic analysis of the electronic equipment that might show if anyone else was involved in a conspiracy with
Belmar said the department expects to release its findings early next month.
County council members, prosecutor McCulloch and former Chief Fitch have criticized Dooley's administration over its handling of the Mueth case from the start.
High billing by Gateway Technical Solutions first raised attention from some county finance employees in 2010, but Mueth was able to soothe those concerns easily.
Then, on
Gunn and Earls instead cut off Mueth's access to the health department computer system and summoned him to a meeting in Earls' office at
Gunn, whom Dooley has stood by in the wake of the embezzlement scandal, maintained in a mid-January interview that "we acted appropriately and immediately."
Her statement coincided with a plea from her and Dooley that the public remain patient until the investigation into the Mueth matter was completed.
The
"I don't want to accuse anyone of covering up, but it certainly looks suspicious for anyone following what's going on," said County Councilman Dolan.
The reluctance to fully disclose information about the Mueth scandal continued earlier this month when the county responded to a public-records request by the
The Post-Dispatch subsequently obtained the entire purchase record from a separate source.
The statements provided to the
County officials say they believe they can account for most, although not all, of the materials and services charged on the purchase card that Mueth used from 2007-2013.
"It was not as consistent as it should have been, but we're more consistent now,"
The county issues the cards to a handful of high-ranking county employees to obtain items costing less than
The documents obtained by the
The statements show that Mueth often ordered the same or nearly identical items from the
"For him to use the P-Card on a daily basis was not unusual if he was supplying over 500 people," said Gunn. "I don't remember seeing anything unusual."
Earls said it was county policy to procure relatively low-cost items such as printers and computer cables on an as-needed basis.
"Splitting purchases is absolutely not a recommended practice," Maas said. "In fact, quite to the contrary."
The health department generally did not catalog or note the destination of goods and services that fell under the
Gunn, who has described Mueth as a "model employee" who "was there early" and "worked late," emphasized that she reviewed and approved everything charged to Mueth's card.
Quinn, the
"Certainly the administration needs to crack down and make sure procedures are followed or that the people that don't follow them are fired," the councilman said.
Gunn maintains that the inventory has determined that nearly all the transactions were legitimate.
Earls says the county has seen no evidence that Mueth sold equipment purchased at a government discount on
Earls based the assessment on his review of the not-yet-public
General assignment reporter
___
(c)2014 the St. Louis Post-Dispatch
Visit the St. Louis Post-Dispatch at www.stltoday.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
Wordcount: | 1955 |
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News