Casualties of the Global War on Terror and Their Future Impact on Health Care and Society: A Looming Public Health Crisis - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Editorial Staff
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
May 10, 2014 Newswires
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Casualties of the Global War on Terror and Their Future Impact on Health Care and Society: A Looming Public Health Crisis

Baker, Michael S
By Baker, Michael S
Proquest LLC

ABSTRACT This article is a primer to understand the medical advances and the future health care consequences of the current conflicts in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, known as the Global War on Terror. There have been significant advances in health care learned in caring for those injured by the conflict-often a polytrauma blast victim, but there are also very high incidence rates of the hidden injuries of war-traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicide, and depression. These lead to disruptive behaviors, homelessness, and family violence. Global War on Terror returnees are using medical services and applying for disability at higher rates than in previous conflicts. The costs for veterans' care may peak 30 to 40 years or longer following the conflict, and will inflict an enormous burden on services and resources. The effects of the war will linger for years and impact across generations because of the stress on families and children. We must mobilize government agencies, create public-private partnerships, and invest our resources now to mitigate the approaching tsunami of veterans' health care needs, the impact on our social services, and the devastating costs to society.

INTRODUCTION

This article highlights the future health care consequences of the current decade long conflict in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, known as the Global War on Terror (GWOT). The end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq and the drawdown of troops from Afghanistan may soon close this chapter in history, but is not the end of our nation's war-derived health concerns and resulting and social impacts. To quote Winston Churchill, "This is not the end; it is not even the beginning of the end, but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning."1 This conflict may result in a major public health crisis and economic drain that will overtax social systems such that it could destabilize our society.

Returning veterans have serious physical and sometimes invisible wounds and problems that need to be addressed- this article is to give a voice to my brothers and sisters in arms who are less fortunate-"For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother..."2 This article reviews how the GWOT resulted in medical advances, the anticipated rise in cost of health care, and the need to improve our efforts to care for the veterans.

THE GOOD

Every war has advanced medical knowledge and patient care and this conflict is notable for improvements that have been adopted into civilian practice and helped save many lives. First responders are key to survival in those first minutes after wounding, and medics and corpsmen are better trained than ever, as are the individual warriors in self-care and buddy care. An example is using tourniquets to stop bleeding, which was not recommended in civilian trauma courses in previous years, despite studies of the Vietnam conflict that had shown that there were preventable deaths on the battlefield because of bleeding.3 Tourniquets have improved, can be self-applied, and use is now integral to current military training and proven as lifesaving.4-6 Devastating wounds in patients with injured extremities who in previous conflicts often exsanguinated (bled to death) in the field can be stabilized long enough to reach definitive care. There are case reports of triple and quadruple amputees surviving because of rapid and precise tourniquet placement.6,7 Other new developments include tourniquets designed for control of hemorrhage in the groin and torso.8

New tools include hemostatic dressings deployed by the U.S. military into the battlefield: zeolite (QuikClot, Z-Medica, Wallingford, Connecticut) and chitosan (HemCon, HemCon Hemorrhage Control Technologies, Portland, Oregon). These had demonstrated success in controlling hemorrhage in animal models. Early clinical experience has shown efficacy in providing hemorrhage control, particularly in injuries not amenable to tourniquet use.4,9

The "tyranny" of time, distance, and the tactical setting historically delayed definitive surgery. Casualties who receive definitive surgery during the "golden hour" after wounding have better outcomes. Hence moving surgery forward to the edge of battle saves lives. Mobile forward surgical units bring definitive care close, and their personnel brave conditions near or in actual combat to save those who would otherwise perish, placing themselves at risk.10 Richard Jadick's "On Call in Hell" is a vivid and poignant description that helps one appreciate the difficulty, stress, and ultimate reward of saving lives while in the line of fire.11

Life and limb saving "damage control procedures" for massively injured patients are now standard practice. The patient undergoes abbreviated surgery, where control of hemorrhage and contamination is rapidly obtained and definitive repairs deferred-short quick fixes to get the injured off the operating table so that metabolic and coagulation needs can be corrected. Limited damage control surgery includes leaving open amputation wounds, debridement, external fixation of fractures, packing of bleeding sites, and temporary abdominal closure using synthetic barriers.4,12- 15

Massively traumatized patients must have short, quick operations. Longer operations can result in hypothermia (cold body core temperature), acidosis (buildup of lactic acid because of inadequate delivery of oxygen to mitochondria), and coagulopathy (blood does not clot)-a physiologic lethal triad that must be prevented. Concluding surgery quickly allows resuscitation with transfusion of blood and clotting factors, and warming to improve physiologic stability.12 Stabilization may allow further procedures or onward evacuation to a higher level of care. The next surgeon will evaluate for hemodynamic status and possibly proceed to removal of packs, re-exploration, completion of repairs, establishment of stomas or gastrointestinal continuity, and wound closure.15 Contaminated wounds or fractures are debrided, cleansed, external stabilization devices applied/adjusted, and wounds covered or closed.16 Definitive surgery, restorative treatment, or evacuation to the next higher level of care in the chain can then be undertaken. Military and civilian surgeons both utilize this limited damage control approach followed by stabilization and then later definitive treatment in the polytrauma patient.

Resuscitation has evolved away from every trauma patient having 2 IVs and receiving at least 2 L of saline-based fluid to restore the circulating volume. A landmark study using a nofluid resuscitation protocol in hypotensive patients after penetrating truncal injuries concluded that traditional rapid fluid resuscitation significantly decreased survival.17 Large volumes of fluid may promote a higher blood pressure, which might result in more bleeding; and there are dilution and coagulation issues with IV fluids as well. Supported by studies on the battlefield, priority is directed to stopping bleeding and allowing lower blood pressure in certain patients-permissive hypotension-to decrease the bleeding from uncontrolled bleeding points, until casualties reach definitive care where bleeding can be stopped.18

Blood is now favored over saline or other extenders for volume restoration in major traumas. Banked blood has had the plasma with most of its clotting factors removed, and the platelets deteriorate over time, so massive transfusion of banked blood can exacerbate coagulation problems. Battlefield observations suggest improved survival of patients receiving fresh whole blood, or with packed cell transfusion augmented by fresh frozen plasma and platelets.19,20 The clinical guidelines for resuscitation of combat-wounded patients in deployed U.S. surgical facilities in hemorrhagic shock requiring a massive transfusion recommend the infusion of fresh frozen plasma, packed red blood cells, platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio, and the minimization of crystalloids and synthetic colloids.21 This change is a direct result of observations and research both on the battlefield and in civilian trauma centers. The most grievously wounded in previous conflicts could not tolerate evacuation even though they needed a higher level of care. Critical Care Air Transport Teams (CCATT) in this conflict evacuate the casualties with the most devastating injuries from the battlefield to Landstuhl Regional Medical Center (LRMC) in Germany and then onward to U.S. centers for treatment. A CCATT has a critical care physician, critical care nurse, and respiratory therapist along with the supplies and equipment to operate a portable intensive care unit within a cargo aircraft, and can care for six low-acuity patients or three high-acuity patients.22 Each member completes additional training in aerospace physiology and medical care in austere environments.4 These teams have worked out protocols for even the most complex intensive care-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiac and respiratory support to patients whose heart and lungs are so severely damaged that they can no longer serve their function of delivering oxygen to the tissues, previously done only in specialized intensive care units.23,24

Information technology has improved so that records of care and images taken during care at each point are accessible to medical professionals along the evacuation and treatment chain. Every week, each critical patient in the evacuation pipeline is discussed on a video teleconference that spans nine time zones on three continents. Attendees include forward surgical teams, combat support hospitals, Landstuhl Regional Medical Center, NATO colleagues, and the Air Force Aeromedical Evacuation service. The conference may include participants at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in the Washington, DC area; Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas; and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).25 The information coming forward and the rapid feedback loop to providers along the chain of care and evacuation is a catalyst for performance improvement and a patient care enhancement. There is also an element of morale boosting for forward deployed providers hearing that patients further down the evacuation chain have achieved significant milestones.

Enhanced training, better tools, and improved techniques augment the professionalism, selflessness, and devotion to duty of the military medical staff. First responder/ field care, Forward Surgical Units, improvements in resuscitation, CCATT, and others have contributed to saving lives. Each of these developments was worked out by medical professionals in uniform observing, studying, and pushing the envelope. The validation of their observations has led to incorporation of many of these advances in the care of casualties around the world. The battlefield provides a robust laboratory for the advancement of medicine; to quote Dr. Mayo: "Medicine is the only victor in war."26

THE BAD

We know the visible injuries of war, but GWOT is a new conflict with a different pattern of injury. The hallmark injury of the GWOT is the massive blast injury-penetrating fragment wounds, burns, toxic inhalation, blast overpressure, and kinetic collision with stationary objects. The patients can have multiple anatomic sites injured with simultaneous open amputations, head and spinal injuries, and complex torso wounds, and eye damage (Figs. 1 and 2). These patients survive to reach definitive care because of the advances in first responder care and forward surgery fielded during this conflict. They often require considerable care and rehabilitation for many years.

We now recognize that there are serious invisible injuries of war. These include injuries to the brain, which can be subtle and can result in significant disability, although not apparent on physical examination, found during surgical exploration, or seen with imaging studies like computed tomography scans. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is another legacy of the GWOT.27 TBI can be a major obvious head injury or a mild concussion. There is evidence that repeated mild TBI injuries can result in cumulative problems.28

TBI symptoms can include headache, confusion, behavioral changes, memory loss, concentration problems, and attention deficits. TBI patients have problems with higher level executive function such as planning, organizing, abstract reasoning, problem solving, and making sound judgments. Early dementia and Parkinson like syndromes may result.29 -33

In one recent study, 33% of all patients with combatrelated injuries and 60% of the patients with blast-related injuries seen at Walter Reed Army National Military Medical Center had sustained a TBI.34 Based on self-reported data, approximately 15% of troops engaged in active combat in Afghanistan and Iraq may have suffered a TBI.30 TBI ranging from mild to severe was 19% in one study.32,35 The Department of Defense (DoD) has diagnosed 280,734 troops with TBI from 2000 through the 2nd quarter of 2013,36 but there are disparate numbers of reported cases because of a lack of adequate screening and failure to capture data.

The other often invisible wound of combat is post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is an anxiety disorder that is a result of an overwhelming or dangerous event. It can lead to flashbacks, emotional numbness, depression, insomnia, and/or angry outbursts. The VHA reported 286,134 veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had been seen for possible PTSD through the end of 2012.These numbers exclude those diagnosed and treated outside the VA system.37 A study of almost 290,000 veterans of GWOT treated at the VA in the period 2002 to 2008 found that 37% had received mental health diagnoses, such as PTSD and depression.38

There may be some overlap in the numbers of DoD and VHA cases, and there is no reporting of diagnoses from nonVHA community providers; the true numbers of veterans having issues may be much higher. The disparity in numbers of those who are treated by the VHA and other providers beyond the DoD counts of veterans with psychological and cognitive injuries may also be the result of delayed detection, delayed onset of symptoms, failure to self-recognize the problem, or avoiding the stigma of reporting although in uniform. Studies suggest that only half (53%) of GWOT veterans who need treatment for major depression or PTSD seek it.32 Many veterans do not recognize their problem, refuse to seek help, or self-medicate with drugs or alcohol.32,33

Studies found that PTSD sufferers are 200% more likely to be diagnosed with an unrelated medical disease within 5 years of returning from deployment than the control group.39 Another study found that veterans with PTSD used nonmental health care services-primary care, ancillary services, diagnostic tests and procedures, emergency services, and hospitalizations-at a rate 71% to 170% higher than those without PTSD.40 Studies have shown that TBI, often overlapping with PTSD, places sufferers at higher risk for lifelong health problems such as heart disease, dementia, and other chronic ailments.30,39-41

TBI and PTSD patients have trouble completing school, holding a job, keeping the family together, and often become homeless. Substance abuse and risk-taking behaviors- smoking, drug abuse, overeating, unprotected sex, fighting, and drunk driving-occur in high numbers in TBI and PTSD patients. Rates of substance abuse among veterans diagnosed with PTSD or other mental health issues range from 21% to 35%.42 Experts have estimated that at least 50% of GWOT veterans will present to either a community or VHA health care provider with one or more problems such as PTSD, TBI, depression, suicide attempt, and/or substance abuse.32 Many vets with problems may not seek VHA help.32

Suicide of uniformed service members has become epidemic, at times averaging one suicide a day. The number of active duty service members who took their lives in 2013 has at times surpassed the number killed in combat.43,44 Among men in the general population ages 17 to 60, suicide represents 7% of deaths but 20% of deaths among men of this age in the military. The risk in the youngest cohort of military service members has suicide rates four times the national average.45 Women veterans are two to three times more likely to commit suicide than nonveteran women.46

The VHA has confirmed 18 suicides per day among the entire veteran population and 1,000 suicide attempts per month among all veterans seen at VHA medical facilities.47,48 Suicides among nonactive duty reservists are not counted by the military and the VHA reports only suicides among enrolled veterans. So the numbers are likely falsely low. This represents an ongoing, long-term cost to society that is another invisible cost of war.

Large numbers of troops on active duty are using psychotropic medications and this appears to be a monumental change in military culture and military medicine. Psychotropic medicine use, especially on the battlefield is an enigma when these medications can have severe side effects such as insomnia, suicidal thoughts, or hallucinations. A June 2010 internal report from the DoD's Pharmacoeconomic Center at Fort Sam Houston in San Antonio showed that 213,972, or 20% of the 1.1 million active duty troops surveyed were taking some form of psychotropic drug: antidepressants, antipsychotics, sedative hypnotics, or other controlled substances.43 This psychotropic medication use will interweave with TBI, PTSD, depression, suicide, and other health problems, and is likely to complicate medical and mental health problems after discharge.

The GWOT has utilized a workforce of several hundred thousand contractors to sustain the war effort, and to lower the apparent number of active duty troops being deployed. These contractors have the same types of injury and mental health problems that uniformed troops have, which will impose both direct budgetary costs through federal subsidies to worker compensation and insurance companies, and projected higher costs to Medicare as they age. Such individuals account for up to 54% of the total of U.S. workforce in both countries.49,50 During the 18-month period from fiscal year 2007 to the first half of 2008, there were approximately 200,000 contractor personnel in theater; and during this period there were at least 455 contractors killed and 15,787 injured.51 There are approximately 3,000 contractor deaths in the GWOT operational theater listed in the database of the Office of Worker's Compensation Programs through June 30, 2013.51 The U.S. government does not keep track of contractors killed and wounded, so these numbers are based on reports to the Department of Labor (which provides insurance) and may be underestimated.49-53

Contractors served in the same places as uniformed personnelandhavealsosufferedthesamekindsofinjuriesas the troops, both physical, and invisible such as TBI and PTSD. One 2007 study measured rates of depression and PTSD at a combined 24% for DynCorp employees returning from the battle zones, a figure within the range of that found in returning troops (23%-31%).54 Approximate numbers of U.S. contractors wounded are available through the Department of Labor: as of May 10, 2011, there were 33,295 claims for injury or illness that involved lost time on the job, but these figures are acknowledged to be quite incomplete. Contractor injuries in both wars have been conservatively estimated at 51,031 through March 2011, using Department of Labor numbers. It is a group with no ties to the military or access to veteran's health care services, but they will suffer the same long-term consequences of combat and contribute to the negative impact on society.49,50,52,53

Approximately 2.5 million service men and women have served in Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation New Dawn, and/or Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan to date.55 About 42% (941,743) had been deployed more than once. For every service member killed in action as of October 21, 2013 (7,092) there are seven wounded in action (51,670). When including "noncombat" injuries (56,874), the ratio of injured to killed jumps to 16 to 1.33,56

One out of four veterans of the current conflicts has filed a disability claim at the VHA, and the VA has treated 30% of veterans of the two wars as of October 2011.33,39 Over 61% (1,442,987) of GWOT veterans are currently separated from active duty and are eligible for VHA services. As of September 2012, some 783,623 of GWOT veterans (50%) have filed disability claims with the VA, of whom 671,299 have been awarded service-connection so far, and 15,521 have been denied (the rest are pending in the VA system).57 The actual number of GWOT veterans receiving government medical care has grown to more than 56% of the total.57 This total, however, does not include the still large number of untreated or undiagnosed illnesses and war disability incurred by serving military, and the actual number may be much larger than these official numbers indicate.

There are large numbers of those who are ill or injured beyond what the DoD counts as the war wounded on its website. Many individuals suffering from PTSD, TBI, depression, and other psychological injuries of war have not been counted by official sources, may not recognize they have problems, and often there is delayed detection and treatment.49,58,59 Many uniformed rape victims do not report the attack or apply to the system for help long after their injuries were inflicted.33,49,60,61 There are reports of Vietnam-era veterans developing delayed middle ear problems, hearing loss, and neurologic symptoms 30+ years after returning home without apparent disability (F. Burkle, personal communication, January 22, 2013).

The large number of veterans with complex injuries will need considerable resources-it is difficult to track, measure, and project future costs. Many of these patients require surgery multiple times at each stop along the evacuation chain. Care will be done in military facilities initially, but there will be a shift to the VHA and private sector care. Many will require more restorative procedures and extensive rehabilitation as they progress. This makes it difficult to quantify the cost now, let alone near impossible to predict for the future. Sizeable resources, large numbers of professionals, heroic efforts, and extraordinary expenditures are required for the care of our wounded warriors-and they deserve the best care that can be resourced.

THE UGLY

GWOT returnees are using veteran's medical services and applying for disability at higher rates than in previous conflicts. The costs of caring for veterans appears to peak 30 to 40 years or longer following the conflict because of agerelated chronic disease overlying the initial problems.40,50,51 The costs of care are likely to escalate exponentially compared to prior wars for a variety of reasons: (1) there is enhanced survival of devastating injuries not seen in previous conflicts; (2) better health care has resulted in longer life spans; and (3) there are more expensive diagnostic and therapeutic tools, treatments, and prosthetics that did not exist for veterans of previous conflicts.

These physical injuries can have a high economic toll; yet, direct costs of treatment are only a fraction of the total costs related to mental health and cognitive conditions. Far higher are the long-term individual and societal costs stemming from lost productivity, reduced quality of life, family disruptions, homelessness, impaired health, substance abuse, and suicide.

Economists writing in The Three Trillion Dollar War state: "for the first time ever, when we went to war, we actually cut taxes, rather than raised taxes to finance the costs. Hence this war has been totally financed by deficit." They calculate that medical care and disability will be the second-largest expense of the war, estimating (as of 2008) this will cost ultimately cost $700 billion and will represent the primary long-term expense of the conflict.62 The projected cost data keep rising as we accrue more casualties, PTSD, and TBI-and much higher costs as the GWOT grinds onward. The conflict and resultant cost has now run several more years on credit, and our children and grandchildren will pay the costs.

The cessation of hostilities of the GWOT is indeed "the end of the beginning"-but will begin a new phase with different problems. This is the opening chapter of a disruptive economic and public health crisis because of escalating medical care and mental health costs for veterans, contractors, their families, and others involved in the GWOT. It will lead to problems that will heavily impact and potentially overwhelm our emergency departments, health care systems, and social safety nets.

The visible and invisible injuries of war involve such large numbers that the potentialsocialimpactwillbedisastrous, while adding an enormous financial burden and substantial stress onto our society. Many statistics undercount the true numbers of those effected, many injuries or issues will manifest years later, and in some areas there are no metrics whatever, such as contractors' injuries and adverse family impacts.

THE UGLIEST OF ALL

Another huge impact on society for which there is no metric is the tragic effect of this fiasco on veterans' families. The family members of those on long deployments, whose family members have been wounded or killed, manifest mental health issues, or develop substance abuse will be forever damaged by this conflict.63 - 68 These conditions ruin relationships, disrupt marriages, aggravate the difficulties of parenting, lead to child mistreatment, and result in psychological problems in children that may extend the consequences of combat trauma across generations.63- 69 The DoD and VHA do not measure this "collateral damage." It may represent the ugliest aspect of all social concerns related here. It is another future cost to society, which will be huge but is neither predictable nor quantifiable.

The veterans, their family members, and those hired contractors that no one has on their radar are going to crash into our society's structure like a tsunami. Homelessness, family disruptions, domestic violence, suicide, criminal acts, substance abuse, and risk taking behaviors are the legacy of the GWOT. Social services, law enforcement agencies, jails, prisons, shelters, emergency rooms, suicide prevention hot lines, and hospitals are going to be slammed.

The economic and geopolitical storm has also hit us. Money is tight, employment scarce, and we have outsourced to the point where we have a service economy and a poor manufacturing job base. We are cutting education opportunities and eating our academic, research, and intellectual seed corn. Twelve years of combat exposed troops with physical wounds or mental impairments will need help when we are least fiscally able to provide for them. The cost of their care will escalate over the next 30 to 40 years. We should spare no effort or expense-as Lincoln said "to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan."70

History tells us that when conflicts end, the resources become scarce, can be diverted, national resolve can shift or wane, media and public interest become focused elsewhere. There is no mention of the GWOT combat in today's newspaper orTVnews,eventhoughwehavetroopsinbattleinaforeign land. How can there be such disregard for this reality? No one feels the pain of raised taxes, material shortages, rationing, or the draft-but that is fodder for another discussion.

Federal agencies like VHA and DOD do not have a stellar record in caring for GWOT vets. They need to invest now to mitigate the cascade of health problems of the veterans of the GWOT. Budget projections must take into account the anticipated escalating expense as veteran's age. Health care and mental health services must be easily accessible, and the paperwork-now taking up to a year-needs to be simplified and acted on in a timely manner.33,71 Delivering effective care now and restoring veterans to better mental and physical health has the potential to reduce these longer term costs. We need to pressure our elected representatives to step up and be proactive for the veterans, and all of us need to participate in local veteran support activities.

Ultimately, as in all prior conflicts, I believe veterans will have to take care of each other.72 I doubt that the federal government can be visionary that the VHA can get ahead of the power curve, that politicians can do the right thing, or that most people care. Those who have worn the cloth of this country-every one of us is bound together-must continue to help each other.

I applaud those who have started their own local, regional, and national programs to help the injured veterans. New organizations such as "Purple Heart Homes"-building homes for disabled vets, "The Mission Continues"-wounded vet link for public services, "Hire Heroes," to name a few, and similar programs are reaching out to help their less fortunate brothers and sisters.73-75 Thepeopleleading these efforts-whether large or small, local or national-are my heroes.

ThePresidentneedstoestablishacommissiontoacton veterans' needs and coordinate resources. There must be a comprehensive national strategy with a long-term plan that will include healthcare, psychological services, education and career transition, and family support. The plan should outline a vision for the future and establish a timeline for delivery. Public-private partnerships should be encouraged and facilitated. The plan should have a definition of roles and responsibilities; and coordination of individuals, communities, volunteer groups, government agencies, charitable groups, and private sector corporations.76 Health care providers should look for problems aggressively and health screening should ask, "have you ever been in combat or been in a war zone," and make the appropriate referral.77 We have to be involved and get ahead of the downward spiral in mental and physical health in this population at risk.

CONCLUSION

The "Good" presented here is that there have been significant advances in health care learned in caring for those injured by the conflict. Forward surgical units, better fluid resuscitation, damage control surgery, and care in the air transport have saved lives and improved outcomes. The "Bad" presented are horrendous visible injuries and the hidden injuries such as PTSD, TBI, and suicide. These can lead to disruptive and reckless behaviors, job loss, homelessness, and family violence. The "Ugly" is the true cost of the war. GWOT returnees are using medical services and applying for disability at higher rates than in previous conflicts. The costs for veterans' care will inflict an enormous burden on services and resources. The "Ugliest" will be the effects of the war on families and children and the impact across generations. We must mobilize government agencies, create public-private partnerships, and invest our resources now to mitigate the approaching tsunami of veterans' health care needs, the impact on our social services, and the devastating costs to society.

President John F. Kennedy said that we don't measure a nation by how many veterans it has, or how many days we take to honor them. We measure it by how those veterans are treated day in and day out. Kennedy stated: "As we express our gratitude, we must never forget that the highest appreciation is not to utter words, but to live by them."78

REFERENCES

1. End of the Beginning-The Churchill Society London. Available at www.churchill-society-london.org.uk/EndoBegn.html; accessed December 9, 2012.

2. Shakespeare W, Henry V: Available at http://www.answers.com/topic/ henry-v-play; accessed December 9, 2012.

3. Bellamy RF: The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research. Mil Med 1984; 149: 55 - 62.

4. Beekley AC, Starnes BW, Sebesta JA: Lessons learned from modern military surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2007; 87(1): 157-84, vii.

5. Beekley AC, Sebesta JA, Blackbourne LH, et al: Prehospital tourniquet use in Operation Iraqi Freedom: effect on hemorrhage control and outcomes. J Trauma 2008; 64(Suppl 2): S28 - 37; discussion S37.

6. Walters TJ, Kauvar DS, Baer DG, Holcomb JB: Battlefield tourniquets: modern combat lifesavers. US Army Med Dep J 2005; 42-43.

7. Householder M: Quadruple amputee soldier: "I just had a bad day at work." KomoNews. July 3, 2012. http://www.komonews.com/news/ national/Quadruple-amputee-soldier-Travis-Mills-I-just-had-a-bad-dayat-work-161213655.html; accessed October 21, 2013.

8. Taylor DM, Coleman M, Parker PJ: The evaluation of an abdominal aortic tourniquet for the control of pelvic and lower limb hemorrhage. Mil Med 2014; 178(11): 1196-1201.

9. Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, Holcomb JB : A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J Trauma 2006; 60(3): 655 - 8.

10. Stevens R: The Forward Resuscitative Surgical System. Available at http://www.ausn.org/Portals/0/Services_pdfs/Health_Affairs-AUG04.pdf; accessed December 9, 2012.

11. Jadick R, Hardy T: On Call in Hell: A Doctor's Iraq War Story. New York, Penguin, 2007.

12. Blackbourne LH: Combat damage control surgery. Crit Care Med 2008; 36(Suppl 7): S304-10.

13. Loveland JA, Boffard KD: Damage control in the abdomen and beyond. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1095-1101.

14. Duchesne JC, Kimonis K, Marr AB, et al: Damage control resuscitation in combination with damage control laparotomy: a survival advantage. J Trauma 2010; 69: 46-52.

15. Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA, et al: Experience with vacuumpack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma and general and vascular surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 784-92.

16. Hildebrand F, Giannoudis P, Kretteck C, Pape HC: Damage control: extremities. Injury 2004; 35: 678-89.

17. Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr., Pepe PE, et al: Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med 1994; 331(17): 1105-9.

18. Beekley AC: Damage control resuscitation: a sensible approach to the exsanguinating surgical patient. Crit Care Med 2008; 36: S267 - 74.

19. Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, et al: Effect of plasma and red blood cell transfusions on survival in patients with combat related traumatic injuries. J Trauma 2008; 64: S69-S77.

20. Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, et al: The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma 2007; 63(4): 805-13.

21. Theater Trauma System (JTTS) Damage Control Resuscitation Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). Available at http://www.usaisr.amedd .army.mil; accessed December 9, 2012.

22. Beninati W, Meyer MT, Carter TE: The critical care air transport program. Crit Care Med 2008; 36(Suppl 7):S370-6.

23. Dorlac GR, Fang R, Pruitt VM, et al: Air transport of patients with severe lung injury: development and utilization of the Acute Lung Rescue Team. J Trauma 2009; 66(Suppl 4): S164- 71.

24. Cannon JW, Zonies DH, Benfield RJ, Elster EA, Wanek SM: Advanced En Route Critical Care During Combat Operations. Available at http://www.facs.org/fellows_info/bulletin/2011/cannon0511.pdf; accessed December 20, 2012.

25. Pellerin C: Landstuhl Medical Center Saves Lives, Advances Medicine; U.S. Department of Defense News. January 25, 2012. Available at http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=66925; accessed December 20, 2012.

26. Clapesattle H: The Doctors Mayo, p 573. Minneapolis, MN, The University of Minnesota Press, 1941.

27. Girard P, Hemick K, Parkinson G: Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury from the battlefield to the community. J Spec Oper Med 2007; 7(2): 55-62.

28. Guskiewicz KM, McCrea M, Marshall SW, et al: Cumulative effects associated with recurrent concussion in collegiate football players: the NCAA Concussion Study. JAMA 2003; 290: 2549-55.

29. Okie S: Traumatic brain injury in the war zone. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 2043-47.

30. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA: Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. Soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 453-63.

31. Traumatic Brain Injury. Department of Veterans Affairs. April 2010. Available at http://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/vhi/traumatic-braininjury-vhi.pdf; accessed December 20, 2012.

32. Tanielian T., et al: Invisible Wounds: Summary and Recommendations for Addressing Psychological and Cognitive Injuries. Santa Monica, CA, RAND Corporation, 2008. Available at www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/ 2008/RAND_MG720.1.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

33. Reference Guide on Current Era Veterans and Their Families; Comprehensive Facts and Figures October 2011. Available at http://www .nationalserviceresources.org/files/sample-forms/ivp_reference_guide_10 .11.pdf; accessed January 20, 2013.

34. Warden DL, Ryan LM, Helmick KM, Schwab K, French L, Lu W, et al: War neurotrauma: the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center (DVBIC) experience at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC). J Neurotrauma 2005; 22(10): 1178.

35. Tanielian T, Jaycox LH: Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery, Vol. MG-720-CCF. Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2008. Available at http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_ MG720.pdf; accessed October 23, 2013.

36. Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center. Available at http://www .dvbic.org/dod-worldwide-numbers-tbi; accessed October 21, 2013.

37. Report on VA Facility Specific Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) Veterans Coded with Potential PTSD. Office of Public Health, Veterans Health Administration Department of Veterans Affairs; Released March 2013. Available at http://www.publichealth.va.gov/docs/epidemiology/ ptsd-report-fy2013-qtr1.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

38. Seal K, Metzler TJ, Gima KS, Bertenthal D, Maguen S, Marmar CR: Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care, 2002-2008. Am J Public Health 2009; 99(9): 1651-8.

39. Geiling JR, Rosen JM, Edwards RD: Medical costs of war in 2035: long-term care challenges for veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Mil Med 2012; 177(11): 1235-44.

40. Cohen BE, Gima K, Bertenthal D, Kim S, Marmar CR, Seal KH: Mental health diagnoses and utilization of VA non-mental health medical services among returning Iraq and Afghanistan veterans. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25(1): 18-24.

41. Milliken CS, Auchterlonie JL, HogeCW: Longitudinal assessment of mental health problems among active and reserve component soldiers returning from the Iraq</location> war. JAMA 2007; 298(18): 2141-8.

42. Petrakis IL, Rosenheck R, Desai R: Substance use comorbidity among veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder and other psychiatric illness. Am J Addict 2011; 20(3), 185 -9.

43. Breggin P: Military to Hold Conference on Escalating Suicides; Drugs Not Allowed. Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-peterbreggin/military-suicide_b_1602927.html; accessed December 9, 2012.

44. Blumenthal SM: Stopping the Surge of Military Suicides: How to Win This Preventable War. Available at http://www.huffingtonpost .com/susan-blumenthal/military-suicide_b_1884083.html; accessed December 9, 2012.

45. Kuehn BM: Soldier suicide rates continue to rise. JAMA 2009; 301: 1111-3.

46. Caroline Cassels: Young Women Veterans at High Risk for Suicide. Medscape Medical News, May 27, 2009. Available at www.medscape .com/viewarticle/703424; accessed October 1, 2013.

47. Katz Ira R: Email to Michael J. Kussman, December 15, 2007. Available at www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/VA_email_121507.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

48. Katz Ira R: E-mail to Ev Chasen, February 13, 2008. Available at www .cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/VA_email_021308.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

49. Lutz C: US and Coalition Casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan Watson Institute, Brown UniversityJune 6, 2011. Available at http://costsofwar .org/sites/default/files/articles/10/attachments/Lutz%20US%20and% 20Coalition%20Casualties.pdf; accessed January 20, 2013.

50. Bilmes LJ: Current and Projected Future Costs of Caring for Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars. Available at http://www.hks.harvard.edu/ var/ezp_site/storage/fckeditor/file/pdfs/centers-programs/centers/mrcbg/ publications/fwp/mrcbg_fwp_2011-06_Bilmes_currentandprojected.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

51. US Department of Labor: Office of Workers' Compensation Programs. Available at http://www.dol.gov/owcp/dlhwc/dbaallnation6-30-13.htm; accessed October 22, 2013.

52. Miller CT: Contractors in Iraq are Hidden Casualties of War. Los Angeles Times, October 6, 2009 (2009b). Available at http://www.latimes.com/ news/nationworld/nation/la-na-iraq-contractor6-2009oct06,0,5717884 .story#axzz2iQB3sDme; accessed October 23, 2013.

53. Debusmann B: In Outsourced U.S. Wars. Available at http://www.reuters .com/article/2007/07/03/us-usa-iraq-contractors-idUSN0318650320070703; accessed January 24, 2013.

54. Thomas JL, Wilk JE, Riviere LA, McGurk D, Castro CA, Hoge CW: Prevalence of mental health problems and functional impairment among active component and National Guard Soldiers 3 and 12 months following combat in Iraq. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 67 (6): 614-23.

55. Blimes LJ: The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan: How Wartime Spending Decisions Will Constrain Future National Security Budgets. March 2013. Available at https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/ workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=8956&type=FN&PersonId=177; accessed November 20, 2013.

56. Department of Defense: Defense Casualty Analysis System, GWOT Casualty Summary by Casualty Type. Available at https://www.dmdc .osd.mil/dcas/pages/report_sum_reason.xhtml; accessed October 23, 2013.

57. VA Benefits Activity, Veterans Deployed to the Global War on Terror" through September 2012, VBA Office of Performance Analysis and Integrity, November 2012.

58. Litz BT, Schlenger WE. PTSD in Service Members and New Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars: A Bibliography and Critique. PTSD Research Quarterly. Vol 20/No. 1, 2009. Available at http://www.ptsd .va.gov/professional/newsletters/research-quarterly/V20N1.pdf; accessed February 12, 2013.

59. Institute of Medicine, Returning Home from Iraq and Afghanistan: Preliminary Assessment of Readjustment Needs of Veterans, Service Members, and Their Families (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010); Military Health System, Department of Defense Numbers for Traumatic Brain Injury (September 27, 2010). Available at http:// www.health.mil/Research/TBI_Numbers/2000-2010tbi.aspx.

60. Williamson RB: Preliminary Findings on VA's Provision of Health Care Services to Women Veterans, Washington DC: GAO (2009). United States Government Accountability Office. Available at http://www.gao .gov/new.items/d09899t.pdf; accessed October 23, 2013.

61. Yaeger D, Himmelfarb N, Cammack A, Mintz J: DSM-IV diagnosed posttraumatic stress disorder in women veterans with and without military sexual trauma. J Gen Intern Med (2006):21(Suppl 3): S65-S69.

62. Bilmes LJ, Stiglitz JE. The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict. WW Norton and Company, New York, 2008.

63. Marshall AD, Panuzio J, Taft CT: Intimate partner violence among military veterans and active duty servicemen. Clin Psychol Rev 2005; 25(7): 862-76.

64. Gerlock AA: Domestic violence and post-traumatic stress disorder severity for participants of a domestic violence rehabilitation program. Mil Med 2004; 169(6): 470-4.

65. Sherman MD, Marmar CR, Fairbank JA, et al: Problems in families of male Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult and Clin Psychol 1992; 60(6): 916-26.

66. Sayers SL, Farrow VA, Ross J, Oslin DW: Family problems among recently returned military veterans referred for a mental health evaluation. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70(2): 163-70. Available at www.dcoe .health.mil/DCoEV2/Content/navigation/documents/sayers%202008% 20family%20problems%20among%20recently%20returned%20military% 20veterans%20referred%20for%20a%20mental%20health%20evaluation .pdf; accessed February 12, 2013.

67. Sogomonyan F, Cooper J: Trauma Faced by Children of Military Families: What every policymaker should know. National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health. Columbia University. 2010. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10022/AC:P:8857; accessed February 12, 2013.

68. Swords to Plowshares. Veterans and Their Families Reference Guide: Findings: Veteran Domestic Violence Roundtable. April 20, 2011. Available at http://www.swords-to-plowshares.org/wp-content/uploads/ Reference-Guide_August-2013.pdf; accessed October 21, 2013.

69. Cesur R, Sabia J, Tekin E. The Psychological Costs of War: Military Combat and Mental Health. NBER Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. April 2011.

70. Lincoln A: Second Inaugural Address, March 4, 1865. Available at http://www.va.gov/opa/publications/celebrate/vamotto.pdf; accessed December 20, 2012.

71. Rizzo J: Veterans' wait time for benefits is 'too long,' VA official concedes; CNN Security Brief. March 13, 2013. Available at http:// security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/03/13/veterans-wait-time-for-benefits-istoo-long-va-official-concedes/; accessed October 26, 2013.

72. Baker M: Medicine and the GWOT, Armed Forces Journal, March 2013. Available at http://armedforcesjournal.com/article/2013/03/12779212; accessed October 1, 2013.

73. Purple Heart Homes, Quality of Life Solutions for American Veterans. Available at http://www.purplehearthomesusa.org/about.htm; accessed January 24, 2013.

74. The Mission Continues: It's not a Charity, It's a Challenge. Available at www.missioncontinues.org; accessed January 24, 2013.

75. Hire Heroes USA. Available at www.Hireheroesusa.org; accessed January 24, 2013.

76. Faison CF: Coming Home. Proc US Nav Inst 2012; 138(12), 64-9.

77. Brown JL: A Piece of My Mind: The Unasked Question "Have you ever served in the military?" JAMA. 2012;308(18):1869 doi:10.1001/jama .2012.14254; accessed October 1, 2013.

78. Kennedy JF: 451-Proclamation 3560-Thanksgiving Day, 1963, November 5, 1963. Available at http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ ws/index.php?pid=9511&st=thanksgiving&st1; accessed February 6, 2013.

RDML Michael S. Baker, MC USN (Ret.)

Department of Surgery, John Muir Hospital, Walnut Creek, CA 94598.

Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814.

doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00471

Copyright:  (c) 2014 Association of Military Surgeons of the United States
Wordcount:  6845

Older

Central Pa. banks continue looking for new ways to engage children, adults in FINANCIAL LITERACY

Advisor News

  • How OBBBA is a once-in-a-career window
  • RICKETTS RECAPS 2025, A YEAR OF DELIVERING WINS FOR NEBRASKANS
  • 5 things I wish I knew before leaving my broker-dealer
  • Global economic growth will moderate as the labor force shrinks
  • Estate planning during the great wealth transfer
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • An Application for the Trademark “DYNAMIC RETIREMENT MANAGER” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
  • Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
  • Prudential launches FlexGuard 2.0 RILA
  • Lincoln Financial Introduces First Capital Group ETF Strategy for Fixed Indexed Annuities
  • Iowa defends Athene pension risk transfer deal in Lockheed Martin lawsuit
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Get Covered Illinois Extends First Open Enrollment Deadline
  • Column: Nebraska health insurance executive offers ways to solve health care crisis
  • Column: I'm a Nebraska health insurance executive. These are keys to solving our health care crisis
  • As millions of Americans face a steep rise in health insurance costs, lawmakers continue a century-long battle over who should pay for health care
  • Thousands of Idahoans cancel health insurance plans on exchange
Sponsor
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • ROUNDS LEADS LEGISLATION TO INCREASE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY FOR FINANCIAL REGULATORS
  • The 2025-2026 risk agenda for insurers
  • Jackson Names Alison Reed Head of Distribution
  • Consumer group calls on life insurers to improve flexible premium policy practices
  • Best’s Market Segment Report: Hong Kong’s Non-Life Insurance Segment Shows Growth and Resilience Amid Market Challenges
More Life Insurance News

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

More Top Read Stories >

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Slow Me the Money
Slow down RMDs … and RMD taxes … with a QLAC. Click to learn how.

ICMG 2026: 3 Days to Transform Your Business
Speed Networking, deal-making, and insights that spark real growth — all in Miami.

Your trusted annuity partner.
Knighthead Life provides dependable annuities that help your clients retire with confidence.

Press Releases

  • Two industry finance experts join National Life Group amid accelerated growth
  • National Life Group Announces Leadership Transition at Equity Services, Inc.
  • SandStone Insurance Partners Welcomes Industry Veteran, Rhonda Waskie, as Senior Account Executive
  • Springline Advisory Announces Partnership With Software And Consulting Firm Actuarial Resources Corporation
  • Insuraviews Closes New Funding Round Led by Idea Fund to Scale Market Intelligence Platform
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2025 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet