Waiting until age 70 to collect Social Security is a gamble – InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Life Insurance News
    • Annuity News
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Property and Casualty
    • Advisor News
    • Washington Wire
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Monthly Focus
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Free Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Free Newsletters
  • Insider Pro
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Advisor News
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
July 25, 2022 Newswires No comments
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Waiting until age 70 to collect Social Security is a gamble

Arizona Daily Star (Tucson)

I wrote a recent column in which I pointed out that waiting until 70 to start your Social Security, which is the mantra of almost everyone who is trying to “maximize” their retirement benefit, is not always the smartest move.

But still many people insist on waiting until that alleged magic age to draw their first Social Security check. Today’s questions come from these folks.

Q: I have been planning to wait until 70 to start my Social Security. I will be 70 on Sept. 7, 2022. I want to make sure I get the absolute maximum Social Security benefit. I’m afraid that if I indicate September as my starting month, they will think I mean the August check that comes in September. And then because I will still be 69 in August, I will get the age 69 benefit rate instead of the age 70 rate that I’ve waited so long to get. Please help me.

Related stories

  • Some major REITs limiting cash-out requests from investors
  • Four stages of retirement planning

A: If you want your benefits to start at age 70, then you will indicate September (the month you turn 70) as your starting month for Social Security benefits. It’s as simple as that. But if through some kind of fluke, they accidentally use August as your starting month — well, it’s really no big deal and nothing to lose any sleep over you would not get the age 69 benefit rate. You would get the benefit rate payable to people who started their Social Security at age 69 and 11 months. And that would be two-thirds of 1% less than your age 70 benefit rate. So, your ongoing benefit rate would be a couple dollars less than it would have been had you started your benefits at age 70. But on the other hand, you would end up with one extra Social Security check. In other words, for probably the next dozen years or so, you’d be ahead if your benefits accidentally started at age 69 and 11 months.

Q: My wife and I are both turning 67. Everything we hear and read about Social Security tells us that we should wait until 70 to start our Social Security. But we really don’t know what to do. We are so torn. We do have about $4 million in various investment funds, but we still want to make sure we get the biggest return on our Social Security investment. So, what should we do?

A: As I always point out in this column, I am not a financial planner. I’m just an old, retired Social Security guy. So, all I can really do is explain Social Security rules to you. And the best way I can do that is by having you read the chapter about when to take your benefits in my little Social Security guidebook called “Social Security: Simple and Smart” that you can get at Amazon and other booksellers. But having said that, I will make this observation: If I had $4 million available to me, I wouldn’t be losing sleep over my Social Security decision. It’s not like you are between a rock and a hard place when it comes to Social Security. You are between a pillow and a soft place. It sounds like you are going to be just fine no matter when you choose to start your benefits. To repeat, that advice is coming from a guy who is not a financial planner. But if you want some financial planning insight, see the answer to the next question.

Q: Half my colleagues tell me I should wait until 70 to start my benefits. The other half tell me to take benefits now. (I’m 67.) I just don’t know what to do.

A: I hear from financial planners all the time about this issue. And I can tell you that for every one who writes to tell me that I should always advise my readers to wait until age 70 to file for benefits, another financial adviser tells me that there is more research that shows the best course of action is to take benefits at full retirement age. So, there really is no clear consensus on this topic. But let me also add this: I hear from people all the time (usually widows) who tell me that their husband insisted on waiting until 70 to file for benefits. And then he died not too long after age 70, meaning that waiting that long was probably a mistake. On the other hand, I also hear from people now in their 90s who took benefits at age 62 who tell me they wish they had waited until a later age to start their Social Security. So, the bottom line is this: no one ever really knows. Obviously, each person just needs to look at a variety of issues when making that decision — things like health status, life expectancy, other income, taxes, potential benefits to widow(er)s, etc.

Q: I took my benefits at 66. I am now 75. I’m worried now that I made a big mistake by not waiting until age 70 to file. How do I figure out when I come out on the losing end of the Social Security stick?

A: First of all, why in the world are you worrying about this? If I were you, I’d be jumping up and down with joy, shouting, “Hey, I’m 75 years old and still kicking and I’ve been getting my full Social Security benefits for nine years now. What a lucky guy I am.” But still, if you’re going to fret about this, here’s how you can do the math. First of all, figure out how much you received in Social Security benefits between ages 66 and 70. Let’s say that was $2,500 per month for 48 months, or $120,000. Then figure out what your age 70 benefit would have been. It should be about 132% of your age 66 rate, or $3,300. The difference between your age 70 rate and your age 66 rate is $800. Then divide $120,000 by $800 and you get 150. So, you would have to live 150 months, or about 12 years, beyond age 70 (in other words, until age 82) before you start coming out on the losing end of the Social Security stick. So, you’ve got seven years yet before you need to go into a deep funk about having made the wrong Social Security choice. But to add to my earlier advice: if you’re still alive at 82, have a drink, jump for joy (if you still can) and forget about that funk. In other words, “Don’t worry, be happy.”

Older

Gadget Insurance Market Seeking Excellent Growth : Chubb, CoverCloud, InsureandGo

Newer

Diversified sources of income can provide retirement security

Advisor News

  • Some major REITs limiting cash-out requests from investors
  • Four stages of retirement planning
  • Can you work while on Social Security?
  • Even on $100K-plus, more Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck
  • Opinion: the state wealth-tax alliance
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Sweet streams of income: ChatGPT, the bard of annuities
  • F&G Annuities & Life announces equity investment in life IMO SYNCIS
  • Investors scrambling to lock in rates propel annuity sales to record highs
  • North American and Annexus launch new fixed index annuity
  • Producers stew as insurers slow to process life and annuity applications
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Medicaid coverage is expiring for millions of Americans – but there's a proven way to keep many of them insured
  • Health savings account balances increase in 2021
  • Outcome Health trial gets underway with prosecutors alleging former execs were involved in $1 billion fraud scheme
  • Bill incentivizing gun owners to secure firearms addresses public health concern
  • With CalPERS, add another to list of California's botched projects
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • NAIFA’s Future Leaders Program offers free sessions for students
  • Scott Boutin named president of Standard Security Life
  • Agent insists Alex Murdaugh suggested he killed his son
  • 78% of families suffer financially handling estate affairs
  • National Life expands living benefits suite
Sponsor
More Life Insurance News
The time is 05:37:30am test

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

  • Investors scrambling to lock in rates propel annuity sales to record highs
  • Chicago news roundup: PPP fraud uncovered in Chicago, informant reveals $100K bounty on FBG Duck and more
  • For some, nothing to fear from taking RMDs, professor says
  • North Carolina businessman pleads guilty in multi-million tax fraud case
  • Study: Education level should drive decisions on Social Security, annuities
More Top Read Stories >

FEATURED OFFERS

Meet Encova Life
We know agents matter. You can count on our life team to be high tech, high touch and responsive.

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Life Insurance News
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Monthly Focus

Top Sections

  • Life Insurance News
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • AdvisorNews
  • Washington Wire
  • Insurance Webinars

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Magazine
  • Write for INN
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2023 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.