WA fines Regence Blue Shield $550K over shortfalls with mental health coverage
For years, Regence failed to provide the state with detailed documentation showing its behavioral health offerings are comparable to medical or surgical coverage, in violation of state and federal law. The data the company did provide showed major differences between the two types of care, including for in-network reimbursement rates, among other areas.
"Throughout this process, Regence's staff appeared to willfully misinterpret our questions, dismiss our concerns and generally disregard their own responsibilities to their members' well-being," state Insurance Commissioner
Regence argued parity wasn't an issue, but didn't provide documentation to prove that, according to the
"The data Regence provided, or in some cases failed to provide, demonstrates a lack of accountability for following this nation's insurance laws," Kuderer said.
A Regence spokesperson said the company has "implemented state and federal requirements for behavioral health access in good faith, made necessary updates and will continue prioritizing compliance while supporting future rulemaking for clear, consistent standards."
"Everyone should have access to high-quality behavioral health care," spokesperson
Under an order signed Friday and announced Monday, the insurer will pay the state
The money will go to
Persistent parity problemsState and federal law require insurers to cover behavioral health treatment similar to physical health care. For example, an insurer can't charge different co-pays for mental health treatment and physical health. And if there's no limit on outpatient physical health care visits, there also can't be a limit for mental health care.
Despite mental health parity laws, mental health coverage still often doesn't stack up.
A nationwide study last year found patients went out of network to see a behavioral health specialist 3.5 times more often than they did for physical health clinicians. For some types of care, the disparity was even greater. Going to out-of-network providers generally results in higher out-of-pocket costs.
And for those who stay in their insurers' network, reimbursement rates were higher for physical health office visits than mental health appointments, the study found.
This year,
The new law, which takes effect in 2027, seeks to make clear that mental health and drug treatment are "medically necessary" care that insurance companies are required to cover. Insurers argued it would drive up premiums.
Over the summer, Kuderer's office similarly levied a
The insurance commissioner's office has been scrutinizing mental health care parity among
In 2023, the agency found similar violations at UnitedHealthcare, resulting in a
Meanwhile, the Trump administration this year has paused new rules issued by former President
This is notable because many Washingtonians are subject to federal mental health parity laws, instead of the state's. That includes those on Medicaid and workers on so-called "self-funded" plans whose employers directly pay for medical benefits, instead of through premiums to an insurance company.
This isn't the first time the state has dinged Regence this year.
Last month, Kuderer's office fined the company



Pinnacle, Synovus merger receives federal regulatory approval
AI vs. AI: Patients deploy bots to battle health insurers that deny care
Advisor News
- Industry groups applaud House passage of Financial Exploitation Prevention Act
- Younger workers more likely to be eligible for a retirement plan after changing jobs
- Bank of America community event unpacks sales tax hike, small business struggles
- CONGRESSMAN VALADAO DEMANDS ANSWERS FROM CALIFORNIA OVER HEALTHCARE TAX HIKE
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- IRI, ACLI express support for CLEAR Forms Act
- A new era at the Federal Reserve
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Making Surprising Moves in Tuesday Session
- Why annuities are gaining traction with younger investors
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Maryland health insurers want to raise premiums an average 13.7% for individual plans in 2027
- Maryland health insurance rates could rise 13.7% in 2027 under proposal
- Millions drop Obamacare health coverage after subsidies expire and costs rise
- Improving how we deliver healthcare in Idaho
- Healthcare system needs a public option
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Misr Insurance Company
- State Farm’s agency overhaul: What distribution can learn
- They Allegedly Enrolled People In Life Insurance Without Consent. Then Death Claims Paid Out
- How much do state residents need to retire comfortably?
- How executive benefits impact an estate plan
More Life Insurance News