Mar. 28—In the past decade, Eversource and United Illuminating will have recouped more than
The utility companies have yet to request restitution for the restoration work for August's Tropical Storm Isaias, which the utilities estimate cost upwards of
State law allows utilities to recoup a reasonable amount of costs 'prudently' incurred from severe weather by increasing electric rates with approval from the
While customers and public officials have criticized both companies for rate increases associated with severe weather, Eversource and United Illuminating argue that the recovery allowance through rates is vital for the function of the utilities.
"Storms can't be avoided and so storm response is a cost of electric service and customers do have to pay for the service they receive," Eversource's spokeswoman
Lawmakers and local elected officials, however, have criticized the way the utilities have handled storms over the years, with PURA launching investigations into Irene and an October snow storm in 2011 and Sandy in 2012. Those investigations found the companies handled Irene inadequately but improved their response to Sandy.
Tropical Storm Isaias, meanwhile, left up to 800,000 in the state without power last August, many of whom remained in the dark a week later.
In a draft decision on the investigation into the utilities' response to Isaias, released earlier this month, PURA concluded Eversource's preparations and response to it were inadequate, citing many of the same reasons they did 10 years ago investigating the company's response to Hurricane Irene.
The draft decision raised lesser concerns with United Illuminating's response, calling it "underwhelming in specific instances," but "markedly better than that of Eversource."
The scope of the investigation includes evaluating the prudence of the company's actions and incurred costs during the preparation for and response to Isaias. PURA's findings can directly impact any future cost recovery.
Taskey Modifica said tree trimming and removal, system automation, and upgrading utility poles are investments that can help avoid outages, but ones that come with a cost.
"All of the capital resources that we need to have available to construct, maintain and reinforce the system every day would become more expensive for customers," Taskey Modifica said. "As a result, denying recovery of these substantial costs is not a tenable solution, for several reasons."
Eversource reported a profit of
UI holds similar reasons for passing storm costs onto customers.
"Major storms are unpredictable and can vary significantly in scope and damage," UI spokesman
The utilities have sought storm recovery several times in the last decade.
At the end of April, those costs will be fully recovered, meaning
The utility recovered
United Illuminated, a subsidiary of
UI hasn't yet sought recovery for any storms in 2017 or 2018 because they haven't filed a rate proceeding since 2016.
PURA didn't investigate the response to these later storms and generally said the utilities performed well.
The last investigation and response
Outages caused by Isaias were comparable to those inflicted by Tropical Storm Irene and the October snow storm of 2011.
With regard to storm Irene, they determined that
As a penalty for the deficient response in the 2011 storms, the attorney general at the time,
Uncontested meant PURA didn't include any findings of facts or determination on the prudency of the utilities' response, according to the 2011 decision. Consequently, the authority allowed the cumulative cost recovery for both storms despite finding their response to Irene inadequate.
The 2011 case "unmistakenly did not involve issues of imprudence or rate recovery disallowances," according to the case's final decision.
Instead of disallowing cost recovery directly, PURA imposed a penalty on
In PURA's draft decision on Isaias, they found deficiencies similar to those cited 10 years ago during the investigation into the
Opening the Isaias investigation as a contested case, however, creates a direct line of sight to impacting recovery for the storm.
"In a contested proceeding, it puts all of the parties on notice that legally binding conclusions can come from the proceeding," PURA Chairman
Storm reserve fund
After Storm Irene and Sandy, both companies established storm reserves — money collected through rates — to help offset the cost of unpredictable weather events in the future.
Additionally, the company can collect
If a storm does materialize, the costs can be drawn down from the catastrophic storm reserve or any unused funds at the end of a year are rolled over into the catastrophic storm reserve.
"The theory is that by having money on hand it removes the disincentive to not prepare for storms appropriately," Gillett said. "The idea is if you have a rainy day fund you are more inclined to stage appropriately."
For UI, storms costing
Their reserve fund is also in the negative, as the company sits with
UI is expected to file an update on the reserve fund at the end of this month. The company could seek recovery of those costs in its next rate proceeding but it's possible they'll have accumulated reserve funds and over earnings to help offset the unrecovered costs.
"So it's not possible to say how much of that may wind up in future rates," Crowder said.
(c)2021 the New Haven Register (New Haven, Conn.)
Visit the New Haven Register (New Haven, Conn.) at www.nhregister.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.