The Role of Professionals in the Twomey Judgement – InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Life Insurance News
    • Annuity News
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Property and Casualty
    • Advisor News
    • Washington Wire
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Monthly Focus
  • INN Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Free Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Free Newsletters
  • Insider Pro
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Editorial Staff
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
September 25, 2019 Newswires No comments
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

The Role of Professionals in the Twomey Judgement

Targeted News Service (Press Releases)

DUBLIN, Ireland, Sept. 24 -- The Irish Small and Medium Enterprises Association issued the following news release:

The reporting of the Twomey judgment by Charlie Weston in the last Saturday's Irish Independent raises a number of serious peripheral issues with the current insurance reform process, especially regarding the roles of professionals such as medical experts and insurers.

Some of the most serious commentary in Mr Justice Twomey's ruling is reserved for the consultant surgeon who produced three reports for a plaintiff whose case was, in the view of both the Circuit and High Courts, fraudulent.

Related stories

  • Program offers free dental care to veterans
  • Short Term Car Insurance Market Giants Spending Is Going to Boom : Allstate, Momentum, GEICO

The role of expert witnesses has been discussed ad nauseum throughout the current insurance reform process, but any suggestion that Ireland would employ independent expert witnesses has been rejected by the Personal Injuries Commission. In its first report, it stated:

'Legal advice received by the Department of Justice and Equality and the Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation from the Office of the Attorney General in relation to use of such an expert panel was that the proposal to prohibit parties from using their own witnesses would affect a claimant's right to fair procedures and access to the courts, and also their rights to present their own evidence and challenge that presented by the opposing party. The introduction of a mandatory panel of expert witnesses would be an impermissible interference with a claimant's constitutional rights.'

It is a fascinating observation of the entire Cost of Insurance Working Group and Personal Injuries Commission processes, that any suggested interference in the rights of parties to conduct civil litigation without end is considered to be unconstitutional. ISME takes the opposite view: it is clear that allowing parties to endlessly litigate irrespective of the merits of that litigation inevitably disadvantages those of limited means, or those without access to no-foal-no-fee lawyers. We therefore call on the Government to release this legal advice from the Attorney General.

The Twomey judgment explicitly shows the limits of the 'adversarial expert witness system' which has been defended by Irish jurists as a cornerstone of our justice system. The failings in this case clearly outweigh the advantages of adversarial expert witnesses.

This is not news. The Law Reform Commission carried out an exhaustive (392 page) consultation on Expert Evidence in 2008 which concluded, in its chapter on Adversarial Bias, Partisanship and Conflicts of Interest that, 'It is clear from the foregoing that bias has proved to be a real and tangible problem in the giving of expert testimony in this jurisdiction.' This is more commonly known as the 'hired gun' problem, where experts deliver the evidence their party wants delivered, not evidence that is impartial, factual and truthful. This problem remains unaddressed in the current stalled reform process; it adds very significantly to the costs of litigation, and it must be fixed by the Justice Minister.

The Twomey judgment also raises issues for the conduct of insurers defending exaggerated and fraudulent claims. While the insurer is to be congratulated and commended for mounting a full defence in the O'Connell -v- Martin case in both the Circuit and High Courts, it is important for us to know:

* Has the insurer registered its judgment for costs against Ms O'Connell?

* Has the insurer instructed its lawyers to pursue Ms O'Connell's solicitor for costs incurred in defending a fraudulent action in the High Court?

* Has the insurer referred the case, and their own internal investigation, to the Garda Divisional Chief Superintendent in Limerick for criminal investigation?

* In the event that the insurer has referred the case to the Gardai, and the latter has decided not to proceed, has the insurer considered mounting a private prosecution of Ms O'Connell?

* Has the insurer made complaints to the relevant professional regulators about the conduct of the solicitor, barrister and medical consultant in this case?

Unless insurers take aggressive action against exaggerated and fraudulent claimants, we will not see an end to such claims. Insurers are duty-bound to follow every line of remedy available to them in tackling criminal behaviour. It is also incumbent upon the authorities to ensure our civil litigation system is run in a just and fair manner. Mr Justice Twomey comments on the legalised extortion permissible by our current system when he says: 'Real power is not merits of case, but legal costs inflicted by impecunious plaintiff.' In other words, a fraudster tried to extort settlement from an innocent driver by threatening Her with high Court costs. Nine times out of ten, this succeeds. The United States has introduced legislation specifically designed to prevent such fraudulent actions in the Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act. Minister Charlie Flanagan is honour-bound to address this injustice here with similar legislation.

Finally, Mr Justice Twomey very explicitly restates the position of the Court of Appeal regarding Court of Appeal to award 'modest damages' for 'minor injuries'. In doing so, he reduced the award of the second plaintiff from Euros17,500 to Euros3,000, and asserted that the Circuit Court was obliged to follow the findings of the Court of Appeal in this regard. This is a significant finding by the High Court, which we hope will now be observed by all judges of the District, Circuit and High Courts.

* * *

- Serious peripheral issues with the current insurance reform process raised.

- Twomey judgment shows the failures of the adversarial expert witness system.

- Experts deliver evidence their party wants, not evidence that is impartial, factual and truthful.

- The Twomey judgment also raises issues for the conduct of insurers defending exaggerated and fraudulent claims.

- ISME hopes Judge Twomey's findings be observed by all judges of the District and Circuit Courts.

Older

TransUnion: New Online Fraud Complexities May Arise for Insurance Companies

Newer

Sen. Udall Advances Strong Investments for N.M. in Major Interior, Environment Funding Bill

Advisor News

  • 'Sandwich generation' survey says Americans caring for children and aging parents are financially stressed
  • Jury finds Lexington investment advisor, guilty of charges related to fraud
  • Chicago investment advisor indicted for allegedly swindling clients out of $683,000
  • Will the family maximum limit my Social Security benefits?
  • South Florida resort sold for $835M, biggest deal for a U.S. hotel since pandemic started
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Winning $754.6M Powerball ticket sold in Washington
  • $747 million Powerball jackpot still up for grabs
  • Study: Does pessimism really suppress annuity sales?
  • Sweet streams of income: ChatGPT, the bard of annuities
  • F&G Annuities & Life announces equity investment in life IMO SYNCIS
Sponsor
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Wyoming Medicaid expansion set to die in the House
  • Bitter with the sweet on Medicaid expansion
  • Texans brace for the end of nearly three years of pandemic Medicaid coverage
  • Survey: Annual 2022 health premiums steady, but may be ‘calm before the storm’
  • Florida looks to double amount of medical-marijuana licenses
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Jury hears about financial crimes in Murdaugh murder trial
  • In Murdaugh murder trial, the path to conviction remains unclear
  • Libby Murdaugh's caretaker saw Alex night of murders for '20 minutes', but he said '30 to 40'
  • SC judge in Murdaugh murder trial allows jury to hear alleged financial crime motive
  • How the cases in Alex Murdaugh's murder trial are shaping up
More Life Insurance News

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

  • Fed slows interest rate increases; more hikes expected
  • Allstate reports $1.4B loss for 2022; increases rates, policy restrictions
  • American Equity readies 2022 earnings report amid ongoing conflicts
  • Research on Oral Health Detailed by Researchers at University of Washington (Health insurance is associated with dental care use among university students in Washington State): Health and Medicine – Oral Health
  • Doctor convicted of using adulterated equipment
More Top Read Stories >

FEATURED OFFERS

Meet Encova Life
We know agents matter. You can count on our life team to be high tech, high touch and responsive.

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Life Insurance News
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Property and Casualty
  • Advisor News
  • Washington Wire
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Monthly Focus

Top Sections

  • Life Insurance News
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • AdvisorNews
  • Washington Wire
  • Insurance Webinars

Our Company

  • About
  • Editorial Staff
  • Magazine
  • Write for INN
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2023 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • AdvisorNews

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.