Sens. Cantwell, Murray Deliver Warning to Speaker Ryan, House Republicans
As the
"We are writing today to inform you that our caucus will not support any efforts that jeopardize the consumer protections our constituents rely upon when they purchase insurance," the Senators wrote. "Before you move forward with floor consideration of the
Speaker Ryan and
"We will oppose any efforts to lessen our constituent's access to basic preventative and primary care... Undermining the value of insurance and requiring that insurance plans cover rudimentary health care services is simply shifting more costs onto patients and taxpayers," the letter continues. "We have always supported sensible improvements to the ACA and believe in working together to improve our health care system for the good of the patients it serves. Instead of supporting a fatally-flawed, incomplete, partisan bill, we hope you will take us up on our sincere offer to improve health care for all Americans."
The letter clearly demonstrates that there are enough votes to sustain a point of order on repealing essential health benefits if this provision is included in the House reconciliation bill, or to block a vote if this provision considered as separate legislation.
In addition to Murray and Cantwell, senators who signed the letter are:
The senators' letter can be read in full below:
The Honorable
Speaker
As a vote nears in the
As we understand your plan, you will seek to enact these proposals after
Any assurances to your colleagues that future legislation to further scale back insurance coverage will pass through regular order if the
For example, we will oppose efforts to eliminate the ACA's essential health benefits that ensure insurance companies cover maternity care, emergency services, substance misuse and mental health treatment, prescription drugs, pediatric dental and vision care and other vital services. We will also oppose any efforts to lessen our constituents' access to basic preventative and primary care. Americans reasonably expect that the premiums they pay cover such basic needs, but before the ACA, consumers were often surprised to find their insurance did not. Undermining the value of insurance and requiring that insurance plans cover rudimentary health care services is simply shifting more costs onto patients and taxpayers. Eliminating the ACA's essential health benefits would merely force the same Americans to pay more out of pocket rather than actually reducing their costs and should not be the "solution" to the premium increases the ACHA will create.
Before you move forward with floor consideration of the
Instead of supporting a fatally-flawed, incomplete, partisan bill, we hope you will take us up on our sincere offer to improve health care for all Americans.
Sincerely,


N.M Congressmen Urge Gov. Martinez to Oppose GOP Health Care Plan
Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee Issues Report on Activities During 114th Congress (Part 2 of 8)
Advisor News
- Benefit Costs Squeeze Schools, Driving Cuts, Tax Hikes And Difficult Tradeoffs
- Why client insurance needs could change even if their life doesn’t
- Most Gen Z investors think less than a year ahead when making financial decisions
- IRI pitches retirement agenda to Jeffries as democrats shape affordability platform
- Help child-free clients plan for their later years
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Guidance, bulletin or reg? NAIC debates form of annuity illustration update
- Nationwide adds mutual fund-linked strategy to New Heights Select FIA
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News