Sen. Hassan, Colleagues Call for Increased Childhood Lead Screenings
* * *
-
* * *
Senator
Children in
"Childhood lead exposure remains a serious public health challenge for communities across the country. With Medicaid serving as an essential health coverage source for the nation's children, the
Full text of the letter to CMS can be found here and below:
Dear Administrator Verma,
Childhood lead exposure remains a serious public health challenge for communities across the country. With Medicaid serving as an essential health coverage source for the nation's children, the
Decades of research demonstrate that lead exposure poses a serious and grave risk to the health of children. Lead exposure can lead to serious health consequences including a lifetime of disease and behavioral challenges. Even as rates of lead poisoning are falling nationwide, data from the
For twenty years, federal law has required blood lead screening "as appropriate for age and risk factors" for all children enrolled in Medicaid. Such screenings are covered under Medicaid's Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnostic, and Treatment (EPSDT) benefit with all children covered by Medicaid required to receive blood lead screenings at 12 months and 24 months of age. In 2016, CMS under the previous administration took a number of actions aimed at improving blood lead screening and testing for Medicaid-eligible children including the collection of data to try and help ensure the delivery of blood lead screening.
However, despite this progress, according to a recent report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) (GAO-19-481), data on statutorily mandated blood lead screenings remains incomplete. For example, while the blood lead screening data reported annually by states to CMS provides basic information on the number of screenings performed, it does not identify the number of beneficiaries who received blood lead screenings. As a result, it is unclear how many children at risk of lead exposure are actually receiving required and needed blood lead screenings in accordance with federal requirements and CMS policy. This is unacceptable.
Progress in addressing this public health crisis will continue to be stifled without significant leadership from the CMS and other federal agencies. While we were encouraged by the steps CMS took in 2016, it is clear that more needs to be done to increase screening rates, emphasize prevention, and facilitate early intervention. While CMS has concurred with the recommendation in the 2019 GAO report regarding the need to collect accurate and complete data on blood lead screening for Medicaid beneficiaries, to our knowledge, CMS has not identified any concrete steps to meet the recommendations included in this report. In order to better understand how CMS plans to address the gaps identified in the 2019 GAO report related to blood lead screening and the specific steps CMS plans to take to address this issue, we ask that you please respond to the following questions:
1. What specific actions has CMS taken or plan to take to address the issues and recommendations related to blood lead screening included in the 2019 GAO report?
2. What steps has CMS taken or plan to take to assist states with planning improvements to ensure complete and accurate reporting of data on blood lead screening?
3. What actions has CMS undertaken or plan to take, in collaboration with the
4. In addition to working with the
5. How is CMS engaging with state Medicaid agencies, managed care plans, health care providers, and other stakeholders to improve the rates and associated reporting of mandated blood lead screenings? What engagement, if any, has already occurred and to what result?
6. Moving beyond the importance of screening, how is CMS working with other federal partners, states, and others to ensure early intervention for children with confirmed elevated blood lead levels?
7. What, if any, additional support or oversight authority from
We request a response to this letter no later than



Open Enrollment Starts Friday, Montana Securities and Insurance Commissioner Rosendale Lowers Health Insurance Rates
Menendez, Sandy Survivors Demand Action to Protect Residents, Communities From Future Floods, Their Aftermath
Advisor News
- Health insurance premium tax bill advancing
- The Medi-Cal money pit
- The untapped potential of Qualified Longevity Annuity Contracts
- NYC's fiscal outlook on downslide over budget gaps
- Health insurance premium tax bill moving in Iowa House
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- An Application for the Trademark “GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY” Has Been Filed by Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company: Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company
- The forces shaping life and annuities in 2026
- Variable annuity sales surge as market confidence remains high, Wink finds
- New Allianz Life Annuity Offers Added Flexibility in Income Benefits
- How to elevate annuity discussions during tax season
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- From $500 to $1.5K: Marylanders feel financial impact of expired ACA tax credits
- The politics behind America's new health insurance shock
- Health insurance premium tax bill advancing
- Families oppose bill locking in Iowa Medicaid privatization
- The Medi-Cal money pit
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Hulse, Murray
- Murray Giles Hulse
- Oaktree grabs control of Atlantic Coast Life Co. in blockbuster A-Cap deal
- AM Best Removes From Under Review With Developing Implications and Downgrades Credit Ratings of Banner Life Insurance Company and William Penn Life Insurance Company of New York
- The forces shaping life and annuities in 2026
More Life Insurance News