Rep. Scott: Do No Harm Act
In 1993,
Under this test, government may substantially burden religious exercise when it is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest, such as the enforcement of civil rights laws, as there is no alternative means to enforce nondiscrimination requirements.
At the time of its passage, RFRA was supported by a broad bipartisan coalition that represented diverse faith groups, legal experts, and civil liberty advocates. However, despite its clear intent to protect people from discrimination, RFRA has increasingly been misused to harm the rights of others. For instance, RFRA has been cited by employers claiming religious objections to recognizing worker protections under the National Labor Relations Act
Two
RFRA was never intended to erode civil rights under the guise of religious freedom. RFRA does not change the First Amendment's Establishment Clause, which ensures that the government cannot grant religious exemptions that have a detrimental impact or elevate certain religious beliefs above the law.
About the Do No Harm Act
The Do No Harm Act restores the Religious Freedom Restoration Act's original purpose to provide protections for religious exercise while ensuring that RFRA is not used to erode civil rights under the guise of religious freedom.
The bill makes clear that RFRA would not apply in certain circumstances where a religious exemption could cause harm to others. Specifically, the bill limits the application of RFRA from being used against: * Nondiscrimination laws;
* Employment laws governing wages and collective bargaining;
* Child labor and protection laws;
* Access to health care;
* Services provided through a government contract or grant; and
* Services by government officials.
These areas of the law protect important civil and legal rights and they are places where a religious exemption for one, results in harm to another. The Do No Harm Act restores protections for these areas under the law to ensure that RFRA can no longer be used to weaken civil rights and other protections. Additionally, the legislation clarifies that RFRA can only be used in litigation in which the government is a party.
The legislation is sponsored by Chairman Scott and joined by Congressman
Endorsing Organizations
Many of the organizations that supported the passage of RFRA in 1993 now support the Do No Harm Act. Today, the Do No Harm Act is supported by 96 civil rights, LGBTQ, civil liberty, faith, health and labor organizations: Advocates for Youth,


White Mountains Declares Annual Dividend
Specialty Insurer and Reinsurer SiriusPoint Launches with Over $3bn in Capital
Advisor News
- The 6X Formula for leveraging content marketing with AI
- When a home becomes difficult to insure, the plan changes
- The inheritance gap: Helping clients plan for money that hasn’t arrived
- After the midterms: Addressing your clients’ tax concerns
- Berkeley arts tax heads toward passage while public bank measure looks likely to fail
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Athene CEO criticizes offshore reinsurance, risk-taking by competitors
- DOL, trade groups, state AGs file briefs supporting Alcoa in PRT lawsuit
- John Hancock launches new fixed indexed annuity suite
- Annuities to play a larger role in workplace retirement plans
- FHLBank Pittsburgh Announces Results in 2026 Board Election
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- CVS is planning a huge corporate breakup after drug price criticism. Did Louisiana play a role?
- A practical benefits strategy for cost-conscious employers
- Uninsured? Here's where to look for free or low-cost vaccines
- Your Health Idaho is in open enrollment
- Apple Health (Medicaid) changes are coming in January: Here's what you need to know
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Three lawsuits put life insurers’ cost-of-insurance practices under scrutiny
- Military Briefs: November 12-18
- Security Benefit Series B Preferred Stock Dividend Rate Resets to 10.286%
- FHLBank Pittsburgh Announces Results in 2026 Board Election
- New Jackson Study Finds the "Sandwich Generation" Squeeze Comes from More Than Two Sides and It’s Quietly Draining Retirement Savings
More Life Insurance News