Patent Issued for Call routing system (USPTO 11349990): United Services Automobile Association - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Editorial Staff
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
June 17, 2022 Newswires
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Patent Issued for Call routing system (USPTO 11349990): United Services Automobile Association

Insurance Daily News

2022 JUN 17 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Insurance Daily News -- According to news reporting originating from Alexandria, Virginia, by NewsRx journalists, a patent by the inventors Condon, Kelly (Phoenix, AZ, US), Cook, Mark (Anthem, AZ, US), Jenkins, Austin (Phoenix, AZ, US), Madsen, Merrill (Anthem, AZ, US), Sprague, Samantha (Glendale, AZ, US), Wroble, Conor (Chandler, AZ, US), filed on April 1, 2020, was published online on May 31, 2022.

The assignee for this patent, patent number 11349990, is United Services Automobile Association (San Antonio, Texas, United States).

Reporters obtained the following quote from the background information supplied by the inventors: “When a person calls an organization’s customer service phone number, he or she is routed to a customer service representative. To talk to the customer service representative, the call routing system may request the person identify the reason for his or her call. In some cases, the call routing system may provide some options such as dialing a number for an option related to complaints. The call routing system may also request the person to enter some identifying information about him or her, such as a member number or a birthdate. After the person enters the requested information, the call routing system typically routes the person to the next available customer service representative.

“The techniques introduced here may be better understood by referring to the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Moreover, while the technology is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below. The intention, however, is not to limit the technology to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the technology is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims.”

In addition to obtaining background information on this patent, NewsRx editors also obtained the inventors’ summary information for this patent: “A conventional call routing system can randomly route a person’s call to a next available customer service representative based on a reason for the person’s call. For instance, the conventional call routing system can request a person to identify a reason for his or her call and can determine that the person is calling about credit card fraud. Based on this reason, the conventional call routing system can randomly select a next available customer service representative within the credit card fraud department to answer the person’s call. In some cases, such a random routing may provide a positive outcome for the person, but in some cases, the person may have a negative experience with the randomly selected customer service representative. By randomly routing the call to an available customer service representative, a conventional call routing system cannot predict whether its routing will result a good experience for the person.

“Furthermore, at the end of a phone call, the conventional call routing system may present an option to a person to take a survey that provides information as to whether the person had a positive experience or a negative experience. However, most people do not take the survey, reducing the sample size of the customers used to determine a metric (e.g., customer satisfaction score) that describes a probability of whether customers had a positive or negative phone call experience. Moreover, the few people who do take the survey are typically either extremely satisfied or extremely dissatisfied, which does not provide representative data for customer satisfaction.

“To overcome at least some of the issues described above for a conventional call routing system, this patent document describes systems, apparatus, and methods for routing calls based on analyzing a person’s prior phone call conversation with a customer service representative. Such a technique can provide a better measure of customer satisfaction score without relying on customer surveys that tend to be ineffective, skewed, or both. The example headings for the various sections below are used to facilitate the understanding of the disclosed subject matter and do not limit the scope of the claimed subject matter in any way. Accordingly, one or more features of one section can be combined with one or more features of another section.

“I. Determine Customer Satisfaction Score”

The claims supplied by the inventors are:

“1. A system for routing a call, comprising: a server configured to: receive call data related to a conversation between a first person and a second person on a first call, wherein the conversation is related to a first topic selected by the first person via the first call, wherein the call data includes: an identifier that identifies the first person, and a plurality of metrics that characterize the first person’s experience on the first call; determine, based on the plurality of metrics, an individual satisfaction score that describes a level of satisfaction of the first person associated with the first call; receive an indication of a second call from the first person, wherein the indication includes the identifier of the first person and a second topic selected via the second call; identify one or more persons to answer the second call based on: (1) the individual satisfaction score of the first person from the first call, and (2) a training score of each of the one or more persons, wherein the training score indicates a level of training, of each of the one or more persons, in the second topic, wherein the training score is one of one or more training scores associated with one or more topics for each of the one or more persons, wherein the training score satisfies a criterion established, for each of the one or more persons, according to the individual satisfaction score of the first person from the first call, and (3) a plurality of additional satisfaction scores associated with each of the one or more persons, wherein, for each of the one or more persons, the plurality of additional satisfaction scores is determined from prior conversations on prior calls with a plurality of additional persons; and send, to one or more computers associated with the one or more persons, a message that indicates that the second call is mapped to the one or more persons.

“2. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is further configured to: determine that the level of satisfaction is high in response to the satisfaction score being greater than a pre-determined threshold value, and determine that the level of satisfaction is low in response to the satisfaction score being less than the pre-determined threshold value.

“3. The system of claim 1, wherein the satisfaction score is determined by a supervised machine learning technique based on a plurality of targets, wherein a first set of targets includes a first set of values for the plurality of metrics associated with the high level of satisfaction, and wherein a second set of targets includes a second set of values for the plurality of metrics associated with the low level of satisfaction.

“4. The system of claim 1, wherein the plurality of metrics includes: a difference in time between a first time value when the first person initiates the first call and a second time value when the second person answers the first call, a first value that describes a number of times that the first person called regarding the first topic, wherein the first value is greater than or equal to one, a second value that describes a number of times that the first person is transferred from one person to another person on the first call, wherein the second value is greater than or equal to zero, a plurality of scores that describe a sentiment of the first person on the first call, and an indication of whether a sentiment during an end portion of the conversation of the first call was positive or negative.

“5. The system of claim 4, wherein the plurality of scores includes a first score that describes a maximum positive sentiment value, a second score that describes a maximum negative sentiment value, a third score that describes an average positive sentiment value, and a fourth score that describes an average negative sentiment value.

“6. The system of claim 1, wherein the first topic is the same as the second topic.

“7. The system of claim 1, wherein the server is further configured to: send a second message to a computer associated with a third person regarding a performance of the second person in response to determining that the satisfaction score is greater than or equal to a second pre-determined threshold value or is less than or equal to a third pre-determined threshold value, wherein the second pre-determined threshold value is greater than the pre-determined threshold value, wherein the third pre-determined threshold value is less than the pre-determined threshold value, and wherein the second message includes the satisfaction score.

“8. A method of routing a call, comprising: receiving call data related to a conversation between a first person and a second person on a first call, wherein the conversation is related to a first topic selected by the first person via the first call, wherein the call data includes: an identifier that identifies the first person, and a plurality of metrics that characterize the first person’s experience on the first call; determining, based on the plurality of metrics, an individual satisfaction score that describes a level of satisfaction of the first person associated with the first call; receiving an indication of a second call from the first person, wherein the indication includes the identifier of the first person and a second topic selected via the second call; identifying one or more persons to answer the second call based on: (1) the individual satisfaction score of the first person from the first call, and (2) a training score of each of the one or more persons, wherein the training score indicates a level of training, of each of the one or more persons, in the second topic, wherein the training score is one of one or more training scores associated with one or more topics for each of the one or more persons, wherein the training score satisfies a criterion established, for each of the one or more persons, according of the individual satisfaction score of the first person from the first call, and (3) a plurality of additional satisfaction scores associated with each of the one or more persons, wherein, for each of the one or more persons, the plurality of additional satisfaction scores is determined from prior conversations on prior calls with a plurality of additional persons; and sending, to one or more computers associated with the one or more persons, a message that indicates that the second call is mapped to the one or more persons.

“9. The method of claim 8, further comprising: determining that the level of satisfaction is high in response to the satisfaction score being greater than a pre-determined threshold value, and determining that the level of satisfaction is low in response to the satisfaction score being less than the pre-determined threshold value.

“10. The method of claim 8, wherein the satisfaction score is determined by a supervised machine learning technique based on a plurality of targets, wherein a first set of targets includes a first set of values for the plurality of metrics associated with the high level of satisfaction, and wherein a second set of targets includes a second set of values for the plurality of metrics associated with the low level of satisfaction.

“11. The method of claim 8, wherein the plurality of metrics includes: a difference in time between a first time value when the first person initiates the first call and a second time value when the second person answers the first call, a first value that describes a number of times that the first person called regarding the first topic, wherein the first value is greater than or equal to one, a second value that describes a number of times that the first person is transferred from one person to another person on the first call, wherein the second value is greater than or equal to zero, a plurality of scores that describe a sentiment of the first person on the first call, and an indication of whether a sentiment during an end portion of the conversation of the first call was positive or negative.

“12. The method of claim 11, wherein the plurality of scores includes a first score that describes a maximum positive sentiment value, a second score that describes a maximum negative sentiment value, a third score that describes an average positive sentiment value, and a fourth score that describes an average negative sentiment value.

“13. The method of claim 8, wherein the first topic is the same as the second topic.

“14. The method of claim 8, further comprising: sending a second message to a computer associated with a third person regarding a performance of the second person in response to determining that the satisfaction score is greater than or equal to a second pre-determined threshold value or is less than or equal to a third pre-determined threshold value, wherein the second pre-determined threshold value is greater than the pre-determined threshold value, wherein the third pre-determined threshold value is less than the pre-determined threshold value, and wherein the second message includes the satisfaction score.”

There are additional claims. Please visit full patent to read further.

For more information, see this patent: Condon, Kelly. Call routing system. U.S. Patent Number 11349990, filed April 1, 2020, and published online on May 31, 2022. Patent URL: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=11349990.PN.&OS=PN/11349990RS=PN/11349990

(Our reports deliver fact-based news of research and discoveries from around the world.)

Older

Patent Issued for Electrical data processing system for determining a navigation route based on the location of a vehicle and generating a recommendation for a vehicle maneuver (USPTO 11348451): Allstate Insurance Company

Newer

New Insurance Findings from Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg (FAU) Outlined (Cyber Risk Management In the Us Banking and Insurance Industry: a Textual and Empirical Analysis of Determinants and Value): Insurance

Advisor News

  • Estate planning during the great wealth transfer
  • Main Street families need trusted financial guidance to navigate the new Trump Accounts
  • Are the holidays a good time to have a long-term care conversation?
  • Gen X unsure whether they can catch up with retirement saving
  • Bill that could expand access to annuities headed to the House
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Insurance Compact warns NAIC some annuity designs ‘quite complicated’
  • MONTGOMERY COUNTY MAN SENTENCED TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR DEFRAUDING ELDERLY VICTIMS OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS
  • New York Life continues to close in on Athene; annuity sales up 50%
  • Hildene Capital Management Announces Purchase Agreement to Acquire Annuity Provider SILAC
  • Removing barriers to annuity adoption in 2026
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • La. cuts two Medicaid contracts, care options for 488,500 in limbo
  • Letters: Health care coverage shouldn’t just focus only on Obamacare recipients
  • Louisiana yanks a Medicaid contract, pushing 330,000 people to other plans
  • With Congress stalled on ACA subsidies, Nebraska Farm Bureau rolls out its own health plan
  • Health plan approved drug lists more complex, challenging consumers
Sponsor
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Jackson Awards $730,000 in Grants to Nonprofits Across Lansing, Nashville and Chicago
  • AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Lonpac Insurance Bhd
  • Reinsurance Group of America Names Ryan Krueger Senior Vice President, Investor Relations
  • iA Financial Group Partners with Empathy to Deliver Comprehensive Bereavement Support to Canadians
  • Roeland Tobin Bell
More Life Insurance News

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

More Top Read Stories >

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Slow Me the Money
Slow down RMDs … and RMD taxes … with a QLAC. Click to learn how.

ICMG 2026: 3 Days to Transform Your Business
Speed Networking, deal-making, and insights that spark real growth — all in Miami.

Your trusted annuity partner.
Knighthead Life provides dependable annuities that help your clients retire with confidence.

Press Releases

  • Springline Advisory Announces Partnership With Software And Consulting Firm Actuarial Resources Corporation
  • Insuraviews Closes New Funding Round Led by Idea Fund to Scale Market Intelligence Platform
  • ePIC University: Empowering Advisors to Integrate Estate Planning Into Their Practice With Confidence
  • Altara Wealth Launches as $1B+ Independent Advisory Enterprise
  • A Heartfelt Letter to the Independent Advisor Community
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2025 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet