Nebraska mental health care providers say changes put 'poorest of poor' at-risk
Behavioral health providers across
In expanding Medicare’s coverage to some behavioral health services like licensed independent mental health practitioners (LIMHP), providers say the reimbursements they were receiving through Nebraska’s Medicaid program have been slashed dramatically.
That has produced a 50% loss in payments for individuals that qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid — so-called “dual eligible” individuals — resulting in losses of thousands of dollars to providers across the state.
In turn, those providers have been forced to reduce the number of times they see dual eligible patients, put those individuals on waiting lists or cut off services to them altogether.
“Especially for our rural providers, this is a hit to their finances, which is causing many to reevaluate how they will be able to continue serving this population,” said
Many of the providers struggling most are working in rural areas of
The problem with how providers are able to be reimbursed was identified more than a year ago, Dubas said, although federal officials chalked it up to “unintended consequences.”
Beginning in
But in
Nebraskans who were “dual eligible” — those over the age of 65 or with a qualifying disability who are also low income — found their reimbursements for behavioral health services were roughly half of what they were before.
For example, before the federal change took effect on
Since
Taken together, the provider is paid a total of
The change in how behavioral health services were reimbursed for dual eligible Nebraskans came as a shock to
After continuing to bill Nebraska Medicaid for services rendered to dual eligible patients, Price said she learned through a
Medicaid demanded Price repay nearly
“I worked really hard to get credentialed with Medicare, and as soon as I was able to get credentials, I tried to rebill all of those claims,” Price explained, “but they did not get repaid.”
To compound matters, Price said Inspirit Counseling had to make difficult decisions about the 30-35 patients who were dual eligible. Some providers decided to keep seeing patients on a pro bono basis, while others had to terminate their patients’ treatment.
At another clinic in the
More than 200 patients who receive services from
More than 50 others who would qualify are now on a waiting list, he said.
Day and others have urged officials with the
Raising the reimbursement rate would allow providers to be paid what they were before the change to Medicare, Day said, while also realizing savings for the state, albeit to a lesser extent than what is being saved now.
"There's one little thing that was broken," Day said. "We just need to fix this one little thing."
In an emailed response, the
“The decision was not for cost savings,” a spokesman for the department said. “It was to ensure parity for payment and fairness in the process of our payment system.”
Clinical psychologists, who are highly trained and experienced, have always had to bill through Medicare first, the department said: “Aligning reimbursement rates for LMHPs and other mental health professionals to that of clinical psychologists brings stability to the payment system.”
Day said other services’ Medicaid reimbursement rates were not necessarily affected by the change made to services covered by Medicare this year, however.
“Ours was the only one that changed, right?” he said. “No other providers were affected by this. We were the only ones that were.”
Dubas said NABHO is working with state lawmakers to introduce legislation in the coming session.
But if left uncorrected, Dubas said the lower reimbursements could have further implications as more providers leave centers across the state for offices where the reimbursement rates are higher.
“When you start cutting back on services, how does that ripple out to other areas across the whole continuum?” she asked.
___
(c)2024 Lincoln Journal Star, Neb.
Visit Lincoln Journal Star, Neb. at www.journalstar.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Editorial | Suspect in CEO killings doesn’t end debate over health care insurance industry
Federal judge blocks rule that would have given DACA recipients access to Affordable Care Act coverage
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News