Nature Conservancy, 2 Collaborators Issue Issues Report Entitled 'Reducing Caribbean Risk - Opportunities for Cost-Effective Mangrove Restoration and Insurance' (Part 1 of 4) - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Editorial Staff
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
April 17, 2023 Newswires
Share
Share
Tweet
Email

Nature Conservancy, 2 Collaborators Issue Issues Report Entitled 'Reducing Caribbean Risk – Opportunities for Cost-Effective Mangrove Restoration and Insurance' (Part 1 of 4)

Targeted News Service

WASHINGTON, April 17 (TNSrep) -- Three organizations issued a 34-page report in April 2023 entitled "Reducing Caribbean Risk: Opportunities for Cost-Effective Mangrove Restoration and Insurance." The three organizations were the Nature Conservancy, University of California Santa Cruz and AXA.

The report was written by Michael W. Beck, Nadine Hec, Siddharth Narayan and Pelayo Menendez of the Institute of Marine Sciences at the University of California, Santa Cruz; Saul Torres-Ortega and Inigo J. Losada of the Instituto de Hidraulica Ambiental-IH Cantabria at the Universidad de Cantabria, Spain; Mark Way and Lianna McFarlane-Connelly of Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia; and Martha Rogers of Nature Conservancy, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Here are excerpts:

* * *

Executive Summary

Mangrove forests play a critically important role in coastal protection. They can dissipate wave energy, which can lower flood risk and minimize erosion. Mangrove forests, however, are threatened by a number of natural and man-made factors, including storm events. Often times, mangroves are able to recover post-storm with limited intervention, but active post-storm restoration efforts are required to re-establish mangroves and hasten recovery, particularly when hydrological damage has occurred.

Insurance is a unique market-based mechanism that can cost-effectively protect and restore coastal habitat. In Quintana Roo, Mexico, The Nature Conservancy helped launch the first-ever insurance product to protect coral reefs from storm damage. We consider whether a similar mechanism could be developed for the protection and restoration of mangroves following storm events. For example, under a parametric insurance policy, payment would be triggered by a natural event and mangroves could be rapidly restored post-storm. Unlike coral reefs, however, mangroves do not usually require rapid post-storm interventions in order to survive. In this case, an indemnity insurance policy may be created that delivers payments based on ex-post assessments of mangrove damage. There are a variety of insurance products available that can be tailored to meet the specific needs of mangroves with initial payouts made quickly through parametric covers and assessed payouts made through indemnity cover at a later stage.

The market for mangrove insurance products will likely vary based on the category of assets most protected by mangroves. In locations where private assets are protected, mangrove insurance could target residential or commercial customers. In other regions, mangrove forests may protect critical public infrastructure, making a mangrove insurance policy targeting public entities a feasible alternative.

Across the Caribbean, we have quantified the cost effectiveness of mangroves for flood risk reduction. To measure mangrove benefits, we estimate the economic value of mangrove forests for flood risk reduction in 20 km study units. These results are based on industry-standard approaches using probabilistic and process-based valuations of flood risk and the damages averted by mangroves. We estimate damages averted by mangroves for four storm frequency events - 1 in 10, 25, 50, and 100-year storm events. We combine these modeled mangrove forest benefits for coastal protection with mangrove restoration costs--estimated to be $45,000/hectare in Florida and $23,000/hectare in the rest of the Caribbean--to develop spatially explicit benefit-cost ratios.

We find that there are 20 states, territories and countries in the Caribbean that have sections of coastline (i.e., ~20 km coastal study units) with cost effective opportunities for mangrove restoration. In total, we identified more than 3,000 km of coastline that have cost effective opportunities for mangrove restoration, with Cuba, the Bahamas, and Florida having the most study units with cost effective opportunities for mangrove restoration. In this study, restoration includes the management, recovery or replanting of damaged or degraded mangroves in existing stands (i.e., where mangroves have or do occur naturally).

For seven of the countries that had the largest amount of mangrove coastline which would be cost-effective to restore, we then looked in greater detail at the governance and market characteristics that would most enable the development of a mangrove insurance product. These countries were: the Bahamas, Belize, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Mexico, and the United States (e.g., Florida). We show that while the Bahamas and the United States have the most robust insurance markets, mangrove forests in the Dominican Republic and Jamaica potentially protect the largest number of people due to their high population densities.

The findings here provide a positive perspective as to the feasibility of de veloping and deploying a mangrove insurance product in the Caribbean region. These results, however, are only preliminary. Prior to the development and deployment of a mangrove insurance policy, a full feasibility study would need to be conducted. This full feasibility study should include higher-resolution flood-risk models, estimation of the wind reduction benefits of mangroves, and the construction of fragility curves to show the relationship between damage to a mangrove forest and some component of a storm event, such as storm surge or wind speed.

* * *

Table of Contents

01 ... Introduction

02 ... Mangrove Risk, Restoration and Insurance Opportunities

03 ... Benefit-Cost Analysis of Mangroves in the Caribbean

04 ... Insurance Product Analysis

05 ... Implications and Recommendations

06 ... References

* * *

* * *

Introduction

Mangrove forests currently cover approximately 14 million hectares across 118 countries (Giri, 2010). This expanse of mangrove forests, however, is drastically smaller than what it once was; between 1980 and 2005 about 20% of mangrove forests were lost globally (Spalding et al., 2010, Giri, 2010) and the overall historical loss is probably 50% or more. Fortunately, the rate of mangrove loss has slowed substantially in the last two decades, but mangrove forests continue to be lost each year (Sanderman, 2018). Finding ways to slow or reverse this loss is critical because mangrove forests provide a suite of important ecosystem services (Barbier, 2011). Mangrove forests enhance fish abundance in nearby coral reefs (Mumby, 2004; Serafy, 2015), and they sequester and store a disproportionate amount of carbon relative to their landcover (Hutchi-son, 2014). They play a particularly important role in flood risk and erosion reduction by slowing storm surge and dissipating wave energy (World Bank, 2016; Menendez et al. 2020), which is especially important in terms of risk reduction and insurance considerations.

There are critical opportunities to harness the power of wetlands and reefs to reduce the impacts of storms and other natural hazards (Narayan et al., 2016; Narayan et al., 2017; Beck et al., 2017; Beck et al., 2018a,b; Beck et al., 2019a,b, Reguero et al., 2018; Menendez et al., 2020). The good news is that we can restore mangroves, if we identify the resources with which to do so.

This report assesses the potential of mangroves as cost-effective risk reduction mechanisms and identifies where insurance could be used to help guarantee the continuation of this benefit for communities and countries alike. First, we provide an overview of habitat insurance and the risk reduction benefits of mangroves. Then, we make a spatially explicit benefit-cost analysis for mangrove restoration across the entire Caribbean to identify where there may be cost effective opportunities for insurance and investment in mangroves. Lastly, we provide a high-level market analysis of opportunities in the Caribbean for mangrove insurance based on these benefit-cost analyses and our experience with the reef insurance model.

Insuring natural assets is a novel and innovative concept. The Nature Conservancy and the Government of Quintana Roo, Mexico launched an insurance product for coral reefs and beaches in 2019. Using the context of coral reefs, we can illustrate how such an insurance product could be used to protect and restore mangrove forests and other natural storm defenses such as coastal marshes.

The concept of the coral reef insurance product is relatively straight forward. Coral reefs reduce 97% of wave energy (Ferrario et al., 2014) and significantly reduce property damage during storms (Beck et al., 2018a). Protecting coral reefs is an effective means of reducing the risks people and properties are subject to because of storms, and we have found that coral reef insurance can be an effective protection mechanism to preserve risk reduction and other benefits provided by the reefs. Insurance can be used to guarantee funding to repair coral reefs after a major storm, much like other artificial infrastructure, to restore and preserve these protection benefits for future events.

The insurance product set up by TNC and partners in Quintana Roo, Mexico, was designed around this logic. The team established a parametric insurance product to help maintain coral reefs and beaches along over 160 km of the coast. The insurance is triggered if wind speeds in a designated area are recorded in excess of 100 knots. The maximum payout over the 12-month period, or the Annual Aggregate Limit, was $3.8 million (USD)./1 The ultimate payout of the insurance product is based on the maximum recorded wind speed during a storm event: (i) a payout equal to 40% of the maximum payout (~$1.5 million) if wind speeds are between 100 and 130 knots; (ii) a payout equal to 80% of the maximum payout (~$3.0 million) if wind speeds are between 130 and 160 knots; and (iii) a payout equal to 100% of the maximum payout (~$3.8 million) if wind speeds are in excess of 160 knots.

The implementation of the coral reef insurance product in Quintana Roo, Mexico follows a trust fund mechanism (see Figure 1) which is designed to collect and disburse funds for coastal management. In this case, the trust fund purchases the insurance product. The trust fund then acts as the single purchaser of the insurance product. The trust is designed to be able to accept funds from public, private and philanthropic sources as well as a federal fee collected from beachfront property owners who wish to use the beach for commercial purposes. Property owners and coastal communities benefit from the coastal protection provided by the coral reefs and from the fact that having coral reefs situated right off their shorelines attracts many tourists. The municipalities collect the federal fee from property owners that benefit from the coral reef's protective capacity and transfer it to the trust fund./2 This also helps to ensure that there are no free riders.

To expand the reef insurance example and assess opportunities for a mangrove insurance product, we address two key components in this pre-feasibility assessment. We consider where mangroves and mangrove restoration can offer cost-effective benefits for risk reduction and where there are likely to be suitable insurance market conditions.

1. The description of the Quintana Roo coral reef insurance policy relates to the inaugural policy which began on June 1, 2019.

2. At the time of writing, funding is provided by the State Government of Quintana Roo.

* * *

Mangrove Risk, Restoration and Insurance Opportunities

Risks to Mangroves

Mangrove degradation can result from several naturally occurring events. Strong storms, such as hurricanes, can impact mangrove forests by damaging, or killing, mangrove trees. Mangrove damage from hurricanes in the Caribbean has been shown to be primarily a function of wind speed; the relationship is sigmoidal with some evidence of damages around 100 km/hour and much higher rates of loss at wind speeds of 130 km per hour (approximately 70 knots) and above (Imbert, 2018). Besides wind speed, several other aspects affect damage rates including distance of the mangrove forest from the center of the storm, orientation of the mangrove forest with respect to the storm, and mangrove species with red mangroves being more susceptible to storm damage than black mangroves (Imbert, 2018). In addition, strong wave surges associated with storms can have devastating impacts for mangrove forests particularly to forests on exposed windward coasts (Cahoon and Hensel, 2002).

There are many additional factors--outside of just storm events--that affect mangrove growth and recovery trajectories. Sea level change will have a varying, but often negative, effect on mangroves. Mangroves have the potential to accumulate sediments and grow land vertically and thus keep up with moderate sea level rise. In this regard, mangroves are likely more resilient to sea level rise than marshes (which can also raise sediments and create land, but not as quickly). However, sea level rise will also 'push' mangroves landward and losses will occur more often due to coastal squeeze, where mangroves may have the necessary conditions to move inward to avoid sea level rise but there is no suitable space for them to go (due to either man-made or natural barriers) (Alongi, 2015).

Changes in precipitation patterns will impact the extent and health of mangroves, which, in general, tend to migrate inland during periods of high rainfall and to contract seaward during periods of low rainfall (Lovelock et al., 2017; Ward, 2016). A decline in precipitation, for example, could limit a mangrove forest's ability to naturally migrate and respond to sea level rise (Ward, 2016). One of the worst mangrove die offs recorded was in Australia's Gulf of Carpentaria in the summer of 2015-2016. During the event, below-average rainfalls, high temperatures and low sea levels combined to result in the dieback of mangroves along 1,000 kilometers of coast line (Duke et al., 2017). Mangrove diebacks have also been shown to follow El Nino events in Australia when sea levels can be 20-30 centimeters lower (Lovelock et al., 2017).

Finally, mangroves are also predicted to expand their ranges as average temperatures rise. Mangrove extent is generally limited by, among other things, the frequency of extreme cold events, defined as days cooler than -4 C (25 F). On the east coast of Florida, the area of mangrove forests has doubled at the northern end of their range over the last 28 years as the frequency of extreme cold events has decreased (Cavanaugh et al., 2014).

Mangrove forests are threatened by various man-made impacts. For example, the growth of shrimp aquaculture, coastal development, timber harvesting, and pollution runoff have all been linked to mangrove forest degradation or destruction. (World Bank, 2019). Altered landscapes can also affect ecosystem characteristics, such as tidal flows, in a way that is detrimental to mangrove health (Lewis, 2016).

* * *

Mangrove Restoration

Mangroves are able to recover post-storm with minimal or no intervention as long as the elevation and hydrology have not been deeply affected (for example by sediment loss). In many respects, mangroves act like weed species and can grow quickly in an intertidal environment with few competitors. Overall, their natural recovery is often faster than for any other marine ecosystem. Initial recovery can be seen in 3-5 years when new generations of mangroves are able to take hold, but full recovery of an ecologically functioning forest can take time (Imbert, 2018). However, mangrove recovery could face several different hurdles. Strong winds and waves can combine for significant erosion that reduces elevation below the tidal threshold for propagule (seed) establishment (Asbridge, 2018). Mangrove forests can be suffocated by excessive sediment deposits if the storm brings the sediment too far landward (Cahoon, 2002).

In many circumstances, particularly those where mangroves are situated around human developments, more active restoration efforts are required to re-establish mangroves and to hasten recovery. An assessment of post-storm status can provide valuable information on whether or not the impacted area would be suitable for planting or whether it requires interventions such as hydrological modifications. A review of 160 documented mangrove restoration efforts across 24 countries illustrated a largely positive picture of mangrove restoration success (Worthington and Spalding, 2018). For projects that are well-documented, survival rates range from 60-90% after 10 years (Worthington and Spalding, 2018).

Some restoration efforts have been less successful. A review of large-scale mangrove restoration efforts in Sri Lanka following the 2004 tsunami showed 54% of plantings, and roughly one-third of sites, had no surviving plants after 5 years, one-third of the sites had survival rates under 10%, and the remaining one-third of sites had survival rates of between 10% and 78% (Kodikara et al., 2017). Common factors that have been identified in limiting the success of mangrove restoration efforts include placing plants in locations not suitable for mangroves due to topography and flooding (Kodikara et al., 2017), planting in areas where mangroves did not previously exist (Lewis, 2005), and a mismatch of species selection that does not consider the biodiversity needs of the site (Lewis, 2005). While these examples highlight the need to consider ecological factors in mangrove restoration, such restoration can be successful in cases that incorporate proper planning. For example, of the 160-plus mangrove restoration projects reviewed by Worthington and Spalding (2018) over 80 of them were deemed successful.

Mangrove restoration for risk reduction is likely to include innovative approaches to ensure and speed up the delivery of flood and erosion risk reduction benefits. These approaches could include planting more mature trees in the front line to break waves and slow erosion, thus offering immediate protective benefits to people and enhancing successful seedling growth behind the front line. A number of mangrove restoration projects combine grey or hybrid infrastructure, such as reed fences or cement planters, to promote mangrove growth; reed fences can slow initial erosion which would impede mangrove growth and cement planters can improve the establishment of mangrove trees on the front-line.

Restoration efforts should incorporate support for the ongoing management of mangrove forests. For example, regular maintenance of roads, such as clearing broken branches, can help maintain hydrological flows that are important for mangrove health. Ultimately, the ongoing management of a mangrove forest will decrease its likelihood of sustaining extensive damage in the event of a storm.

Finally, any mangrove management project should place some emphasis on greater ecosystem management and reporting. A joint report published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and TNC (McLeod, 2006) listed seven factors for ongoing mangrove management success, which are shown in Figure 2.

* * *

Figure 2 Identified Factors for Ongoing Mangrove Management Success. Source: McLeod, Elizabeth and Rodney V. Salm. (2006). "Managing Mangroves for Resilience to Climate Change," IUCN, Gland, Switzerland: pp. 64.

* * *

Opportunities for a Mangrove Insurance Product

Given that mangrove forests create significant protective value for coastal communities, there is likely an opportunity to insure these natural assets, as in the case of coral reefs. Initially, we focus on opportunities to insure mangrove forests from damage incurred during storm events. Assessing the potential for a mangrove insurance product covering storm events is logical given that it is more straightforward to assess the fragility of mangroves to wind speed or storm surge--common characteristics of a storm event--than other more nuanced ecological stressors, such as precipitation and sea level rise. At the end of this section, we highlight potential opportunities for a mangrove insurance product outside of storm events.

Identifying the Appropriate Insurance Product

A key decision when setting up a mangrove insurance product is what type of insurance product to use. For the coral reef insurance product discussed above, a parametric insurance product was implemented where insurance payouts were made based on the recorded wind intensity of a storm. In the case of mangroves, as with coral reefs, there are key characteristics of parametric insurance that make it likely to be the best candidate for an insurance product.

Parametric insurance payouts can be made in as little as 10 working days of the damage occurring. This fast payout schedule is because parametric insurance, unlike traditional property indemnity insurance, is not tied to a specific asset but rather to a specific triggering event. As soon as the triggering event occurs, the pre-defined payout can be made to the insured party. With parametric insurance, there is no need to wait for an insurance assessor to come to the property and assess the amount of damages incurred and what will and will not be covered by insurance. This quick payout could be beneficial where a rapid post-disaster response to mangrove restoration may be necessary to ensure the long-term viability of the mangrove forest. In many cases, rapid restoration action may be less critical for mangroves per se than it is for coral reefs. However, rapid payouts that help provide restoration jobs in local communities could be socially beneficial, which could have indirect and long-term benefits for ecological recovery.

A parametric insurance policy would cover a defined geographical area, which identifies the mangroves included in the insurance policy. Estimated restoration costs would form the basis to calculate the required amount of insurance coverage. Several recent studies address the relationship between wind speed and mangrove destruction (Imbert, 2018; Tallie et al., 2020; Tomiczek et al., 2020). Another issue is the likely cost of restoration if there is both mangrove loss and extensive hydrological alteration (e.g., extensive erosion or sedimentation). It is likely that restoration costs may increase non-linearly with wind speed because of these hydrological/topographical impacts./3

3. Non-linearity in restoration costs/efforts was also assumed with coral reef insurance.

* * *

n the case of parametric insurance, an important decision-point is the triggering event. In the case of the coral reef insurance product in Mexico, the trigger point was recorded wind speed in a given area; payouts started when wind speeds of 100 knots or more were recorded and maxed out when wind speeds of 160 knots--equal to a category five hurricane--or more were recorded. When insuring mangrove forests using a parametric insurance product, it would be important to decide what the appropriate trigger point for payouts would be, with wind speed being the most likely trigger point.

n deciding on the triggering event and trigger point for a mangrove insurance project, careful thought will also need to be given to the associated basis risk (defined as the imperfect correlation between index and individual loss). In designing a parametric insurance product, the triggering event, index, and trigger point must reflect the insured risk as accurately as possible. Basis risk refers to the degree to which the insurance index under or overestimates the damage following a triggering event. In the case of a mangrove insurance product, basis risk would occur, for example, if a triggering event that was linked to wind speed did not match up closely with the expected damage sustained to a mangrove forest during a storm event. For one, a mangrove forest may be in the lee of a storm and even though the wind speeds exceed the trigger point the mangroves sustain limited to no damage. Conversely, a mangrove forest could sustain damage even if a storm's wind speeds do not exceed the trigger point. Thus, when deciding on the appropriate triggering event and trigger point for a mangrove insurance product, careful thought needs to be given to factors that affect mangrove forests, how their impacts on mangrove forests can be measured, and the vulnerability of mangrove forests to those factors. Ideally, historical storm events serve as the ground for assessing the historical damages and losses which allows for an accurate structuring of the trigger point and mitigates the challenge with basis risk.

Mangrove forests could also potentially be insured following a more traditional property indemnity insurance model. In contrast to parametric insurance, with property-indemnity insurance, the size of the payout would be based on ex-post assessments of mangrove damage. In this example, mangroves could be rolled into corporate insurance where, for example, a company that restores and/or maintains a mangrove forest of a specified size and location could then qualify for a reduction in insurance premiums. It is open to question whether it may be feasible to develop a similar model with private home insurance, with verification as one of the practicalities that would have to be addressed.

Alternatively, a combined parametric-indemnity insurance product could be created. In this case, a percentage of the payout could be paid out immediately post-storm through the parametric portion and a remaining portion could be paid out at a later date based on assessed damage.

Identifying the Appropriate Insurance Customer

The second decision when setting up mangrove insurance focuses on identifying the primary customer. Ultimately, the identified customer will be location-specific and depend on the assets that are being protected by a specific mangrove forest. In areas where mangrove forests protect residential houses, individual private citizens may wish to purchase a mangrove insurance product. Similarly, in areas where mangrove forests protect commercial properties - such as hotels-private businesses may wish to purchase a mangrove insurance product.

For both residential and commercial insurance, there are complications that could arise in developing an individual insurance product. In any mangrove insurance product, one needs to understand what area of land is protected for a given parcel of mangrove forests. If a given parcel of mangrove forest protects multiple properties, whether they are residential or commercial, then any one property holder taking out mangrove insurance will end up inherently benefiting multiple property owners. On the flip side, if all benefiting property owners took out their own mangrove insurance policies the logistics of aggregating and disbursing payouts for mangrove restoration could quickly become cumbersome and a hindrance to the post-storm restoration of the mangrove forest.

Multiple schemes may be used to get around this collective action problem. As in the case of the coral reef insurance in Mexico, a trust fund could be created. In the Mexico example, all benefiting property owners agreed to pay into the trust fund. Alternatively, a composite insurance policy could be used (Sanderman, 2018). With composite insurance, individual property owners are insured under a single insurance policy where their payments into the policy are a function of the relative protective benefits received from the mangrove forests. Finally, the mangrove insurance product could be purchased directly by an insurance company to cover regions where a portfolio of insured properties has extensive coastal exposure.

A mangrove insurance product could also be purchased by the public sector, such as a national government, which would avoid this collective action problem. Mangroves often provide critical coastal defenses to important public infrastructure. Ports, airports, wastewater treatment and energy transfer facilities were built in the lowest lying open areas near urban centers, which often meant over mangroves. A national or local government could opt to purchase a single mangrove insurance plan to reduce storm damage in specified regions with the intent of protecting many of its different stakeholders, including private citizens and companies. Due to the protection gap, the costs of storm relief and recovery efforts are typically covered by governments. In many cases, maintaining mangrove forests is a cost-effective means of mitigating storm damage affecting sea walls and other grey infrastructure (Bell and Lovelock, 2013). Consequently, a government could find that purchasing mangrove insurance is a cost-effective means of ensuring that mangrove forests within a given area are maintained sufficiently to maximize protection to inland communities from storms. Additionally, mangroves are often on public land and governments may already be committing millions of dollars to restoring mangroves. There is the possibility that a publicly-oriented mangrove insurance product could also be of interest to local or global humanitarian and/or disaster risk-reduction organizations as either a stand-alone product or integrated into other product offerings.

Opportunities for Mangrove Insurance Beyond Storm Events

Up until now, we have focused on the benefits of insuring mangrove forests in order to prevent or reduce damage to physical assets from a storm event. As discussed above, however, mangroves are subject to additional ecological stressors outside of storm events. Mangrove forests also provide many other benefits to neighboring communities beyond property protection (Barbier, 2011). When considering mangrove insurance, it may be feasible to develop an insurance product that focuses on one of these other benefits or stressors. One possible alternative mangrove forest benefit to consider for an insurance product relates to carbon storage.

Mangrove forests are considered one of the most carbon-dense ecosystems in the world - the carbon storage benefits of marine habitats, including mangroves, is commonly referred to as blue carbon. Mangrove forests are able to store carbon not only in their biomass but also in the soil, acting as long-term carbon sinks, and making them incredibly effective environments for carbon storage (Sanderman, 2018). The Caribbean is home to mangrove forests that store a significant amount of carbon and many of these countries have lost soil carbon at notably high rates since 2000 (Sanderman, 2018). Although insurance for carbon credits is fundamentally different from the mangrove insurance discussed above, it is still possible to develop a mangrove insurance product related to carbon storage (Bell and Lovelock, 2013). Insurance Facilitators in Australia, for example, launched one of the first insurance products to cover sequestered carbon from forests, which works in collaboration with major accredited carbon offset projects (Insurance Facilitators). A similar product could be developed for mangrove forests. Alternatively, the development of a mangrove insurance product could potentially be expedited if insurance companies were able to count the carbon sequestration benefits of insured mangrove forests as carbon offsets.

A mangrove insurance product could also theoretically be linked to non-storm related ecological stressors, such as precipitation or temperature changes. Assessing the fragility of mangroves with respect to these stressors, however, is likely to be much more difficult than assessing the fragility of mangroves with respect to different intensities of storm events. For one, the impact of precipitation and temperature changes on mangrove forests is much more location-specific than the impact of storm events on mangroves, with some regions experiencing expansion of mangrove forests as rain events increase and/or temperatures increase, while other regions experience the opposite effect. Thus, any insurance product focusing on these ecological stressors would potentially need to construct dozens of different fragility curves specific to the region and stressor - an enormously time-intensive pursuit. While feasible, it's much more likely that any cost-effective mangrove insurance product would focus on the impact to mangroves from storm events. Funding from any storm-related insurance product would then have to be utilized efficiently to resolve any other compounding factors that threaten mangroves.

In order to identify which locations to focus on for mangrove insurance in the Caribbean, we begin with a high-level country analysis. For any local analysis, we'll need to consider both supply-side factors and demand-side factors. Supply-side factors refer to whether insurance providers show interest in developing a product and have the ability to do so. The demand-side factors refer to the process of identifying the recipients of mangrove protection, and other services (e.g., residential, commercial, or government), and how much they would be willing to pay to insure the mangrove forest, which in turn, is a function of the amount of benefits received. From an economic perspective, mangrove insurance will be feasible in areas where mangrove forests exist, where mangrove forests provide protective, and other benefits, and where it is cost-effective for the beneficiaries to restore or protect the mangrove forest.

* * *

(Continues with Part 2 of 4)

The report is posted at: https://www.nature.org/content/dam/tnc/nature/en/documents/TNC_MangroveInsurance_Final.pdf

TARGETED NEWS SERVICE (founded 2004) features non-partisan 'edited journalism' news briefs and information for news organizations, public policy groups and individuals; as well as 'gathered' public policy information, including news releases, reports, speeches. For more information contact MYRON STRUCK, editor, [email protected], Springfield, Virginia; 703/304-1897; https://targetednews.com

Older

GAO Issues Report: Fraud Risk Management – Key Areas for Federal Agency and Congressional Action

Newer

Nature Conservancy, 2 Collaborators Issue Issues Report Entitled 'Reducing Caribbean Risk – Opportunities for Cost-Effective Mangrove Restoration and Insurance'(Part 3 of 4)

Advisor News

  • 5 things I wish I knew before leaving my broker-dealer
  • Global economic growth will moderate as the labor force shrinks
  • Estate planning during the great wealth transfer
  • Main Street families need trusted financial guidance to navigate the new Trump Accounts
  • Are the holidays a good time to have a long-term care conversation?
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
  • Prudential launches FlexGuard 2.0 RILA
  • Lincoln Financial Introduces First Capital Group ETF Strategy for Fixed Indexed Annuities
  • Iowa defends Athene pension risk transfer deal in Lockheed Martin lawsuit
  • Pension buy-in sales up, PRT sales down in mixed Q3, LIMRA reports
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • House GOP passes 'first step' health care bill, considers broader package in 2026
  • Speaker Johnson Says He Will Not Call for a Vote to Extend Healthcare Subsidies
  • Study Findings from Danielle Laperche-Santos et al Broaden Understanding of Breast Cancer (Impact of public vs. private insurance coverage on quality of life of women with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer): Oncology – Breast Cancer
  • Becky Johnson: Why are health coverage costs increasing under the Affordable Care Act in North Carolina?
  • IDHW hears concerns on Medicaid managed care transition
Sponsor
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Best’s Market Segment Report: Hong Kong’s Non-Life Insurance Segment Shows Growth and Resilience Amid Market Challenges
  • Product understanding will drive the future of insurance
  • Nearly Half of Americans More Stressed Heading into 2026, Allianz Life Study Finds
  • New York Life Investments Expands Active ETF Lineup With Launch of NYLI MacKay Muni Allocation ETF (MMMA)
  • LTC riders: More education is needed, NAIFA president says
More Life Insurance News

- Presented By -

Top Read Stories

More Top Read Stories >

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Slow Me the Money
Slow down RMDs … and RMD taxes … with a QLAC. Click to learn how.

ICMG 2026: 3 Days to Transform Your Business
Speed Networking, deal-making, and insights that spark real growth — all in Miami.

Your trusted annuity partner.
Knighthead Life provides dependable annuities that help your clients retire with confidence.

Press Releases

  • Two industry finance experts join National Life Group amid accelerated growth
  • National Life Group Announces Leadership Transition at Equity Services, Inc.
  • SandStone Insurance Partners Welcomes Industry Veteran, Rhonda Waskie, as Senior Account Executive
  • Springline Advisory Announces Partnership With Software And Consulting Firm Actuarial Resources Corporation
  • Insuraviews Closes New Funding Round Led by Idea Fund to Scale Market Intelligence Platform
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2025 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet