Most People Take Out Fire Insurance 'Because It's a Loan Requirement'
Insurers have argued that the low uptake of insurance against fire in the country is down to such factors as the relatively low risk of fire incident compared to other accidents, the small profit margin for insurers, and the country's economy that is still small.
They made their arguments on
On Tuesday, the senators met with the
The oversight follows the increasing fire outbreaks across the country despite the exiatence of the Prime Minister Instructions, of 2014, relating to the fire prevention in
One of the provisions of the instructions states that for the purpose of insuring materials, properties, persons, and their adequate compensation, all public buildings and other public places shall have insurance against fire outbreaks.
The committee reviewed the inspection report of the
The report states soaring number of fire outbreaks for the last 3 years; from 21 cases in 2018 to 71 cases in 2019 with 89 cases recorded in 2020.
In addition, the Committee will tour 19 districts countrywide to assess the enforcement of the Prime Minister's instructions of 2014 relating to fire prevention in the country.
During the tour, the legislators will assess public buildings, markets and malls, commercial and artisan hubs (udukiriro), industries, among others.
Annie Nibishaka, Chairperson of
Nibishaka revealed that just about 30,000 local entities including individuals and institutions had fire insurance, saying that they were very few compared to the country's population currently estimated at 13 million.
She said that most individuals get take fire insurance policies on their houses just because it is a requirement by the bank before they can be given a loan.
"But after servicing the loan, they in most cases think that it is no longer necessary to continue paying for the fire insurance," she said, adding that this is most common for residential houses.
"I think this is a problem. Fire incidents are not prevalent in
Though there has been the Government's directive requiring all public buildings to have fire insurance cover, it was not [effectively] enforced, calling for ways to ensure that people embrace it adequately.
In addition, he said, the cost of fire insurance distribution and marketing is high compared to the premiums paid by the policyholders, making this product relatively less profitable.
"The fire insurance premium, which is one-thousandth of the value of the insured asset, is the lowest of all the insurance product rates," he said.
Given that the purchasing power of Rwandans is still low as a result of the limited economy, insurance was not considered a priority by many.
"On the priority scale, insurance comes at the last position. When people have met all their priority needs including education, healthcare, food, accommodation and clothing, and they have some money left, that's what they invest in insurance," he said.
Compensations marred with inefficiencies
"Buying insurance coverage for wood value chain businesses is very important to protect them from losses in case of fire," he said, calling for sensitization for people engaged in this trade.
Some people expressed concern that investigation to establish the cause of the fire and the extent of damage delays and that sometimes this affects the quality of the report and the people who want compensation.
On the complaint that sometimes the compensation claims of the affected people are not paid or payment delays, Nibishaka said that for an insurer to pay, the incident has to be thoroughly investigated by
SiriusPoint Promotes Shams Patel to Chief Pricing Actuary
Gun-Rights Group Sues California City For Requiring Gun Liability Insurance
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News