Moral argument should lead health care debate
So said President
Well, we have had over a week now to read and digest the legislative equivalent of sausage making by Speaker
Who could have believed that was even possible?
It is possible, I assume, that
What we have learned so far is that nothing as big as Trumpcare -- the Obamacare replacement -- happens in the blink of an eye or with the snap of our fingers. Besides the very complicated nature of legislation that will consume a major part of our gross national product over the coming decades, writing the laws that take from millions of Americans their health care safety net that they have come to rely upon is not an easy task. In fact, it really is complicated!
What concerns me is that all those folks who jumped on the repeal-and-replace bandwagon didn't have an inkling about what would be required to get the job done. Nor did they have a clue that when they said repeal and replace that they were actually talking about their own health care.
And yet here we are. We have a plan trying to work its way through the
In the end, I believe that
In the end, it doesn't matter to me how people get affordable, efficient and quality health care as long as they have it. The idea that in the wealthiest country in the world people would have to go broke just because they get sick borders on the immoral. So, change it, replace it, fix it or leave it alone. Just don't hurt the very people who need the help the most.
I realize what I am about to say may not be a universal truth but it is an anecdotal certainty.
Prior to Obamacare I had the unfortunate need to take a loved one to the emergency room of various local hospitals. No one needs any aggravation when a loved one needs medical assistance so it goes without saying that having to wait for what could have been hours to see a doctor -- because the emergency rooms were full of people seeking primary care because they had no insurance and no primary doctors -- should not be an issue in a first world country.
Years later, in fact last weekend, I had the need to avail the services of another emergency room -- this time on a Saturday night in
What happened between 2009 and 2017 that emptied the emergency room of primary care medical problems? What allowed the people who would have normally clogged up the most expensive part of our healthcare provision system to go somewhere else for primary care? What allowed my emergency and others like it to be treated as the emergencies they were and allowed the doctors to focus on acute issues?
I may be wrong but it seems to me that the only thing that happened between 2009 and 2017 that would have had such an impact is -- wait for it -- Obamacare!
It really isn't all that complicated.
And now
___
(c)2017 the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.)
Visit the Las Vegas Sun (Las Vegas, Nev.) at www.lasvegassun.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.


For many older Americans, costs rise under GOP health plan
President Donald Trump’s budget proposal raises concerns among some local officials about the way it would affect Weld County
Advisor News
- When new investment trends emerge, Gen Z is most likely generation to be first in
- Could ‘plain English’ become an advisor’s secret weapon?
- IRI urges Senate action on 403(b) parity legislation
- Three estate planning ideas to protect your clients and their wealth
- What advisors must know about accessible client documents
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
- Wink: Annuity sales post strong Q2, led by MYGAs and structured products
- Legacy Marketing Group partners with Malibu Life USA for annuity launch
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News