Medicare for all? How about Medicare for me? | Opinion
To the follow-up “Obama gotcha” question -- those who like their [private] insurance don’t get to keep it? -- the
“The idea is that everyone gets access to medical care, and you don’t have to go through the process of going through an insurance company, having them give you approval. … Let’s eliminate all of that; let’s move on.”
My first reaction, being the designated person in my household for dealing with our kindly insurance company, was prospective relief from paperwork. It was quickly followed by my usual economist’s skepticism about a free lunch. For one thing, I am due to join the current Medicare program (for old folks) when I retire during a prospective President Harris’ term of office. For another, as part of my role as an expert, I have had to learn a fair amount about how that program actually works.
So, I asked myself whether
(A personal note: Sen. Harris’ father, Don, was my colleague when we were both assistant professors at
The problem is that the label “Medicare for All” has been attached to a variety of different proposals from various
1. It sometimes requires approval before paying doctors for some services.
2. The approval of coverage and development of payment policies for benefits are actually done by private insurance companies under contract with Medicare, and their policies vary across states. (In Pennsylvania, the contractor is Novitas Services, a subsidiary of
I might like it, if it pays more for services that I like than for others I don’t (though not everyone may agree with me on which is which). Of course, we as beneficiaries would all wish that insurance paid well for every service, so doctors and hospitals would pay more attention to us, although as taxpayers and premium-payers, we would prefer that it paid less for everyone but us.
So, I remain a little nervous about Sen. Harris’ plan, and wish I had paid more attention to the leaders of tomorrow at my feet when I was in my first academic job. One may hope more realistic details will be forthcoming. There is no shortage of goodwill and good intentions among the emerging and impressive list of candidates and plans. However, realism, being the most valuable political commodity, is also the scarcest.
___
(c)2019 Philly.com
Visit Philly.com at www.philly.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Baby Boomers Flocking To A Mexican Retirement
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News