MAKE THE CARRIER VISIT PRODUCTIVE

The following information was released by the Public Risk Management Association:

Donna Settle P.E.

Property Risk Engineering Leader, Gallagher

The last thing a public entity risk manager needs is another insurance "gotcha" visit. Yet property risk engineering visits often start off on the wrong foot, not because anyone is careless, but because the process is fragmented. The person scheduling the visit isn't always the person who hosts it. The host may get little notice. The engineer arrives under time pressure. Documentation is hard to find, local staff feel scrutinized, and everyone walks away grumpy.

A few years ago, I watched that play out at a municipal facility with aging infrastructure and a small, overextended maintenance team. The risk manager scheduled the visits, but the tour landed on facility staff who had never met the engineer and didn't know what might be needed. The engineer asked for sprinkler inspection reports and impairment procedures. The supervisor called three people, then disappeared into a file room. Fifteen minutes later, the only thing found was rising anxiety. The engineer's expression said what no one wanted to say out loud: "Now I have to write a recommendation."

The risk manager stepped in and did something simple, yet powerful. She reframed the visit in real time: "Let's treat this like a working session. We'll show what we have, what we're improving and what we need help prioritizing." Then she asked the engineer for the specific items that mattered most and offered a plan: "If we can't locate everything today, we'll send a package within 48 hours." The tone changed immediately. The engineer stopped hunting for faults and started collaborating on a path forward. That visit still resulted in recommendations, but fewer were "administrative" (missing records, unclear impairment controls) and more were meaningful, prioritized, and realistic.

That's the heart of an optimized property risk engineering visit: instead of trying to create a perfect facility, focus on creating clarity and shared understanding.

In a perfect world, the engineer provides a request for information (RFI) in advance, and the organization sends an information package ahead of time: fire protection inspection/testing records, impairment procedures, emergency plans, basic building/site drawings, and a short note about recent changes or known constraints. Even when budgets are tight, this step alone reduces friction because it signals organization and transparency and it allows the engineer to focus on risk, not scavenger hunts. When engineers receive requested information in advance, they can arrive better prepared and use onsite time more efficiently.

Set the visit up like a relay, not a solo marathon. A single person rarely has the knowledge to answer every question. Instead, identify a primary point of contact to open the visit, then invite the "right person for the right area" to join for brief segments: maintenance for mechanical rooms, safety for hot work/impairments, operations for storage and housekeeping. This doesn't require more staff, just better sequencing. It also reduces the tension local staff feel when they're asked questions outside their lane or pulled away from critical duties.

Finally, protect the closing meeting. This is where value is either captured or lost. Ask the engineer: "What are you most likely to recommend and why?" Then offer context: "Here's what we can address immediately, here's what requires capital planning, and here are interim risk-reduction steps we can do now." This kind of collaborative communication is exactly what turns a report into an improvement roadmap and helps avoid recommendations that exist only because uncertainty wasn't resolved during the visit.

Public entities operate with real constraints: political, financial and operational. No site visit can change that reality, but preparation, transparency and coordination can change the outcome. When a facility team demonstrates understanding of its risks, clarity around priorities and a credible plan forward, the tone of the visit shifts. What begins as an inspection becomes a working session, turning friction into partnership. That shift is where better outcomes start.

Donna Settle

Property Risk Engineering Leader, Gallgher

Professional Biography

Donna Settle is a commercial property risk engineering leader with over 30 years of experience advising complex organizations on risk improvement, loss prevention, and disaster readiness. She specializes in high-challenge occupancies including manufacturing, logistics, cold storage, healthcare, education, and research campuses. Donna is a licensed Professional Engineer in Texas and has held roles across the full spectrum of the risk ecosystem, including carrier engineering (FM and Zurich), brokerage consulting, and client-side engineering, allowing her to translate technical requirements into actionable, achievable solutions.

Donna graduated from Lamar University with a B.S degree in Industrial Engineering.