Letter: Re: the July 11. article "Social Security & You: There is no marriage penalty with social security"
Arizona Daily Star (Tucson)
Maybe it is outside the scope of the article, as all questions referred to retirement benefits. However, there IS a marriage penalty on Disabled Adult Children receiving Social Security Disability Insurance under a parent's record. If a DAC were to marry, except to another person receiving SSDI, they would lose all their benefits. There was a bill introduced (California SJR-8) to urge Congress to remove this penalty. I am not sure of the status of the bill. But I hope that the issue receives some attention and the penalty is removed so that all may marry without risking losing the benefits they rely on.
Shannon L
Northwest side
Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star.
On insurance, it’s time for Florida to try something new | Editorial [South Florida Sun-Sentinel]
National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies Issues Public Comment on NHTSA Notice
Advisor News
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
- Retaining clients by giving them a memorable experience
- Addressing the longevity paradox
- Employers shift focus from retirement access to financial outcomes
- Helping widowed clients navigate their new financial reality
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Farm Bureau P&C insurers post first underwriting gain since 2021
- Legacy Marketing, Malibu Life launch two fixed indexed annuities
- Changing client priorities are reshaping annuity conversations
- Solen Software acquires annuity software provider Cooperative Technologies
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Centene sues feds over low ratings for senior health plans
- Terry Savage: Small business owners, now is the time to offer health insurance coverage
- Aldermen select employee medical insurance broker services provider
- Southwest Bridge Health focusing on insurance coverage gap in Berrien County
- HEALTHCARE SHOULDN'T REQUIRE A MAP
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News