Letter: Re: the July 11. article "Social Security & You: There is no marriage penalty with social security"
Arizona Daily Star (Tucson)
Maybe it is outside the scope of the article, as all questions referred to retirement benefits. However, there IS a marriage penalty on Disabled Adult Children receiving Social Security Disability Insurance under a parent's record. If a DAC were to marry, except to another person receiving SSDI, they would lose all their benefits. There was a bill introduced (California SJR-8) to urge Congress to remove this penalty. I am not sure of the status of the bill. But I hope that the issue receives some attention and the penalty is removed so that all may marry without risking losing the benefits they rely on.
Shannon L
Northwest side
Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star.
On insurance, it’s time for Florida to try something new | Editorial [South Florida Sun-Sentinel]
National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies Issues Public Comment on NHTSA Notice
Advisor News
- IRI pitches retirement agenda to Jeffries as democrats shape affordability platform
- Help child-free clients plan for their later years
- When new investment trends emerge, Gen Z is most likely generation to be first in
- Could ‘plain English’ become an advisor’s secret weapon?
- IRI urges Senate action on 403(b) parity legislation
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Guidance, bulletin or reg? NAIC debates form of annuity illustration update
- Nationwide adds mutual fund-linked strategy to New Heights Select FIA
- NUNN INTRODUCES BILL TO CUT RED TAPE, GIVE IOWANS CLEARER INSURANCE INFORMATION
- NAIC working group pressed to accelerate annuity illustration overhaul
- State Auditor James Brown Kicks Off Life Insurance Awareness Month With Policy Locator Tool
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News