LEADING HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS URGE NC LAWMAKERS TO RECONSIDER PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTING MEDICAID CUTS
The following information was released by the
This is a statement from a group of 14 patient and consumer advocacy organizations.
HB 696 CCS sets copay amounts at the highest possible levels, which creates barriers to treatment that can disrupt the continuity of care for patients with chronic disease. Research has shown that even low levels of cost-sharing and copayments deter patients from seeking care. Consistent access to medications, primary care professionals, specialists, and ongoing treatment help slow disease progression and prevent avoidable complications and emergency room use. We urge policymakers to instead adopt the lowest permissible cost-sharing amounts to protect patients' access to care.
The legislation also requires individuals to prove compliance with the work reporting requirement for three months prior to application and for at least three of the six months prior to renewal. This additional lookback period is more restrictive than the one month period that is required by federal law. Requiring three months poses undue paperwork barriers on patients and increases the risk for delayed care. For many conditions, delayed care could result in disease progression and unnecessary medical costs due to loss of health care and coverage.
The legislation increases the frequency of the eligibility checks from quarterly to monthly. This is also more excessive than required by federal law. This increased administrative burden risks eligible individuals losing coverage due to data mismatches or errors. This will lead to patients not getting the timely care they need and increase the likelihood of emergency care and associated costs.
Many of our organizations have released Principles on Protecting Patients' Access to Medicaid. Our organizations encourage lawmakers to carefully consider the needs of patients and families in the implementation of Public Law 119-21 to align with these principles. HB 696 CCS currently does the opposite, which jeopardizes patients' access to care, and we stand ready to work with policymakers to lessen the impact on patients.


Tracing the decline of health care in America
DEBIT CARD PROCESSING FEE CAP CHALLENGED IN SMALL BUSINESS LAWSUIT
Advisor News
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- Savers vs. spenders: How money management attitudes impact financial confidence
- Demonstrating the value of life insurance to Gen Z
- Poor money habits are a dealbreaker in a new relationship
- DC plan sponsors see opportunity in alternatives
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- The next growth phase in life/annuities depends on modernization
- CA judge certifies class action in teachers’ lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Globe Life Inc. (NYSE: GL) Records 52-Week High Thursday Morning
- AM Best Managing Director Joins ‘Target Topics’ Podcast to Discuss State of Delegated Underwriting Authority Enterprises Market
- KBRA Assigns Rating to TruSpire Retirement Insurance Company
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Doctors 'Cringe' At Possibility Of Documenting Which Medicaid Enrollees Too Sick To Work
- They harvest the nation’s food, but a new rule may strip them of health insurance
- Health insurers hedge on Trump-backed pledge to improve denials process
- CONGRESSMAN DESAULNIER INTRODUCES BILL TO PROTECT WORKERS FROM WRONGFUL HEALTH CLAIM DENIALS
- Walla Walla residents drop health insurance because of affordability under Trump
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Regulators: ‘No firm conclusions’ from first offshore reinsurance filings
- Allianz Life Study Finds Americans Struggle to Shift From Retirement Saving to Spending
- The next growth phase in life/annuities depends on modernization
- How can more Americans achieve financial independence?
- AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to MAAGAP Insurance Inc.
More Life Insurance News