LEADING HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS URGE NC LAWMAKERS TO RECONSIDER IMPLEMENTATION OF MEDICAID CUTS
The following information was released by the
As
14 nonpartisan organizations representing millions of patients living with serious and chronic health conditions are concerned that HB 696 CCS, signed by
HB 696 CCS sets copay amounts at the highest possible levels, which creates barriers to treatment that can disrupt the continuity of care for patients with chronic disease. Research has shown that even low levels of cost-sharing and copayments deter patients from seeking care. Consistent access to medications, primary care professionals, specialists, and ongoing treatment help slow disease progression and prevent avoidable complications and emergency room use. We urge policymakers to instead adopt the lowest permissible cost-sharing amounts to protect patients' access to care.
The legislation also requires individuals to prove compliance with the work reporting requirement for three months prior to application and for at least three of the six months prior to renewal. This additional lookback period is more restrictive than the one month period that is required by federal law. Requiring three months poses undue paperwork barriers on patients and increases the risk for delayed care. For many conditions, delayed care could result in disease progression and unnecessary medical costs due to loss of health care and coverage.
The legislation increases the frequency of the eligibility checks from quarterly to monthly. This is also more excessive than required by federal law. This increased administrative burden risks eligible individuals losing coverage due to data mismatches or errors. This will lead to patients not getting the timely care they need and increase the likelihood of emergency care and associated costs.
Many of our organizations have released Principles on Protecting Patients' Access to Medicaid. Our organizations encourage lawmakers to carefully consider the needs of patients and families in the implementation of Public Law 119-21 to align with these principles. HB 696 CCS currently does the opposite, which jeopardizes patients' access to care, and we stand ready to work with policymakers to lessen the impact on patients.
###
About the
The


FOR 7TH STRAIGHT YEAR, MEDICAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUMS CLIMB
State employees speak out against dropping Blue Cross from Kansas health plan
Advisor News
- Embracing a family-centric approach to financial planning
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
- Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
- How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
- Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
- California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
- Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
- Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Louisiana hospitals see sharp uptick in uninsured patients after Obamacare subsidies expired
- CareScout Redefines Worksite Long-Term Care Insurance With a Solution That Goes Further for Employers and Employees
- Next Generation My Care – It’s here … now what?
- 4 common LTC missteps older Americans must avoid
- Missouri and Kansas can expect double-digit Obamacare premium hikes again
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- Built to Last: Winston-Salem—a quiet industrial powerhouse
- The silver economy ushers in a new era of life insurance growth
- Family communication: Financial planning’s growing blind spot
- Indiana eyes more oversight of insurance companies' exposure to private credit
- HEALEY-DRISCOLL ADMINISTRATION RETURNS $14.5 MILLION TO HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES
More Life Insurance News