LEADING HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS URGE NC LAWMAKERS TO RECONSIDER IMPLEMENTATION OF MEDICAID CUTS
The following information was released by the
As
14 nonpartisan organizations representing millions of patients living with serious and chronic health conditions are concerned that HB 696 CCS, signed by
HB 696 CCS sets copay amounts at the highest possible levels, which creates barriers to treatment that can disrupt the continuity of care for patients with chronic disease. Research has shown that even low levels of cost-sharing and copayments deter patients from seeking care. Consistent access to medications, primary care professionals, specialists, and ongoing treatment help slow disease progression and prevent avoidable complications and emergency room use. We urge policymakers to instead adopt the lowest permissible cost-sharing amounts to protect patients' access to care.
The legislation also requires individuals to prove compliance with the work reporting requirement for three months prior to application and for at least three of the six months prior to renewal. This additional lookback period is more restrictive than the one month period that is required by federal law. Requiring three months poses undue paperwork barriers on patients and increases the risk for delayed care. For many conditions, delayed care could result in disease progression and unnecessary medical costs due to loss of health care and coverage.
The legislation increases the frequency of the eligibility checks from quarterly to monthly. This is also more excessive than required by federal law. This increased administrative burden risks eligible individuals losing coverage due to data mismatches or errors. This will lead to patients not getting the timely care they need and increase the likelihood of emergency care and associated costs.
Many of our organizations have released Principles on Protecting Patients' Access to Medicaid. Our organizations encourage lawmakers to carefully consider the needs of patients and families in the implementation of Public Law 119-21 to align with these principles. HB 696 CCS currently does the opposite, which jeopardizes patients' access to care, and we stand ready to work with policymakers to lessen the impact on patients.
###
About the
The


FOR 7TH STRAIGHT YEAR, MEDICAL LIABILITY INSURANCE PREMIUMS CLIMB
State employees speak out against dropping Blue Cross from Kansas health plan
Advisor News
- I started using AI, but what now?
- How to support an entrepreneur client with multiple businesses
- Could a narrower focus help grow your practice?
- U.S. debt hits $40 trillion: how to support concerned clients
- Flourish brings private-bank-like cash solution to MassMutual’s network
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- MassMutual Expands Lending Options With New Secured Credit Line
- Corebridge Financial Introduces Progressive Trigger, a First-of-Its-Kind Index Annuity Strategy Designed to Turn Missed Years into Future Opportunity
- Insurer proposes $1.1M deal to resolve CA teachers’ annuity fee lawsuit
- IMOs get frustrated with slow carrier adoption of faster technology
- New class-action lawsuit targets Delaware Life over annuity disclosures
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Terry Savage: Questions answered on open enrollment
- New Jersey residents will see Affordable Care Act premiums jump 20% on average for 2027 health insurance
- Health insurance hits municipal budgets, taxpayers hard
- Minnesota seniors face tough choices for health plans
- Recent Findings from New York University (NYU) Langone Health Provide New Insights into Managed Care (State Medicaid Body Mass Index Requirements for Solid Organ Transplant Coverage: A 50-State Policy Review): Managed Care
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News