Hatch in the Daily Signal: Key Steps to Restoring Accountability to the Federal Bureaucracy
Key Steps to Restoring Accountability to the Federal Bureaucracy
By Senator
http://dailysignal.com/2017/06/05/key-steps-restoring-accountability-federal-bureaucracy/
Over the last century, we have seen an exponential growth of the federal bureaucracy.
As a practical matter, federal agencies--not
In his first 100 days, President
For instance, within days of taking office, Trump issued an ambitious executive order that requires federal agencies to identify two old regulations to eliminate for every new regulation proposed and to ensure that the net costs of new regulations are offset by the elimination of old ones.
Trump has also nominated a number of exceptionally qualified agency heads who share a vision of less government by regulation, including, most recently, the inspired choice of
I will be pleased this week to introduce Rao before the
Her confirmation will assure that federal regulation is carefully scrutinized and improved before imposing additional costs on American job creators and consumers.
But
Governing by regulation is costly. By some estimates, federal regulations now impose a burden of well over
But the costs to core democratic values are greater still. A bureaucratic vision of governance threatens the separation of powers enshrined in our
As
Lawmaking by regulation consolidates governmental powers in the hands of unelected bureaucrats. It's time to rein in the federal bureaucracy and make it more accountable.
That's why last month I joined Sens.
This bipartisan legislation, if enacted, would constitute the most significant reform to the federal bureaucracy in over seven decades. It would modernize the regulatory process to make it smarter, more cost-effective, and more democratically accountable.
And it would do so without undermining the ability of agencies to fully protect public health, safety, and the environment.
For instance, the Regulatory Accountability Act would codify the requirements developed and embraced by our last five presidents that federal agencies must analyze the costs and benefits of new regulations--using the best data and science--and generally adopt the most cost-effective approach.
Similarly, it would require agencies to review old regulations to determine whether they still serve their intended purpose, and it would allow the public to petition for old regulations to be withdrawn or otherwise modified.
To address the democratic deficits in the regulatory process, the Regulatory Accountability Act would also ensure greater transparency and public participation in the rulemaking process. It would require agencies to disclose the empirical data on which they base their proposed regulations for public comment, as well as provide greater notice before rulemaking.
It would likewise limit an agency's ability to bypass the public comment period--a dangerous practice federal agencies have increasingly embraced in recent years.
For the most economically significant regulations, the bill would require agencies to invite public comment before proposing the rule and, in some circumstances, would allow interested parties to request a public hearing on the proposed rule.
While agencies would have to engage in additional analysis on the front end for some rules, the extra work will yield better results on the back end. That means smarter and more effective regulation for the public good.
Importantly, the Regulatory Accountability Act would give federal courts greater authority to review final regulations and, in particular, to ensure that the federal agency officials followed these procedures.
It would also help restore the proper separation of powers between the branches of government by eliminating so-called "Auer" deference, whereby courts largely defer to agencies' interpretations of their own regulations.
As I have argued, this doctrine displaces the judiciary's constitutional role and encourages federal agencies to use less democratically accountable processes.
Some might wonder why
We continue to push for regulatory reform because this isn't about politics. The
The bipartisan Regulatory Accountability Act is critical to restoring those constitutional values and, in the process, encouraging smarter and more effective federal regulations.
Director of Communications
Senator
Office: 202.224.4511


Readout of the Vice President’s Healthcare Listening Session with Women Small Business Owners
Obamacare Is Clearly Failing To Live Up To Its Promises
Advisor News
- Wealth planning vs. estate planning: Honoring your client’s wishes
- What to discuss during the first retirement planning meeting
- Inflation, competing priorities and uncertainty erode retirement security
- As health premiums rise, 1 in 8 workers cut retirement savings
- CT governor’s candidates claims: What’s true, and what’s misleading
More Advisor NewsAnnuity News
- National Life Group expands annuity portfolio
- AM Best to Join Life/Annuity Insurance-Focused Panel Discussion at Capitol Forum Event
- USAA Earns No. 1 Ranking in JD Power Individual Annuity Study for the Third Consecutive Year
- How flexible annuities fit today’s retirement portfolios
- Foresters Financial appoints Tom Ross as chief distribution officer for U.S. annuity sales
More Annuity NewsHealth/Employee Benefits News
- Pennsylvania Health Plans Must Cover Colon Cancer Screening at 45
- In Miami-Dade court, health insurer fights an order to cover $48,500 cancer drug
- Fed judge blocks Medicaid work requirement rule
- Health insurers leave millions unpaid for mental health crisis care in California
- Commissioner places Mending Health in conservatorship
More Health/Employee Benefits NewsLife Insurance News
- AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Insignia Life S.A. de C.V.
- FINANCIAL FRAUD
- Security Benefit Announces Planned Dividend Rate Reset for Series B Preferred Stock
- Palmetto Heritage and Atlantic Coast Life Announce Discussions Regarding Potential Acquisition
- Jury finds insurance company acted in bad faith, awards Nebraska woman $11.3M
More Life Insurance News