EDITORIAL: Sen. Bennet gets tepid response to Medicare X
As Bennet impugns the Democratic fairy tale, he should stop staking his campaign on the Medicare X Choice Act he introduced in the
Bennet,
Medicare X would become a new buy-in option, most appealing to Americans who lack other government or private insurance. In
Bennet correctly reminds his fellow candidates how the vast majority of voters don't want to leave their private health insurance arrangements. Nearly 68% of Americans earn or pay out-of-wallet for private health policies, and most desire to keep them.
Although Bennet defends private insurance as if promising to shield it, he assured the town hall crowd his Medicare X is the beginning of "universal health care."
"I believe the fastest way to universal health care is my plan," he said, eliciting no favorable response.
The senator cannot have it both ways. He either values a system in which most Americans enjoy private health insurance plans that compete, or he wants a "universal" system. A market of private polices and "universal health care" are antithetical.
It appears Bennet does not oppose government health care for all. He merely wants it to creep gradually into our lives as Medicare X expands. Boil a frog slowly and it cooks before noticing the heat. He wants to separate himself from fellow contenders, simultaneously promising a slow pursuit of their vision.
Voters favoring universal care will be far more likely to embrace the immediate fantasy offered by Sens.
Like nearly all politicians, Bennet ignores the true nature of the health care crisis by offering minor tweaks to the troublesome insurance market. Insurance does not serve Americans well because it cannot solve the real problem: growing demand for health care meeting a deepening shortage of health care providers.
Bennet cannot expect to gain presidential traction by fighting to give one more insurance option to a demographic comprising single-digit percentages in 35 states and less than 15% in all but Republican
Bennet and other politicians need to stop promising insurance solutions before addressing the underlying dilemma. Many of the country's 46 million rural residents have no reasonable access to health care with or without insurance. Most Americans with insurance endure rationing best known as budget-busting deductibles and co-pays, caused by the demand for health care steadily outpacing the supply.
Throwing insurance at our scarcity of health care amounts to solving a crop shortage with food stamps. Coverage is not care.
Bennet and other politicians will not offer constituents anything real until they start crafting legislation to create more competitive and affordable care. We need more doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, physician's assistants, mental health professionals, and clinics in vast regions of the country.
For someone lacking access to affordable care, a Medicare X subscription could sound like a lame solution. Politicians should rethink their approach. Propose legislation to ignite a robust market of surplus health care -- not more mediocre coverage -- for all.
The Gazette Editorial Board
___
(c)2019 The Gazette (Colorado Springs, Colo.)
Visit The Gazette (Colorado Springs, Colo.) at www.gazette.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Fire official douses EC claims of cost savings in controversial firefighter shift changes
Ocala quadriplegic battles new spate of bad luck
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News