EDITORIAL: Pull Ohio together? Not with the ‘heartbeat bill’
The legislation would all but outlaw abortion. Which helps explain why Gov.
As things stand, the majorities at the
Actually, there is a third option, suggested in the position of the governor, who long has been an ardent opponent of abortion rights. The Republican majorities would do well to acknowledge the extent to which they already have limited access to abortion.
Put another way, they have done enough.
That includes a clear violation of court precedent. When the governor vetoed the "heartbeat bill," he signed legislation banning abortion at 20 weeks. Why not now wait to see whether that controversial restriction survives legal challenges before taking a more extreme step?
All told, the past eight years, the governor and fellow
More, health plans offered in
In 2011, there were 18 abortion clinics in
Which gets to a truth in this debate. Women will seek abortions no matter what the law says or court rulings hold. The thinking behind court precedent the past 45 years is that the choice is private, best left to the woman, and if she chooses to have an abortion, the procedure must be safe, as it currently is, fewer than 0.05 percent involving complications.
In his victory speech,
Neither does the state need the divisiveness that would come with enacting the "heartbeat bill." Abortion is legal, and
___
(c)2018 the Akron Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio)
Visit the Akron Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) at www.ohio.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Former Military Leaders Meet With Risk Executives to Address the Growing Insider Threat Epidemic
Oregon Expands State-Run Retirement Plan To Individuals
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News