Day 12: Gunshot residue expert explains ‘particles’ found on Alex Murdaugh, clothes
Murdaugh has pleaded not guilty. He faces life in prison without parole if found guilty. The trial started
How to watch the Murdaugh double murder trial, who to follow from The State,
Prosecutors have ended their questioning of SLED forensics expert
Shortly after, Judge
At the end of her testimony Tuesday, prosecutor
“If a recently fired firearm were wrapped up inside that jacket, would that be consistent with your findings?” Meadors asked.
“There is a possibility of that, yes,” Fletcher confirmed.
Fletcher said her examination revealed a “significant” number of particles on the inside of the rain coat, more than were found on the jacket’s exterior. She said 38 particles were “consistent” with gunshot primer residue, whereas Murdaugh’s T-shirt had three.
The particles can be spread by being close to a gunshot, touching something that already had gunshot residue on it, or someone wearing clothes and firing a gun themselves, Fletcher said.
The blue jacket was first examined in
A murder weapon has never been recovered.
Meadors’ questioning hints prosecutors allege Murdaugh wrapped a potential murder weapon in the coat and hauled it away to hide evidence.
The coat could have been big enough to do so. Fletcher said it had to be spread over two tables for lab employees to take samples.
Defense attorneys
Murdaugh’s defense team is likely to rebut the state’s suggestion by pointing at how common gunfire was on the property, therefore gunshot residue likely was at Moselle.
SLED forensics expert
Two particles were identified on the right side of the white T-shirt SLED recovered, Fletcher said. She noted the shirt also smelled of laundry detergent, uncommon for lab evidence that usually smells “musty.”
Another particle was discovered on the left side of the shirt.
Fletcher also testified three particles were lifted from Murdaugh’s shorts. One particle was found on his hands, she said.
Particles can be transferred by firing a gun, being near a firearm when it’s fired, or touching something that already had gunshot residue on it.
“I can’t say which is more likely (in this case),” Fletcher said.
Friends of Paul Murdaugh’s previously testified the family had several guns on the property, and members of the family often used the guns for hunting.
When Murdaugh called police the night of Maggie and Paul’s deaths, Murdaugh told 911 that he ran to grab a gun after discovering their bodies. He was seen in body camera footage with a shotgun, which investigators seized.
Cleaning an item, exposing it to “environmental factors,” like wind and rain, or blood and debris on the item, could remove gunshot primer residue particles, Fletcher said, responding to a question from prosecutor
No gunshot residue particles were found on the shoes SLED analyzed, Fletcher added.
Prosecutors called
Controversy has swirled around a blue raincoat recovered from Alex Murdaugh’s mother’s home about a week after Maggie and
Following testimony from the caretaker for Murdaugh’s mother, Mushelle Smith, defense said no witness could link the raincoat to Murdaugh and asked it not be considered as evidence.
Smith said she saw Murdaugh carrying something that looked like a blue tarp into his mother’s house, but never identified it as a blue raincoat. She later said she’d never seen the blue raincoat SLED agents recovered from the home.
Earlier Tuesday, Judge
“That is the job of the jury, to weigh the credibility of the witness,” Newman ruled.
Crosby testified that in conversations he had with Murdaugh, after Maggie and Paul were murdered, Murdaugh specifically said he did not go to the kennels with Maggie and Paul before leaving Moselle to visit his mother.
Three voices can be heard in a video Paul took shortly before his death. Waters played it for Crosby.
“Did you recognize any voices on that video?” Waters asked after the clip ended.
“The three voices on that video are the voices of
Waters asked, “How sure are you?”
“I’m 100% sure that’s whose voices are on that audio,” Crosby said.
Parker Law CFO
Seckinger first became suspicious Murdaugh might be taking money from the firm when she never received
Crosby paused when lead prosecutor
“Do you want me to say what I said?” Crosby hesitated.
“You can say the sanitized version or you can say the real version,” Waters told him.
“(I said) ‘Oh, f---, no we did not,’” Crosby said.
Crosby was choked up when Waters asked if he’d known
Buster and Paul called him “uncle Ronnie,” he said.
The prosecution has called
Crosby first gave testimony on Monday, during a motion hearing without the jury present.
On Monday, Crosby said he was present at John Marvin Murdaugh’s house on
Crosby said Monday that Murdaugh spoke with his current defense attorney,
Others present at the meeting included Murdaugh’s surviving son, Buster, and Parker Law attorneys
Crosby will testify on the fee structure at
Parker Law Group CFO
Judge
After the deaths of Paul and
Defense attorney
“So the death of his wife and son got him 30 days reprieve from your investigation? Is that correct?” Griffin asked.
“Correct,” Seckinger said.
“And it wasn’t reported to you by
Seckinger replied she’d “never had a conversation” with Maggie or Paul.
The questions were part of Griffin’s push to nullify one of prosecution’s motive arguments: that Murdaugh killed his wife and son to distract from the imminent discovery of years of financial misdeeds. Griffin suggested the short delay Maggie and Paul’s deaths offered wouldn’t justify their murders even if Murdaugh was trying to escape scrutiny.
He also cast doubt why Murdaugh might target his family, if they weren’t involved in revealing details of his alleged crimes.
Defense attorney
Lead prosecutor
“Did you really know Alex Murdagh?” Waters asked Seckinger, who testified she’d known Murdaugh for around 40 years and worked closely with him for 20.
“I don’t think I ever really knew him,” Seckinger responded. “I don’t think anybody really does.”
She told
Before cross-examination, Griffin asked Judge
“This testimony is being allowed for limited purpose in assisting the state in proving motive. You may not consider it for purposes of the character of
With Parker Law CFO
The documents, including several canceled checks payable to “Forge” with Murdaugh’s signature, were first introduced in
Seckinger said Parker Law discovered Murdaugh was allegedly defrauding clients as early as 2013-2014. In some cases, similar to the lawsuit filed after the 2011 car accident death of Allendale resident
Parker Law has since started paying back clients who never received settlements, Seckinger testified.
Parker Law CFO
Seckinger testified Murdaugh’s co-workers were especially concerned about his “sanity” after his wife and son were killed.
Randy, Murdaugh’s brother and fellow attorney at Parker Law, previously said he and “the rest of (his) PMPED family” were shocked to learn of Murdaugh’s drug problem.
She also repeated testimony before the jury that she previously gave in motion hearings detailing her
Seckinger went to Murdaugh’s office on
Seckinger told him she had reason to believe he’d taken the money for himself, and needed proof that wasn’t true. Murdaugh assured her the money was in the client trust of
That conversation was interrupted when Murdaugh received a phone call about his father’s rapidly declining health, Seckinger said.
She didn’t see him the rest of the day, Seckinger testified. She learned around
Executives at Alex Murdaugh’s former law firm, now named
Parker Law CFO
Seckinger said it was rare for Parker Law to structure attorney’s fees into an annuity, and when it was done, the rest of the group should be made aware.
“I also told him the way he had done it (structured the fees) was not correct,” Seckinger said. “He wouldn’t be saving on the tax consequences, and he needed to set it up with the insurance company on the front side (to avoid taxation).”
Seckinger said Murdaugh said he was worried less about the tax benefits and more about “getting money in Maggie’s name.”
“That is hiding assets, and we (Parker Law) weren’t going to be part of hiding assets or any type of wrongdoing,” Seckinger said.
Seckinger’s testimony Tuesday is similar to what she shared, with the jury absent, during motion hearings last Thursday.
Under questioning by lead prosecutor
Seckinger said Murdaugh often seemed “chaotic,” as if he would “get bored with details.” But, she said, he had the “gift of gab” and was talented in building rapport with clients.
Murdaugh’s success was built “not on his work ethic, but from his ability to establish relationships, and to manipulate people into settlements and his clients into liking him,” Seckinger testified.
“Through the art of bulls---, basically,” Seckinger punctuated her testimony.
Prosecutors have argued Murdaugh understood how the emotions of a case could sway judgment, and suggested part of his motivation to allegedly murder Paul and Maggie was to build sympathy as he faced a bevy of financial-related charges.
Seckinger previously testified in a motion hearing with the jury absent. She is testifying again after Judge
In her initial testimony, Seckinger said she confronted Murdaugh early on
Without the jury present Tuesday morning, defense attorney
Smith testified Monday that she saw Murdaugh for about 20 minutes on the night of the murders, and that Murdaugh later told her he was there “30 or 40 minutes.”
The controversial point the defense team objected to was Smith’s testimony that she’d never
Griffin argued that the inconsistency of Smith’s testimony made it worth striking, and that Murdaugh had never been linked to the blue rain coat, which prosecution said had gunshot residue on the inside. Newman denied the motion.
“That is the job of the jury, to weigh the credibility of the witnesses,” Judge
Newman said Smith may have been unable to “articulate her thoughts” effectively during her testimony due to her emotional state.
Smith broke into tears at several points during her testimony. She said she was upset about the murders and fall out surrounding the Murdaugh family. Smith described them as “good people” during her testimony.
Court is back Tuesday after a day of eyebrow raising witnesses took the stand.
The jury last heard from
The state called Hall to the stand because she did gunshot residue tests on Alex Murdaugh’s T-shirt, shorts and shoes on
Hall testified that the shirt smelled “freshly laundered” when she received it, and had “small, reddish-brown stains.” She did not say the stains appeared to be blood, and she said she had “no knowledge” of any other tests done on the shirt.
Hall noted Murdaugh’s shoes were wet and had “yard debris” on them.
The jury also heard from Mushelle “Shelly” Smith, the caregiver for Murdaugh’s mother, Libby, who has Alzheimer’s.
Murdaugh has contended that he was not home when the murders occurred, but was at his mother’s house.
Smith said on the stand Murdaugh was only at his mother’s home for about 20 minutes on
There also was disagreement over a blue tarp or raincoat found at Murdaugh’s home that Smith testified Murdaugh brought to the home days later, bundled up.
Meanwhile, for the first time, the jury heard from the state’s first financial-related witness over defense objections after Judge
“Testimony is about to be offered that the defendant may have been involved in other criminal activity, and that evidence is not evidence or proof that he committed the offenses charged in the indictments,” Newman explained to the jury. “This testimony has been allowed ... for the limited purpose of assisting the state in proving motive.”
With the financial information allowed in, lawyers indicated the trial, scheduled to end
©2023 The Charlotte Observer. Visit charlotteobserver.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
Jury hears about financial crimes in Murdaugh murder trial
Medicaid's pandemic benefits are ending
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News