Congressional Research Service: 'Private Flood Insurance & National Flood Insurance Program' (Part 1 of 2) - Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet

InsuranceNewsNet — Your Industry. One Source.™

Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Home Now reading Newswires
Topics
    • Advisor News
    • Annuity Index
    • Annuity News
    • Companies
    • Earnings
    • Fiduciary
    • From the Field: Expert Insights
    • Health/Employee Benefits
    • Insurance & Financial Fraud
    • INN Magazine
    • Insiders Only
    • Life Insurance News
    • Newswires
    • Property and Casualty
    • Regulation News
    • Sponsored Articles
    • Washington Wire
    • Videos
    • ———
    • About
    • Meet our Editorial Staff
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Newsletters
  • Exclusives
  • NewsWires
  • Magazine
  • Newsletters
Sign in or register to be an INNsider.
  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Exclusives
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Video
  • Washington Wire
  • Life Insurance
  • Annuities
  • Advisor
  • Health/Benefits
  • Property & Casualty
  • Insurtech
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Editorial Staff

Get Social

  • Facebook
  • X
  • LinkedIn
Newswires
Newswires RSS Get our newsletter
Order Prints
January 17, 2023 Newswires
Share
Share
Post
Email

Congressional Research Service: 'Private Flood Insurance & National Flood Insurance Program' (Part 1 of 2)

Targeted News Service

WASHINGTON, Jan. 17 -- The Congressional Research Service issued the following report (No. R45242) on Jan. 9, 2023, entitled "Private Flood Insurance and the National Flood Insurance Program" by Diane P. Horn, flood Insurance and emergency management specialist, and Baird Webel, acting section research manager.

Here are excerpts:

* * *

Summary

The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is the main source of primary flood insurance coverage in the United States, collecting over $4.6 billion in premiums, fees, and surcharges for over five million flood insurance policies. This is in contrast to the majority of other property and casualty risks, such as damage from fire or accidents, which are covered by a broad array of private insurance companies. One of the primary reasons behind the creation of the NFIP in 1968 was the withdrawal by private insurers from providing flood insurance coverage, leaving flood victims largely reliant on federal disaster assistance to recover after a flood. While private insurers have taken on relatively little flood risk, they have been involved in the administration of the NFIP through sales and servicing of policies and claims.

In recent years, private insurers have expressed increased interest in providing flood coverage. Advances in the analytics and data used to quantify flood risk along with increases in capital market capacities may allow private insurers to take on flood risks that they shunned in the past. Private flood insurance may offer some advantages over the NFIP, including more flexible flood polices, integrated coverage with homeowners insurance, or lower-cost coverage for some consumers. Private marketing might also increase the overall amount of flood coverage purchased, reducing the amount of extraordinary disaster assistance necessary to be provided by the federal government. Increased private coverage could reduce the overall financial risk to the NFIP, reducing the amount of NFIP borrowing necessary after major disasters.

Increasing private insurance, however, may have some downsides compared to the NFIP. Private coverage would not be guaranteed to be available to all floodplain residents, unlike the NFIP, and consumer protections could vary in different states. The role of the NFIP has historically been broader than just providing insurance. As currently authorized, the NFIP also encompasses social goals to provide flood insurance in flood-prone areas to property owners who otherwise would not be able to obtain it, and to reduce government's cost after floods. Through flood mapping and mitigation efforts, the NFIP has tried to reduce the future impact of floods, and it is unclear how effectively the NFIP could play this broader role if private insurance became a large part of the flood marketplace. Increased private insurance could also have an impact on the subsidies that are provided for some consumers through the NFIP.

The 2012 reauthorization of the NFIP (Division F, Title II of P.L. 112-141) included provisions encouraging private flood insurance; however, various barriers have remained. Legislation passed the House in the 114th Congress (H.R. 2901) and 115th Congress (H.R. 2874) which would have attempted to expand the role of private flood insurance; neither bill was taken up by the Senate. In the 116th Congress, no NFIP legislation advanced past introduction. Two bills were introduced in the 117th Congress for long-term reauthorization and reform of the NFIP.

The NFIP is currently operating under a short-term reauthorization until September 30, 2023.

* * *

Contents

Introduction ... 1

Background ... 1

Objectives of the NFIP ... 2

Primary Flood Insurance Through the NFIP ... 3

The Mandatory Purchase Requirement ... 3

Premium Subsidies and Cross-Subsidies ... 4

NFIP Reauthorization and Legislation ... 5

117th Congress ... 5

Prior Congresses ... 5

The Current Role of Private Insurers in the NFIP ... 6

Servicing of Policies and Claims Management ... 6

Reinsurance ... 8 Private Flood Insurance Outside the NFIP: Issues and Barriers ... 10

Flood Insurance Coverage "at Least as Broad as" the NFIP ... 11

Continuous Coverage ... 12

The "Non-Compete" Clause ... 12

NFIP Subsidized Rates ... 13

Regulatory Uncertainty ... 15

Ability to Assess Flood Risk Accurately ... 15

Adequate Consumer Participation ... 16

Potential Effects of Increased Private Sector Involvement in the Flood Market ... 17

Increased Consumer Choice ... 17

Cheaper Flood Insurance ... 17

Variable Consumer Protections ... 18

Adverse Selection ... 18

Issues for NFIP Flood Mapping and Floodplain Management ... 19

Concluding Comments ... 20

Tables

Table 1. NFIP Reinsurance Purchases ... 9

Table A-1. Provisions Related to Private Flood Insurance in Legislation in the 116th Congress ... 25

Appendixes

Appendix. Provisions Related to Private Flood Insurance in Legislation in the 116th Congress ... 22

Contacts

Author Information ... 27

* * *

Introduction

Congress is currently considering long-term reauthorization of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Floods are the most common natural disaster in the United States, and all 50 states, plus DC, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands have experienced flood events since May 2018./1

The NFIP has paid a total of nearly $19.03 billion in claims over the past five fiscal years./2

Expanding the role of private insurers, including reinsurers, has been seen by many as an answer to the variability of the financial position of the NFIP./3

Increasing participation by private insurers could transfer more flood risk from policyholders to the private insurance sector, as opposed to transferring the risk to the federal government through the NFIP. In addition to the possible advantage to the NFIP, the increased availability of flood insurance as private companies enter the market may benefit households and businesses, as insured flood victims are likely to recover more quickly and more fully after a flood.

Private insurer interest in directly providing and underwriting flood risk has increased in recent years. Advances in the analytics and data used to quantify flood risk along with increases in capital market capacities may allow private insurers to take on flood risks that they shunned in the past. However, increasing the private sector role in providing flood insurance coverage directly to consumers may have implications for the operations and fiscal solvency of the NFIP as currently structured. Increased access to private flood insurance could provide individual policyholders with a wider choice of coverage and possibly cheaper premiums, but may also lead to variable consumer protections.

The extent to which private insurance companies participate in the U.S. flood insurance market represents an area of congressional concern. A number of bills have been introduced to address issues related to private flood insurance, but no legislation has yet been enacted. The NFIP is currently operating under its 25th short-term reauthorization, until September 30, 2023./4

This report describes the current role of private insurers in U.S. flood insurance, and discusses barriers to private sector involvement. The report considers potential effects of increased private sector involvement in the U.S. flood market, both for the NFIP and for consumers. Finally, the report outlines the provisions relevant to private flood insurance in House and Senate NFIP reauthorization bills from the 115th, 116th, and 117th Congresses.

Background/5

The NFIP is the main provider of primary flood insurance coverage for residential properties in the United States, providing nearly $1.3 trillion in coverage for over five million residential flood insurance policies. In FY2018, the program collected about $3.51 billion in annual premium revenue, $1.09 billion in assessments, fees, and surcharges and $1.04 billion in payments from private reinsurers./6

* * *

1 Email correspondence from FEMA Congressional Affairs staff, August 5, 2019.

2 Email correspondence from FEMA Congressional Affairs staff, December 30, 2020.

3 FEMA, National Flood Insurance Program Report to Congress on Reinsuring NFIP Insurance Risk and Options for Privatizing the NFIP, August 13, 2015, p. 41.

4 P.L. 117-328. For further information on NFIP reauthorization, see CRS Insight IN10835, What Happens If the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Lapses?, by Diane P. Horn.

5 For more detail on the NFIP, see CRS Report R44593, Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), by Diane P. Horn and Baird Webel.

6 Statistics on the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policy and claims are available from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website "Policy and Claim Statistics for Flood Insurance," at https://www.fema.gov/policy-claim-statistics-flood-insurance; premium and fee data from The Watermark Third Quarter 2021, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_fima-watermark-FY2021-Q3.pdf.

* * *

In FY2019, the program collected about $3.39 billion in annual premium revenue and $1.07 billion in assessments, fees, and surcharge, with no payments from private reinsurers./7

In FY2020, the program collected about $3.51 billion in annual premium revenue and $1.11 billion in assessments, fees, and surcharge, with no payments from private reinsurers.

Nationally, over 22,000 communities participate in the NFIP./8

The role of the federal government in flood insurance is in contrast to the majority of other property and casualty risks, such as damage from fire or accidents, which are covered by a broad array of private insurance companies. Total direct written premiums for private flood insurance in 2019 totaled $523 billion, compared to $420 million in 2018 and $390 million in 2017. Over 140 insurers wrote private flood insurance in 2019, up from 120 insurers in 2018, 90 insurers in 2017, and 50 insurers in 2016./9

Total premiums for private property and casualty insurance in 2018 totaled $611 billion, with the policies backed by over $2 trillion in assets held by private insurers./10

Objectives of the NFIP

The NFIP has two main policy goals: (1) to provide access to primary flood insurance, thereby allowing for the transfer of some of the financial risk of property owners to the federal government; and (2) to mitigate and reduce the nation's comprehensive flood risk/11 through the development and implementation of floodplain management standards. A longer-term objective of the NFIP is to reduce federal expenditure on disaster assistance after floods.

As a public insurance program, the NFIP is designed differently from the way in which private sector companies provide insurance. As currently authorized, the NFIP also encompasses social goals to provide flood insurance in flood-prone areas to property owners who otherwise would not be able to obtain it, and to reduce the government's cost after floods./12

The NFIP also engages in many "non-insurance" activities in the public interest: it disseminates flood risk information through flood maps, requires communities to adopt land use and building code standards in order to participate in the program, potentially reduces the need for other post-flood disaster aid, contributes to community resilience by providing a mechanism to fund rebuilding after a flood, and may protect lending institutions against mortgage defaults due to uninsured losses.

* * *

7 Fee data from The Watermark Third Quarter 2021, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_fimawatermark-FY2021-Q3.pdf.

8 Detailed information about which communities participate and where is available from the Community Status Book, found on FEMA's website at https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/community-status-book.

9 National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), Report on Private Flood Insurance Data, April 28, 2020, provided by NAIC to CRS on October 24, 2020.

10 Premium amounts used are net premiums written and asset amounts are admitted assets from A.M. Best, 2019 Best's Rankings: U.S. Property/Casualty - 2018 Financial Results, March 25, 2019.

11 In the context of this report, comprehensive flood risk means that the risk includes both financial risk (i.e., physical damage to property), and also the risk to human life.

12 See 82 Stat. 573 for text in original statute (Section 1302(c) of P.L. 90-448). This language remains in statute (see 42 U.S.C. Sec.4001(c)).

* * *

The benefits of such tasks are not directly measured in the NFIP's financial results from selling flood insurance./13

From the inception of the NFIP, the program has been expected to achieve multiple objectives, some of which may conflict with one another:

* to ensure reasonable insurance premiums for all;

* to have risk-based premiums that would make people aware of and bear the cost of their floodplain location choices;

* to secure widespread community participation in the NFIP and substantial numbers of insurance policy purchases by property owners; and

* to earn premium and fee income that, over time, covers claims paid and program expenses./14

Primary Flood Insurance Through the NFIP

The NFIP offers flood insurance to anyone in a community that chooses to participate in the program. Flood insurance purchase generally is voluntary, except for property owners who are in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)/15 and whose mortgage is backed by the federal government./16

Flood insurance policies through the NFIP are sold only in participating communities and are offered to both property owners and renters and to residential and nonresidential properties. NFIP policies have relatively low coverage limits, particularly for nonresidential properties or properties in high-cost areas. The maximum coverage for single-family dwellings (which also includes single-family residential units within a 2-4 family building) is $100,000 for contents and up to $250,000 for building coverage. The maximum available coverage limit for other residential buildings is $500,000 for building coverage and $100,000 for contents coverage, and the maximum coverage limit for nonresidential business buildings is $500,000 for building coverage and $500,000 for contents coverage.

The Mandatory Purchase Requirement

By law and regulation, federal agencies, federally regulated lending institutions, and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs)/17 must require the property owners in an SFHA to purchase flood insurance as a condition of any mortgage that these entities make, guarantee, or purchase./18

* * *

13 American Academy of Actuaries Flood Insurance Work Group, The National Flood Insurance Program: Challenges and Solutions, April 2017, p. 79, http://www.actuary.org/files/publications/FloodMonograph.04192017.pdf.

14 National Research Council of the National Academies, Affordability of National Flood Insurance Program Premiums: Report 1, 2015, p. 3, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/21709/affordability-of-national-flood-insurance-programpremiums-report-1.

15 A Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) is defined by FEMA as an area with a 1% or greater risk of flooding every year.

16 This includes mortgages from banks insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and mortgages backed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, as well as federal entities such as the Federal Housing Administration and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

17 Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) are private companies with congressional charters. Examples of GSEs providing mortgages that would be affected by the mandatory purchase requirement include the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae).

18 42 U.S.C. Sec.4012a.

* * *

In addition to this legal mandatory purchase requirement, lenders may also require borrowers outside of an SFHA to maintain flood insurance as a means of financially securing the property.

In order to comply with this mandate, property owners may purchase flood insurance through the NFIP, or through a private company, so long as the private flood insurance "provides flood insurance coverage which is at least as broad as the coverage" of the NFIP, among other conditions./19

The mandatory purchase requirement is enforced by the lender, rather than FEMA, and lenders can be fined up to $2,000 by banking regulators for each failure to require flood insurance or provide notice./20

Property owners who do not obtain flood insurance when required may find that they are not eligible for certain types of disaster assistance after a flood./21

Premium Subsidies and Cross-Subsidies

Flood insurance rates in the NFIP generally are directed by statute to be "based on consideration of the risk involved and accepted actuarial principles,"/22 meaning that the rate is reflective of the true flood risk to the property. However, Congress has directed FEMA not to charge actuarial rates for certain categories of properties and to offer discounts to other classes of properties./23

FEMA is not, however, provided funds to offset these subsidies and discounts,/24 which has contributed to FEMA's need to borrow from the U.S. Treasury to pay NFIP claims.

There are three main categories of properties that pay less than full risk-based rates:

* Pre-FIRM: properties that were built or substantially improved before December 31, 1974, or before FEMA published the first Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for their community, whichever was later;/25

* Newly mapped: properties that are newly mapped into a SFHA on or after April 1, 2015, if the applicant obtains coverage that is effective within 12 months of the map revision date;/26 and

* Grandfathered: properties that were built in compliance with the FIRM in effect at the time of construction and are allowed to maintain their old flood insurance rate class if their property is remapped into a new flood rate class./27

* * *

19 42 U.S.C Sec.4012a(b). For additional information on private flood insurance, see CRS Insight IN10450, Private Flood Insurance and the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), by Baird Webel and Diane P. Horn. The "at least as broad as" requirement is discussed in more detail in the section titled "Flood Insurance Coverage "at Least as Broad as" the NFIP" in this report.

20 42 U.S.C Sec.4012a(f).

21 For additional information, see CRS Report R44808, Federal Disaster Assistance: The National Flood Insurance Program and Other Federal Disaster Assistance Programs Available to Individuals and Households After a Flood, by Diane P. Horn.

22 42 U.S.C. Sec.4014(a)(1).

23 For a full discussion of NFIP subsidies and cross-subsidies, see the section on Pricing and Premium Rate Structure in CRS Report R44593, Introduction to the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), by Diane P. Horn and Baird Webel, the section on Premiums Subsidies and Cross-Subsidies in CRS Report R46095, The National Flood Insurance Program: Selected Issues and Legislation in the 116th Congress, by Diane P. Horn and Baird Webel, and the section on Premium Subsidies and Cross-Subsidies in CRS Report R45999, National Flood Insurance Program: The Current Rating Structure and Risk Rating 2.0, by Diane P. Horn.

24 Government Accountability Office (GAO), Flood Insurance: Comprehensive Reform Could Improve Solvency and Enhance Resilience, GAO-17-425, April 2017, p. 17, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-425.

25 42 U.S.C. Sec.4015(c).

26 Sec.6 of P.L. 113-89, 128 Stat.1028, as codified at 42 U.S.C. Sec.4015(i).

27 For a full description, see FEMA, Grandfathering, March 2020, https://www.fema.gov/node/404682.

* * *

NFIP Reauthorization and Legislation

117th Congress

The NFIP is currently authorized until September 30, 2023./28 Since the end of FY2017, 25 short-term NFIP reauthorizations have been enacted. Two companion bills were introduced in the 117th Congress for reform and reauthorization of the NFIP: S. 3128 and H.R. 5802, the National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2021. These bills were not considered by the committees of jurisdiction.

Prior Congresses

The House passed standalone legislation to encourage private insurance in the 114th Congress (H.R. 2901); however, the Senate did not take up H.R. 2901 in the 114th Congress.

In the 115th Congress, a number of bills were introduced to provide a longer-term reauthorization of the NFIP as well as make numerous other changes to the program. The House of

Representatives passed H.R. 2874 (The 21st Century Flood Reform Act) by a vote of 237-189 on November 14, 2017. Among its numerous provisions, H.R. 2874 would have authorized the NFIP until September 30, 2022.

Three bills were introduced in the Senate that would have reauthorized the expiring provisions of the NFIP:

* S. 1313 (Flood Insurance Affordability and Sustainability Act of 2017);

* S. 1368 (Sustainable, Affordable, Fair, and Efficient [SAFE] National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2017);/29 and

* S. 1571 (National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2017).

None of these bills were considered by the full Senate in the 115th Congress. Among their other provisions, S. 1313 would have authorized the NFIP until September 30, 2027; S. 1368 would have authorized the NFIP until September 30, 2023; and S. 1571 would have authorized the NFIP until September 30, 2023.

* * *

28 The statute for the NFIP does not contain a comprehensive expiration, termination, or sunset provision for the whole of the program. Rather, the NFIP has multiple different legal provisions that generally tie to the expiration of key components of the program. Unless reauthorized or amended by Congress, the following will occur on September 30, 2023: (1) The authority to provide new flood insurance contracts will expire. Flood insurance contracts entered into before the expiration would continue until the end of their policy term of one year; and (2) The authority for NFIP to borrow funds from the Treasury will be reduced from $30.425 billion to $1 billion (42 U.S.C. Sec.4016(a)). The most recent reauthorization of the NFIP is in P.L. 117-328.

29 A similar bill was introduced in the House, H.R. 3285.

* * *

The four reauthorization bills in the 115th Congress differed significantly in the degree to which they would have encouraged private participation in flood insurance, particularly flood insurance sold by private companies in competition with the NFIP. In general, legislation passed by the House was more encouraging of private flood insurance than Senate legislation. In the 115th Congress, the House included the same provisions in H.R. 2874 and in an unrelated bill to reauthorize the Federal Aviation Administration (H.R. 3823). The Senate removed the flood insurance language from H.R. 3823 before passing it. Reportedly, the provisions relating to private flood insurance were a particular issue of concern./30 The Senate ultimately did not take up H.R. 2874 during the 115th Congress. S. 1313 included some similar provisions to H.R. 2874 on private flood insurance, but S. 1368 and S. 1571 did not.

In the 116th Congress, the House Financial Services Committee completed markup of a bill for the long-term reauthorization of the NFIP, the National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2019 (H.R. 3167), and ordered it reported on June 12, 2019./31 H.R. 3167 would have reauthorized the NFIP until September 30, 2024. One bill was introduced in the Senate, on July 18, 2019, to reauthorize the expiring provisions of the NFIP: the National Flood Insurance Program Reauthorization and Reform Act of 2019 (S. 2187), with a companion bill in the House, H.R. 3872./32 The latter two bills were not considered by the committees of jurisdiction. S. 2187 and H.R. 3872 would also have reauthorized the NFIP until September 30, 2024. Details of the provisions relating to private insurance in the House and Senate bills in the 116th Congress are described in the Appendix, and Table A-1 relates the provisions in the bills in the 116th Congress to the issues discussed in this report.

The Current Role of Private Insurers in the NFIP

Private insurers can be involved in the flood insurance market in a number of ways, including (1) by helping to administer the NFIP; (2) by sharing risk with the NFIP as a reinsurer; or (3) by taking on risk themselves as a primary insurer, where the insurer contracts directly with a consumer. Since 1983, private insurers have played a major role in administering the NFIP, including selling and servicing policies and adjusting claims, but they largely have not been underwriting flood risk themselves./33 Instead, the NFIP retains the direct financial risk of paying claims for these policies. The NFIP has purchased reinsurance since 2016, thus transferring some of the flood risk to the private sector.

* * *

30 See, for example, Shaun Courtney, "'Hard to Envision' Senate Democrats Blocking FAA Extension, Thune Says," Bloomberg BNA, September 27, 2017, Daily Report for Executives,

Thune wants to see the Senate pass the House bill under unanimous consent, but committee ranking member Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) made that sound unlikely. "That will not get passed here," Nelson said Sept. 26 in response to Bloomberg BNA's inquiry about the House's flood insurance provision.... Senator Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), ranking member on the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, which has jurisdiction over flood insurance proposals, said the House provision was unacceptable. "We're not going to do it," Brown said. "This would undermine all of our flood insurance efforts. It will cause all kinds of cherry-picking by private insurance." 31 See H.Rept. 116-262, Part 1, https://www.congress.gov/116/crpt/hrpt262/CRPT-116hrpt262.pdf.

32 H.R. 3872 was introduced on July 22, 2019.

33 Underwriting risk refers to the potential loss to an insurer or reinsurer. An insurer takes on this risk in return for a premium, and promises to pay an agreed amount in the event of a loss. See NAIC, Glossary of Insurance Terms, http://www.naic.org/consumer_glossary.htm#U.

* * *

Servicing of Policies and Claims Management

While FEMA provides the overarching management and oversight of the NFIP, the majority of the day-to-day operation of the NFIP is handled by private companies. This includes marketing, selling and writing policies, and all aspects of claims management./34 FEMA has established two different arrangements with private industry. The first is the Direct Servicing Agent, or DSA, which operates as a private contractor, selling NFIP policies on behalf of FEMA for individuals seeking to purchase flood insurance policies directly from the NFIP./35 The DSA also handles the policies of severe repetitive loss properties./36 The second arrangement is the Write-Your-Own (WYO) program, where private insurance companies are paid to issue and service NFIP policies.

With either the DSA or WYO program, the NFIP retains the actual financial risk of paying claims for the policy, and the policy terms and premiums are the same. Approximately 13% of the total NFIP policy portfolio is managed through the DSA and 87% of NFIP policies are sold by the 57 companies participating in the WYO program./37

Companies participating in the WYO program are compensated through a variety of methods, but this compensation is not directly based on the costs incurred by the WYOs. In the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012 (Division F, Title II of P.L. 112-141, hereinafter BW-12), Congress required FEMA to develop and issue a rulemaking on a "methodology for determining the appropriate amounts that property and casualty insurance companies participating in the WYO program should be reimbursed for selling, writing, and servicing flood insurance policies and adjusting flood insurance claims on behalf of the National Flood Insurance Program." /8 This rulemaking was required within a year of enactment of BW-12. FEMA published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to revise the compensation structure of the WYOs on July 8, 2019./39 The comment period closed on September 6, 2019. Until the analysis is complete, it is difficult to ascertain how much it actually costs WYO companies to administer the NFIP policies, or the WYO's profit margins (if any).

In the 115th Congress, H.R. 2874 would have capped the allowance paid to the WYOs at 27.9% of premiums, while S. 1368 would have capped the allowance at 22.46%.

In the 116th Congress, Section 302 of S. 2187 would have established that the total amount of reimbursement paid to WYO companies could not be greater than 22.46% of the aggregate amount of premiums charged by the company. This section would also have required FEMA to ensure that the commission paid by a WYO company to agents of the company would not be less than 15%. Section 304 of S. 2187 would require FEMA, within 12 months of enactment, to develop a schedule to determine the actual costs of WYO companies and reimburse the WYO companies only for the actual costs of the service or products. It would have required that all reimbursements made to WYO companies be made public, including a description of the product or service provided to which the reimbursement pertains. Section 405 of S. 2187 would have required FEMA to establish penalties for underpayment of claims by WYO companies that are not less than the penalty for overpayment of a claim. Both H.R. 3872 and S. 2187 contained provisions giving FEMA the authority to terminate a WYO contract under certain conditions, such as fraud or other conduct detrimental to the NFIP.

* * *

34 See primarily 42 U.S.C. Sec.4081 and Sec.4018, and 44 C.F.R. Part 62.

35 The current Direct Servicing Agent is a company called National Flood Services., who was awarded the contract in October 2020. See https://nationalfloodservices.com/press/nfs-awarded-nfip-direct-service-provider-contract/https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSFEMA/bulletins/1c9da05.

36 Severe repetitive loss properties are those that have incurred four or more claim payments exceeding $5,000 each, with a cumulative amount of such payments over $20,000; or at least two claims with a cumulative total exceeding the value of the property. See 42 U.S.C. Sec.4014(h) and 44 C.F.R. Sec.79.2(h).

37 Email correspondence from FEMA Congressional Affairs staff, March 1, 2019. A list of companies participating in the WYO program is available at https://nfipservices.floodsmart.gov/wyo-program-list.

38 Sec.100224 of P.L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 936.

39 Federal Emergency Management Agency, "National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Revisions to Methodology for Payments to Write Your Own (WYO) Companies," 84(130) Federal Register 32,371-32,379, July 8, 2019, and Federal Emergency Management Agency, "National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Revisions to Methodology for Payments to Write Your Own (WYO) Companies; Correction," 84(170) Federal Register 45,933-45,934, September 3, 2019.

* * *

Reinsurance

In the Homeowner Flood Insurance Affordability Act of 2014 (P.L. 113-89, HFIAA), Congress revised the authority of FEMA to secure reinsurance/40 for the NFIP from the private reinsurance and capital markets./41 The purchase of private market reinsurance reduces the likelihood of FEMA needing to borrow from the Treasury to pay claims. In addition, as the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) noted, reinsurance could be beneficial because it allows FEMA to price some of its flood risk up front through the premiums it pays to the reinsurers rather than borrowing from Treasury after a flood./42 From a risk management perspective, using reinsurance to cover losses in only the more extreme years could help the government to manage and reduce the volatility of its losses over time.

Transfer of risk to the private sector through reinsurance, however, is unlikely to lower the overall cost of the NFIP because reinsurers understandably charge FEMA premiums to compensate for the risk they assume. The primary benefit of reinsurance is to transfer and manage risk rather than to reduce the NFIP's long-term fiscal exposure./43 For example, a reinsurance scenario which would provide the NFIP with $16.8 billion coverage (sufficient for Katrina-level losses) could cost an estimated $2.2 billion per year./44 Such a reinsurance premium, however, would be a large portion of the total premiums paid into the NFIP, approximately two-thirds of the current premium amounts. Devoting such a large portion of premiums to reinsurance could leave insufficient funds for paying claims outside of large disasters,/45 or for covering the other purposes for NFIP funds, such as flood mitigation, mapping, and improving NFIP rating structures.

Reinsurance has been purchased by FEMA through two different mechanisms, "traditional" reinsurance and reinsurance backed by catastrophe bonds./46 The traditional reinsurance has been purchased from a varied group of reinsurance companies with each reinsurer bearing part of the risk. The catastrophe bond reinsurance is facilitated by a single company, with the risk then transferred to capital market investors who purchase the bonds. The specifics of each reinsurance purchase has varied, but in general, the reinsurance has been designed to pay a certain percentage of the losses from a single, large scale event, with a higher percentage if losses are higher./47 Coverage has typically started after $4 billion in losses, a loss level that has only been reached by the NFIP in three events - Hurricane Katrina, Superstorm Sandy, and Hurricane Harvey. Table 1 outlines the various reinsurance purchases, including the dates in force, type of reinsurance, amount of coverage, premiums paid by FEMA, and claims paid to FEMA.

* * *

40 Reinsurance is defined as a transaction between a primary insurer and another licensed (re)insurer where the reinsurer agrees to cover all or part of the losses and/or loss adjustment expenses of the primary insurer. See NAIC, Glossary of Insurance Terms, http://www.naic.org/consumer_glossary.htm#R.

41 See Sec.10 of P.L. 113-89, 128 Stat. 1025, as codified at 42 U.S.C. Sec.4081(e).

42 GAO, Flood Insurance: Comprehensive Reform Could Improve Solvency and Enhance Resilience, GAO-17-425, April 2017, p. 19, https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-17-425.

43 Ibid.

44 FEMA, National Flood Insurance Program Report to Congress on Reinsuring NFIP Insurance Risk and Options for Privatizing the NFIP, August 13, 2015, p. 171.

45 The NFIP reinsurance purchases have been designed to cover claims for only one large flood, and smaller flood claims will continue to be paid from NFIP premiums.

46 For more details see FEMA, National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Reinsurance Program, https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/reinsurance and CRS Insight IN10965, The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Reinsurance, and Catastrophe Bonds, by Diane P. Horn and Baird Webel.

47 For example, the 2020 traditional reinsurance purchase covered 10.25% of NFIP losses from $4 billion to $6 billion, 34.68% of losses from $6 billion to $8 billion, and $21.80% of losses from $8 billion to $10 billion.

* * *

In the 115th Congress, H.R. 2874, S. 1313, and S. 1571 all contained provisions that would have required or encouraged the NFIP to transfer a portion of its risk to the private reinsurance market. In the 116th Congress, H.R. 3167, Section 406, would have required FEMA annually to evaluate ceding a portion of the risk of the NFIP to the private reinsurance or capital markets, if the Administrator determines that the rates and terms are reasonable and doing so would further the development and maintenance of a sound financial framework for the NFIP. The Senate bill in the 116th Congress, S. 2187, did not contain any provisions related to reinsurance. In the 117th Congress, companion bills S. 3128 and H.R. 5802 did not contain any provisions related to reinsurance.

* * *

Table 1. NFIP Reinsurance Purchases

Source: FEMA websites at https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/reinsurance and information provided by FEMA Congressional Affairs staff, November 15, 2021.

a. Premiums of $62 million in each of first and second years, $63.75 million in third year.

b. Premiums of $32 million in first year, $38 million in second year, $37.2 million in third year.

c. Premiums of $50.28 million in first year and $50.88 million in second year.

d. Premium of $79.44 million in the first year.

* * *

The NFIP has claimed on reinsurance once, after the losses experienced after Hurricane Harvey, which resulted in over $9 billion paid by the NFIP to policyholders and triggered the full claim of $1.042 billion on the 2017 reinsurance. To date, FEMA has not claimed on any of the catastrophe bonds.

* * *

Continues with Part 2 of 2

* * *

The report is posted at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45242

Older

Congressional Research Service: 'Private Flood Insurance & National Flood Insurance Program' (Part 2 of 2)

Newer

Maine's Mega Millions winner would be richer if they got the ticket a mile away

Advisor News

  • Americans aren’t turning retirement plans into action, LIMRA finds
  • Ashley Hinson ‘death tax’ story collides with truth
  • How advisors can prepare clients for an uncertain retirement landscape
  • Investors aren’t waiting out uncertainty
  • Transamerica and Advo(k)ate Advisors launch pooled employer plan
More Advisor News

Annuity News

  • Investigation finds deceptive sales, churning of annuities targeting postal workers
  • Corebridge annuity sales slip ahead of Equitable marriage
  • California teachers settle class-action lawsuit over in-plan annuity fees
  • Jackson Financial CEO caps 40-year career with blockbuster Q2
  • Lumos Insurance introduces the Immediate Care Plan to help families fund long-term care
More Annuity News

Health/Employee Benefits News

  • Missouri and Kansas can expect double-digit Obamacare premium hikes again
  • Teachers and other state employees brace for possible health insurance increase
  • Ashley Hinson unveils insurance transparency bill amid scrutiny of her health care record
  • Commissioner rejects proposed rate increase from Fallon Community Health Plan, re-negotiated seven proposals to save $72 million for 670,000 residents
  • Medicaid insurers' contracts on line in tight Iowa governor's race
More Health/Employee Benefits News

Life Insurance News

  • Indiana eyes more oversight of insurance companies' exposure to private credit
  • HEALEY-DRISCOLL ADMINISTRATION RETURNS $14.5 MILLION TO HEALTH AND DENTAL INSURANCE CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES
  • ‘Uniquely positioned’: Equitable outlines future post-Corebridge merger
  • Don't keep checks with clerical errors
  • The insurance distributor that builds its own software will win the next decade
More Life Insurance News

NEWS INSIDE

  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Economic News
  • INN Magazine
  • Insurtech News
  • Newswires Feed
  • Regulation News
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos

FEATURED OFFERS

Press Releases

  • Royal Neighbors Unveils Its 2026 Scholarship Recipients 2026 Royal Neighbors Scholars Making a Difference Across the Country
  • Ibexis Announces Expanded Bank Relationships and New Index Options for FIA Plus® and WealthDefender® Series
  • Agent Review Launches Video AI Identity Verification to Help Protect Insurance Professionals, Consumers and Public Trust
  • Prosperity Life GroupSM Launches Prosperity PathWaySM Series, Bringing Greater Choice and Flexibility to Retirement Income Planning
More Press Releases > Add Your Press Release >

How to Write For InsuranceNewsNet

Find out how you can submit content for publishing on our website.
View Guidelines

Topics

  • Advisor News
  • Annuity Index
  • Annuity News
  • Companies
  • Earnings
  • Fiduciary
  • From the Field: Expert Insights
  • Health/Employee Benefits
  • Insurance & Financial Fraud
  • INN Magazine
  • Insiders Only
  • Life Insurance News
  • Newswires
  • Property and Casualty
  • Regulation News
  • Sponsored Articles
  • Washington Wire
  • Videos
  • ———
  • About
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Newsletters

Top Sections

  • AdvisorNews
  • Annuity News
  • Health/Employee Benefits News
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine
  • Life Insurance News
  • Property and Casualty News
  • Washington Wire

Our Company

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Meet our Editorial Staff
  • Magazine Subscription
  • Write for INN

Sign up for our FREE e-Newsletter!

Get breaking news, exclusive stories, and money- making insights straight into your inbox.

select Newsletter Options
Facebook Linkedin Twitter
© 2026 InsuranceNewsNet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • InsuranceNewsNet Magazine

Sign in with your Insider Pro Account

Not registered? Become an Insider Pro.
Insurance News | InsuranceNewsNet