Congressional Research Service Issues Insight White Paper on Unemployment Insurance Fraud
* * *
Unemployment Insurance Fraud: Background and Recent Data
This Insight provides background and recent data on fraud within the federal-state
Defining UI Fraud
An improper payment is any payment that should not have been made or was made in an incorrect amount under statutory, administrative, or other legally applicable requirements, including any payment to an ineligible recipient. Improper payments include both overpayments and underpayments. UI overpayments are identified when a state determines that the individual received a payment, or a portion of a payment, to which the individual is not entitled.
Fraud is a subset of overpayments and is defined under each state's Unemployment Compensation (UC) laws. Thus, what constitutes fraud varies from state to state. In general, fraud involves a knowing and willful act or concealment of material facts to obtain or increase benefits. Fraud determinations often include identifying a pattern of action or the claimant's certification of erroneous information under the penalty of perjury. Regular, state UC benefits do not employ one federal definition of fraud, yet several of the COVID-19 UI benefits did include statutory language related to fraud.
Two types of UI fraud have been prevalent with regard to the COVID-19 UI benefits, as explained in DOL program guidance to states: (1) eligibility fraud, which occurs when UI benefits are received by unqualified individuals based on intentionally false information, and (2) identity fraud, which occurs when someone utilizes identifying information of another person to receive UI benefits illegally.
UI Fraud Data
Under 20 C.F.R Sec.650.1(b), state UC laws must provide an opportunity for a fair hearing for all individuals whose claims for unemployment benefits are denied. As a result, states may not identify fraud immediately. Additional investigation by relevant law enforcement agencies may also be necessary to establish fraud. Thus, the full scope of UI fraud may not be known for some time.
With those caveats in mind, a
'Federal and state entities have produced several fraud and fraud-related measures and estimates of UI fraud during the pandemic. These measures and estimates reflect a variety of characteristics and potential indicators of fraud. While each type of measure and estimate has strengths and limitations, as described below, none completely and reliably indicates the extent of fraud in UI programs during the pandemic.'
Recent UI Fraud Measures
Recent UI fraud measures include state UI agency reports to DOL of fraudulent payments from all UI programs (at least
'Prior to the pandemic, the OIG opened approximately 100 UI investigative matters annually. Since
Recent UI Fraud Estimates
DOL produces estimates of UI fraud, which are currently limited to regular, state UC programs (roughly
Recently, GAO estimated the lower bound of UI fraud at
Congressional Interest in UI Fraud
In 2023,
* on
* on
Legislation has been introduced in recent Congresses related UI program integrity and fraud - for example, in the 117th
* * *
The white paper is posted at: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN12117
Texas A&M University Health Science Center: Notable Inaccuracies Found In Insurers' Mental Health Care Provider Directories In California
TONI SAYS: What is Medicare's "creditable" prescription drug coverage? [The Times-Tribune, Corbin, Ky.]
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News