Bank of America Corporation Liquidity Coverage Ratio (September 30, 2024)
Pillar 3 U.S. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) Disclosures
For the quarter ended
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
2
Important Presentation Information
These disclosures are required by the Liquidity Coverage Ratio: Public Disclosure Requirements Final Rule published by the
DISCLOSURE MAP
Pillar 3 Report |
3Q24 Form |
|
Description |
page |
10-Q page |
reference |
reference |
|
Corporate Overview |
3 |
3 |
LCR Requirements and Disclosures |
3 |
25-28 |
Main Drivers of the LCR |
4 |
25-28 |
Composition of Eligible HQLA |
5 |
25-28 |
Concentration of Funding Sources |
5 |
25-28 |
Derivative Exposures and Potential Collateral Calls |
5 |
|
Currency Mismatch in the LCR |
5 |
|
Centralized Liquidity Management Function |
6 |
25-28 |
CORPORATE OVERVIEW
LCR REQUIREMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
The objective of the LCR is to promote the short-term resilience of the liquidity risk profile of financial institutions by requiring banks to hold high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) that can be easily monetized to meet their liquidity needs for a 30 calendar-day liquidity stress scenario. The LCR is intended to improve the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress. The LCR is calculated as the amount of a financial institution's HQLA relative to the prescribed net cash outflows the institution could encounter over a 30 calendar-day period of significant liquidity stress, expressed as a percentage.
3
THE MAIN DRIVERS OF THE LCR
The main drivers of the Corporation's
For the quarterly period ended
|
Average |
Average |
|
In millions of |
Unweighted |
Weighted |
|
Amount |
Amount |
||
3Q24 |
3Q24 |
||
HIGH-QUALITY LIQUID ASSETS |
|||
1 |
Total eligible high-quality liquid assets (HQLA), of which: |
610,306 |
610,228 |
2 |
Eligible level 1 liquid assets |
609,785 |
609,785 |
3 |
Eligible level 2A liquid assets |
521 |
443 |
4 |
Eligible level 2B liquid assets |
- |
- |
CASH OUTFLOW AMOUNTS |
|||
5 |
Deposit outflow from retail customers and counterparties, of which: |
1,182,350 |
83,639 |
6 |
Stable retail deposit outflow |
700,825 |
21,025 |
7 |
Other retail funding outflow |
325,401 |
36,631 |
8 |
Brokered deposit outflow |
156,124 |
25,983 |
9 |
Unsecured wholesale funding outflow, of which: |
695,061 |
257,075 |
10 |
Operational deposit outflow |
410,498 |
101,601 |
11 |
Non-operational funding outflow |
271,169 |
142,080 |
12 |
Unsecured debt outflow |
13,394 |
13,394 |
13 |
Secured wholesale funding and asset exchange outflow |
866,417 |
205,064 |
14 |
Additional outflow requirements, of which: |
615,266 |
152,466 |
15 |
Outflow related to derivative exposures and other collateral requirements |
43,454 |
31,373 |
16 |
Outflow related to credit and liquidity facilities including unconsolidated structured transactions and mortgage |
571,812 |
121,093 |
commitments |
|||
17 |
Other contractual funding obligation outflow |
15,405 |
15,405 |
18 |
Other contingent funding obligations outflow |
327,713 |
11,108 |
19 |
TOTAL CASH OUTFLOW |
3,702,212 |
724,758 |
CASH INFLOW AMOUNTS |
|||
20 |
Secured lending and asset exchange cash inflow |
717,449 |
152,284 |
21 |
Retail cash inflow |
7,189 |
3,594 |
22 |
Unsecured wholesale cash inflow |
16,084 |
12,453 |
23 |
Other cash inflows, of which: |
38,050 |
38,050 |
24 |
Net derivative cash inflow |
11,926 |
11,926 |
25 |
Securities cash inflow |
4,558 |
4,558 |
26 |
Broker-dealer segregated account inflow |
21,565 |
21,565 |
27 |
Other cash inflow |
0 |
- |
28 |
TOTAL CASH INFLOW |
778,772 |
206,381 |
Average |
|||
Amount1 |
|||
29 |
HQLA AMOUNT |
610,228 |
|
30 |
TOTAL NET CASH OUTFLOW AMOUNT EXCLUDING THE MATURITY MISMATCH ADD-ON |
518,377 |
|
31 |
MATURITY MISMATCH ADD-ON |
11,382 |
|
32 |
TOTAL UNADJUSTED NET CASH OUTFLOW AMOUNT |
529,758 |
|
33 |
OUTFLOW ADJUSTMENT PERCENTAGE |
100% |
|
34 |
TOTAL ADJUSTED NET CASH OUTFLOW AMOUNT |
529,758 |
|
35 |
LIQUIDITY COVERAGE RATIO (%) |
115.2% |
1 The amounts reported in this column may not equal the calculation of those amounts using component amounts reported in rows 1-28 due to technical factors such as the application of the level 2 liquid asset caps, the total inflow cap, and for depository institution holding companies subject to subpart G, the application of the modification to total net cash outflows.
Note: Eligible HQLA reported in rows 1-4 in the table above exclude excess liquidity held at certain subsidiaries.
4
THE COMPOSITION OF ELIGIBLE HQLA
Under the LCR Rule, HQLA is classified into three categories: Level 1, Level 2A and Level 2B. Level 1 assets include central bank reserves (less reserve requirements) and certain marketable securities backed by sovereigns and central banks. Level 2A assets, subject to a 15 percent haircut, include certain
Average weighted amount
In millions of
ELIGIBLE HQLA
1 |
Eligible cash 1 |
318,079 |
2 |
Eligible level 1 securities 2 |
291,706 |
3 |
TOTAL eligible level 1 assets |
609,785 |
4 |
Eligible level 2a securities 2 |
443 |
5 |
Eligible level 2b securities 2 |
- |
6 |
Total eligible HQLA |
610,228 |
1 Central bank reserves
2 Per the LCR rule, HQLA securities are represented at fair value which may differ from the accounting treatment under GAAP
CONCENTRATION OF FUNDING SOURCES
We fund our assets primarily with a mix of deposits and secured and unsecured liabilities through a centralized, globally coordinated funding approach diversified across products, programs, markets, currencies and investor groups. We consider a substantial portion of our deposits to be a stable, low-cost and consistent source of funding. Our long-term unsecured debt is primarily issued in a variety of maturities and currencies to achieve cost-efficient funding, to maintain an appropriate maturity profile and to ensure that we maintain global capital market access. Our trading activities in our broker-dealer entities are primarily funded on a secured basis through securities lending and repurchase agreements and these amounts will vary based on customer activity and market conditions. We believe funding these activities in the secured financing markets is less sensitive to changes in our credit ratings than unsecured financing, and more cost-efficient. For additional information on funding sources refer to Liquidity Risk - Diversified Funding Sources within the MD&A section of the
DERIVATIVE EXPOSURES AND POTENTIAL COLLATERAL CALLS
We enter into derivative transactions with customers to help them manage different types of risk, including risks that they may face given changes in interest rates, currency relationships, securities prices or commodities prices. In addition, we enter into derivative transactions with third parties and between affiliate legal entities to enable management of risk across the enterprise. Risk factors in derivatives activities impacting liquidity include: contractual margin asymmetries, cash and collateral outflows related to changes in the financial condition of the Corporation, counterparty behavior and valuation changes.
CURRENCY MISMATCH IN THE LCR
Given the nature of our business, our HQLA and net cash outflows are primarily in
5
CENTRALIZED LIQUIDITY MANAGEMENT FUNCTION
We manage our liquidity position through line of business and asset-liability management activities, as well as through our legal entity funding strategy, on both a forward and current (including intraday) basis under both expected and stressed conditions. We believe that a centralized approach to funding and liquidity management enhances our ability to monitor liquidity requirements, maximizes access to funding sources, minimizes borrowing costs and facilitates timely responses to liquidity events.
We provide centralized funding and liquidity management through a variety of activities, including monitoring of established limits, assessing exposures under both normal and stressed conditions and reviewing liquidity risk management processes and controls. Global Risk Management (GRM) provides oversight of liquidity management across the Corporation, including front-line units and legal entities. GRM oversees the liquidity risk management governance structure, establishes liquidity risk policies, and provides independent review and challenge of the Corporation's liquidity risk management processes. The Board, its risk committee and various management committees oversee the Corporation's liquidity risk activities. The Board and/or ERC approve our liquidity risk policy, Financial Contingency and Recovery Plan and liquidity risk appetite limits. Management committees responsible for liquidity governance include the Corporation's
6
Attachments
Disclaimer
AM Best Downgrades Issuer Credit Rating of Gleaner Life Insurance Society; Maintains Under Review With Developing Implications Status on Credit Ratings
State-run property insurance provider Citizen defends high rate of claims closed without payment; "We don't want your business”
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News