ATHENE HOLDING LTD – 10-K – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Index to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Overview 69 Industry Trends and Competition 71 Key Operating and Non-GAAP Measures 76 Results of Operations 79 Investment Portfolio 85 Non-GAAP Measure Reconciliations 104 Liquidity and Capital Resources 108 Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments 115 68
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with Forward-Looking Statements, Item 1A. Risk Factors and Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data included within this report.
Overview
We are a leading financial services company that specializes in issuing, reinsuring and acquiring retirement savings products designed for the increasing number of individuals and institutions seeking to fund retirement needs. We focus on generating spread income by combining our two core competencies of (1) sourcing long-term, persistent liabilities and (2) using the global scale and reach of Apollo's asset management business to actively source or originate assets with our preferred risk and return characteristics. Our steady and significant base of earnings generates capital that we opportunistically invest across our business to source attractively priced liabilities and capitalize on opportunities. EffectiveJanuary 1, 2022 , as a result of the closing of the merger involving us and Apollo, Apollo Global Management, Inc. (NYSE: APO) became the beneficial owner of 100% of our Class A common shares and controls all of the voting power to elect members to our board of directors. We have established a significant base of earnings and, as ofDecember 31, 2022 , have an expected annual net investment spread, which measures our investment performance plus strategic capital management fees less the total cost of our liabilities, of 1-2% over the 8.6 year weighted-average life of our net reserve liabilities. The weighted-average life includes deferred annuities, pension group annuities, funding agreements, payout annuities and other products.
Our total assets have grown to
year ended
The following table presents the inflows generated from our organic and
inorganic channels:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, December 31, (In millions) 2022 2021 2020 Retail$ 20,407 $ 8,781 $ 7,801 Flow reinsurance 6,186 2,564 6,002 Funding agreements1 10,039 11,852 8,277 Pension group annuities 11,218 13,837 5,467 Gross organic inflows 47,850 37,034 27,547 Gross inorganic inflows - - 28,792 Total gross inflows 47,850 37,034 56,339 Gross outflows2 (27,872) (17,534) (13,656) Net flows$ 19,978 $ 19,500 $ 42,683 Inflows attributable to Athene$ 39,244 $ 26,795 $ 36,891 Inflows attributable to ACRA noncontrolling interest 8,606 10,239 19,448 Total gross inflows$ 47,850
Outflows attributable to Athene$ (23,724) $ (14,761) $ (11,949) Outflows attributable to ACRA noncontrolling interest (4,148) (2,773) (1,707) Total gross outflows2$ (27,872)
1 Funding agreements are comprised of funding agreements issued under our FABN and FABR programs, funding agreements issued to the FHLB and long-term repurchase agreements. 2 Gross outflows consist of full and partial policyholder withdrawals on deferred annuities, death benefits, pension group annuity benefit payments, payments on payout annuities and funding agreement repurchases and maturities. Gross outflows in 2022 include a$4.9 billion strategic reinsurance transaction withCatalina Holdings . 69
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Our organic channels, including retail, flow reinsurance and institutional products, provided gross inflows of$47.9 billion ,$37.0 billion and$27.5 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively, which were underwritten to attractive, above target returns. Gross organic inflows for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 increased$10.8 billion , or 29%, reflecting the strength of our multi-channel distribution platform and our ability to quickly pivot into optimal and profitable channels as opportunities arise. Withdrawals on our deferred annuities, repurchases and maturities of our funding agreements, payments on payout annuities, pension group annuity payments and ceded reinsurance (collectively, gross outflows), in the aggregate were$27.9 billion ,$17.5 billion and$13.7 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in gross outflows was primarily driven by a$4.9 billion strategic reinsurance transaction withCatalina Holdings as well as the repurchases and increased maturities of historical funding agreement issuances. Our funding agreement repurchases of$704 million included our first ever targeted tender offer for two series of FABNs included in our FABN program as well as open market repurchases of FABNs. We believe that our credit profile, current product offerings and product design capabilities as well as our growing reputation as both a seasoned funding agreement issuer and a reliable pension group annuity counterparty will continue to enable us to grow our existing organic channels and allow us to source additional volumes of profitably underwritten liabilities in various market environments. We intend to continue to grow organically by expanding each of our retail, flow reinsurance and institutional distribution channels. We believe that we have the right people, infrastructure, scale and capital discipline to position us for continued growth. Within our retail channel, we had fixed annuity sales of$20.4 billion ,$8.8 billion and$7.8 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in our retail channel was driven by the strong performance of our indexed annuity and MYGA products across our bank, IMO and broker-dealer channels, exhibiting strong sales execution as interest rates rose in the current year, as well as our expansion into large financial institutions. We have maintained our disciplined approach to pricing and our targeted underwritten returns. We aim to continue to grow our retail channel by deepening our relationships with our approximately 54 IMOs, approximately 78,000 independent agents and our growing network of 16 banks and 127 regional broker-dealers. Our strong financial position and diverse, capital-efficient products allow us to be dependable partners with IMOs, banks and broker-dealers as well as consistently write new business. We expect our retail channel to continue to benefit from our credit profile, recent product launches and the interest rate environment. We believe this should support growth in sales at our targeted returns through increased volumes via existing IMO relationships and allow us to continue to expand our bank and broker-dealer channels. Additionally, we continue to focus on hiring and training a specialized sales force and creating products to capture new potential distribution opportunities. Within our flow reinsurance channel, we target reinsurance business consistent with our preferred liability characteristics, which provides us another opportunistic channel for us to source liabilities with attractive crediting rates. We generated inflows through our flow reinsurance channel of$6.2 billion ,$2.6 billion and$6.0 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in our flow reinsurance channel from prior year was driven by strong volumes from existing partnerships as interest rates have risen in the current year as well as new partners added during 2022 and the second half of 2021. We expect that our credit profile and our reputation as a solutions provider will help us continue to source additional reinsurance partners, which will further diversify our flow reinsurance channel. Within our institutional channel, we generated inflows of$21.3 billion ,$25.7 billion and$13.7 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in our institutional channel was driven by lower pension group annuity and funding agreement inflows. During the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , we closed 10 pension group annuity transactions. We issued group annuity contracts in the aggregate principal amount of$11.2 billion ,$13.8 billion and$5.5 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. Since entering the pension group annuity market in 2017, we have closed 43 deals resulting in the issuance or reinsurance of group annuities of$41.4 billion with more than 435,000 plan participants as ofDecember 31, 2022 . We issued funding agreements in the aggregate principal amount of$10.0 billion ,$11.9 billion and$8.3 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively, including issuances in multiple currencies. The decrease in our funding agreement channel from prior year was driven by fewer issuances through our FABN program due to challenging market conditions for most of the year. The following represents the aggregate principal amount of funding agreement inflows: Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, (In millions) December 31, 2022 2021 2020 FABN$ 4,325 $ 11,102 $ 5,804 FHLB 1,445 750 875 FABR 2,000 - 1,000 Long-term repurchase agreements 2,269 - 598 Total funding agreement inflows$ 10,039
As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had funding agreements of$21.0 billion and$3.0 billion outstanding under our FABN and FABR programs, respectively,$3.7 billion outstanding with the FHLB and$2.9 billion of long-term repurchase agreements. We expect to grow our institutional channel by continuing to engage in pension group annuity transactions and programmatic issuances of funding agreements. 70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Our inorganic channel has contributed significantly to our growth through both acquisitions and block reinsurance transactions. We believe our corporate development team, with support from Apollo, has an industry-leading ability to source, underwrite and expeditiously close transactions. With support from Apollo, we are a solutions provider with a proven track record of closing transactions, which we believe makes us the ideal partner to insurance companies seeking to restructure their business. We expect that our inorganic channel will continue to be an important source of profitable growth in the future. Executing our growth strategy requires that we have sufficient capital available to deploy. We believe that we have significant capital available to support our growth aspirations. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we estimate that we have approximately$5.2 billion in capital available to deploy, consisting of approximately$2.3 billion in excess equity capital,$2.7 billion in untapped debt capacity (assuming a peer average adjusted debt to capitalization ratio of 25%) and$0.2 billion in available undrawn capital at ACRA, subject, in the case of debt capacity, to market conditions and general availability. To support our growth strategies and capital deployment opportunities, we established ACRA as a long-duration, on-demand capital vehicle. We own 36.55% of the economic interests in ACRA, with the remaining 63.45% of the economic interests being owned by ADIP, a series of funds managed by an affiliate of Apollo. ACRA participates in certain transactions by drawing a portion of the required capital for such transactions from third-party investors equal to ADIP's proportionate economic interest in ACRA. This shareholder-friendly, strategic capital solution allows us the flexibility to simultaneously deploy capital across multiple accretive avenues, while maintaining a strong financial position.
In 2022, we contributed$8.0 billion of certain of our alternative investments toAAA in exchange for limited partnership interests inAAA , which is consolidated as a VIE. Apollo establishedAAA for the purpose of providing a single vehicle through which we and third-party investors can participate in a portfolio of alternative investments. Additionally, we believeAAA enhances Apollo's ability to increase alternative assets under management (AUM) by raising capital from third parties, which will allow Athene to achieve greater scale and diversification for alternatives. Third-party investors began to invest inAAA onJuly 1, 2022 .
Merger with Apollo
OnJanuary 1, 2022 , we completed our merger with AGM and are now a direct wholly owned subsidiary of AGM. The total consideration for the transaction was$13.1 billion . The consideration was calculated based on historical AGM'sDecember 31, 2021 closing share price multiplied by the AGM common shares issued in the share exchange, as well as the fair value of stock-based compensation awards replaced, fair value of warrants converted to AGM common shares and other equity consideration, and effective settlement of pre-existing relationships and other consideration. At the closing of the merger with AGM, each issued and outstanding AHL Class A common share (other than shares held by Apollo, the AOG or the respective direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of Athene or the AOG) was converted automatically into 1.149 shares of AGM common shares with cash paid in lieu of any fractional AGM common shares. In connection with the merger, AGM issued to AHL Class A common shareholders 158.2 million AGM common shares in exchange for 137.6 million AHL Class A common shares that were issued and outstanding as of the acquisition date, exclusive of the 54.6 million shares previously held by Apollo immediately before the acquisition date.
Strategic Transaction with Apollo
OnFebruary 28, 2020 , we closed a strategic transaction with Apollo in which Apollo acquired an incremental stake in us for AOG units valued at$1.1 billion , upon close, and$350 million of cash. Changes in the value of the AOG units are reflected within the investment gains (losses), net of offsets non-operating line item. Subsequent to our merger with AGM described in Note 2 - Business Combination, our investment in Apollo was distributed to AGM in the first quarter of 2022. See Note 14 - Related Parties - OtherRelated Party Transactions - Apollo Share Exchange and Related Transactions to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion.
Industry Trends and Competition
Economic and Market Conditions
As a leading financial services company specializing in retirement services, we are affected by numerous factors, including the condition of global financial markets and the economy. Price fluctuations within equity, credit, commodity and foreign exchange markets, as well as interest rates and global inflation, which may be volatile and mixed across geographies, can significantly impact the performance of our business including, but not limited to, the valuation of investments and related income we may recognize. Adverse economic conditions may result from domestic and global economic and political developments, including plateauing or decreasing economic growth and business activity, civil unrest, geopolitical tensions or military action, such as the armed conflict betweenUkraine andRussia and corresponding sanctions imposed bythe United States and other countries, and new or evolving legal and regulatory requirements on business investment, hiring, migration, labor supply and global supply chains. 71
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
We carefully monitor economic and market conditions that could potentially give rise to global market volatility and affect our business operations, investment portfolios and derivatives, which includes global inflation. US inflation remained heightened during the fourth quarter of 2022 with the USFederal Reserve continuing its interest rate hiking cycle as a result. TheUS Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the annual US inflation rate edged down to 6.5% as ofDecember 31, 2022 , compared to 8.2% as ofSeptember 30, 2022 , as action from the US Federal Reserve is beginning to temper inflation. While beginning to decline, the heightened US inflation rate remains persistent due to a combination of supply and demand factors. As a result, inDecember 2022 , theFederal Reserve raised the benchmark interest rate to a target range of 4.25% to 4.50%, up from a target range of 3.00% to 3.25% inSeptember 2022 , which marks the seventh consecutive interest rate hike in 2022. In the US, the S&P 500 Index decreased 19.4% in 2022 and credit markets faced similar underperformance. TheBureau of Economic Analysis reported US real GDP increased at an annual rate of 2.1% in 2022. As ofJanuary 2023 , theInternational Monetary Fund estimated that the US economy will expand by 1.4% in 2023 and 1.0% in 2024. TheUS Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the US unemployment rate remained at 3.5% as ofDecember 31, 2022 . Foreign exchange rates can impact the valuations of our investments and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. The US dollar weakened in the fourth quarter compared to the Euro as global central banks worked to combat the increasing yield disparity. Relative to the US dollar, the euro appreciated 9.2% during the fourth quarter of 2022, after depreciating 6.5% in the third quarter of 2022. We generally undertake hedging activities to eliminate or mitigate foreign exchange currency risk. Oil prices also moderated, ending the year up 6.7%, amid a volatile year which included recession fears that counteracted constrained supply and oil export disruptions driven by the ongoing conflict betweenUkraine andRussia .
Interest Rate Environment
Rates moved meaningfully higher than most predictions in 2022, and this trend continued in the fourth quarter with the US 10-yearTreasury yield reaching levels as high as 4.25% during the quarter before ending the year at 3.88%. Given theFederal Reserve's continued focus on curbing inflation and recessionary concerns, it is difficult to predict the level of interest rates and the shape of the yield curve. Our investment portfolio consists predominantly of fixed maturity investments. See -Investment Portfolio. If prevailing interest rates were to rise, we believe the yield on our new investment purchases may also rise and our investment income from floating rate investments would increase, while the value of our existing investments may decline. If prevailing interest rates were to decline significantly, the yield on our new investment purchases may decline and our investment income from floating rate investments would decrease, while the value of our existing investments may increase. We address interest rate risk through managing the duration of the liabilities we source with assets we acquire through ALM modeling. As part of our investment strategy, we purchase floating rate investments, which we expect would perform well in a rising interest rate environment, as experienced in the current year, and which we expect would underperform in a declining rate environment. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , our net invested asset portfolio included$39.3 billion of floating rate investments, or 20% of our net invested assets and our net reserve liabilities included$14.2 billion of floating rate liabilities at notional, or 7% of our net invested assets, resulting in$25.1 billion of net floating rate assets, or 13% of our net invested assets. If prevailing interest rates were to rise, we believe our products would be more attractive to consumers and our sales would likely increase. If prevailing interest rates were to decline, it is likely that our products would be less attractive to consumers and our sales would likely decrease. In periods of prolonged low interest rates, the net investment spread may be negatively impacted by reduced investment income to the extent that we are unable to adequately reduce policyholder crediting rates due to policyholder guarantees in the form of minimum crediting rates or otherwise due to market conditions. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , most of our products were deferred annuities with 19% of our FIAs at the minimum guarantees and 27% of our fixed rate annuities at the minimum crediting rates. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , minimum guarantees on all of our deferred annuities, including those with crediting rates already at their minimum guarantees, were, on average, greater than 150 basis points below the crediting rates on such deferred annuities, allowing us room to reduce rates before reaching the minimum guarantees. Our remaining liabilities are associated with immediate annuities, pension group annuity obligations, funding agreements and life contracts for which we have little to no discretionary ability to change the rates of interest payable to the respective policyholder or institution. A significant majority of our deferred annuity products have crediting rates that we may reset annually upon renewal following the expiration of the current guaranteed period. While we have the contractual ability to lower these crediting rates to the guaranteed minimum levels, our willingness to do so may be limited by competitive pressures. See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks, which includes a discussion regarding interest rate and other significant risks and our strategies for managing these risks. 72
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Discontinuation of certain IBORs (including LIBOR)
OnDecember 31, 2021 , most LIBOR settings (i.e., 24 out of 35, including 1-week and 2-month US Dollar (USD) LIBOR as well as all other non-USD LIBOR settings) ceased to be published. In addition, a few of the most widely used GBP and JPY LIBOR settings (i.e., 1-, 3- and 6- month GBP and JPY LIBOR settings) were deemed permanently unrepresentative, but will continue to be published on a synthetic basis, for a limited time period for the purpose of all legacy contracts (except for cleared derivatives). The remaining USD LIBOR settings (i.e., 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-month USD LIBOR settings) will continue to be published, subject to limitations on use, and cease or become unrepresentative onJune 30, 2023 . Without the intervention of theUK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) using enhanced powers provided by theUK Government to compel continued panel bank contribution by the IBA, the LIBOR administrator, LIBOR will cease publication afterJune 30, 2023 . InNovember 2022 , theFCA published a consultation seeking market input on its proposal to compel the IBA to continue to publish USD LIBOR on a synthetic basis untilSeptember 30, 2024 . The response period for this consultation is now closed and the next step is for theFCA to publish its findings and recommendations. Similar developments have occurred with respect to other IBORs. As a result of the expected discontinuation of certain IBORs, including LIBOR, regulators and market participants in various jurisdictions have been working to identify alternative reference rates that are compliant with theInternational Organization of Securities Commission's standards for transaction-based benchmarks. In the US, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), a group of market and official sector participants, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its recommended alternative benchmark rate. Other alternative reference rates have been recommended in other jurisdictions (e.g., in theUnited Kingdom , the alternative benchmark rate for GBP LIBOR is the Sterling Overnight Interbank Average Rate). The discontinuation of IBORs could have a significant impact on the financial markets and represents a material uncertainty to our business. In particular, to manage the uncertainty surrounding the discontinuation of LIBOR, we have established a LIBOR transition team and a transition plan. We have created anExecutive Steering Committee composed of senior executives to coordinate and oversee the execution of our plan. It is difficult to predict the full impact of the transition away from LIBOR on our contracts whose value is tied to LIBOR. The value or profitability of these contracts may be adversely affected. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had contracts tied to LIBOR in the notional amounts set forth in the table below: Extending Beyond (In millions) Total Exposure June 30, 2023 Investments$ 30,366 $ 28,846 Product liabilities 11,370 8,318 Derivatives hedging product liabilities 15,927 10,853 Other derivatives 3,552 3,549 Other contracts 1,113 1,113 Total notional of contracts tied to LIBOR$ 62,328 $ 52,679 Investments As ofDecember 31, 2022 , our investments tied to LIBOR were in the following asset classes: (In millions) Total Exposure Extending Beyond June 30, 2023 Multi-lateral arrangements Corporates $ 644 $ 608 RMBS 2,710 2,684 CMBS 704 688 CLO 15,219 15,212 ABS 5,357 5,043 Bank Loans 1,129 1,068 Total multi-lateral arrangements 25,763 25,303 Bi-lateral arrangements CML 4,486 3,426 RML 117 117 Total bi-lateral arrangements 4,603 3,543 Total investments tied to LIBOR$ 30,366 $ 28,846 73
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Of the total notional value of investment-related contracts tied to LIBOR, extending beyondJune 30, 2023 ,$25.3 billion or 87.7% relate to multi-lateral arrangements. These arrangements are typically characterized by a large, diverse set of unrelated holders, the majority or all of whom must consent to amendments to the terms of the underlying investment instrument. Generally, when the amendments concern a material term such as the determination of interest, consent must be unanimous. Given the collective action issues inherent in such structures, such consent is typically impracticable and beyond our control. The existence and character of fallback provisions affected by the discontinuation of LIBOR vary widely from contract to contract. Many of our legacy contracts may not contemplate the permanent discontinuation of LIBOR and upon LIBOR's discontinuation may result in the conversion of the instrument from a floating- to a fixed-rate instrument or may involve a significant degree of uncertainty as to the method of determining interest. To the extent that such legacy arrangements do not contemplate the permanent discontinuation of LIBOR, we would most likely look to some broad-based solution, such as the US federal LIBOR transition law and related rule(s) issued by theBoard of Governors of theFederal Reserve System , or, if applicable, the New York LIBOR transition law, to address such deficiency. To the extent that such a solution is ineffective, for example as a result of being ruled unconstitutional we would likely be required to undertake a re-evaluation of affected investments, which might result in the disposition of individual positions and a realized loss in value due to any such deficiency or other market factors. To the extent that individual positions are retained, we may incur adverse financial consequences, including any mark-to-market impacts resulting from those investments that convert from a floating to a fixed rate. To the extent that the fallback rates ultimately used to determine interest payable on structured securities do not align with the fallback rates used to determine interest payable on the underlying assets, economic losses could be sustained on the overall structure.
The remaining notional value of investment-related contracts tied to LIBOR
extending beyond
arrangements that are capable of being amended through negotiation with the
relevant counterparty.
As our investment manager, Apollo maintains the documentation associated with the assets in our investment portfolio. We are therefore dependent upon Apollo for the successful completion of our LIBOR transition efforts relating to our investment portfolio. See Part I-Item 1A. Risk Factors-Risks Relating to Our Business Operations-Changes to the method of determining the LIBOR or the selection of a replacement for LIBOR may affect the value of investments held by or due to us and could affect our results of operations and financial results. Apollo's failure to fulfill its responsibilities could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and ability to timely report accurate financial information.
Product Liabilities and Associated Hedging Instruments
As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had product liabilities with a notional value of approximately$11.4 billion for which LIBOR is a component in the determination of interest credited, of which we expect$8.3 billion to have a current crediting term that extends beyondJune 30, 2023 . For purposes of evaluating our exposure to LIBOR, we only consider our exposure to the current crediting term, which is typically one to two years. Upon renewal of the crediting term, we have the ability to migrate policyholders into new strategies not involving LIBOR. Generally, there are two categories of indices that use LIBOR in the determination of interest credited, "excess return" indices (return of index in excess of LIBOR) and indices that use LIBOR as a means to control volatility. The indices to which these products are tied are primarily proprietary indices for which key inputs are determined by the index sponsor. The index sponsor generally has the right to unilaterally change the reference rate upon the discontinuation of LIBOR. As a result, we do not anticipate any administrative concerns in connection with the transition from LIBOR to a replacement rate with respect to these products. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we held derivatives with a notional value of approximately$15.9 billion to hedge our exposure to these product liabilities, of which we expect$10.9 billion to extend beyondJune 30, 2023 . Included within this category are$4.8 billion of Eurodollar futures, of which we expect$2.7 billion to extend beyondJune 30, 2023 . Exchange traded products, such as Eurodollar futures, will follow the CME Group Inc.'s approach regarding the discontinuation of LIBOR, which may be different than the approach taken with respect to the product liability by the relevant index sponsor, and expose us to potential basis mismatch. The remaining derivatives in this category are primarily purchased to hedge the current crediting period. We will be required to purchase new derivatives in future periods to hedge future crediting periods associated with the related existing product liabilities, which will expose us to potential basis mismatch to the extent that the reference rate for the product liability is not the same as the reference rate for the derivative instrument. These derivatives are entered into pursuant to ISDA Master Agreements and will transition to SOFR in accordance with the process described below under the caption Other Derivatives.
Other Derivatives
Our other derivative contracts tied to LIBOR are generally entered into pursuant to ISDA Master Agreements. ISDA published the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol (Protocol) and released Supplement 70 to the 2006 ISDA Definitions (Supplement) onOctober 23, 2020 . The Protocol and Supplement include appropriate fallbacks that contemplate the permanent discontinuation of LIBOR and certain other IBORs. InJanuary 2021 , we joined industry peers by adhering to the Protocol and terms of the Supplement, each of which became effective onJanuary 25, 2021 . With respect to future transactions, we anticipate adoption of the 2021 ISDA Interest Rate Definitions, which also include appropriate fallbacks that contemplate the permanent discontinuation of LIBOR and certain other IBORs. To the extent that the fallbacks incorporated into our other derivative contracts result in the use of a replacement rate that differs from that employed in the contract being hedged, we may experience basis mismatch. In connection with the publication of the Protocol, ISDA also published templates for possible bilateral amendments to legacy contracts (including derivatives contracts) for situations in which the parties elect not to utilize the fallbacks contemplated by the Protocol and instead negotiate their own fallback provisions to avoid potential basis risk. We intend to evaluate whether and the extent to which we are subject to such basis risk, as well as the possibility of using the available bilateral templates to mitigate such risk. 74
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Other Contracts and Other Sources of Exposure
The "Other Contracts" category is comprised of our LIBOR-based floating rate funding agreement, fixed-to-float Series A preference shares, and our revolving credit agreement, if any amounts were to be outstanding all of which contemplate the permanent discontinuation of LIBOR. These agreements are tied to LIBOR in a manner that is not expected to have a significant impact upon LIBOR's discontinuation or have fallback provisions in place that provide for the determination of interest after the discontinuation of LIBOR. In addition to the other contracts for which we have quantified our exposure, we are party to contracts that are tied to LIBOR based upon the occurrence of some remote contingency, such as the accrual of penalty interest, or for which LIBOR is otherwise not a material term of the contract. These contracts do not lend themselves to quantification and are lower in priority in our LIBOR remediation efforts. Finally, LIBOR is used as a component in our internal derivative valuation models. We are in the process of transitioning the benchmark yield curve in such models from LIBOR to SOFR and we expect to complete the transition prior to the discontinuation of LIBOR. Such transition may affect the valuation of our derivative instruments. We can provide no assurance that we will be successful at fully implementing our plan prior to the discontinuation of LIBOR. Completion of certain components of our plan are contingent upon market developments and are therefore not fully within our control. To the extent management effort and attention is focused on other matters, the timely completion of our plan could become more difficult. Failure to fully implement our plan prior to the discontinuation of LIBOR may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows and on our ability to timely report accurate financial information. Demographics Over the next four decades, the retirement-age population is expected to experience unprecedented growth. Technological advances and improvements in healthcare are projected to continue to contribute to increasing average life expectancy, and aging individuals must be prepared to fund retirement periods that will last longer than ever before. Further, many working households inthe United States do not have adequate retirement savings. As a tool for addressing the unmet need for retirement planning, we believe that many Americans have begun to look to tax-efficient savings products with low-risk or guaranteed return features and potential equity market upside. Our tax-efficient savings products are well positioned to meet this increasing customer demand.
Competition
We operate in highly competitive markets. We face a variety of large and small industry participants, including diversified financial institutions, insurance and reinsurance companies and private equity firms. These companies compete in one form or another for the growing pool of retirement assets driven by a number of external factors such as the continued aging of the population and the reduction in safety nets provided by governments and private employers. In the markets in which we operate, scale and the ability to provide value-added services and build long-term relationships are important factors to compete effectively. We believe that our leading presence in the retirement market, diverse range of capabilities and broad distribution network uniquely position us to effectively serve consumers' increasing demand for retirement solutions, particularly in the FIA market. According to LIMRA, total fixed annuity market sales inthe United States were$143.3 billion for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , a 45.6% increase from the same time period in 2021, as a rise in interest rates spurred continued growth in the US annuity market. In the total fixed annuity market, for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 (the most recent period for which specific market share data is available), we were the largest company based on sales of$12.3 billion , translating to an 8.6% market share. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , our market share was 5.7% with sales of$5.6 billion . According to LIMRA, total fixed annuity sales inthe United States were$129.3 billion for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , a 7.4% increase from the year endedDecember 31, 2020 . In the total fixed annuity market, for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , we were the fourth largest company based on sales of$8.3 billion , translating to a 6.4% market share. For the year endedDecember 31, 2020 , our market share was 6.4% with sales of$7.7 billion . According to LIMRA, total FIA sales inthe United States were$57.5 billion for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , a 22.1% increase from the same time period in 2021. In the total FIA Market, for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 (the most recent period for which specific market share data is available), we were the largest provider of FIAs based on sales of$7.1 billion , and our market share for the same period was 12.4%. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , our market share was 11.3% with sales of$5.3 billion . According to LIMRA, total FIA sales inthe United States were$63.7 billion for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , a 14.8% increase from the year endedDecember 31, 2020 . In the total FIA market, for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , we were the largest provider of FIAs based on sales of$7.7 billion , and our market share for the same period was 12.1%. For the year endedDecember 31, 2020 , we were the largest provider of FIAs based on sales of$5.8 billion , translating to a 10.5% market share. According to LIMRA, total RILA market sales inthe United States were$31.0 billion for the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 , a 9.6% increase from the same time period in 2021. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2022 (the most recent period for which specific market share data is available), we were the twelfth largest provider of RILAs based on sales of$678 million , and our market share for the same period was 2.2%. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2021 , we were the ninth largest provider of RILAs based on sales of$354 million , translating to a 1.2% market share. We believe RILAs represent a significant growth opportunity for Athene. 75
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
According to LIMRA, total RILA market sales inthe United States were$38.7 billion for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , a 62.1% increase from the year endedDecember 31, 2020 . In the total RILA market, for the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , we were the ninth largest provider of RILAs based on sales of$566 million , and our market share for the same period was 1.5%. For the year endedDecember 31, 2020 , we were the ninth largest provider of RILAs based on sales of$187 million , translating to a 0.8% market share.
Key Operating and Non-GAAP Measures
In addition to our results presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inthe United States of America (US GAAP), we present certain financial information that includes non-GAAP measures. Management believes the use of these non-GAAP measures, together with the relevant US GAAP measures, provides information that may enhance an investor's understanding of our results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers of our business. The majority of these non-GAAP measures are intended to remove from the results of operations the impact of market volatility (other than with respect to alternative investments) as well as integration, restructuring and certain other expenses which are not part of our underlying profitability drivers, as such items fluctuate from period to period in a manner inconsistent with these drivers. These measures should be considered supplementary to our results in accordance with US GAAP and should not be viewed as a substitute for the corresponding US GAAP measures. See Non-GAAP Measure Reconciliations for the appropriate reconciliations to the most directly comparable US GAAP measures.
Spread Related Earnings (SRE)
Spread related earnings is a pre-tax non-GAAP measure used to evaluate our financial performance excluding market volatility and expenses related to integration, restructuring, stock compensation and other expenses. Our spread related earnings equals net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder adjusted to eliminate the impact of the following: •Investment Gains (Losses), Net of Offsets-Consists of the realized gains and losses on the sale of AFS securities, the change in fair value of reinsurance assets, unrealized gains and losses, changes in the credit loss allowance, and other investment gains and losses. Unrealized, allowances and other investment gains and losses are comprised of the fair value adjustments of trading securities (other than CLOs and ABS) and mortgage loans, investments held under the fair value option and our investment in Apollo, derivative gains and losses not hedging FIA index credits, and the change in credit loss allowances recognized in operations net of the change in AmerUs Closed Block fair value reserve related to the corresponding change in fair value of investments. Investment gains and losses are net of offsets related to DAC and DSI amortization and changes to guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit (GLWB) and guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) reserves (together, GLWB and GMDB reserves represent rider reserves) as well as the MVAs associated with surrenders or terminations of contracts.
•Non-operating Change in Insurance Liabilities and Related Derivatives, Net of
Offsets
•Change in Fair Values of Derivatives and Embedded Derivatives - FIAs, Net of Offsets-Consists of impacts related to the fair value accounting for derivatives hedging the FIA index credits and the related embedded derivative liability fluctuations from period to period. The index reserve is measured at fair value for the current period and all periods beyond the current policyholder index term. However, the FIA hedging derivatives are purchased to hedge only the current index period. Upon policyholder renewal at the end of the period, new FIA hedging derivatives are purchased to align with the new term. The difference in duration between the FIA hedging derivatives and the index credit reserves creates a timing difference in earnings. This timing difference of the FIA hedging derivatives and index credit reserves is included as a non-operating adjustment, net of offsets related to DAC and DSI amortization and changes to rider reserves. We primarily hedge with options that align with the index terms of our FIA products (typically 1-2 years). On an economic basis, we believe this is suitable because policyholder accounts are credited with index performance at the end of each index term. However, because the term of an embedded derivative in an FIA contract is longer-dated, there is a duration mismatch which may lead to mismatches for accounting purposes. •Non-operating Change in Funding Agreements-Consists of timing differences caused by changes to interest rates on variable funding agreements and funding agreement backed notes and the associated reserve accretion patterns of those contracts. Further included are adjustments for gains associated with the Company's Tender Offer for funding agreement backed notes.
•Integration, Restructuring, and Other Non-operating Expenses-Consists of
restructuring and integration expenses related to acquisitions and block
reinsurance costs as well as certain other expenses, which are not predictable
or related to our underlying profitability drivers.
•Stock Compensation Expense-Consists of stock compensation expenses associated with our share incentive plans, including long-term incentive expenses, which are not related to our underlying profitability drivers and fluctuate from time to time due to the structure of our plans. 76
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
•Income Tax (Expense) Benefit-Consists of the income tax effect of all income statement adjustments, including our Apollo investment, and is computed by applying the appropriate jurisdiction's tax rate to all adjustments subject to income tax. We consider these adjustments to be meaningful adjustments to net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder for the reasons discussed in greater detail above. Accordingly, we believe using a measure which excludes the impact of these items is useful in analyzing our business performance and the trends in our results of operations. Together with net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder, we believe spread related earnings provides a meaningful financial metric that helps investors understand our underlying results and profitability. Spread related earnings should not be used as a substitute for net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder.
Adjusted Debt to Capital Ratio
Adjusted debt to capital ratio is a non-GAAP measure used to evaluate our capital structure excluding the impacts of AOCI and the cumulative changes in fair value of funds withheld and modco reinsurance assets as well as mortgage loan assets, net of DAC, DSI, rider reserve and tax offsets. Adjusted debt to capital ratio is calculated as total debt at notional value divided by adjusted capitalization. Adjusted capitalization includes our adjusted AHL common shareholder's equity, preferred stock and the notional value of our debt. Adjusted AHL common shareholder's equity is calculated as the ending AHL shareholders' equity excluding AOCI, the cumulative changes in fair value of funds withheld and modco reinsurance assets and mortgage loan assets as well as preferred stock. These adjustments fluctuate period to period in a manner inconsistent with our underlying profitability drivers as the majority of such fluctuation is related to the market volatility of the unrealized gains and losses associated with our AFS securities. Except with respect to reinvestment activity relating to acquired blocks of businesses, we typically buy and hold AFS investments to maturity throughout the duration of market fluctuations, therefore, the period-over-period impacts in unrealized gains and losses are not necessarily indicative of current operating fundamentals or future performance. Adjusted debt to capital ratio should not be used as a substitute for the debt to capital ratio. However, we believe the adjustments to shareholders' equity are significant to gaining an understanding of our capitalization, debt utilization and debt capacity.
Net Investment Spread and Other Operating Expenses
Net investment spread is a key measure of profitability. Net investment spread measures our investment performance plus our strategic capital management fees, less our total cost of funds. Net investment earned rate is a key measure of our investment performance while cost of funds is a key measure of the cost of our policyholder benefits and liabilities. Strategic capital management fees consist of management fees received by us for business managed for others, primarily the non-controlling interest portion of Athene's business ceded to ACRA. Net investment earned rate is a non-GAAP measure we use to evaluate the performance of our net invested assets that does not correspond to US GAAP net investment income. Net investment earned rate is computed as the income from our net invested assets divided by the average net invested assets, for the relevant period. To enhance the ability to analyze these measures across periods, interim periods are annualized. The adjustments to net investment income to arrive at our net investment earned rate add (a) alternative investment gains and losses, (b) gains and losses related to trading securities for CLOs, (c) net VIE impacts (revenues, expenses and noncontrolling interest), (d) forward points gains and losses on foreign exchange derivative hedges and (e) the change in fair value of reinsurance assets, and removes the proportionate share of the ACRA net investment income associated with the ACRA noncontrolling interest as well as the gain or loss on our investment in Apollo. We include the income and assets supporting our change in fair value of reinsurance assets by evaluating the underlying investments of the funds withheld at interest receivables and we include the net investment income from those underlying investments which does not correspond to the US GAAP presentation of change in fair value of reinsurance assets. We exclude the income and assets supporting business that we have exited through ceded reinsurance including funds withheld agreements. We believe the adjustments for reinsurance provide a net investment earned rate on the assets for which we have economic exposure. Cost of funds includes liability costs related to cost of crediting on both deferred annuities and institutional products as well as other liability costs, but does not include the proportionate share of the ACRA cost of funds associated with the noncontrolling interest. Cost of crediting on deferred annuities is the interest credited to the policyholders on our fixed strategies as well as the option costs on the indexed annuity strategies. With respect to FIAs, the cost of providing index credits includes the expenses incurred to fund the annual index credits, and where applicable, minimum guaranteed interest credited. Cost of crediting on institutional products is comprised of (1) pension group annuity costs, including interest credited, benefit payments and other reserve changes, net of premiums received when issued, and (2) funding agreement costs, including the interest payments and other reserve changes. Other liability costs include DAC, DSI and VOBA amortization, change in rider reserves, the cost of liabilities on products other than deferred annuities and institutional products, premiums, product charges and other revenues. We exclude the costs related to business that we have exited through ceded reinsurance transactions. Cost of funds is computed as the total liability costs divided by the average net invested assets, for the relevant period. To enhance the ability to analyze these measures across periods, interim periods are annualized. We believe a measure like cost of funds is useful in analyzing the trends of our core business operations and profitability. While we believe cost of funds is a meaningful financial metric and enhances our understanding of the underlying profitability drivers of our business, it should not be used as a substitute for total benefits and expenses presented under US GAAP. Net investment earned rate, cost of funds, and net investment spread are non-GAAP measures we use to evaluate the profitability of our business. We believe these metrics are useful in analyzing the trends of our business operations, profitability and pricing discipline. While we believe each of these metrics are meaningful financial metrics and enhance our understanding of the underlying profitability drivers of our business, they should not be used as a substitute for net investment income or total benefits and expenses presented under US GAAP. 77
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Other operating expenses excludes integration, restructuring and other non-operating expenses, stock compensation and long-term incentive plan expenses, interest expense and policy acquisition expenses. We believe a measure like other operating expenses is useful in analyzing the trends of our core business operations and profitability. While we believe other operating expenses is a meaningful financial metric and enhances our understanding of the underlying profitability drivers of our business, it should not be used as a substitute for policy and other operating expenses presented under US GAAP.
Net Invested Assets
In managing our business, we analyze net invested assets, which does not correspond to total investments, including investments in related parties, as disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Net invested assets represent the investments that directly back our net reserve liabilities as well as surplus assets. Net invested assets is used in the computation of net investment earned rate, which allows us to analyze the profitability of our investment portfolio. Net invested assets includes (a) total investments on the consolidated balance sheet with AFS securities at cost or amortized cost, excluding derivatives, (b) cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, (c) investments in related parties, (d) accrued investment income, (e) VIE and VOE assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interest adjustments, (f) net investment payables and receivables, (g) policy loans ceded (which offset the direct policy loans in total investments) and (h) an adjustment for the allowance for credit losses. Net invested assets also excludes assets associated with funds withheld liabilities related to business exited through reinsurance agreements and derivative collateral (offsetting the related cash positions). We include the underlying investments supporting our assumed funds withheld and modco agreements in our net invested assets calculation in order to match the assets with the income received. We believe the adjustments for reinsurance provide a view of the assets for which we have economic exposure. Net invested assets includes our proportionate share of ACRA investments, based on our economic ownership, but does not include the proportionate share of investments associated with the noncontrolling interest. Net invested assets also includes our investment in Apollo for prior periods. Our net invested assets are averaged over the number of quarters in the relevant period to compute our net investment earned rate for such period. While we believe net invested assets is a meaningful financial metric and enhances our understanding of the underlying drivers of our investment portfolio, it should not be used as a substitute for total investments, including related parties, presented under US GAAP. Net Reserve Liabilities In managing our business, we also analyze net reserve liabilities, which does not correspond to total liabilities as disclosed in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. Net reserve liabilities represent our policyholder liability obligations net of reinsurance and is used to analyze the costs of our liabilities. Net reserve liabilities include (a) interest sensitive contract liabilities, (b) future policy benefits, (c) long-term repurchase obligations, (d) dividends payable to policyholders and (e) other policy claims and benefits, offset by reinsurance recoverable, excluding policy loans ceded. Net reserve liabilities include our proportionate share of ACRA reserve liabilities, based on our economic ownership, but do not include the proportionate share of reserve liabilities associated with the noncontrolling interest. Net reserve liabilities is net of the ceded liabilities to third-party reinsurers as the costs of the liabilities are passed to such reinsurers and, therefore, we have no net economic exposure to such liabilities, assuming our reinsurance counterparties perform under our agreements. The majority of our ceded reinsurance is a result of reinsuring large blocks of life business following acquisitions. For such transactions, US GAAP requires the ceded liabilities and related reinsurance recoverables to continue to be recorded in our consolidated financial statements despite the transfer of economic risk to the counterparty in connection with the reinsurance transaction. While we believe net reserve liabilities is a meaningful financial metric and enhances our understanding of the underlying profitability drivers of our business, it should not be used as a substitute for total liabilities presented under US GAAP.
Sales
Sales statistics do not correspond to revenues under US GAAP but are used as relevant measures to understand our business performance as it relates to inflows generated during a specific period of time. Our sales statistics include inflows for fixed rate annuities and FIAs and align with the LIMRA definition of all money paid into an individual annuity, including money paid into new contracts with initial purchase occurring in the specified period and existing contracts with initial purchase occurring prior to the specified period (excluding internal transfers). We believe sales is a meaningful metric that enhances our understanding of our business performance and is not the same as premiums presented in our consolidated statements of income (loss). 78
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Results of Operations We completed our merger with AGM onJanuary 1, 2022 and have elected pushdown accounting in which we used AGM's basis of accounting that reflects the fair market value of our assets and liabilities as of the date of the merger. The resulting change in the value of our assets and liabilities limits the comparability of our financial results for the Predecessor and Successor periods.
The following summarizes the consolidated results of operations for the
Predecessor and Successor periods, which relate to the periods preceding and
period succeeding our merger with AGM, respectively.
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, (In millions) December 31, 2022 2021 2020 Revenues$ 7,623 $ 26,320 $ 14,764 Benefits and expenses 14,853 22,134 12,558 Income (loss) before income taxes (7,230) 4,186 2,206 Income tax expense (benefit) (976) 386 285 Net income (loss) (6,254) 3,800 1,921
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling
interests
(2,092) (59) 380 Net income (loss) attributable to Athene Holding Ltd. (4,162) 3,859 1,541 Less: Preferred stock dividends 141 141 95
Net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder
$ 3,718 $ 1,446
Year Ended
In this section, references to 2022 refer to the year ended
and references to 2021 refer to the year ended
Net Income (Loss) Available to AHL Common Shareholder
Net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder decreased by$8.0 billion , or 216%, to$(4.3) billion in 2022 from$3.7 billion in 2021. The decrease in net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder was driven by an$18.7 billion decrease in revenues, partially offset by a$7.3 billion decrease in benefits and expenses, a$2.0 billion decrease in noncontrolling interests and a$1.4 billion decrease in income tax expense.
Revenues
Revenues decreased by$18.7 billion to$7.6 billion in 2022 from$26.3 billion in 2021. The decrease was driven by a decrease in investment related gains and losses and a decrease in premiums, partially offset by an increase in net investment income and an increase in VIE investment related gains and losses. Investment related gains (losses) decreased by$16.9 billion to$(12.7) billion in 2022 from$4.2 billion in 2021, primarily due to the changes in fair value of reinsurance assets, FIA hedging derivatives, mortgage loans, trading and equity securities, realized losses on AFS securities compared to realized gains in the prior year and an increase in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by foreign exchange derivative gains. The change in fair value of reinsurance assets decreased$7.1 billion primarily driven by the change in the value of the underlying assets, mainly related to credit spread widening compared to credit spread tightening in the prior year and a larger increase inUS Treasury rates in the current year. The change in fair value of FIA hedging derivatives decreased$5.3 billion primarily driven by the unfavorable performance of the indices upon which our call options are based. The largest percentage of our call options are based on the S&P 500 index, which decreased 19.4% in 2022, compared to an increase of 26.9% in 2021. The$3.0 billion unfavorable change in mortgage loans was primarily due to credit spread widening and an increase inUS Treasury rates in the current year as well as unfavorable foreign exchange impacts. Additionally, at the beginning of the year, and in conjunction with our merger with Apollo, we elected the fair value option on our mortgage loans, while in prior periods they were stated at unpaid principal, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, net of allowance for credit losses. The unfavorable changes in realized gains and losses on AFS securities of$1.1 billion and fair value of trading and equity securities of$741 million were primarily due to credit spread widening compared to credit spread tightening in the prior year, a larger increase inUS Treasury rates in the current year and unfavorable economics, including foreign exchange impacts. The unfavorable change in the provision for credit losses of$280 million was primarily driven by unfavorable economics, including impacts from the conflict betweenRussia andUkraine and exposure toChina's real estate market. The increase in foreign exchange derivative gains reflects additional assets denominated in foreign currencies and the strengthening of the US dollar during the year. Premiums decreased by$2.6 billion to$11.6 billion in 2022 from$14.3 billion in 2021, primarily driven by lower pension group annuity premiums compared to the prior year. 79
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Net investment income increased by$471 million to$7.6 billion in 2022 from$7.1 billion in 2021, primarily driven by growth in our investment portfolio attributed to strong net flows during the previous twelve months and higher floating rate income related to higher short-term interest rates. These increases were partially offset by the favorable prior year change in fair value of our investment in Apollo of$831 million , which was distributed to AGM following the merger, less favorable alternative investment performance, the transfer in 2022 of a significant portion of our alternative investments toAAA , a consolidated VIE, higher investment management fees driven by the strong growth in our investment portfolio and lower RMBS and bond call income. As a result of purchase accounting, the book value of our investment portfolio was marked up to fair value at theJanuary 1, 2022 merger date, resulting in an adverse impact to our net investment income. VIE investment related gains (losses) increased by$346 million to$319 million in 2022 from$(27) million in 2021, primarily driven by an increase in VIEs consolidated as a result of our merger with Apollo as well as unrealized gains on assets after the initial transfer toAAA .
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and expenses decreased by$7.3 billion to$14.9 billion in 2022 from$22.1 billion in 2021. The decrease was driven by a decrease in interest sensitive contract benefits, a decrease in future policy and other policy benefits and a decrease in DAC, DSI and VOBA amortization, partially offset by an increase in policy and other operating expenses. Our annual unlocking of assumptions resulted in a decrease in benefits and expenses of$41 million , compared to an increase of$47 million in 2021. The 2022 unlocking was driven by a decrease of$41 million in FIA embedded derivative liabilities and no net impact related to DAC, DSI, VOBA, negative VOBA and rider reserves compared to a decrease of$59 million in FIA embedded derivative liabilities and an increase of$107 million related to DAC, DSI, VOBA and rider reserves in 2021. Interest sensitive contract benefits decreased by$3.9 billion to$541 million in 2022 from$4.4 billion in 2021, primarily driven by a decrease in the change in FIA fair value embedded derivatives of$4.4 billion and higher negative VOBA amortization resulting from purchase accounting, partially offset by growth in the block of business. As a result of purchase accounting, we marked our reserve liabilities to fair value at theJanuary 1, 2022 merger date, resulting in a favorable impact to our interest sensitive contract benefits primarily from negative VOBA amortization. The change in the FIA fair value embedded derivatives was primarily due to the performance of the equity indices to which our FIA policies are linked, primarily the S&P 500 index, which decreased 19.4% in 2022 compared to an increase of 26.9% in 2021, as well as a favorable change in discount rates, partially offset by unfavorable economics impacting policyholder projected benefits and an unfavorable change in unlocking compared to the prior year. The FIA fair value embedded derivatives unlocking in 2022 was$41 million favorable primarily due to changes to projected interest crediting, partially offset by the impact of higher rates on future account values, while unlocking in 2021 was$59 million favorable primarily due to higher lapse assumptions on recently issued business. Additionally, negative VOBA unlocking related to our interest sensitive contract liabilities was$1 million favorable in 2022. Future policy and other policy benefits decreased by$3.4 billion to$12.3 billion in 2022 from$15.7 billion in 2021, primarily attributable to lower pension group annuity issuances, a decrease in the change in rider reserves, higher negative VOBA amortization resulting from purchase accounting and a decrease in the change in the AmerUs Closed Block fair value liability, partially offset by higher benefit payments due to growth in the block of business. The favorable change in rider reserves of$749 million was primarily driven by the unfavorable change in reinsurance assets and net FIA derivatives as well as a favorable change in unlocking compared to prior year. The change in the AmerUs Closed Block fair value liability was primarily due to unrealized losses on the underlying investments reflecting credit spreads widening and a larger increase inUS Treasury rates in the current year. Unlocking in 2022 was$5 million unfavorable due to changes to projected interest crediting, partially offset by the impact of higher rates on future account values, while unlocking in 2021 was$97 million unfavorable related to changes in lapse assumptions, partially offset by favorable income rider experience. DAC, DSI and VOBA amortization decreased by$321 million to$509 million in 2022 from$830 million in 2021, primarily due to the unfavorable change in net FIA derivatives as a result of the unfavorable equity market performance, impacts from purchase accounting, which included the removal of historical DAC and DSI, and a favorable change in unlocking, partially offset by the establishment of a new VOBA asset. Unlocking in 2022 was$4 million favorable, primarily related to the impact of higher rates on future account values, partially offset by changes to projected interest crediting, while unlocking in 2021 was$10 million unfavorable primarily related to changes in lapse assumptions and income rider experience. Policy and other operating expenses increased by$365 million to$1.5 billion in 2022 from$1.1 billion in 2021, primarily driven by significant growth in the business, the amortization of newly established intangible assets as a result of the merger and interest expense related to the issuance of repurchase agreements, partially offset by the costs incurred in the prior year associated with our merger with Apollo and a$53 million impairment of aCorporate-Owned Life Insurance (COLI) asset. Taxes Income tax expense (benefit) decreased by$1.4 billion to$(976) million in 2022 from$386 million in 2021. The income tax benefit for 2022 was calculated by applying the 21% US statutory rate to the loss of our US and foreign subsidiaries (net of noncontrolling interests), and was primarily driven by the unfavorable changes in fair value of reinsurance assets, mortgage loans and net FIA derivatives. Our effective tax rate in 2022 was a benefit of 13% compared to an expense of 9% in 2021. The effective tax rate in 2022 was due to the change in fair value of reinsurance assets, mortgage loans and net FIA derivatives subject to tax. 80
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests decreased by
from
value of reinsurance assets as a result of more unrealized losses within
reinsurance investment portfolios.
Year Ended
In this section, references to 2021 refer to the year ended
and references to 2020 refer to the year ended
Net Income Available to AHL Common Shareholder
Net income available to AHL common shareholder increased by$2.3 billion , or 157%, to$3.7 billion in 2021 from$1.4 billion in 2020. The increase in net income available to AHL common shareholder was driven by an$11.6 billion increase in revenues and a$439 million decrease in noncontrolling interests, partially offset by a$9.6 billion increase in benefits and expenses, a$101 million increase in income tax expense and a$46 million increase in preferred stock dividends. Revenues Revenues increased by$11.6 billion to$26.3 billion in 2021 from$14.8 billion in 2020. The increase was driven by an increase in premiums, an increase in net investment income and an increase in investment related gains and losses.
Premiums increased by
2020, driven by higher pension group annuity premiums compared to the prior
year.
Net investment income increased by$2.3 billion to$7.1 billion in 2021 from$4.8 billion in 2020, primarily driven by growth in our investment portfolio attributed to strong net flows during the previous twelve months as well as the Jackson reinsurance transaction, favorable alternative investment performance, the favorable change in the fair value of our investment in Apollo of$639 million mainly attributable to the increase in valuation price compared to prior year and the early redemptions of two loans. These were partially offset by lower new money rates reflecting the prolonged low interest rate environment and lower floating rate investment income due to the low interest rate environment. Investment related gains (losses) increased by$928 million to$4.2 billion in 2021 from$3.3 billion in 2020, primarily due to the change in fair value of FIA hedging derivatives, foreign exchange gains on derivatives, an increase in the fair value of equity securities and an increase in realized gains on AFS securities, partially offset by the change in fair value of reinsurance assets and a decrease in the change in fair value of trading securities. The change in fair value of FIA hedging derivatives increased$1.6 billion driven by more favorable performance of the indices upon which our call options are based and an increase in derivatives hedging our FIA products resulting from strong growth in our FIA block of business over the previous twelve months. The majority of our call options are based on the S&P 500 index, which increased 26.9% in 2021 compared to an increase of 16.3% in 2020. The increase in foreign exchange gains on derivatives reflects additional business denominated in foreign currencies and the strengthening of the US dollar during 2021. The increase in the fair value of equity securities was primarily due to an increase in the market value of our equity position in Jackson. The increase in realized gains on AFS securities was primarily driven by an increase in sales of corporate securities. The change in fair value of reinsurance assets decreased$2.1 billion primarily driven by the change in the value of the underlying assets related to the increase inUS Treasury rates compared to a decrease in the prior year. The unfavorable change in fair value of reinsurance assets was magnified by the growth in our reinsurance asset portfolio as a result of the Jackson reinsurance transaction. The unfavorable change in fair value of trading securities was primarily due to a decrease in AmerUs Closed Block assets of$160 million primarily related to the increase inUS Treasury rates.
Benefits and Expenses
Benefits and expenses increased by$9.6 billion to$22.1 billion in 2021 from$12.6 billion in 2020. The increase was driven by an increase in future policy and other policy benefits, an increase in interest sensitive contract benefits, an increase in DAC, DSI and VOBA amortization and an increase in policy and other operating expenses. Our annual unlocking of assumptions resulted in an increase in benefits and expenses of$47 million , compared to a decrease of$77 million in 2020. The 2021 unlocking was driven by a decrease of$59 million in FIA embedded derivative liabilities and an increase of$107 million related to DAC, DSI, VOBA and rider reserves, compared to a decrease of$110 million in FIA embedded derivative liabilities and an increase of$34 million related to DAC, DSI, VOBA and rider reserves in 2020. Future policy and other policy benefits increased by$8.5 billion to$15.7 billion in 2021 from$7.2 billion in 2020, primarily attributable to higher pension group annuity obligations, higher pension group annuity benefit payments and an increase in the change in rider reserves, partially offset by a decrease in the AmerUs Closed Block liability. The change in rider reserves of$170 million was primarily driven by the change in net FIA derivatives, unfavorable unlocking and higher gross profits, partially offset by a more favorable change in actuarial experience and market impacts. Unlocking in 2021 was unfavorable$97 million related to changes in lapse assumptions, partially offset by favorable income rider experience. The 2020 unlocking impacts were favorable$26 million related to favorable income rider and mortality experience, partially offset by changes in lapse assumptions and long-term net investment earned rate assumptions. 81
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Interest sensitive contract benefits increased by$551 million to$4.4 billion in 2021 from$3.9 billion in 2020, driven by growth in the block of business, including the Jackson reinsurance transaction, and an increase in the change in FIA fair value embedded derivatives of$150 million . The change in the FIA fair value embedded derivatives was primarily due to the performance of the equity indices to which our FIA policies are linked, primarily the S&P 500 index, which experienced an increase of 26.9% in 2021, compared to an increase of 16.3% in 2020, as well as an unfavorable change in unlocking compared to the prior year. These were partially offset by a favorable change in discount rates used in our embedded derivative calculations as the current year experienced an increase in discount rates compared to a decrease in rates in 2020. The FIA fair value embedded derivatives unlocking in 2021 was$59 million favorable primarily due to higher lapse assumptions on recently issued business, while 2020 unlocking was$110 million favorable primarily due to lowering future option budgets. DAC, DSI and VOBA amortization increased by$243 million to$830 million in 2021 from$587 million in 2020, primarily due to the change in net FIA derivatives, higher gross profits and growth in the block. These impacts were partially offset by the unfavorable change in fair value of reinsurance assets, the favorable change in actuarial experience and market impacts and the favorable change in unlocking. Unlocking in 2021 was$10 million unfavorable, primarily related to changes in lapse assumptions and income rider experience, while unlocking in 2020 was$60 million unfavorable related to changes in the long-term net investment earned rate assumptions and mortality experience, partially offset by lapse assumptions. Policy and other operating expenses increased by$235 million to$1.1 billion in 2021 from$893 million in 2020, primarily driven by significant growth in the business, the costs associated with the previously announced merger with Apollo, a$53 million impairment of a COLI asset and interest expense on recent debt issuances. Taxes Income tax expense increased by$101 million to$386 million in 2021 from$285 million in 2020, primarily driven by higher income subject to tax due to the favorable change in net FIA derivatives, unrealized gains on our investment in Apollo, an increase in net investment income and the tax impact from the COLI adjustment to deferred tax liabilities, partially offset by a$63 million out-of-period adjustment in the third quarter of 2021 related to the correction of previously disclosed errors in taxable income by jurisdiction, which resulted in the misstatement of income tax expense, and an unfavorable change in the fair value of reinsurance assets. Our effective tax rate in 2021 was an expense of 9% compared to an expense of 13% in 2020. Our effective tax rate was dependent upon the relationship of income or loss subject to tax compared to consolidated income or loss before income taxes. Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests decreased by
reinsurance assets as a result of more unrealized losses within reinsurance
investment portfolios, magnified by the Jackson reinsurance transaction.
Preferred Stock Dividends
Preferred stock dividends increased by
issuances.
Summary of Non-GAAP Earnings
The following summarizes our spread related earnings:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, (In millions) December 31, 2022 2021 2020
Fixed income and other investment income, net
$ 5,325 $ 4,836 Alternative investment income 1,206 1,754 492 Net investment earnings 6,913 7,079 5,328 Strategic capital management fees 53 39 22 Cost of funds (3,897) (3,993) (3,575) Net investment spread 3,069 3,125 1,775 Other operating expenses (466) (359) (324) Interest and other financing costs (279) (257) (196) Spread related earnings$ 2,324 $ 2,509 $ 1,255 82
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Year Ended
Spread Related Earnings
SRE decreased by$185 million , or 7%, to$2.3 billion in 2022 from$2.5 billion in 2021. The decrease in SRE was driven by lower net investment earnings and higher other operating expenses, partially offset by lower cost of funds. Net investment earnings decreased$166 million primarily driven by unfavorable purchase accounting adjustments, less favorable alternative investment performance compared to prior year, lower RMBS returns and lower bond call income, partially offset by$28.7 billion of growth in our average net invested assets and higher floating rate income. Other operating expenses increased$107 million mainly due to significant growth in the business. Cost of funds decreased$96 million primarily driven by favorable purchase accounting adjustments and the favorable change in unlocking, partially offset by growth in the block of business, higher rates on existing floating rate funding agreements and new PGA issuances, growth in the institutional block of business at higher crediting rates, higher deferred annuity rates on new business and an unfavorable change in market impacts. Unlocking, net of noncontrolling interests, was favorable$6 million primarily related to the impact of higher rates on future account values, partially offset by changes to projected interest crediting, compared to unfavorable unlocking of$91 million in 2021 reflecting unfavorable lapse assumptions, partially offset by income rider experience. Net Investment Spread Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended December Year Ended December 31, 2022 31, 2021 December 31, 2020 Fixed income and other investment earned rate 3.22 % 3.51 % 3.82 % Alternative investment earned rate 10.42 % 21.37 % 8.01 % Net investment earned rate 3.66 % 4.42 % 4.01 % Strategic capital management fees 0.03 % 0.02 % 0.02 % Cost of funds 2.06 % 2.50 % 2.69 % Net investment spread 1.63 % 1.94 % 1.34 % Net investment spread decreased 31 basis points to 1.63% in 2022 from 1.94% in 2021. Our net investment earned rate was 3.66% in 2022, a decrease from 4.42% in 2021, primarily due to less favorable performance of our alternative investment portfolio compared to prior year as well as lower returns in our fixed and other investment portfolio. The alternative net investment earned rate was 10.42% in 2022, a decrease from 21.37% in 2021, primarily driven by significant outperformance in the prior year, partially offset by strong returns on real estate funds, Wheels Donlen andAthora in the current year. The prior year outperformance was mainly due to a higher return onAmeriHome Mortgage Company, LLC (AmeriHome) related to a valuation increase resulting from the eventual sale in the second quarter of 2021, a higher Venerable return attributed to a valuation increase driven by a reinsurance agreement withEquitable Financial Life Insurance Company and higher equity fund returns driven by more favorable economics in the prior year. Fixed and other net investment earned rate was 3.22% in 2022, a decrease from 3.51% in 2021, primarily driven by unfavorable purchase accounting impacts, lower RMBS returns and lower bond call income, partially offset by favorable floating rate income. Cost of funds decreased by 44 basis points to 2.06% in 2022, from 2.50% in 2021, primarily driven by favorable purchase accounting adjustments and the favorable change in unlocking, partially offset by higher rates on existing floating rate funding agreements and new PGA issuances, growth in the institutional block of business at higher crediting rates, higher deferred annuity rates on new business and an unfavorable change in market impacts.
Adjustments to Net Income (Loss) Available to Athene Holding Ltd. Common
Shareholder
The decrease in adjustments to net income (loss) available to AHL common shareholder compared to 2021 was primarily driven by the change in investment related gains and losses and the non-operating change in insurance liabilities and related derivatives, net of offsets. Investment related gains and losses, net of offsets, were unfavorable$8.0 billion primarily due to the changes in fair value of reinsurance assets and mortgage loan assets, the prior year favorable change in the fair value of our investment in Apollo of$831 million , which was distributed to AGM following the merger, realized losses on the sale of AFS securities in the current year compared to realized gains on the sale of AFS securities in the prior year related to changes in economics, and the change in the provision for credit losses. The unfavorable changes in fair value of reinsurance assets of$3.5 billion and mortgage loans were primarily due to credit spread widening compared to credit spread tightening in the prior year and a larger increase inUS Treasury rates in the current year. Additionally, at the beginning of 2022 in conjunction with our merger with Apollo, we elected the fair value option on our mortgage loans, while in prior periods they were stated at unpaid principal, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, net of an allowance for credit losses. The unfavorable change in the provision for credit losses of$202 million (net of noncontrolling interests) was primarily driven by unfavorable economics, including impacts from the conflict betweenRussia andUkraine and exposure toChina's real estate market. 83
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Non-operating change in insurance liabilities and related derivatives, net of offsets was unfavorable$1.1 billion primarily due to the unfavorable change in net FIA derivatives resulting from the unfavorable performance of the equity indices to which our FIA policies are linked, primarily the S&P 500 index, which experienced a decrease of 19.4% in 2022, compared to an increase of 26.9% in 2021, as well as unfavorable economics impacting the policyholder projected benefits, partially offset by the favorable change in discount rates and the favorable change in unlocking. FIA embedded derivative unlocking, net of DAC, DSI, rider reserve and noncontrolling interest offsets, was favorable$37 million in 2022 primarily due to changes to projected interest crediting, partially offset by the impact of higher rates on future account values, compared to a favorable change of$32 million in 2021 primarily due to higher lapse rates on recently issued business.
Year Ended
Spread Related Earnings
SRE increased by$1.3 billion , or 100%, to$2.5 billion in 2021 from$1.3 billion in 2020. The increase in SRE was driven by higher net investment earnings, partially offset by higher cost of funds and higher interest and other financing costs from more recent preferred share and senior debt issuances. Net investment earnings increased$1.8 billion primarily driven by favorable alternative investment performance,$27.3 billion of growth in our average net invested assets attributed to the strong growth in net flows as well as the Jackson reinsurance transaction and the early redemptions of two loans, partially offset by lower new money rates reflecting the prolonged low interest rate environment, lower floating rate investment income and a favorable 2020 non-recurring adjustment on derivative collateral. Cost of funds were$418 million higher primarily related to growth in the block of business, higher gross profits and the unfavorable change in unlocking of$97 million , partially offset by the favorable change in rider reserves and DAC amortization reflecting the more favorable change in actuarial experience and market impacts. Unlocking, net of noncontrolling interest, was unfavorable$91 million reflecting unfavorable lapse assumptions, partially offset by income rider experience, compared to favorable unlocking of$6 million in 2020 primarily driven by favorable income rider experience and mortality updates, largely offset by long-term net investment earned rate and lapse assumptions. Net Investment Spread Net investment spread increased 60 basis points to 1.94% in 2021 from 1.34% in 2020. Our net investment earned rate was 4.42% in 2021, an increase from 4.01% in 2020, primarily due to the favorable performance of our alternative investment portfolio, partially offset by the decline in the fixed and other net investment earned rate. The alternative net investment earned rate was 21.37% in 2021, an increase from 8.01% in 2020, primarily driven by higher returns on real estate funds, a higher Venerable return attributed to a valuation increase related to the announced reinsurance agreement withEquitable Financial Life Insurance Company , an increase in the market value of our equity position in Jackson and higher MidCap returns as a result of a valuation increase in 2021 relating to a capital raise priced at a premium compared to a decrease in valuation in 2020, partially offset by less favorable AmeriHome income as a result of the sale in April of 2021 and strong earnings in 2020. Additionally, the first half of the prior year experienced unfavorable performance of alternative investments attributed to the economic downturn from the spread of COVID-19. The fixed and other net investment earned rate was 3.51% in 2021, a decrease from 3.82% in 2020, primarily attributed to lower new money rates reflecting the prolonged low interest rate environment, lower floating rate investment income and a favorable 2020 non-recurring adjustment on derivative collateral, partially offset by the early redemptions of two loans in 2021. Cost of funds decreased by 19 basis points to 2.50% in 2021, from 2.69% in 2020, primarily driven by lower rates on recent funding agreement issuances and pension group annuity transactions, favorable deferred annuity rates due to favorable rate actions and lower option costs, a favorable change in rider reserves and DAC amortization attributed to the favorable change in actuarial experience and market impacts, partially offset by an increase in mix of the higher crediting rate institutional block, higher gross profits and unfavorable unlocking.
Adjustments to Net Income Available to AHL Common Shareholder
The increase in adjustments to net income available to AHL common shareholder compared to 2020 was primarily driven by the non-operating change in insurance liabilities and related derivatives, net of offsets and the change in investment related gains and losses, partially offset by higher non-operating expenses. Non-operating change in insurance liabilities and related derivatives, net of offsets was favorable$927 million primarily due to the favorable net FIA derivatives resulting from a favorable change in discount rates used in our embedded derivative calculations and a more favorable performance of the equity indices to which our FIA policies are linked. FIA embedded derivative unlocking, net of DAC, DSI, VOBA, rider reserve and noncontrolling interest offsets, was favorable$32 million in both 2021 and 2020. The 2021 unlocking was primarily driven by higher lapse rates on recently issued business, while the 2020 unlocking was primarily driven by lowering future option budgets. Investment related gains and losses, net of offsets, were favorable$291 million primarily driven by the favorable change in the fair value of our investment in Apollo of$639 million related to the increase in valuation price compared to 2020, realized gains on the sale of AFS securities, foreign exchange gains and a favorable change in the provision for credit losses, partially offset by the unfavorable change in fair value of reinsurance assets. The increase in realized gains on AFS securities was primarily due to an increase in sales of corporate securities and the redeployment of the Jackson reinsurance portfolio. The increase in foreign exchange gains reflects additional business denominated in foreign currencies. The favorable change in the provision for credit losses of$73 million (net of noncontrolling interests) was primarily due to the initial establishment of the allowance in the first quarter of 2020 as well as unfavorable impacts reflecting the economic downturn from the spread of COVID-19 in 2020. The change in fair value of reinsurance assets was unfavorable$1.4 billion primarily driven by the increase inUS Treasury rates in 2021 compared to a decrease in 2020. 84
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The increase in non-operating expenses was primarily due to the costs associated
with the merger with Apollo and a
Investment Portfolio
We had consolidated investments, including related parties and VIEs, of$212.1 billion and$212.5 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our investment strategy seeks to achieve sustainable risk-adjusted returns through the disciplined management of our investment portfolio against our long-duration liabilities, coupled with the diversification of risk. The investment strategies utilized by our investment manager focuses primarily on a buy and hold asset allocation strategy that may be adjusted periodically in response to changing market conditions and the nature of our liability profile. Substantially all of our investment portfolio is managed by Apollo, which provides a full suite of services for our investment portfolio, including direct investment management, asset allocation, mergers and acquisition asset diligence and certain operational support services, including investment compliance, tax, legal and risk management support. Our relationship with Apollo allows us to take advantage of our generally persistent liability profile by identifying investment opportunities with an emphasis on earning incremental yield by taking liquidity and complexity risk rather than assuming incremental credit risk. Apollo's investment team and credit portfolio managers utilize their deep experience to assist us in sourcing and underwriting complex asset classes. Apollo has selected a diverse array of primarily high-grade fixed income assets including corporate bonds, structured securities and commercial and residential real estate loans, among others. We also maintain holdings in floating rate and less rate-sensitive instruments, including CLOs, non-agency RMBS and various types of structured products. In addition to our fixed income portfolio, we opportunistically allocate approximately 5% - 6% of our portfolio to alternative investments where we primarily focus on fixed income-like, cash flow-based investments. Net investment income on the consolidated statements of income (loss) included management fees under our investment management arrangements with Apollo. For the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, we incurred management fees, inclusive of base and sub-allocation fees, of$775 million ,$592 million and$490 million , respectively. The total amounts we incurred, directly and indirectly, from Apollo and its affiliates were$1.1 billion ,$936 million , and$716 million , respectively, for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020. Such amounts include (1) fees associated with investment management agreements, which exclude sub-advisory fees paid to ISG for the benefit of third-party sub-advisors but include fees charged by Apollo to third-party cedants with respect to assets supporting obligations reinsured to us (such fees directly reduce the settlement payments that we receive from the third-party cedant and, as such, we, as beneficiaries of the services performed, indirectly pay such fees), (2) fees associated with fund investments (including those fund investments held byAAA ), which include management fees, carried interest (including unrealized but accrued carried interest fees) and other fees on Apollo-managed funds and our other alternative investments and (3) other fees resulting from shared services, advisory and other agreements with Apollo or its affiliates; net of fees incurred directly and indirectly attributable to ACRA, based upon the economic ownership of the noncontrolling interest in ACRA. Our net invested assets, which are those that directly back our net reserve liabilities as well as surplus assets, were$196.5 billion and$175.3 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Apollo's knowledge of our funding structure and regulatory requirements allows it to design customized strategies and investments for our portfolio. Apollo manages our asset portfolio within the limits and constraints set forth in our Investment and Credit Risk Policy. Under this policy, we set limits on investments in our portfolio by asset class, such as corporate bonds, emerging markets securities, municipal bonds, non-agency RMBS, CMBS, CLOs, commercial mortgage whole loans and mezzanine loans and investment funds. We also set credit risk limits for exposure to a single issuer that vary based on the issuer's ratings. Our strategic investments are also governed by our Strategic Investment Risk Policy which provides for special governance and risk management procedures for these transactions. In addition, our investment portfolio is constrained by its scenario-based capital ratio limit and its stressed liquidity limit. 85
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following table presents the carrying values of our total investments
including related parties and VIEs:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Carrying Percent of Total Carrying Value Percent of Total (In millions, except percentages) Value AFS securities, at fair value$ 102,404 48.3 % $ 100,159 47.1 % Trading securities, at fair value 1,595 0.8 % 2,056 1.0 % Equity securities 1,487 0.7 % 1,170 0.5 % Mortgage loans 27,454 12.9 % 20,748 9.8 % Investment funds 79 - % 1,178 0.6 % Policy loans 347 0.2 % 312 0.1 % Funds withheld at interest 32,880 15.5 % 43,907 20.7 % Derivative assets 3,309 1.6 % 4,387 2.1 % Short-term investments 2,160 1.0 % 139 0.1 % Other investments 773 0.4 % 1,473 0.7 % Total investments 172,488 81.4 % 175,529 82.7 % Investments in related parties AFS securities, at fair value 9,821 4.6 % 10,402 4.9 % Trading securities, at fair value 878 0.4 % 1,781 0.8 % Equity securities, at fair value 279 0.1 % 284 0.1 % Mortgage loans 1,302 0.6 % 1,360 0.6 % Investment funds 1,569 0.7 % 7,391 3.5 % Funds withheld at interest 9,808 4.6 % 12,207 5.7 % Other investments 303 0.2 % 222 0.1 % Total related party investments 23,960 11.2 % 33,647 15.7 % Total investments including related parties 196,448 92.6 % 209,176 98.4 % Investments owned by consolidated VIEs Trading securities, at fair value 1,063 0.5 % - - % Mortgage loans 2,055 1.0 % 2,040 1.0 % Investment funds, at fair value 12,480 5.9 % 1,297 0.6 % Other investments, at fair value 101 - % - - % Total investments owned by consolidated VIEs 15,699 7.4 % 3,337 1.6 % Total investments including related parties and VIEs$ 212,147 100.0 % $ 212,513 100.0 % The decrease in our total investments, including related parties and VIEs, as ofDecember 31, 2022 of$366 million compared toDecember 31, 2021 was primarily driven by unrealized losses on AFS securities in the year endedDecember 31, 2022 of$18.2 billion , unrealized losses within our funds withheld portfolio, the distribution of our$2.1 billion investment in Apollo to AGM following the merger and a decrease in the change in fair value of mortgage loan assets and trading securities primarily due to an increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening in the current year. This was primarily offset by growth from gross organic inflows of$47.9 billion in excess of gross liability outflows of$23.0 billion , an increase in investments due to the consolidation of additional VIEs in conjunction with our merger with Apollo, the reinvestment of earnings, an increase in short-term investments related to the issuance of a reverse repurchase agreement and the deployment of proceeds from the issuances of$500 million of preferred stock and$400 million of debt.
Our investment portfolio consists largely of high quality fixed maturity
securities, loans and short-term investments, as well as additional
opportunistic holdings in investment funds and other instruments, including
equity holdings. Fixed maturity securities and loans include publicly issued
corporate bonds, government and other sovereign bonds, privately placed
corporate bonds and loans, mortgage loans, CMBS, RMBS, CLOs, and ABS.
86
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
While the substantial majority of our investment portfolio has been allocated to corporate bonds and structured credit products, a key component of our investment strategy is the opportunistic acquisition of investment funds with attractive risk and return profiles. Our investment fund portfolio consists of funds or similar equity structures that employ various strategies including equity, hybrid and yield funds. We have a strong preference for assets that have some or all of the following characteristics, among others: (1) investments that constitute a direct investment or an investment in a fund with a high degree of co-investment; (2) investments with credit- or debt-like characteristics (for example, a stipulated maturity and par value), or alternatively, investments with reduced volatility when compared to pure equity; or (3) investments that we believe have less downside risk. We hold derivatives for economic hedging purposes to reduce our exposure to the cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, equity market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign exchange risk. Our primary use of derivative instruments relates to providing the income needed to fund the annual indexed credits on our FIA products. We primarily use fixed indexed options to economically hedge indexed annuity products that guarantee the return of principal to the policyholder and credit interest based on a percentage of the gain in a specific market index. With respect to derivative positions, we transact with highly rated counterparties, and expect the counterparties to fulfill their obligations under the contracts. We generally use industry standard agreements and annexes with bilateral collateral provisions to further reduce counterparty credit exposure.
Related Party Investments
We hold investments in related party assets primarily comprised of AFS securities, trading securities, funds withheld at interest receivables, mortgage loans within our triple net lease investment and investment funds, which primarily include investments over which Apollo can exercise influence. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , these investments totaled$34.4 billion , or 13.9% of our total assets. Related party AFS and trading securities primarily consist of structured securities for which Apollo is the manager of the underlying securitization vehicle and securities issued by Apollo direct origination platforms including Wheels Donlen and MidCap. In each case, the underlying collateral, borrower or other credit party is generally unaffiliated with us. The funds withheld at interest related party amounts are comprised of the Venerable reinsurance portfolios, which are considered related party even though a significant majority of the underlying assets within the investment portfolios do not have a related party affiliation. Related party investment funds include strategic investments in direct origination platforms and insurance companies and investments in Apollo managed funds. A summary of our related party investments reflecting the nature of the affiliation is as follows: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Carrying Percent of Total Percent of Total (In millions, except percentages) Value Assets Carrying Value Assets Venerable funds withheld reinsurance portfolio$ 9,808 4.0 % $ 12,207 5.2 % Securitizations of unaffiliated assets where Apollo is manager 11,141 4.5 % 9,495 4.0 % Investments in Apollo funds 5,410 2.2 % 3,785 1.6 % Strategic investments in Apollo direct origination platforms 5,509 2.2 % 5,704 2.4 % Strategic investment in Apollo - - % 2,112 0.9 % Strategic investments in insurance companies 2,502 1.0 % 1,626 0.7 % Other - - % 17 - % Total related party investments$ 34,370 13.9 % $ 34,946 14.8 % As ofDecember 31, 2022 , a$9.8 billion funds withheld reinsurance asset with Venerable was included in our US GAAP related party assets. Venerable is a related party due to our minority equity investment in its holding company's parent,VA Capital . For US GAAP, each funds withheld and modified coinsurance reinsurance portfolio is treated as one asset rather than reporting the underlying investments in the portfolio. For our non-GAAP measure of net invested assets, we provide visibility into the underlying assets within these reinsurance portfolios. The below table looks through to the underlying assets within our reinsurance portfolios to determine the related party status. As ofDecember 31, 2022 ,$28.3 billion , or 14.4% of our total net invested assets were related party investments. Of these, approximately$14.8 billion , or 7.6% of our net invested assets were structured securities for which Apollo or an affiliated direct origination platform was the manager of the underlying securitization vehicle, but the underlying collateral, borrower or other credit party is generally unaffiliated with us. Related party investments in strategic affiliated companies or Apollo funds represented$13.4 billion , or 6.8% of our net invested assets. 87
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
A summary of our related party net invested assets reflecting the nature of the affiliation is as follows: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 20211 Net Invested Percent of Net Net Invested Percent of Net (In millions, except percentages) Asset Value Invested Assets Asset Value Invested Assets Securitizations of unaffiliated assets where Apollo is manager$ 14,847 7.6 %$ 13,736 7.8 % Investments in Apollo funds 5,521 2.8 % 3,802 2.2 % Strategic investments in Apollo direct origination platforms 5,509 2.8 % 6,074 3.5 % Strategic investment in Apollo - - % 2,112 1.2 % Strategic investments in insurance companies 2,391 1.2 % 1,626 0.9 % Other - - % 17 - % Total related party net invested assets$ 28,268 14.4 %$ 27,367 15.6 %
1 Prior year related party net invested asset values have been revised.
We invest in AFS securities and attempt to source investments that match our future cash flow needs. However, we may sell any of our investments in advance of maturity to timely satisfy our liabilities as they become due or in order to respond to a change in the credit profile or other characteristics of the particular investment. AFS securities are carried at fair value, less allowances for expected credit losses, on our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair value of our AFS securities, net of related DAC and DSI amortization and the change in rider reserves, are charged or credited to other comprehensive income, net of tax. All changes in the allowance for expected credit losses, whether due to passage of time, change in expected cash flows or change in fair value are recorded through the provision for credit losses within investment related gains (losses) on the consolidated statements of income (loss). The distribution of our AFS securities, including related parties, by type is as follows: Successor December 31, 2022 Allowance for Unrealized Percent of (In millions, except percentages) Amortized Cost Credit Losses Unrealized Gains Losses Fair Value Total AFS securities US government and agencies $ 3,333 $ - $ -$ (756) $ 2,577 2.3 % US state, municipal and political subdivisions 1,218 - - (291) 927 0.8 % Foreign governments 1,207 (27) 3 (276) 907 0.8 % Corporate 74,644 (61) 92 (13,774) 60,901 54.3 % CLO 17,722 (7) 115 (1,337) 16,493 14.7 % ABS 11,447 (29) 15 (906) 10,527 9.4 % CMBS 4,636 (5) 6 (479) 4,158 3.7 % RMBS 6,775 (329) 64 (596) 5,914 5.3 % Total AFS securities 120,982 (458) 295 (18,415) 102,404 91.3 % AFS securities - related parties Corporate 1,028 - 1 (47) 982 0.9 % CLO 3,346 (1) 10 (276) 3,079 2.7 % ABS 6,066 - 3 (309) 5,760 5.1 % Total AFS securities - related parties 10,440 (1) 14 (632) 9,821 8.7 % Total AFS securities including related parties$ 131,422 $ (459) $ 309$ (19,047) $ 112,225 100.0 % 88
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Predecessor December 31, 2021 Allowance for Unrealized Percent of
(In millions, except percentages) Amortized Cost Credit Losses
Unrealized Gains Losses Fair Value Total AFS securities US government and agencies $ 231 $ - $ 2$ (10) $ 223 0.2 % US state, municipal and political subdivisions 1,081 - 134 (2) 1,213 1.1 % Foreign governments 1,110 - 35 (17) 1,128 1.0 % Corporate 62,817 - 4,060 (651) 66,226 59.9 % CLO 13,793 - 44 (185) 13,652 12.4 % ABS 8,890 (17) 151 (35) 8,989 8.1 % CMBS 2,764 (3) 56 (59) 2,758 2.5 % RMBS 5,772 (103) 326 (25) 5,970 5.4 % Total AFS securities 96,458 (123) 4,808 (984) 100,159 90.6 % AFS securities - related parties Corporate 842 - 19 (2) 859 0.8 % CLO 2,573 - 5 (29) 2,549 2.3 % ABS 6,986 - 61 (53) 6,994 6.3 % Total AFS securities - related parties 10,401 - 85 (84) 10,402 9.4 % Total AFS securities including related parties$ 106,859 $ (123) $ 4,893$ (1,068) $ 110,561 100.0 % 89
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
We maintain a diversified AFS portfolio of corporate fixed maturity securities across industries and issuers, and a diversified portfolio of structured securities. The composition of our AFS securities, including related parties, is as follows: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Fair Value Percent of Total Corporate Industrial other1$ 18,923 16.9 % $ 23,882 21.6 % Financial 23,402 20.8 % 21,537 19.5 % Utilities 13,100 11.7 % 14,290 12.9 % Communication 3,097 2.8 % 3,492 3.2 % Transportation 3,361 3.0 % 3,884 3.5 % Total corporate 61,883 55.2 % 67,085 60.7 % Other government-related securities US state, municipal and political subdivisions 927 0.8 % 1,213 1.1 % Foreign governments 907 0.8 % 1,128 1.0 % US government and agencies 2,577 2.3 % 223 0.2 % Total non-structured securities 66,294 59.1 % 69,649 63.0 % Structured securities CLO 19,572 17.4 % 16,201 14.7 % ABS 16,287 14.5 % 15,983 14.4 % CMBS 4,158 3.7 % 2,758 2.5 % RMBS Agency 12 0.0 % 23 - % Non-agency 5,902 5.3 % 5,947 5.4 % Total structured securities 45,931 40.9 % 40,912 37.0 % Total AFS securities including related parties$ 112,225 100.0 % $ 110,561 100.0 %
1 Includes securities within various industry segments including capital goods, basic industry, consumer cyclical, consumer non-cyclical,
industrial and technology.
The fair value of our AFS securities, including related parties, was$112.2 billion and$110.6 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase was mainly driven by strong growth from organic inflows in excess of liability outflows, the reinvestment of earnings and the deployment of proceeds from the issuances of preferred stock and debt, mainly offset by unrealized losses on AFS securities of$18.2 billion attributed to an increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening. 90
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The Securities Valuation Office (SVO) of the NAIC is responsible for the credit quality assessment and valuation of securities owned by state regulated insurance companies. Insurance companies report ownership of securities to the SVO when such securities are eligible for filing on the relevant schedule of the NAIC Financial Statement. The SVO conducts credit analysis on these securities for the purpose of assigning an NAIC designation and/or unit price. Generally, the process for assigning an NAIC designation varies based upon whether a security is considered "filing exempt" (General Designation Process). Subject to certain exceptions, a security is typically considered "filing exempt" if it has been rated by aNationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO). For securities that are not "filing exempt," insurance companies assign temporary designations based upon a subjective evaluation of credit quality. The insurance company generally must then submit the securities to the SVO within 120 days of acquisition to receive an NAIC designation. For securities considered "filing exempt," the SVO utilizes the NRSRO rating and assigns an NAIC designation based upon the following system: NAIC designation NRSRO equivalent rating 1 A-G AAA/AA/A 2 A-C BBB 3 A-C BB 4 A-C B 5 A-C CCC 6 CC and lower An important exception to the General Designation Process occurs in the case of certain loan backed and structured securities ( LBaSS). The NRSRO ratings methodology is focused on the likelihood of recovery of all contractual payments, including principal at par, regardless of an investor's carrying value. In effect, the NRSRO rating assumes that the holder is the original purchaser at par. In contrast, the SVO's LBaSS methodology is focused on determining the risk associated with the recovery of the amortized cost of each security. Because the NAIC's methodology explicitly considers amortized cost and the likelihood of recovery of such amount, we view the NAIC's methodology as the most appropriate means of evaluating the credit quality of our fixed maturity portfolio since a large portion of our holdings were purchased and are carried at significant discounts to par. The SVO has developed a designation process and provides instruction on modeled LBaSS. For modeled LBaSS, the process is specific to the non-agency RMBS and CMBS asset classes. To establish ratings at the individual security level, the SVO obtains loan-level analysis of each RMBS and CMBS using a selected vendor's proprietary financial model. The SVO ensures that the vendor has extensive internal quality-control processes in place and the SVO conducts its own quality-control checks of the selected vendor's valuation process. The SVO has retained the services of Blackrock, Inc. (Blackrock) to model non-agency RMBS and CMBS owned by US insurers for all years presented herein. Blackrock provides five prices (breakpoints), based on each US insurer's statutory book value price, to utilize in determining the NAIC designation for each modeled LBaSS. The NAIC designation determines the associated level of risk-based capital that an insurer is required to hold for all securities owned by the insurer. In general, under the modeled LBaSS process, the larger the discount to par value at the time of determination, the higher the NAIC designation the LBaSS will have. A summary of our AFS securities, including related parties, by NAIC designation is as follows: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Amortized Cost Fair Value Percent of Amortized Cost Fair Value Percent of (In millions, except percentages) Total Total NAIC designation 1 A-G$ 67,739 $ 58,470 52.1 %$ 49,639 $ 51,514 46.6 % 2 A-C 58,139 49,067 43.7 % 51,587 53,398 48.3 % Total investment grade 125,878 107,537 95.8 % 101,226 104,912 94.9 % 3 A-C 3,813 3,302 3.0 % 4,199 4,247 3.8 % 4 A-C 1,103 925 0.8 % 1,113 1,100 1.0 % 5 A-C 237 190 0.2 % 94 88 0.1 % 6 391 271 0.2 % 227 214 0.2 % Total below investment grade 5,544 4,688 4.2 % 5,633 5,649 5.1 % Total AFS securities including related parties$ 131,422 $ 112,225 100.0 %$ 106,859 $ 110,561 100.0 % A significant majority of our AFS portfolio, 95.8% and 94.9% as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, was invested in assets considered investment grade with an NAIC designation of 1 or 2. 91
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
A summary of our AFS securities, including related parties, by NRSRO ratings is set forth below: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Fair Value Percent of Total NRSRO rating agency designation AAA/AA/A$ 51,926 46.3 % $ 44,501 40.2 % BBB 44,783 39.9 % 47,636 43.1 % Non-rated1 8,985 8.0 % 10,754 9.7 % Total investment grade 105,694 94.2 % 102,891 93.0 % BB 3,176 2.8 % 3,713 3.4 % B 749 0.7 % 946 0.9 % CCC 1,055 0.9 % 1,356 1.2 % CC and lower 584 0.5 % 755 0.7 % Non-rated1 967 0.9 % 900 0.8 % Total below investment grade 6,531 5.8 % 7,670 7.0 % Total AFS securities including related parties$ 112,225 100.0 % $ 110,561 100.0 %
1 Securities denoted as non-rated by the NRSRO were classified as investment or non-investment grade according to the security's respective
NAIC designation. With respect to modeled LBaSS, the NAIC designation methodology differs in significant respects from the NRSRO rating
methodology.
Consistent with the NAIC Process and Procedures Manual, an NRSRO rating was assigned based on the following criteria: (a) the equivalent S&P rating when the security is rated by one NRSRO; (b) the equivalent S&P rating of the lowest NRSRO when the security is rated by two NRSROs; and (c) the equivalent S&P rating of the second lowest NRSRO when the security is rated by three or more NRSROs. If the lowest two NRSRO ratings are equal, then such rating will be the assigned rating. NRSRO ratings available for the periods presented were S&P, Fitch, Moody's Investor Service, DBRS, andKroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc. The portion of our AFS portfolio that was considered below investment grade based on NRSRO ratings was 5.8% and 7.0% as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The primary driver of the difference in the percentage of securities considered below investment grade by NRSRO as compared to the securities considered below investment grade by the NAIC is the difference in methodologies between the NRSRO and NAIC for RMBS due to investments acquired and/or carried at a discount to par value, as discussed above. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, non-rated securities were comprised 74% and 73%, respectively, of corporate private placement securities for which we have not sought individual ratings from an NRSRO, and 16% and 17%, respectively, of RMBS, many of which were acquired at a significant discount to par. We rely on internal analysis and designations assigned by the NAIC to evaluate the credit risk of our portfolio. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, 90% and 92%, respectively, of the non-rated securities were designated NAIC 1 or 2. Asset-backed Securities - We invest in ABS which are securitized by pools of assets such as consumer loans, automobile loans, student loans, insurance-linked securities, operating cash flows of corporations and cash flows from various types of business equipment. Our ABS holdings were$16.3 billion and$16.0 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. 92
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
A summary of our AFS ABS portfolio, including related parties, by NAIC
designations and NRSRO quality ratings is as follows:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Fair Value Percent of Total NAIC designation 1 A-G$ 9,681 59.4 % $ 8,089 50.6 % 2 A-C 5,912 36.3 % 7,047 44.1 % Total investment grade 15,593 95.7 % 15,136 94.7 % 3 A-C 505 3.1 % 643 4.0 % 4 A-C 172 1.1 % 200 1.3 % 5 A-C 13 0.1 % 4 - % 6 4 - % - - % Total below investment grade 694 4.3 % 847 5.3 % Total AFS ABS including related parties$ 16,287 100.0 % $ 15,983 100.0 % NRSRO rating agency designation AAA/AA/A$ 9,620 59.1 % $ 7,892 49.4 % BBB 5,901 36.2 % 6,975 43.5 % Non-rated 73 0.4 % 232 1.5 % Total investment grade 15,594 95.7 % 15,099 94.4 % BB 505 3.1 % 680 4.3 % B 172 1.1 % 200 1.3 % CCC 13 0.1 % 4 - % CC and lower 3 - % - - % Non-rated - - % - - % Total below investment grade 693 4.3 % 884 5.6 % Total AFS ABS including related parties$ 16,287 100.0 % $ 15,983 100.0 % As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, a substantial majority of our AFS ABS portfolio, 95.7% and 94.7%, respectively, was invested in assets considered to be investment grade based upon application of the NAIC's methodology while 95.7% and 94.4%, respectively, of securities were considered investment grade based on NRSRO ratings. 93
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Collateralized Loan Obligations - We also invest in CLOs which pay principal and interest from cash flows received from underlying corporate loans. These holdings were$19.6 billion and$16.2 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
A summary of our AFS CLO portfolio, including related parties, by NAIC
designations and NRSRO quality ratings is as follows:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Fair Value Percent of Total NAIC designation 1 A-G$ 12,483 63.8 % $ 9,957 61.5 % 2 A-C 6,955 35.5 % 6,096 37.6 % Total investment grade 19,438 99.3 % 16,053 99.1 % 3 A-C 116 0.6 % 124 0.8 % 4 A-C 18 0.1 % 24 0.1 % 5 A-C - - % - - % 6 - - % - - % Total below investment grade 134 0.7 % 148 0.9 % Total AFS CLO including related parties$ 19,572 100.0 % $ 16,201 100.0 % NRSRO rating agency designation AAA/AA/A$ 12,483 63.8 % $ 9,943 61.4 % BBB 6,955 35.5 % 6,101 37.6 % Non-rated - - % - - % Total investment grade 19,438 99.3 % 16,044 99.0 % BB 116 0.6 % 130 0.8 % B 18 0.1 % 27 0.2 % CCC - - % - - % CC and lower - - % - - % Non-rated - - % - - % Total below investment grade 134 0.7 % 157 1.0 % Total AFS CLO including related parties$ 19,572 100.0 % $ 16,201 100.0 % As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, 99.3% and 99.1%, respectively, of our AFS CLO portfolio was invested in assets considered to be investment grade based upon application of the NAIC's methodology. The increase in our CLO portfolio was mainly driven by the deployment of strong organic inflows in the current year, partially offset by unrealized losses attributed to an increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening.Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities - A portion of our AFS portfolio is invested in CMBS which are constructed from pools of commercial mortgages. These holdings were$4.2 billion and$2.8 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, our CMBS portfolio included$3.8 billion (92% of the total) and$2.0 billion (74% of the total), respectively, of securities that are considered investment grade based on NAIC designations, while$3.5 billion (83% of the total) and$2.1 billion (75% of the total), respectively, of securities were considered investment grade based on NRSRO ratings. 94
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Residential Mortgage-backed Securities - A portion of our AFS portfolio is invested in RMBS, which are securities constructed from pools of residential mortgages. These holdings were$5.9 billion and$6.0 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. A summary of our AFS RMBS portfolio by NAIC designations and NRSRO quality ratings is as follows: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Fair Value Percent of Total NAIC designation 1 A-G$ 5,069 85.7 % $ 5,097 85.4 % 2 A-C 286 4.8 % 331 5.5 % Total investment grade 5,355 90.5 % 5,428 90.9 % 3 A-C 304 5.2 % 327 5.5 % 4 A-C 185 3.1 % 172 2.9 % 5 A-C 67 1.1 % 29 0.5 % 6 3 0.1 % 14 0.2 % Total below investment grade 559 9.5 % 542 9.1 % Total AFS RMBS$ 5,914 100.0 % $ 5,970 100.0 % NRSRO rating agency designation AAA/AA/A$ 1,904 32.2 % $ 1,110 18.6 % BBB 679 11.5 % 522 8.7 % Non-rated1 1,301 22.0 % 1,648 27.6 % Total investment grade 3,884 65.7 % 3,280 54.9 % BB 97 1.6 % 184 3.1 % B 112 1.9 % 193 3.2 % CCC 960 16.2 % 1,281 21.5 % CC and lower 542 9.2 % 733 12.3 % Non-rated1 319 5.4 % 299 5.0 % Total below investment grade 2,030 34.3 % 2,690 45.1 % Total AFS RMBS$ 5,914 100.0 % $ 5,970 100.0 %
1 Securities denoted as non-rated by the NRSRO were classified as investment or non-investment grade according to the security's
respective NAIC designations. The NAIC designation methodology differs in significant respects from the NRSRO rating methodology.
A significant majority of our RMBS portfolio, 90.5% and 90.9% as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, was invested in assets considered to be investment grade based upon an application of the NAIC designations. The NAIC's methodology with respect to RMBS gives explicit effect to the amortized cost at which an insurance company carries each such investment. Because we invested in RMBS after the stresses related to US housing had caused significant downward pressure on prices of RMBS, we carry most of our investments in RMBS at significant discounts to par value, which results in an investment grade NAIC designation. In contrast, our understanding is that in setting ratings, NRSROs focus on the likelihood of recovering all contractual payments including principal at par value. As a result of a fundamental difference in approach, NRSRO characterized 65.7% and 54.9% of our RMBS portfolio as investment grade as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Unrealized Losses
Our investments in AFS securities, including related parties, are reported at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income. Certain of our AFS securities, including related parties, have experienced declines in fair value that we consider temporary in nature. These investments are held to support our product liabilities, and we currently have the intent and ability to hold these securities until recovery of the amortized cost basis prior to sale or maturity. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , our AFS securities, including related parties, had a fair value of$112.2 billion , which was 14.6% below amortized cost of$131.4 billion . As ofDecember 31, 2021 , our AFS securities, including related parties, had a fair value of$110.6 billion , which was 3.5% above amortized cost of$106.9 billion . Our fair value of AFS securities as ofDecember 31, 2022 was below amortized cost, as the investment portfolio was marked to fair value onJanuary 1, 2022 in conjunction with purchase accounting, with subsequent losses driven by the increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening experienced in the current year. 95
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following tables reflect the unrealized losses on the AFS portfolio,
including related parties, for which an allowance for credit losses has not been
recorded, by NAIC designations:
Successor December 31, 2022 Amortized Cost of Gross Fair Value of AFS Fair Value to Fair Value of Gross Unrealized AFS Securities Unrealized Securities with Amortized Cost Total AFS Losses to Total (In millions, except with Unrealized Losses Unrealized Loss Ratio Securities AFS Fair Value percentages) Loss NAIC designation 1 A-G$ 58,030 $ (8,959) $ 49,071 84.6 %$ 58,470 (15.3) % 2 A-C 54,616 (9,035) 45,581 83.5 % 49,067 (18.4) % Total investment grade 112,646 (17,994) 94,652 84.0 % 107,537 (16.7) % 3 A-C 3,222 (455) 2,767 85.9 % 3,302 (13.8) % 4 A-C 742 (101) 641 86.4 % 925 (10.9) % 5 A-C 134 (25) 109 81.3 % 190 (13.2) % 6 180 (18) 162 90.0 % 271 (6.6) % Total below investment grade 4,278 (599) 3,679 86.0 % 4,688 (12.8) % Total$ 116,924 $ (18,593) $ 98,331 84.1 %$ 112,225 (16.6) % Predecessor December 31, 2021 Amortized Cost of Gross Unrealized Fair Value of AFS Fair Value to Fair Value of Gross Unrealized (In millions, except AFS Securities with Losses Securities with Amortized Cost Total AFS Losses to Total percentages) Unrealized Loss Unrealized Loss Ratio Securities AFS Fair Value NAIC designation 1 A-G $ 19,369$ (338) $ 19,031 98.3 %$ 51,514 (0.7) % 2 A-C 20,849 (475) 20,374 97.7 % 53,398 (0.9) % Total investment grade 40,218 (813) 39,405 98.0 % 104,912 (0.8) % 3 A-C 1,494 (82) 1,412 94.5 % 4,247 (1.9) % 4 A-C 410 (26) 384 93.7 % 1,100 (2.4) % 5 A-C 41 (6) 35 85.4 % 88 (6.8) % 6 61 (14) 47 77.0 % 214 (6.5) % Total below investment grade 2,006 (128) 1,878 93.6 % 5,649 (2.3) % Total $ 42,224$ (941) $ 41,283 97.8 %$ 110,561 (0.9) % The gross unrealized losses on AFS securities, including related parties, were$18.6 billion and$941 million as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in unrealized losses on AFS securities was driven by the increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening experienced in the current year.
Provision for Credit Losses
For our credit loss accounting policies and the assumptions used in the
allowances, see Note 1 - Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 3 - Investments to the consolidated financial
statements.
As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, we held an allowance for credit losses on AFS securities of$459 million and$123 million , respectively. As a result of purchase accounting, we removed our existing CECL allowance and established a new allowance of$311 million related to purchased credit deteriorated (PCD) securities due to having marked our assets to fair value at theJanuary 1, 2022 merger date. During the year endedDecember 31, 2022 , we recorded an increase in provision for credit losses on AFS securities of$148 million , of which$171 million had an income statement impact and$(23) million were related to PCD securities and other changes. The increase in the allowance for credit losses on AFS securities was mainly due to unfavorable economics, including impacts from the conflict betweenRussia andUkraine and exposure toChina's real estate market. During the year endedDecember 31, 2021 , we recorded an increase in provision for credit losses on AFS securities of$19 million , of which$9 million had an income statement impact and$10 million were related to PCD securities and other changes. The intent-to-sell impairments for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 were$51 million and$4 million , respectively. 96
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
International Exposure A portion of our AFS securities are invested in securities with international exposure. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, 36% and 35%, respectively, of the carrying value of our AFS securities, including related parties, was comprised of securities of issuers based outside ofthe United States and debt securities of foreign governments. These securities are either denominated in US dollars or do not expose us to significant foreign currency risk as a result of foreign currency swap arrangements.
The following table presents our international exposure in our AFS portfolio,
including related parties, by country or region of issuance:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Amortized Fair Value Percent of Amortized Fair Value Percent of (In millions, except percentages) Cost Total Cost Total Country Ireland$ 6,023 $ 5,326 13.3 %$ 5,172 $ 5,052 13.0 % Other Europe 11,062 8,899 22.1 % 8,864 9,218 23.7 % Total Europe 17,085 14,225 35.4 % 14,036 14,270 36.7 % Non-US North America 20,599 18,936 47.1 % 17,218 17,387 44.8 % Australia & New Zealand 2,933 2,494 6.2 % 2,441 2,557 6.6 % Central & South America 1,704 1,443 3.6 % 1,347 1,346 3.5 % Africa & Middle East 2,253 1,900 4.7 % 1,966 2,019 5.2 % Asia/Pacific 1,535 1,192 3.0 % 1,256 1,262 3.2 % Total$ 46,109 $ 40,190 100.0 %$ 38,264 $ 38,841 100.0 % Approximately 97.3% and 96.7% of these securities are investment grade by NAIC designation as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , 11% of our AFS securities, including related parties, were invested in CLOs ofCayman Islands issuers (included inNon-US North America ) for which underlying investments are largely loans to US issuers, and 25% were invested in securities of other non-US issuers. The majority of our investments inIreland are comprised of Euro denominated CLOs, for which the SPV is domiciled inIreland , but the underlying leveraged loans involve borrowers from the broader European region.
As of
including related parties. Our investment managers analyze each holding for
credit risk by economic and other factors of each country and industry.
Trading Securities
Trading securities, including related parties and VIEs, were$3.5 billion and$3.8 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Trading securities are primarily comprised of AmerUs Closed Block securities for which we have elected the fair value option valuation, CLO and ABS equity tranche securities, structured securities with embedded derivatives, investments which support various reinsurance arrangements and MidCap profit participating notes prior to the contribution of the notes toAAA during the second quarter of 2022. The decrease in trading securities was primarily driven by the contribution of our MidCap profit participating notes and PK AirFinance subordinated notes toAAA during the second quarter of 2022 as well as losses caused by an increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening, partially offset by the consolidation of additional VIEs. 97
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Mortgage Loans
The following is a summary of our mortgage loan portfolio by collateral type,
including assets held by related parties and consolidated VIEs:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Net Carrying (In millions, except percentages) Fair Value Percent of Total Value Percent of Total Property type Office building$ 4,651 15.1 %$ 4,870 20.1 % Retail 1,454 4.7 % 2,022 8.4 % Apartment 6,692 21.7 % 4,626 19.2 % Hotels 1,855 6.1 % 1,727 7.2 % Industrial 2,047 6.6 % 2,336 9.7 % Other commercial1 3,409 11.1 % 1,316 5.4 % Total net commercial mortgage loans 20,108 65.3 % 16,897 70.0 % Residential loans 10,703 34.7 % 7,251 30.0 % Total mortgage loans, including related parties and VIEs$ 30,811 100.0 %$ 24,148 100.0 %
1 Other commercial loans include investments in nursing homes, other healthcare institutions, parking garages, storage facilities and
other commercial properties.
We invest a portion of our investment portfolio in mortgage loans, which are generally comprised of high quality commercial first lien and mezzanine real estate loans. Our mortgage loan holdings, including related parties and consolidated VIEs, were$30.8 billion and$24.1 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. This included$1.7 billion and$1.9 billion of mezzanine mortgage loans as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. We have acquired mortgage loans through acquisitions and reinsurance arrangements, as well as through an active program to invest in new mortgage loans. We invest in CMLs on income producing properties including hotels, apartments, retail and office buildings, and other commercial and industrial properties. Our RML portfolio primarily consists of first lien RMLs collateralized by properties located in the US. Loan-to-value ratios at the time of loan approval are generally 75% or less. In connection with the merger, we elected the fair value option on our mortgage loan portfolio; therefore, we no longer have an allowance for credit losses for commercial and residential loans. Interest income is accrued on the principal amount of the loan based on the loan's contractual interest rate. Interest income and prepayment fees are reported in net investment income on the consolidated statements of income (loss). Changes in the fair value of the mortgage loan portfolio are reported in investment related gains (losses) on the consolidated statements of income (loss). It is our policy to cease to accrue interest on loans that are over 90 days delinquent. For loans less than 90 days delinquent, interest is accrued unless it is determined that the accrued interest is not collectible. If a loan becomes over 90 days delinquent, it is our general policy to initiate foreclosure proceedings unless a workout arrangement to bring the loan current is in place. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, we had$474 million and$990 million , respectively, of mortgage loans that were 90 days past due, of which$99 million and$54 million , respectively, were in the process of foreclosure. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021,$221 million and$856 million of mortgage loans that were 90 days past due were related toGovernment National Mortgage Association (GNMA) early buyouts that are fully or partially guaranteed and are accruing interest. Investment Funds Our investment funds investment strategy primarily focuses on funds with core holdings of strategic origination and insurance platforms and equity, hybrid, yield and other funds. Our investment funds generally meet the definition of a VIE, and in certain cases these investment funds are consolidated in our financial statements because we meet the criteria of the primary beneficiary. 98
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The following table illustrates our investment funds, including related parties and consolidated VIEs: Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 20211 Carrying (In millions, except percentages) Value Percent of Total Carrying Value Percent of Total Investment funds Equity$ 46 0.3 % $ 410 4.2 % Hybrid 32 0.2 % 667 6.7 % Yield - - % 99 1.0 % Other 1 - % 2 - % Total investment funds 79 0.5 % 1,178 11.9 % Investment funds - related parties Strategic origination platforms 34 0.2 % 1,338 13.6 % Strategic insurance platforms 1,259 8.9 % 1,440 14.6 % Apollo and other fund investments Equity 246 1.8 % 1,199 12.1 % Hybrid - - % 952 9.6 % Yield 5 - % 305 3.1 % Other2 25 0.2 % 2,157 21.9 % Total investment funds - related parties 1,569 11.1 % 7,391 74.9 % Investment funds owned by consolidated VIEs Strategic origination platforms 4,829 34.2 % 264 2.7 % Strategic insurance platforms 529 3.8 % - - % Apollo and other fund investments Equity 2,640 18.7 % 229 2.3 % Hybrid 3,112 22.0 % 56 0.6 % Yield 1,044 7.4 % 748 7.6 % Other 326 2.3 % - - % Total investment funds owned by consolidated VIEs 12,480 88.4 % 1,297 13.2 % Total investment funds, including related parties and VIEs$ 14,128 100.0 % $ 9,866 100.0 % Note: During 2022, we contributed the majority of our investment funds toAAA , which we consolidate as a VIE. See Note 14 - Related Parties for further information onAAA . 1 Certain reclassifications have been made to conform with current year presentation. 2 Includes our investment in Apollo held as ofDecember 31, 2021 . Overall, the total investment funds, including related parties and consolidated VIEs, were$14.1 billion and$9.9 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 3 - Investments to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding how we account for our investment funds. Our investment fund portfolio is subject to a number of market-related risks including interest rate risk and equity market risk. Interest rate risk represents the potential for changes in the investment fund's net asset values resulting from changes in the general level of interest rates. Equity market risk represents potential for changes in the investment fund's net asset values resulting from changes in equity markets or from other external factors which influence equity markets. These risks expose us to potential volatility in our earnings period-over-period. We actively monitor our exposure to these risks. The increase in investment funds, including related parties and consolidated VIEs, was primarily driven by the consolidation of additional VIEs in conjunction with our merger with Apollo, the deployment of organic inflows, contributions from third-party investors intoAAA , a consolidated VIE, and the increase in valuation of several funds, partially offset by the distribution of our$2.1 billion investment in Apollo to AGM following the merger.
Funds Withheld at Interest
Funds withheld at interest represent a receivable for amounts contractually withheld by ceding companies in accordance with modco and funds withheld reinsurance agreements in which we act as the reinsurer. Generally, assets equal to statutory reserves are withheld and legally owned by the ceding company. We hold funds withheld at interest receivables, including those held with VIAC,Lincoln and Jackson. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , the majority of the ceding companies holding the assets pursuant to such reinsurance agreements had a financial strength rating of A or better (based on anA.M. Best scale). 99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The funds withheld at interest is comprised of the host contract and an embedded derivative. We are subject to the investment performance on the withheld assets with the total return directly impacting the host contract and the embedded derivative. Interest accrues at a risk-free rate on the host receivable and is recorded as net investment income in the consolidated statements of income (loss). The embedded derivative in our reinsurance agreements is similar to a total return swap on the income generated by the underlying assets held by the ceding companies. The change in the embedded derivative is recorded in investment related gains (losses). Although we do not legally own the underlying investments in the funds withheld at interest, in each instance the ceding company has hired Apollo to manage the withheld assets in accordance with our investment guidelines.
The following summarizes the underlying investment composition of the funds
withheld at interest, including related parties:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Carrying (In millions, except percentages) Value Percent of Total Carrying Value Percent of Total Fixed maturity securities US government and agencies $ - - % $ 50 0.1 % US state, municipal and political subdivisions 263 0.6 % 338 0.6 % Foreign governments 401 1.0 % 553 1.0 % Corporate 19,944 46.7 % 26,143 46.5 % CLO 3,875 9.1 % 5,322 9.5 % ABS 5,977 14.0 % 7,951 14.2 % CMBS 1,122 2.6 % 1,661 3.0 % RMBS 1,138 2.7 % 1,586 2.8 % Equity securities 373 0.9 % 243 0.4 % Mortgage loans 8,025 18.8 % 9,437 16.8 % Investment funds 1,126 2.6 % 1,807 3.2 % Derivative assets 141 0.3 % 208 0.4 % Short-term investments 184 0.4 % 54 0.1 % Cash and cash equivalents 557 1.3 % 1,049 1.9 % Other assets and liabilities (438) (1.0) % (288) (0.5) % Total funds withheld at interest including related parties$ 42,688 100.0 % $ 56,114 100.0 % As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, we held$42.7 billion and$56.1 billion , respectively, of funds withheld at interest receivables, including related parties. Approximately 94.3% and 93.5% of the fixed maturity securities within the funds withheld at interest are investment grade by NAIC designation as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in funds withheld at interest, including related parties, was primarily driven by run-off of the underlying blocks of business and unrealized losses during the year endedDecember 31, 2022 attributed to an increase inUS Treasury rates and credit spread widening.
Derivative Instruments
We hold derivative instruments for economic hedging purposes to reduce our exposure to cash flow variability of assets and liabilities, equity market risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and foreign exchange risk. The types of derivatives we may use include interest rate swaps, foreign currency swaps and forward contracts, total return swaps, credit default swaps, variance swaps, futures and equity options.
A discussion regarding our derivative instruments and how such instruments are
used to manage risk is included in Note 4 - Derivative Instruments to the
consolidated financial statements.
As part of our risk management strategies, management continually evaluates our
derivative instrument holdings and the effectiveness of such holdings in
addressing risks identified in our operations.
100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Net Invested Assets
The following summarizes our net invested assets:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Net Invested Percent of Total Net Invested Percent of Total (In millions, except percentages) Asset Value1 Asset Value1 Corporate$ 80,800 41.1 %$ 75,163 42.9 % CLO 19,881 10.1 % 17,892 10.2 % Credit 100,681 51.2 % 93,055 53.1 % CML 23,750 12.1 % 21,438 12.2 % RML 11,147 5.7 % 7,116 4.1 % RMBS 7,363 3.7 % 6,969 4.0 % CMBS 4,495 2.3 % 3,440 2.0 % Real estate 46,755 23.8 % 38,963 22.3 % ABS 20,680 10.5 % 20,376 11.6 % Alternative investments 12,079 6.1 % 9,873 5.6 % State, municipal, political subdivisions and foreign government 2,715 1.4 % 2,505 1.4 % Equity securities 1,737 0.9 % 754 0.4 % Short-term investments 1,930 1.0 % 111 0.1 % US government and agencies 2,691 1.4 % 212 0.1 % Other investments 41,832 21.3 % 33,831 19.2 % Cash and equivalents2 5,481 2.8 % 6,116 3.5 % Policy loans and other2 1,702 0.9 % 1,266 0.7 % Net invested assets excluding investment in Apollo 196,451 100.0 % 173,231 98.8 % Investment in Apollo - - % 2,112 1.2 % Net invested assets$ 196,451 100.0 %$ 175,343 100.0 %
1 See
2 Prior period has been updated to reflect a reclassification between line items for comparability.
Our net invested assets were$196.5 billion and$175.3 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , corporate securities included$24.9 billion of private placements, which represented 12.7% of our net invested assets. The increase in net invested assets as ofDecember 31, 2022 from 2021 was primarily driven by growth from net organic inflows of$39.2 billion in excess of net liability outflows of$23.7 billion , purchase accounting adjustments resulting in an increase in book value as our investment portfolio was marked up to fair value, reinvestment of earnings, an increase in short-term investments related to the issuance of a reverse repurchase agreement, an increase in valuation of several alternative investments and the deployment of proceeds from the issuances of preferred stock and debt, partially offset by the distribution of our$2.1 billion investment in Apollo to AGM following the merger. In managing our business, we utilize net invested assets as presented in the above table. Net invested assets do not correspond to total investments, including related parties, on our consolidated balance sheets, as discussed previously in Key Operating and Non-GAAP Measures. Net invested assets represent the investments that directly back our net reserve liabilities and surplus assets. We believe this view of our portfolio provides a view of the assets for which we have economic exposure. We adjust the presentation for funds withheld and modco transactions to include or exclude the underlying investments based upon the contractual transfer of economic exposure to such underlying investments. We also adjust for VIEs to show the net investment in the funds, which are included in the alternative investments line above as well as adjusting for the allowance for credit losses. Net invested assets includes our proportionate share of ACRA investments, based on our economic ownership, but excludes the proportionate share of investments associated with the noncontrolling interest. Net invested assets is utilized by management to evaluate our investment portfolio. Net invested assets is used in the computation of net investment earned rate, which allows us to analyze the profitability of our investment portfolio. Net invested assets is also used in our risk management processes for asset purchases, product design and underwriting, stress scenarios, liquidity, and ALM. 101
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Net Alternative Investments
The following summarizes our net alternative investments:
Successor Predecessor December 31, 2022 December 31, 20211 Net Invested Net Invested (In millions, except percentages) Asset Value Percent of Total Asset Value Percent of Total Strategic origination platforms Wheels Donlen$ 662 5.5 % $ 590 6.0 % Redding Ridge 624 5.2 % 217 2.2 % NNN Lease 579 4.8 % 637 6.5 % MidCap 604 5.0 % 666 6.7 % Foundation Home Loans 302 2.5 % - - % PK AirFinance 251 2.1 % 316 3.2 % Aqua Finance 267 2.2 % - - % Other 308 2.5 % 99 1.0 % Total strategic origination platforms 3,597 29.8 % 2,525 25.6 % Strategic retirement services platforms Athora 1,012 8.4 % 743 7.5 % Catalina 417 3.4 % 442 4.6 % FWD 400 3.3 % 400 4.1 % Challenger 294 2.4 % 232 2.3 % Venerable 241 2.0 % 219 2.2 % Other 20 0.2 % 133 1.3 % Total strategic retirement services platforms 2,384 19.7 % 2,169 22.0 % Apollo and other fund investments Equity Real estate 1,212 10.0 % 1,105 11.2 % Traditional private equity 947 7.8 % 689 7.0 % Other 189 1.6 % 309 3.1 % Total equity 2,348 19.4 % 2,103 21.3 % Hybrid Real estate 1,289 10.7 % 809 8.2 % Other 1,315 10.9 % 1,282 13.0 % Total hybrid 2,604 21.6 % 2,091 21.2 % Yield 885 7.3 % 773 7.8 % Total Apollo and other fund investments 5,837 48.3 % 4,967 50.3 % Other 261 2.2 % 212 2.1 % Net alternative investments$ 12,079 100.0 %$ 9,873 100.0 %
1 Certain reclassifications have been made to conform with current year presentation.
Net alternative investments were$12.1 billion and$9.9 billion as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, representing 6.1% and 5.6% of our net invested assets portfolio as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase in net alternative investments was primarily driven by deployment into alternative investments, including Foundation Home Loans and Aqua Finance, due to growth in net organic inflows in excess of liability outflows and an increase in valuation of several alternative investments. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we have contributed approximately 68% of our net alternative investments toAAA . Net alternative investments do not correspond to the total investment funds, including related parties and consolidated VIEs, on our consolidated balance sheets. As discussed above in the net invested assets section, we adjust the US GAAP presentation for funds withheld, modco and VIEs. We include CLO and ABS equity tranche securities in alternative investments due to their underlying characteristics and equity-like features. 102
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Through our relationship with Apollo, we have indirectly invested in companies that meet the key characteristics we look for in net alternative investments.Athora , our largest alternative investment, is a strategic investment.
Athora is a specialized insurance and reinsurance group fully focused on the European market.Athora's principal operational subsidiaries areAthora Netherlands N.V. inthe Netherlands ,Athora Belgium SA inBelgium ,Athora Lebensversicherung AG inGermany ,Athora Ireland plc inIreland , andAthora Life Re Ltd inBermuda .Athora deploys capital and resources to further its mission to build a stand-alone independent and integrated insurance and reinsurance business.Athora's growth is achieved primarily through acquisitions, portfolio transfers and reinsurance.Athora is building a European insurance brand and has successfully acquired, integrated, and transformed multiple insurance companies. Our alternative investment inAthora had a carrying value of$1.0 billion and$743 million as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Our investment inAthora represents our proportionate share of its net asset value, which largely reflects any contributions to and distributions fromAthora and changes in its fair value.Athora returned a net investment earned rate of 13.77%, 10.52% and 15.94% for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. Alternative investment income fromAthora was$125 million ,$76 million and$66 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in alternative investment income for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily driven by an increase in average NAV as well as strong performance of the fund in the current year. 103
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Non-GAAP Measure Reconciliations
The reconciliation of total net income (loss) available to Athene Holding Ltd.
common shareholder to spread related earnings, is as follows:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, December 31, (In millions) 2022 2021 2020
Net income (loss) available to Athene Holding Ltd.
common shareholder
$ (4,303) $ 3,718 $ 1,446 Preferred stock dividends 141 141 95 Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests (2,092) (59) 380 Net income (loss) (6,254) 3,800 1,921 Income tax expense (benefit) (976) 386 285 Income (loss) before income taxes (7,230) 4,186 2,206 Realized gains (losses) on sale of AFS securities (176) 545 27 Unrealized, allowances and other investment gains (losses)1 (3,187) 1,053 73 Change in fair value of reinsurance assets (4,084) (629) 792 Offsets to investment gains (losses) 456 55 (159) Investment gains (losses), net of offsets (6,991) 1,024 733 Non-operating change in insurance liabilities and related derivatives, net of offsets (454) 692 (235) Integration, restructuring and other non-operating expenses (133) (124) (10) Stock compensation expense2 (56) (38) (25) Preferred stock dividends 141 141 95
Noncontrolling interests - pre-tax income (loss) and
VIE adjustments
(2,061) (18) 393
Total adjustments to income (loss) before income taxes (9,554)
1,677 951 Spread related earnings$ 2,324
1 Unrealized, allowances and other investment gains (losses) was updated to include the change in fair value of
Apollo investment. 2 Stock compensation expense was updated to include our long-term incentive plan expense.
The reconciliation of total AHL shareholders' equity to total adjusted AHL
common shareholder's equity is as follows:
Successor Predecessor (In millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Total AHL shareholders' equity $ 916 $ 20,130 Less: Preferred stock 3,154 2,312 Total AHL common shareholder's equity (deficit) (2,238) 17,818 Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (12,311) 2,430
Less: Accumulated change in fair value of reinsurance
assets
(3,046) 585
Less: Accumulated change in fair value of mortgage loan
assets
(2,091) - Total adjusted AHL common shareholder's equity $ 15,210 $ 14,803 104
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The reconciliation of debt to capital ratio to adjusted debt to capital ratio is
as follows:
Successor Predecessor (In millions, except percentages) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Total debt $ 3,658 $ 2,964 Less: Adjustment to arrive at notional debt 258 (36) Notional debt $ 3,400 $ 3,000 Total debt $ 3,658 $ 2,964 Total AHL shareholders' equity 916 20,130 Total capitalization 4,574 23,094 Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (12,311) 2,430
Less: Accumulated change in fair value of reinsurance
assets
(3,046) 585
Less: Accumulated change in fair value of mortgage loan
assets
(2,091) - Less: Adjustment to arrive at notional debt 258 (36) Total adjusted capitalization $ 21,764 $ 20,115 Debt to capital ratio 80.0 % 12.8 % Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (44.7) % 1.6 % Accumulated change in fair value of reinsurance assets (11.1) % 0.4 % Accumulated change in fair value of mortgage loan assets (7.6) % - % Adjustment to arrive at notional debt (1.0) % 0.1 % Adjusted debt to capital ratio 15.6 % 14.9 % The reconciliation of net investment income to net investment earnings and earned rate is as follows: Successor Predecessor Year Ended December 31, 2022 Year Ended December 31, 2021 Year Ended December 31, 2020 (In millions, except percentages) Dollar Rate Dollar Rate Dollar
Rate
US GAAP net investment income$ 7,571 4.01 %$ 7,100 4.44 %$ 4,834 3.64 % Change in fair value of reinsurance assets 333 0.18 % 1,451 0.90 % 1,408 1.06 % VIE earnings and noncontrolling interest 586 0.31 % 108 0.07 % 46 0.03 % Alternative gains (losses) 41 0.02 % 144 0.09 % (102) (0.08) % ACRA noncontrolling interest (1,505) (0.80) % (943) (0.59) % (559) (0.42) % Reinsurance impacts (41) (0.02) % - - % - - % Apollo investment (gain) loss (33) (0.02) % (864) (0.54) % (225) (0.17) % Held for trading amortization and other (39) (0.02) % 83 0.05 % (74) (0.05) % Total adjustments to arrive at net investment earnings/earned rate (658) (0.35) % (21) (0.02) % 494 0.37 % Total net investment earnings/earned rate$ 6,913 3.66 %$ 7,079 4.42 %$ 5,328 4.01 % Average net invested assets$ 188,742 160,019$ 132,750 105
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The reconciliation of benefits and expenses to cost of funds is as follows:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended December 31, 2022 Year Ended December 31, 2021 Year Ended December 31, 2020 (In millions, except percentages) Dollar Rate Dollar Rate Dollar Rate US GAAP benefits and expenses$ 14,853 7.87 %$ 22,134 13.83 %$ 12,558 9.46 % Premiums (11,638) (6.17) % (14,262) (8.91) % (5,963) (4.49) % Product charges (718) (0.38) % (621) (0.39) % (571) (0.43) % Other revenues 28 0.01 % (72) (0.04) % (36) (0.03) % FIA option costs 1,264 0.67 % 1,125 0.70 % 1,101 0.83 % Reinsurance impacts 17 0.01 % 49 0.03 % 57 0.04 % Non-operating change in insurance liabilities and embedded derivatives, net of offsets 938 0.50 % (2,989) (1.87) % (2,261) (1.70) % DAC and DSI amortization related to investment gains and losses1 64 0.03 % 115 0.07 % (95) (0.07) % Rider reserves related to investment gains and losses 379 0.20 % (4) - % (10) (0.01) % Policy and other operating expenses, excluding policy acquisition expenses (1,110) (0.59) % (772) (0.48) % (533) (0.40) % AmerUs Closed Block fair value liability 291 0.15 % 57 0.04 % (104) (0.08) % ACRA noncontrolling interest (530) (0.28) % (759) (0.47) % (527) (0.40) % Other 59 0.04 % (8) (0.01) % (41) (0.03) % Total adjustments to arrive at cost of funds (10,956) (5.81) % (18,141) (11.33) % (8,983) (6.77) % Total cost of funds$ 3,897 2.06 %$ 3,993 2.50 %$ 3,575 2.69 % Average net invested assets$ 188,742 $ 160,019 $ 132,750
1 Periods prior to the merger include VOBA amortization related to investment gains and losses.
The reconciliation of policy and other operating expenses to other operating
expenses is as follows:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, (In millions) December 31, 2022 2021 2020 US GAAP policy and other operating expenses$ 1,493 $ 1,128 $ 893 Interest expense (227) (139) (114) Policy acquisition expenses, net of deferrals (383) (356) (360) Integration, restructuring and other non-operating expenses (133) (134) (10) Stock compensation expenses1 (56) (38) (25) ACRA noncontrolling interest (231) (93) (58) Other changes in policy and other operating expenses 3 (9) (2)
Total adjustments to arrive at other operating expenses (1,027)
(769) (569) Other operating expenses $ 466
1 Stock compensation expense was updated to include our long-term incentive plan expense.
106
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The reconciliation of total investments, including related parties, to net
invested assets is as follows:
Successor Predecessor (In millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Total investments, including related parties $ 196,448 $ 209,176 Derivative assets (3,309) (4,387) Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash) 8,407 10,275 Accrued investment income 1,328 962 Net receivable (payable) for collateral on derivatives1 (1,486) (3,902) Reinsurance funds withheld and modified coinsurance 1,423 (1,035) VIE and VOE assets, liabilities and noncontrolling interest 12,747 2,958 Unrealized (gains) losses 22,284 (4,057) Ceded policy loans (179) (169) Net investment receivables (payables)1 186 43 Allowance for credit losses 471 361 Other investments (10) - Total adjustments to arrive at gross invested assets 41,862 1,049 Gross invested assets 238,310 210,225 ACRA noncontrolling interest (41,859) (34,882) Net invested assets $ 196,451 $ 175,343
1 Prior period has been updated to reflect a reclassification between line items for comparability.
The reconciliation of total investment funds, including related parties and VIEs, to net alternative investments within net invested assets is as follows: Successor Predecessor (In millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021
Investment funds, including related parties and VIEs $ 14,128
$ 9,866 Equity securities1 509 872 CLO and ABS equities included in trading securities1 225 1,418 Investment in Apollo - (2,112) Investment funds within funds withheld at interest 1,126 1,807 Royalties and other assets included in other investments 15 50 Net assets of the VIE, excluding investment funds (2,041) (772) Unrealized (gains) losses 44 14 ACRA noncontrolling interest (1,836) (1,270) Other assets (91) - Total adjustments to arrive at net alternative investments (2,049) 7 Net alternative investments $ 12,079 $ 9,873
1 Prior period has been updated to reflect a reclassification between line items for comparability.
107
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The reconciliation of total liabilities to net reserve liabilities is as follows: Successor Predecessor (In millions) December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021 Total liabilities $ 243,667 $ 212,968 Debt (3,658) (2,964) Derivative liabilities (1,646) (472)
Payables for collateral on derivatives and securities to
repurchase
(3,841) (6,446) Other liabilities (1,635) (2,975) Liabilities of consolidated VIEs (815) (461) Reinsurance impacts (9,186) (4,594) Policy loans ceded (179) (169) ACRA noncontrolling interest (38,382) (32,933) Other 1 (3) Total adjustments to arrive at net reserve liabilities (59,341) (51,017) Net reserve liabilities $ 184,326 $ 161,951
Liquidity and Capital Resources
There are two forms of liquidity relevant to our business, funding liquidity and balance sheet liquidity. Funding liquidity relates to the ability to fund operations. Balance sheet liquidity relates to our ability to liquidate or rebalance our balance sheet without incurring significant costs from fees, bid-offer spreads, or market impact. We manage our liquidity position by matching projected cash demands with adequate sources of cash and other liquid assets. Our principal sources of liquidity, in the ordinary course of business, are operating cash flows and holdings of cash, cash equivalents and other readily marketable assets. Our investment portfolio is structured to ensure a strong liquidity position over time in order to permit timely payment of policy and contract benefits without requiring asset sales at inopportune times or at depressed prices. In general, liquid assets include cash and cash equivalents, highly rated corporate bonds, unaffiliated preferred stock and public common stock, all of which generally have liquid markets with a large number of buyers. The carrying value of these assets, excluding assets within modified coinsurance and funds withheld portfolios, as ofDecember 31, 2022 was$94.5 billion . Assets included in modified coinsurance and funds withheld portfolios are available to fund the benefits for the associated obligations but are restricted from other uses. The carrying value of the underlying assets in these modified coinsurance and funds withheld portfolios that we consider liquid as ofDecember 31, 2022 was$21.5 billion . Although our investment portfolio does contain assets that are generally considered illiquid for liquidity monitoring purposes (primarily mortgage loans, policy loans, real estate, investment funds, and affiliated common stock), there is some ability to raise cash from these assets if needed. In periods of economic downturn, we may maintain higher cash balances than required to manage our liquidity risk and to take advantage of market dislocations as they arise. We have access to additional liquidity through our$1.25 billion Credit Facility, with potential increases up to$1.75 billion . The Credit Facility was undrawn as ofDecember 31, 2022 and had a remaining term of more than one year, subject to up to two one-year extensions. Additionally, during 2022, we entered into a revolving Liquidity Facility that has a borrowing capacity of$2.5 billion , with potential increases up to$3.0 billion . The Liquidity Facility was undrawn as ofDecember 31, 2022 and has a 364-day term, subject to additional 364-day extensions. OnFebruary 7, 2023 , we borrowed$1.0 billion from the Liquidity Facility for short-term cash flow needs. We also have access to$2.0 billion of committed repurchase facilities. Our registration statement on Form S-3 ASR (Shelf Registration Statement) provides us access to the capital markets, subject to market conditions and other factors. We are also the counterparty to repurchase agreements with several different financial institutions, pursuant to which we may obtain short-term liquidity, to the extent available. In addition, through our membership in the FHLB, we are eligible to borrow under variable rate short-term federal funds arrangements to provide additional liquidity. We proactively manage our liquidity position to meet cash needs while minimizing adverse impacts on investment returns. We analyze our cash-flow liquidity over the upcoming 12 months by modeling potential demands on liquidity under a variety of scenarios, taking into account the provisions of our policies and contracts in force, our cash flow position, and the volume of cash and readily marketable securities in our portfolio. Liquidity risk is monitored, managed and mitigated through a number of stress tests and analyses to assess our ability to meet our cash flow requirements, as well as the ability of our reinsurance and insurance subsidiaries to meet their collateral obligations, under various stress scenarios. We further seek to mitigate liquidity risk by maintaining access to alternative, external sources of liquidity as described below.
Our liquidity risk management framework is codified in the company's Liquidity
Risk Policy that is reviewed and approved by our board of directors.
108
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Insurance Subsidiaries' Liquidity
Operations
The primary cash flow sources for our insurance subsidiaries include retirement services product inflows (premiums and deposits), investment income, principal repayments on our investments, net transfers from separate accounts and financial product inflows. Uses of cash include investment purchases, payments to policyholders for surrenders, withdrawals and payout benefits, interest and principal payments on funding agreements, payments to satisfy pension group annuity obligations, policy acquisition costs and general operating costs. Our policyholder obligations are generally long-term in nature. However, policyholders may elect to withdraw some, or all, of their account value in amounts that exceed our estimates and assumptions over the life of an annuity contract. We include provisions within our annuity policies, such as surrender charges and MVAs, which are intended to protect us from early withdrawals. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, approximately 76% and 74%, respectively, of our deferred annuity liabilities were subject to penalty upon surrender. In addition, as ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, approximately 60% and 54%, respectively, of policies contained MVAs that may also have the effect of limiting early withdrawals if interest rates increase, but may encourage early withdrawals by effectively subsidizing a portion of surrender charges when interest rates decrease. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , approximately 29% of our net reserve liabilities were generally non-surrenderable, including funding agreements, group annuities and payout annuities, while 53% were subject to penalty upon surrender.
Membership in
Through our membership in the FHLB, we are eligible to borrow under variable rate short-term federal funds arrangements to provide additional liquidity. The borrowings must be secured by eligible collateral such as mortgage loans, eligible CMBS or RMBS, government or agency securities and guaranteed loans. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, we had no outstanding borrowings under these arrangements. We have issued funding agreements to the FHLB. These funding agreements were issued in an investment spread strategy, consistent with other investment spread operations. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, we had funding agreements outstanding with the FHLB in the aggregate principal amount of$3.7 billion and$2.8 billion , respectively. The maximum FHLB indebtedness by a member is determined by the amount of collateral pledged and cannot exceed a specified percentage of the member's total statutory assets dependent on the internal credit rating assigned to the member by the FHLB. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , the total maximum borrowing capacity under the FHLB facilities were limited to$52.4 billion . However, our ability to borrow under the facilities is constrained by the availability of assets that qualify as eligible collateral under the facilities and certain other limitations. Considering these limitations, as ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had the ability to draw up to an estimated$5.8 billion , inclusive of borrowings then outstanding. This estimate is based on our internal analysis and assumptions and may not accurately measure collateral which is ultimately acceptable to the FHLB.
Securities Repurchase Agreements
We engage in repurchase transactions whereby we sell fixed income securities to third parties, primarily major brokerage firms or commercial banks, with a concurrent agreement to repurchase such securities at a determined future date. We require that, at all times during the term of the repurchase agreements, we maintain sufficient cash or other liquid assets sufficient to allow us to fund substantially all of the repurchase price. Proceeds received from the sale of securities pursuant to these arrangements are generally invested in short-term investments, with the offsetting obligation to repurchase the security included within payables for collateral on derivatives and securities to repurchase on the consolidated balance sheets. As per the terms of the repurchase agreements, we monitor the market value of the securities sold and may be required to deliver additional collateral (which may be in the form of cash or additional securities) to the extent that the value of the securities sold decreases prior to the repurchase date. As ofDecember 31, 2022 and 2021, the payables for repurchase agreements were$4.7 billion and$3.1 billion , respectively, while the fair value of securities and collateral held by counterparties backing the repurchase agreements was$5.0 billion and$3.2 billion , respectively. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , payables for repurchase agreements were comprised of$1.9 billion of short-term and$2.9 billion of long-term repurchase agreements. As ofDecember 31, 2021 , payables for repurchase agreements were comprised of$2.5 billion of short-term and$598 million of long-term repurchase agreements. We have a$1.0 billion committed repurchase facility withBNP Paribas . The facility has an initial commitment period of 12 months and automatically renews for successive 12-month periods until terminated by either party. During the commitment period, we may sell andBNP Paribas is required to purchase eligible investment grade corporate bonds pursuant to repurchase transactions at pre-agreed discounts in exchange for a commitment fee. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had no outstanding payables under this facility. We have a$1.0 billion committed repurchase facility with Societe Generale. The facility has a commitment term of 5 years, however, either party may terminate the facility upon 24-months' notice, in which case the facility will end upon the earlier of (1) such designated termination date, or (2)July 26, 2026 . During the commitment period, we may sell and Societe Generale is required to purchase eligible investment grade corporate bonds pursuant to repurchase transactions at pre-agreed rates in exchange for an ongoing commitment fee for the facility. As ofDecember 31, 2022 , we had no outstanding payables under this facility. 109
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Cash Flows
Our cash flows were as follows:
Successor Predecessor Year Ended Year Ended Year Ended December 31, December 31, (In millions) December 31, 2022 2021 2020 Net income (loss)$ (6,254) $ 3,800 $ 1,921 Payment at inception or recapture of reinsurance agreements, net - - (723) Non-cash revenues and expenses 12,512 6,492 2,956 Net cash provided by operating activities 6,258 10,292 4,154 Sales, maturities and repayments of investments 28,163 42,063 18,712 Purchases of investments (62,386) (70,220) (33,230) Other investing activities (152) 225 (299) Net cash used in investing activities (34,375) (27,932) (14,817) Inflows on investment-type policies and contracts 33,920 21,447 18,836 Withdrawals on investment-type policies and contracts (10,209) (7,042) (7,067) Other financing activities 2,761 5,224 2,720 Net cash provided by financing activities 26,472 19,629 14,489 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (15) (2) (26) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1$ (1,660)
1 Includes cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash and cash equivalents of consolidated variable interest
entities.
Cash flows from operating activities
The primary cash inflows from operating activities include net investment income, annuity considerations and insurance premiums. The primary cash outflows from operating activities are comprised of benefit payments and operating expenses. Our operating activities generated cash flows totaling$6.3 billion ,$10.3 billion and$4.2 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily driven by lower cash received from pension group annuity transactions net of outflows as well as an increase in cash paid for taxes.
Cash flows from investing activities
The primary cash inflows from investing activities are the sales, maturities and repayments of investments. The primary cash outflows from investing activities are the purchases and acquisitions of new investments. Our investing activities used cash flows totaling$34.4 billion ,$27.9 billion and$14.8 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in cash used in investing activities was primarily attributed to a decrease in sales, maturities and repayments of securities primarily driven by the redeployment of the Jackson reinsurance investment portfolio in the prior year. This was partially offset by a decrease in the purchases of investments as the prior year included purchases from the redeployment of the Jackson reinsurance transaction, partially offset by cash inflows from higher organic growth compared to the prior year.
Cash flows from financing activities
The primary cash inflows from financing activities are inflows on our investment-type policies and contracts, changes of cash collateral posted for derivative transactions, capital contributions, proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock and proceeds from borrowing activities. The primary cash outflows from financing activities are withdrawals on our investment-type policies, changes of cash collateral posted for derivative transactions, repayments of outstanding borrowings and payment of preferred and common stock dividends. Our financing activities provided cash flows totaling$26.5 billion ,$19.6 billion and$14.5 billion for the years endedDecember 31, 2022 , 2021 and 2020, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributed to higher organic inflows from retail and flow reinsurance net of withdrawals, net capital contributions from noncontrolling interests, including capital contributions from third-party investors intoAAA , and the issuance of preferred stock in the current year, partially offset by the change in cash collateral posted for derivative transactions driven by unfavorable equity market performance in 2022 compared to 2021, the payment of the$750 million dividend to Apollo declared in 2021, the payment of additional common stock dividends of$563 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2022 and lower net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt than in the prior year. 110
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Material Cash Obligations The following table summarizes estimated future cash obligations as ofDecember 31, 2022 : Payments Due by Period 2028 and (In millions) Total 2023 2024-2025 2026-2027 thereafter Interest sensitive contract liabilities$ 173,653 $ 20,431 $ 40,875 $ 33,971 $ 78,376 Future policy benefits 55,328 2,168 4,115 4,070 44,975 Other policy claims and benefits 129 129 - - - Dividends payable to policyholders 96 5 9 9 73 Debt1 5,357 153 306 306 4,592 Securities to repurchase2 5,315 2,036 1,360 1,919 - Total$ 239,878 $ 24,922 $ 46,665 $ 40,275 $ 128,016
1 The obligations for debt payments include contractual maturities of principal and estimated future interest payments based on
the terms of the debt agreements.
2 The obligations for securities for repurchase payments include contractual maturities of principal and estimated future
interest payments based on the terms of the agreements. Future interest payments on floating rate repurchase agreements were
calculated using the
OnFebruary 8, 2023 , the Company,Apollo and Credit Suisse AG (CS) undertook the first close of their previously announced transaction whereby certain subsidiaries of Atlas, which is owned byAAA , acquired certain assets of theCS Securitized Products Group (the Transaction). A subsequent closing was held onFebruary 23, 2023 . Under the terms of the Transaction, Atlas has agreed to pay CS$3.3 billion , of which$0.4 billion is deferred untilFebruary 8, 2026 , and$2.9 billion is deferred untilFebruary 8, 2028 . This deferred purchase price is an obligation first of Atlas, second ofAAA , third of AAM, fourth of AHL and fifth of AARe, which has issued an assurance letter to CS to guarantee the full amount of$3.3 billion . In exchange for the purchase price, Atlas expects to receive, by the Transaction's final close, approximately$0.4 billion in cash and a portfolio of senior secured warehouse assets, subject to debt, with approximately$1 billion of tangible equity value (to the extent that the warehouse assets received by Atlas constitute less than$1 billion of tangible equity value, the amount of cash is expected to increase by an offsetting amount). These warehouse assets are senior secured assets at industry standard loan-to-value ratios, structured to investment grade-equivalent criteria, and were approved by Atlas in connection with this transaction. In addition, Atlas has entered into an investment management contract to manage certain assets on behalf of CS, providing for quarterly payments expected to total approximately$1.1 billion net to Atlas over 5 years. Finally, Atlas shall also benefit generally from the net spread earned on its assets in excess of its cost of financing. As a result, the fair value of our guarantees related to the Transaction are not material to the consolidated financial statements.
Holding Company Liquidity
Common Stock Dividends
We declared common stock cash dividends of$750 million onDecember 31, 2021 with a record date and payment date following the completion of our merger with AGM. The dividend payable was included in related party other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as ofDecember 31, 2021 . The dividend was paid onJanuary 4, 2022 . We also paid$563 million in additional common stock dividends during the year endedDecember 31, 2022 .
Dividends from Subsidiaries
AHL is a holding company whose primary liquidity needs include the cash-flow requirements relating to its corporate activities, including its day-to-day operations, debt servicing, preferred and common stock dividend payments and strategic transactions, such as acquisitions. The primary source of AHL's cash flow is dividends from its subsidiaries, which are expected to be adequate to fund cash flow requirements based on current estimates of future obligations. The ability of AHL's insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends is limited by applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions where the subsidiaries are domiciled, as well as agreements entered into with regulators. These laws and regulations require, among other things, the insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum solvency requirements and limit the amount of dividends these subsidiaries can pay. Subject to these limitations and prior notification to the appropriate regulatory agency, the US insurance subsidiaries are permitted to pay ordinary dividends based on calculations specified under insurance laws of the relevant state of domicile. Any distributions above the amount permitted by statute in any twelve month period are considered to be extraordinary dividends, and require the approval of the appropriate regulator prior to payment. AHL does not currently plan on having the US subsidiaries pay any dividends to their parents. 111
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Dividends from subsidiaries are projected to be the primary source of AHL's liquidity. Under the Bermuda Insurance Act, each of ourBermuda insurance subsidiaries is prohibited from paying a dividend in an amount exceeding 25% of the prior year's statutory capital and surplus, unless at least two members of the board of directors of theBermuda insurance subsidiary and its principal representative inBermuda sign and submit to theBermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) an affidavit attesting that a dividend in excess of this amount would not cause theBermuda insurance subsidiary to fail to meet its relevant margins. In certain instances, theBermuda insurance subsidiary would also be required to provide prior notice to the BMA in advance of the payment of dividends. In the event that such an affidavit is submitted to the BMA in accordance with the Bermuda Insurance Act, and further subject to theBermuda insurance subsidiary meeting its relevant margins, theBermuda insurance subsidiary is permitted to distribute up to the sum of 100% of statutory surplus and an amount less than 15% of its total statutory capital. Distributions in excess of this amount require the approval of the BMA. The maximum distribution permitted by law or contract is not necessarily indicative of our actual ability to pay such distributions, which may be further restricted by business and other considerations, such as the impact of such distributions on surplus, which could affect our ratings or competitive position and the amount of premiums that can be written. Specifically, the level of capital needed to maintain desired financial strength ratings from rating agencies, including S&P,A.M. Best , Fitch and Moody's, is of particular concern when determining the amount of capital available for distributions. AHL believes its insurance subsidiaries have sufficient statutory capital and surplus, combined with additional capital available to be provided by AHL, to meet their financial strength ratings objectives. Finally, state insurance laws and regulations require that the statutory surplus of our insurance subsidiaries following any dividend or distribution must be reasonable in relation to their outstanding liabilities and adequate for the insurance subsidiaries' financial needs. 112
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Other Sources of Funding We may seek to secure additional funding at the holding company level by means other than dividends from subsidiaries, such as by drawing on our undrawn $1.25 billion Credit Facility, drawing on the remaining $1.5 billion of our revolving Liquidity Facility or by pursuing future issuances of debt or preference shares to third-party investors. Certain other sources of liquidity potentially available at the holding company level are discussed below. Our Credit Facility contains various standard covenants with which we must comply, including maintaining a Consolidated Debt to Capitalization Ratio (as such term is defined in the Credit Facility) of not greater than 35% at the end of any quarter, maintaining a minimum ConsolidatedNet Worth (as such term is defined in the Credit Facility) of no less than $7.3 billion, and restrictions on our ability to incur debt and liens, in each case with certain exceptions. Our revolving Liquidity Facility also contains various standard covenants with which we must comply, including maintaining an ALRe minimum ConsolidatedNet Worth (as such term is defined in the Liquidity Facility) of no less than $9.3 billion and restrictions on our ability to incur debt and liens, in each case with certain exceptions.
Shelf Registration - Under our Shelf Registration Statement, subject to market
conditions, we have the ability to issue, in indeterminate amounts, debt
securities, preference shares, depositary shares, Class A common shares,
warrants and units.
Debt - The following summarizes our outstanding long-term senior notes (in millions, except percentages): Issuance Issue Date Maturity Date Interest Rate Principal Balance 2028 Senior Unsecured Notes January 12, 2018 January 12, 2028 4.125% $1,000 2030 Senior Unsecured Notes April 3, 2020 April 3, 2030 6.150% $500 2031 Senior Unsecured Notes October 8, 2020 January 15, 2031 3.500% $500 2051 Senior Unsecured Notes May 25, 2021 May 25, 2051 3.950% $500 2052 Senior Unsecured Notes December 13, 2021 May 15, 2052 3.450% $500 2033 Senior Unsecured Notes November 21, 2022 February 1, 2033 6.650% $400
See Note 10 - Debt to the consolidated financial statements for further
information on debt.
Preferred Stock - The following summarizes our perpetual non-cumulative
preferred stock issuances (in millions, except share, per share data and
percentages):
Issuance
Fixed/Floating Rate Issue Date Optional Redemption Date1 Shares Issued Par Value Per Share Liquidation Value Per Share Aggregate Net Proceeds Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate 6.350% June 10, 2019 June 30, 2029 34,500 $1.00 $25,000 $839 Series B Fixed-Rate 5.625% September 19, 2019 September 30, 2024 13,800 $1.00 $25,000 $333 Series C Fixed-Rate Reset 6.375% June 11, 2020 Variable2 24,000 $1.00 $25,000 $583 Series D Fixed-Rate 4.875% December 18, 2020 December 30, 2025 23,000 $1.00 $25,000 $557 Series E Fixed-Rate Reset 7.750% December 12, 2022 Variable3 20,000 $1.00 $25,000 $487 1 We may redeem preferred stock anytime on or after the dates set forth in this column, subject to the terms of the applicable certificate of designations. 2 We may redeem during a period from and including June 30 of each year in which there is a Reset Date to and including such Reset Date. Reset Date means September 30, 2025 and each date falling on the fifth anniversary of the preceding Reset Date. 3 We may redeem during a period from and including December 30 of each year in which there is a Reset Date to and including such Reset Date. Reset Date means December 30, 2027 and each date falling on the fifth anniversary of the preceding Reset Date.
See Note 11 - Equity to the consolidated financial statements for further
information on preferred stock.
Unsecured Revolving Promissory Note Payable with AGM - AHL has an unsecured revolving promissory note with AGM which allows AHL to borrow funds from AGM. The note has a borrowing capacity of $500 million and maturity date of December 13, 2025, or earlier at AGM's request. There was no outstanding balance on the note payable as of December 31, 2022. Intercompany Note - AHL has an unsecured revolving note payable with ALRe, which permits AHL to borrow up to $4.0 billion with a fixed interest rate of 2.29% and a maturity date of December 15, 2028. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the revolving note payable had an outstanding balance of $896 million and $158 million, respectively. 113
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Use of Captives While our business strategy does not involve the use of captives, we ceded certain liabilities to a captive reinsurer that we acquired in connection with the AvivaUSA acquisition. The captive reinsurer was formed in 2011 and is domiciled in the state ofVermont . The statutory reserves of the affiliated captive reinsurer are supported by a combination of funds withheld receivable assets and letters of credit issued by an unaffiliated financial institution. The reinsurance activities within the captive reinsurer are eliminated in consolidation. As discussed in Note 13 - Statutory Requirements to the consolidated financial statements, a permitted practice of the state ofVermont allows the captive to include issued and outstanding letters of credit in the amount of $112 million and $117 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, as admitted assets in its statutory financial statements. The NAIC and certain state insurance departments have scrutinized insurance companies' use of affiliated captive reinsurers. Regulatory changes regarding the use of captives could affect our financial position and results of operations.
Capital
We believe we have a strong capital position and are well positioned to meet policyholder and other obligations. We measure capital sufficiency using an internal capital model which reflects management's view on the various risks inherent to our business, the amount of capital required to support our core operating strategies and the amount of capital necessary to maintain our current ratings in a recessionary environment. The amount of capital required to support our core operating strategies is determined based upon internal modeling and analysis of economic risk, as well as inputs from rating agency capital models and consideration of both NAIC RBC andBermuda capital requirements. Capital in excess of this required amount is considered excess equity capital, which is available to deploy. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, our US insurance companies' TAC, as defined by the NAIC, was $4.1 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, and our US RBC ratio was 387% and 377%, respectively. The increase in our US insurance companies' TAC was primarily related to capital contributions to provide capital in support of organic growth. Each US domestic insurance subsidiary's state of domicile imposes minimum RBC requirements that were developed by the NAIC. The formulas for determining the amount of RBC specify various weighting factors that are applied to financial balances or various levels of activity based on the perceived degree of risk. Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of TAC to its authorized control level RBC (ACL). Our TAC was significantly in excess of all regulatory standards as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.Bermuda statutory capital and surplus for ourBermuda insurance companies in aggregate was $14.8 billion and $14.6 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. OurBermuda insurance companies adhere to BMA regulatory capital requirements to maintain statutory capital and surplus to meet the MMS and maintain minimum EBS capital and surplus to meet the ECR. Under the EBS framework, assets are recorded at market value and insurance reserves are determined by reference to nine prescribed scenarios, with the scenario resulting in the highest reserve balance being ultimately required to be selected. TheBermuda group's EBS capital and surplus was $21.9 billion and $19.7 billion, resulting in a BSCR ratio of 278% and 232% as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase was primarily driven by the movement in interest rates. TheBermuda group's BSCR ratio includes the capital and surplus of ALRe, AARe, ALReI and all of their subsidiaries, including AADE and its subsidiaries. An insurer must have a BSCR ratio of 100% or greater to be considered solvent by the BMA. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, ourBermuda insurance companies held the appropriate capital to adhere to these regulatory standards. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, our Bermuda RBC ratio was 407% and 410%, respectively. The Bermuda RBC ratio is calculated by applying the NAIC RBC factors to the statutory financial statements of our non-US reinsurance subsidiaries on an aggregate basis with certain adjustments made by management as described in the glossary. We exclude our interests in subsidiary holding companies from our capital base for purposes of calculating Bermuda RBC, but do reflect such interests within our capital analysis, net of risk charges. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, our consolidated statutory capital and surplus in the aggregate was $20.1 billion and $19.6 billion, respectively, and our consolidated RBC ratio was 416% and 433%, respectively. Our consolidated regulatory capital represents the aggregate capital of our US andBermuda insurance entities, determined with respect to each insurance entity by applying the statutory accounting principles applicable to each such entity with adjustments made to, among other things, assets and expenses at the holding company level. The consolidated RBC ratio is calculated by applying the NAIC RBC factors to the statutory financial statements of our non-US reinsurance and US reinsurance subsidiaries on an aggregate basis, including interests in other non-insurance subsidiary holding companies, with certain adjustments made by management to ourBermuda and non-insurance holding companies. See Glossary - Consolidated RBC for further information. ACRA - ACRA provides us with access to on-demand capital to support our growth strategies and capital deployment opportunities. ACRA provides a capital source to fund both our inorganic and organic channels, including pension group annuity, funding agreement and retail channels. This strategic capital solution allows us the flexibility to simultaneously deploy capital across multiple accretive avenues, while maintaining a strong financial position. 114
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Amounts based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business, and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. Critical estimates and assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis based on historical developments, market conditions, industry trends and other information that is reasonable under the circumstances. There can be no assurance that actual results will conform to estimates and assumptions and that reported results of operations will not be materially affected by the need to make future accounting adjustments to reflect periodic changes in these estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by our methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our significant accounting policies described in Note 1 - Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the consolidated financial statements. The following summary of our critical accounting estimates is intended to enhance one's ability to assess our financial condition and results of operations and the potential volatility due to changes in estimate.
Investments
We are responsible for the fair value measurement of investments presented in our consolidated financial statements. We perform regular analysis and review of our valuation techniques, assumptions and inputs used in determining fair value to evaluate if the valuation approaches are appropriate and consistently applied, and the various assumptions are reasonable. We also perform quantitative and qualitative analysis and review of the information and prices received from commercial pricing services and broker-dealers, to verify it represents a reasonable estimate of the fair value of each investment. In addition, we use both internally-developed and commercially-available cash flow models to analyze the reasonableness of fair values using credit spreads and other market assumptions, where appropriate. For investment funds, we typically recognize our investment, including those for which we have elected the fair value option, based on net asset value information provided by the general partner or related asset manager. For a discussion of our investment funds for which we have elected the fair value option, see Note 6 - Fair Value to the consolidated financial statements. 115
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Valuation of Fixed Maturity Securities, Equity Securities and Mortgage Loans
The following table presents the fair value of fixed maturity securities, equity securities and mortgage loans, including those with related parties and those held by consolidated VIEs, by pricing source and fair value hierarchy: December 31, 2022 (In millions, except percentages) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fixed maturity securities AFS securities Priced via commercial pricing services $ 78,335 $ 2,570 $ 75,758 $ 7 Priced via independent broker-dealer quotations 23,166 - 20,475 2,691 Priced via models or other methods 10,724 - - 10,724 Trading securities Priced via commercial pricing services 1,087 21 1,066 - Priced via independent broker-dealer quotations 506 2 453 51 Priced via models or other methods 880 - - 880 Trading securities of consolidated VIEs 1,063 5 436 622 Total fixed maturity securities including related parties and VIEs 115,761 2,598 98,188 14,975 Equity securities Priced via commercial pricing services 995 150 845 - Priced via independent broker-dealer quotations 15 - - 15 Priced via models or other methods 356 - - 356 Total equity securities including related parties and VIEs 1,366 150 845 371 Mortgage loans Priced via commercial pricing services 27,644 - - 27,644 Priced via models or other methods 1,112 - - 1,112 Mortgage loans of consolidated VIEs 2,055 - - 2,055
Total mortgage loans including related parties and
VIEs
30,811 - - 30,811 Total fixed maturity securities, equity securities and mortgage loans including related parties and consolidated VIEs $ 147,938 $ 2,748 $ 99,033 $ 46,157 Percent of total 100.0 % 1.9 % 66.9 % 31.2 % We measure the fair value of our securities based on assumptions used by market participants in pricing the assets, which may include inherent risk, restrictions on the sale or use of an asset, or nonperformance risk. The estimate of fair value is the price that would be received to sell a security in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal market, or the most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market, for that security. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange while not under duress. The valuation of securities involves judgment, is subject to considerable variability and is revised as additional information becomes available. As such, changes in, or deviations from, the assumptions used in such valuations can significantly affect our consolidated financial statements. Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in security values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. Our ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized upon the sale of securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities. Accordingly, estimates of fair value are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange. 116
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
For fixed maturity securities, we obtain the fair values, when available, based on quoted prices in active markets that are regularly and readily obtainable. Generally, these are liquid securities and the valuation does not require significant management judgment. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, fair value is based on market standard valuation techniques, giving priority to observable inputs. We obtain the fair value for most marketable bonds without an active market from several commercial pricing services. The pricing services incorporate a variety of market observable information in their valuation techniques, including benchmark yields, broker-dealer quotes, credit quality, issuer spreads, bids, offers, and other reference data. For certain fixed maturity securities without an active market, an internally-developed discounted cash flow or other approach is utilized to calculate the fair value. A discount rate is used, which adjusts a market comparable base rate for securities with similar characteristics for credit spread, market illiquidity or other adjustments. The fair value of privately placed fixed maturity securities are based on the credit quality and duration of comparable marketable securities, which may be securities of another issuer with similar characteristics. In some instances, we use a matrix-based pricing model, which considers the current level of risk-free interest rates, corporate spreads, credit quality of the issuer, and cash flow characteristics of the security. We also consider additional factors, such as net worth of the borrower, value of collateral, capital structure of the borrower, presence of guarantees and our evaluation of the borrower's ability to compete in its relevant market. For equity securities, we obtain the fair value, when available, based on quoted market prices. Other equity securities, typically private equities or equity securities not traded on an exchange, are valued based on other sources, such as commercial pricing services or brokers. Effective January 1, 2022, we elected the fair value option on our mortgage loan portfolio. We use independent commercial pricing services to value our mortgage loan portfolio. Discounted cash flow analysis is performed through which the loans' contractual cash flows are modeled and an appropriate discount rate is determined to discount the cash flows to arrive at a present value. Financial factors, credit factors, collateral characteristics and current market conditions are all taken into consideration when performing the discounted cash flow analysis. We perform vendor due diligence exercises annually to review vendor processes, models and assumptions. Additionally, we review price movements on a quarterly basis to ensure reasonableness.
Future Policy Benefits
The future policy benefit liabilities associated with long duration contracts include term and whole-life products, accident and health, disability, and deferred and immediate annuities with life contingencies. Liabilities for nonparticipating long duration contracts are established using accepted actuarial valuation methods which require us to make certain assumptions regarding expenses, investment yields, mortality, morbidity, and persistency, with a provision for adverse deviation, at the date of issue or acquisition. As of December 31, 2022, the reserve investment yield assumptions for nonparticipating contracts range from 2.3% to 6.6% and are specific to our expected earned rate on the asset portfolio supporting the reserves. We base other key assumptions, such as mortality and morbidity, on industry standard data adjusted to align with actual company experience, if necessary. Premium deficiency tests are performed periodically using current assumptions, without provisions for adverse deviation, to test the appropriateness of the established reserves. If the reserves using current assumptions are greater than the existing reserves, the excess is recorded and the initial assumptions are revised.
Liabilities for Guaranteed Living Withdrawal Benefits and Guaranteed Minimum
Death Benefits
We issue and reinsure deferred annuity contracts which contain GLWB and GMDB riders. We establish future policy benefits for GLWB and GMDB by estimating the expected value of withdrawal and death benefits in excess of the projected account balance. We recognize the excess proportionally over the accumulation period based on total actual and expected assessments. The methods we use to estimate the liabilities have assumptions about policyholder behavior, which includes lapses, withdrawals and utilization of the benefit riders, mortality, and market conditions affecting the account balance. Projected policyholder lapse and withdrawal behavior assumptions are set in one of two ways. For certain blocks of business, this behavior is a function of our predictive analytics model which considers various observable inputs. For the remaining blocks of business, these assumptions are set at the product level by grouping individual policies sharing similar features and guarantees and reviewed periodically against experience. Base lapse rates consider the level of surrender charges and are dynamically adjusted based on the level of current interest rates relative to the guaranteed rates and the amount by which any rider guarantees are in a net positive position. Rider utilization assumptions consider the number and timing of policyholders electing the riders. We track and update this assumption as experience emerges. Mortality assumptions are set at the product level and generally based on standard industry tables, adjusted for historical experience and a provision for mortality improvement. Projected guaranteed benefit amounts in excess of the underlying account balances are considered over a range of scenarios in order to capture our exposure to the guaranteed withdrawal and death benefits. 117
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
The assessments used to accrue liabilities are based on interest margins, rider charges, surrender charges and realized gains (losses). As such, future reserve changes can be sensitive to changes in investment results and the impacts of shadow adjustments, which represent the impact of assuming unrealized gains (losses) are realized in future periods. As of December 31, 2022, the GLWB and GMDB liability balance, including the impacts of shadow adjustments, totaled $5.3 billion. The relative sensitivity of the GLWB and GMDB liability balance from changes to these assumptions, including the impacts of shadow adjustments from hypothetical changes in projected assessments, changes in the discount rate and annual equity growth, has decreased and are not significant following the business combination and pushdown accounting election described in Note 2 - Business Combination.
Derivatives
Valuation of Embedded Derivatives on Indexed Annuities
We issue and reinsure products, primarily indexed annuity products, or purchase investments that contain embedded derivatives. If we determine the embedded derivative has economic characteristics not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and a separate instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for separately, unless the fair value option is elected on the host contract. Indexed annuities and indexed universal life insurance contracts allow the policyholder to elect a fixed interest rate return or an equity market component for which interest credited is based on the performance of certain equity market indices. The equity market option is an embedded derivative, similar to a call option. The benefit reserve is equal to the sum of the fair value of the embedded derivative and the host (or guaranteed) component of the contracts. The fair value of the embedded derivatives represents the present value of cash flows attributable to the indexed strategies. The embedded derivative cash flows are based on assumptions for future policy growth, which include assumptions for expected index credits on the next policy anniversary date, future equity option costs, volatility, interest rates and policyholder behavior. The embedded derivative cash flows are discounted using a rate that reflects our own credit rating. The host contract is established at contract inception as the initial account value less the initial fair value of the embedded derivative and accreted over the policy's life. Contracts acquired through a business combination which contain an embedded derivative are re-bifurcated as of the acquisition date. In general, the change in the fair value of the embedded derivatives will not directly correspond to the change in fair value of the hedging derivative assets. The derivatives are intended to hedge the index credits expected to be granted at the end of the current term. The options valued in the embedded derivatives represent the rights of the policyholder to receive index credits over the period indexed strategies are made available to the policyholder, which is typically longer than the current term of the options. From an economic basis we believe it is suitable to hedge with options that align with index terms of our indexed annuity products because policyholder accounts are credited with index performance at the end of each index term. However, because the value of an embedded derivative in an indexed annuity contract is longer-dated, there is a duration mismatch which may lead to differences in the recognition of income and expense for accounting purposes. A significant assumption in determining policy liabilities for indexed annuities is the vector of rates used to discount indexed strategy cash flows. The change in risk free rates is expected to drive most of the movement in the discount rates between periods. Changes to credit spreads for a given credit rating as well as any change to our credit rating requiring a revised level of nonperformance risk would also be factors in the changes to the discount rate. If the discount rates used to discount the indexed strategy cash flows were to fluctuate, there would be a resulting change in reserves for indexed annuities recorded through the consolidated statements of income (loss). As of December 31, 2022, we had embedded derivative liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy of $5.8 billion. The increase (decrease) to the embedded derivatives on indexed annuity products from hypothetical changes in discount rates is summarized as follows: (In millions) December 31, 2022 +100 bps discount rate $ (299) -100 bps discount rate 331 However, these estimated effects do not take into account potential changes in other variables, such as equity price levels and market volatility, which can also contribute significantly to changes in carrying values. Therefore, the quantitative impact presented in the table above does not necessarily correspond to the ultimate impact on the consolidated financial statements. In determining the ranges, we have considered current market conditions, as well as the market level of discount rates that can reasonably be anticipated over the near-term. For additional information regarding sensitivities to interest rate risk and public equity risk, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks-Sensitivities.
Deferred Acquisition Costs, Deferred Sales Inducements, and Value of Business
Acquired
Costs related directly to the successful acquisition of new or renewal insurance or investment contracts are deferred to the extent they are recoverable from future premiums or gross profits. These costs consist of commissions and policy issuance costs, as well as sales inducements credited to policyholder account balances. We perform periodic tests, including at issuance, to determine if the deferred costs are recoverable. If it is determined that the deferred costs are not recoverable, we record a cumulative charge to the current period. 118
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Deferred costs related to universal life-type policies and investment contracts with significant revenue streams from sources other than investment of the policyholder funds are amortized over the lives of the policies, based upon the proportion of the present value of actual and expected deferred costs to the present value of actual and expected gross profits to be earned over the life of the policies. Gross profits include investment spread margins, surrender charge income, policy administration, changes in the GLWB and GMDB reserves and realized gains (losses) on investments. Current period gross profits for indexed annuities also include the change in fair value of both freestanding and embedded derivatives. Our estimates of expected gross profits and margins are based on assumptions using accepted actuarial methods related to policyholder behavior, including lapses and the utilization of benefit riders, mortality, yields on investments supporting the liabilities, future interest credited amounts (including indexed related credited amounts on fixed indexed annuity products), and other policy changes as applicable, and the level of expenses necessary to maintain the policies over their expected lives. Each reporting period, we update estimated gross profits with actual gross profits as part of the amortization process. We also periodically revise the key assumptions used in the amortization calculation which results in revisions to the estimated future gross profits. The effects of changes in assumptions are recorded as unlocking in the period in which the changes are made. We establish VOBA for blocks of insurance contracts acquired through the acquisition of insurance entities. The fair value of the liabilities purchased is determined using market participant assumptions at the time of acquisition and represents the amount an acquirer would expect to be compensated to assume the contracts. We record the fair value of the liabilities assumed in two components: reserves and VOBA. Reserves are established using our best estimate assumptions, plus a provision for adverse deviation where applicable, as of the business combination date. VOBA is the difference between the fair value of the liabilities and the reserves. VOBA can be either positive or negative. Any negative VOBA is recorded to the same financial statement line on the consolidated balance sheets as the associated reserves. Positive VOBA is recorded in DAC, DSI and VOBA on the consolidated balance sheets.
VOBA and negative VOBA are amortized in relation to applicable policyholder
liabilities. Significant assumptions which impact VOBA and negative VOBA
amortization are consistent with those which impact the measurement of
policyholder liabilities.
Estimated future gross profits vary based on a number of factors but are typically most sensitive to changes in investment spread margins, which are the most significant component of gross profits. If estimated gross profits for all future years on business in force were to change, including the impacts of shadow adjustments, there would be a resulting increase or decrease to the balances of DAC and DSI recorded as an increase or decrease to amortization of DAC and DSI on the consolidated statements of income (loss) or AOCI. Actual gross profits will depend on actual margins, including the changes in the value of embedded derivatives. The most sensitive assumption in determining the value of the embedded derivative is the vector of rates used to discount the embedded derivative cash flows. If the discount rates used to discount the embedded derivative cash flows were to change, there would be a resulting increase or decrease to the balances of DAC and DSI recorded as an increase or decrease in amortization of DAC and DSI on the consolidated statements of income (loss). Following the business combination and application of pushdown accounting described in Note 2 - Business Combination, Predecessor DAC and DSI balances were eliminated. Successor DAC and DSI balances exhibit less sensitivity to hypothetical changes in estimated future gross profits and changes in the embedded derivative discount rate as they are relatively less material following the business combination. VOBA balances no longer amortize based on estimated gross profits, and accordingly, are not sensitive to changes to actual or estimated gross profits.
Consolidation
We consolidate all entities in which we hold a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date whether through a majority voting interest or otherwise, including those investment funds that meet the definition of a VIE in which we are determined to be the primary beneficiary. If we are not the primary beneficiary, the general partner or another limited partner may consolidate the investment fund, and we record the investment as an equity method investment. See Note 5 - Variable Interest Entities to the consolidated financial statements. The assessment of whether an entity is a VIE and the determination of whether we should consolidate such VIE requires judgment by our management. Those judgments include, but are not limited to: (1) determining whether the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (2) evaluating whether the holders of equity investment at risk, as a group, can make decisions that have a significant effect on the success of the entity, (3) determining whether the equity investors have proportionate voting rights to their obligations to absorb losses or rights to receive the expected residual returns from an entity and (4) evaluating the nature of the relationship and activities of those related parties with shared power or under common control for purposes of determining which party within the related-party group is most closely associated with the VIE. Judgments are also made in determining whether a member in the equity group has a controlling financial interest including power to direct activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance and rights to receive benefits or obligations to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE. This analysis considers all relevant economic interests including proportionate interests held through related parties.
Additionally, evaluating an entity to determine whether it meets the
characteristics of an investment company is qualitative in nature and may
involve significant judgment. We have retained this specialized accounting for
investment companies in consolidation.
119
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
Income Taxes Significant judgment is required in determining tax expense and in evaluating tax positions, including evaluating uncertainties. We recognize the tax benefit of uncertain tax positions only where the position is "more likely than not" to be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefit is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. If a tax position is not considered more likely than not to be sustained, then no benefits of the position are recognized. We review and evaluate our tax positions quarterly to determine whether we have uncertain tax positions that require financial statement recognition. For more information regarding income taxes, see Note 12 - Income Taxes to the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis using currently enacted tax rates. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period during which the change is enacted. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. We test the value of deferred assets for realizability at the taxpaying-component level within each tax jurisdiction. Significant judgment and estimates are required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following: •whether sufficient taxable income exists within the allowed carryback or carryforward periods; •whether future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences will occur, including any tax planning strategies that could be used; •nature or character (e.g., ordinary vs. capital) of the deferred tax assets and liabilities; and •whether future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards exist.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting us, see Note 1 -
Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies to the
consolidated financial statements.
120
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table of Contents
CLOVER HEALTH INVESTMENTS, CORP. /DE – 10-K – Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
March will bring bear-market risks for US stocks, Morgan Stanley says
Advisor News
Annuity News
Health/Employee Benefits News
Life Insurance News